I'm not going to quote the post since it seems to break the rules, but I didn't realize we meant blocking very specific Google results like that. The logistics of that would be insane, to have people constantly manually blocking specific search phrases like that for every copyrighted release, and they could only ever cover a fraction of the search terms and copyrighted materials possible. You could cover the major flavour of the week things, but it's only going to account for a small percentage of piracy in the long run.
To me that just sounds like trying to patch holes in a sinking ship. All you're doing is slightly slowing down the process, not stopping it at all.
There will always be rape, and our laws against it can at best mitigate the amount of rape, and punish rapists. There will always be murder, and our laws can at best mitigate the number of murders, and punish murders. There will always be theft, and our laws can at best mitigate the number of thefts, and punish thieves. If the ship is sinking, then we're no whee near the shore, so patching the holes is the best we can do.
People keep rebutting, "but it won't stop it!" But that isn't very much of a real argument. The only laws that actually prevent anything from happening are the physical laws of the universe, the rest are simply moral code and justification for judicial punishment. Nothing we do will
ever stop all pirating of material on the internet, and due to the nature of software, will probably be less effective than non-virtual laws. That is a given, and it is not a reason why we should not do something that's rather easy to do.
Piracy will end when we stop socially accepting it; and we'll stop socially accepting it when we make every excuse in the book to not try and do something about it.
How about the novel of idea of actually going after the people who upload this shit and make the punishment severe. It seems like the gov just likes to make stupid laws controlling stuff they don't have to get into when there is a much more direct way of solving the problem. Go after the people who commit the crimes.
Haven't they tried that? It's probably harder to do this, than anything I'm suggesting.