The death of Gadhafi brought to mind some questions of when Osama Bin Laden was killed. Here they are. Please keep in mind that these questions' main purpose is more to stimulate thoughtful responses. I do not necessarily hold some of the views the questions may suggest I do.
1.) What unbiased proof do we have that Osama Bin Laden facilitated the execution of and masterminded 9/11?
2.)Why, if, as it was stated, he was in fact unarmed, did we a) Kill him on the spot; b) Not take him alive and give him the "inalienable human right" to a fair trail? Did killing him simply taint the US's advocacy of "due process" as hypocritical?
In WWII, the US bothered to proceed with the Nuremberg trials, which, arguably, dealt with "terrorists," mass murderers and advocates of mass genocide whose crimes against humanity cause Osama's alleged crimes (namely, 9/11) to appear almost small by comparison. Why not subject Osama to a fair trial as Nazi leaders were?
3.) If Osama was actually responsible for masterminding the attacks of 9/11 which ultimately led to the deaths of 3000+ civilians and his fate was death (or potential trial), then why would not George W. Bush, who is either directly or indirectly responsible for even more civilian deaths in the Middle East and elsewhere, be deserving of a trial for crimes against humanity?
4.) Why would the alleged world's most dangerous and wanted terrorist live in such risk in Abbottabad, and, also, without enough paranoia to warrant being perpetually armed?