Really? IMO, they are jjust too painful to listen to.
They're on key, and not played sloppily. That's all I need. Again, not definitively, but I sure as heck don't skip them when I listen to the album.
Although I do think it was unnecessary, and a very cheap way to try and sell the album with "new versions" of beloved classics.
But, see, that is my main issue with
everything I have heard from the album. Unlike a lot of people on this forum, when someone says they like something I do not like or vice versa, I am normally content to just let it lie because tastes and opinions differ, and there is no right or wrong in that regard. But this album is actually
objectively bad because it is NOT on key and it IS played sloppily. (It also contains what I consider to be bad songwriting/lyric writing, but those are subjective judgments, so I will leave that alone) Add to that vocal delivery that is just improper singing technique, and I just cannot fathom why anyone could call this a good album. Mind you, I have no problem with someone saying something like, "this is heavily flawed, but I can look past that and enjoy it anyway." Hey, if you dig it, warts and all, cool. But saying it doesn't have those flaws is baffling to me.