Author Topic: All Star Trek Discussion Thread ("Into Darkness" trailer released)  (Read 430290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cool Chris

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 13607
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #210 on: July 07, 2011, 12:41:28 PM »
No, it was a lame way to take the Trek universe fans know and love and bastardize it to fit their own silly vision :p
"Nostalgia is just the ability to forget the things that sucked" - Nelson DeMille, 'Up Country'

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59476
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #211 on: July 07, 2011, 12:55:01 PM »
No, it was a lame way to take the Trek universe fans know and love and bastardize it to fit their own silly vision :p

 :lol  It didn't bother me like some.  In the immortal words of William Shatner, "Get a life!" :lol
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Offline MetalJunkie

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 6971
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #212 on: July 07, 2011, 01:28:32 PM »
The original Scotty was an interesting character as Doohan played him.  Obviously, he was mainly interested in tinkering and building/repairing stuff, but if pressed into service, he was an awesome command officer.  Any time he was in the big chair, he was cold as ice, yet still deliberate and thoughtful.  The new Scotty seemed to be more about comic relief, and that's unfortunate. 
Keep in mind there's about ten years between STXI and TOS. That's a lot of time for a character to evolve.
Listen! Do you smell something?

Offline MetalJunkie

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 6971
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #213 on: July 07, 2011, 09:57:12 PM »
The only thing that actually bugged me as a plot hole was the fact that, even if you collapse something into a black hole, the mass is still the same. So, the gravitational pull stays the same.
I was thinking about this at work today. I don't think they made the planet into a black hole; they made a black hole at the center of the planet. There are endless possibilities since we don't know anything about the properties of the red matter.
Listen! Do you smell something?

Online chknptpie

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3759
  • Gender: Female
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #214 on: July 08, 2011, 08:26:46 AM »
This thread needs more lens flares

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #215 on: July 08, 2011, 08:30:44 AM »
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #216 on: July 08, 2011, 08:31:22 AM »
The only thing that actually bugged me as a plot hole was the fact that, even if you collapse something into a black hole, the mass is still the same. So, the gravitational pull stays the same.
I was thinking about this at work today. I don't think they made the planet into a black hole; they made a black hole at the center of the planet. There are endless possibilities since we don't know anything about the properties of the red matter.

And yeah, my impression has always been that they made a black hole in the center of the planet.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline ScioPath

  • the king of dance
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2236
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #217 on: July 08, 2011, 08:45:35 AM »
I bought a Spock Cookie Jar yesterday.


Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59476
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #218 on: July 08, 2011, 08:50:01 AM »
That is highly illogical ScioPath. :lol
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30742
  • Bad Craziness
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #219 on: July 08, 2011, 09:00:41 AM »
Now a cool one would have been Spock with the headband thingie from Spock's Brain, so you'd remove his skullcap to get at the cookies.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline AndyDT

  • Posts: 2229
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #220 on: July 10, 2011, 07:49:08 AM »

Offline hefdaddy42

  • Et in Arcadia Ego
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 53218
  • Gender: Male
  • Postwhore Emeritus
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #221 on: July 10, 2011, 09:53:41 AM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_Of_Gods_and_Men

Has anybody ever watched this?
No, but I would love to see it.  What a great-sounding thing.
Hef is right on all things. Except for when I disagree with him. In which case he's probably still right.

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30742
  • Bad Craziness
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #222 on: July 10, 2011, 10:04:13 AM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_Of_Gods_and_Men

Has anybody ever watched this?
Nope.  I have watched 2 or 3 of the New Voyages and didn't care for them.  Looking at the cast of this,  I assume it's pretty similar.  The problem with NV is that they were constantly trying to force in as many references to the original series as possible*, and many of them were cheesy.  The fact that Charlie Evans is included in this doesn't strike me as encouraging.  



*The continuation of Captain Decker's story after the Planet Killer was pretty amusing, though.  
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline MetalJunkie

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 6971
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #223 on: July 11, 2011, 01:40:27 AM »
The continuation of Captain Decker's story after the Planet Killer was pretty amusing, though. 
Sounds interesting. Do tell?
Listen! Do you smell something?

Online El Barto

  • Rascal Atheistic Pig
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 30742
  • Bad Craziness
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #224 on: July 11, 2011, 09:02:38 AM »
The continuation of Captain Decker's story after the Planet Killer was pretty amusing, though. 
Sounds interesting. Do tell?
Via some nonsensical event he woke up in the 20th century after entering the planet killer.  He goes to Earth, gets married and settles down.  The Enterprise uses the guardian of forever to go back in time and finds a signal from his shuttlecraft.  Kirk, Spock and McCoy show up at a pre-fab house in suburbia, meet his wife and watch a video he'd left for them (he had died 6 months earlier).  The amusing bit is that when they're getting ready to leave, she tells them there is one other thing they might be interested in.  She takes them out to the garage and opens the door to reveal Decker's shuttlecraft parked next to piles of clutter.

Honestly, the show's really pretty bad.  I like that they're trying to do it, and on some levels they did a fine job.  They're using a perfect recreation of the original bridge set (Paramount actually used their set for the TNG episode where Scotty returns).  They're creating top of the line CGI for it.  The actors they've got are convincing as K, S and McC (though not very good at actually acting).  The two main problems are that it still looks like it was shot by the drama department at a community college somewhere in Nebraska, and they rely too heavily on trying to incorporate cameos from TOS characters.  Every episode seems to involve some mishap that allows for an 80 year old Sulu to appear, except that it's usually much lower tier characters.  Mr. Leslie is a captain.  Lt. Kyle is an admiral.  Etc. 
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline skydivingninja

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 11600
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #225 on: July 11, 2011, 09:38:07 AM »
So all the shows except DS9 are on Netflix right now.  So I've been watching some great TNG episodes, starting with Q Who and Deja Q, inspired by recent visits by the Omnipotent being himself.  What a great show.  I'm going to watch Qpid next just for the line "Captain!  I must protest!  I am NOT a Merry Man!"

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36224
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #226 on: July 11, 2011, 03:52:31 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_Of_Gods_and_Men

Has anybody ever watched this?
No, but I would love to see it.  What a great-sounding thing.

I just watched about 12 or so minutes of it.



Good god it was horrible. Just awful. The story may have been good, but jesus christ. The acting, the directing, the writing...........everything was abysmal.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #227 on: August 04, 2011, 08:11:41 AM »
Mr. Worf, do you know Gilbert and Sullivan?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61AAwNDwU4U

 :laugh:
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline ACID_FOX

  • DTF's Offical Arctic Monkeys Fanboy.
  • Posts: 1408
  • Gender: Male
  • But You're Just Fiction, And I'm A Twisted Boy.
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #228 on: August 04, 2011, 08:23:43 AM »
The new Star Trek film was great, haters.
I only like ablums that I can xanascholithoun.

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #229 on: August 04, 2011, 10:37:30 AM »
The new Star Trek film was great, haters.

I agree 100%. It was Fantastic.  :biggrin:

Kicked Nemesis so hard in the balls. I was shocked when I found out the forger in Inception also played Shinzon.  ( Tom Hardy )

Did. Not. Recgonise, In. The. Slightest.  :o

Offline ReaPsTA

  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 11205
  • Gender: Male
  • Addicted to the pain
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #230 on: August 04, 2011, 11:02:30 AM »
The new Star Trek film was great, haters.

I agree 100%. It was Fantastic.  :biggrin:

Kicked Nemesis so hard in the balls. I was shocked when I found out the forger in Inception also played Shinzon.  ( Tom Hardy )

Did. Not. Recgonise, In. The. Slightest.  :o

He definitely became a better actor too.
Take a chance you may die
Over and over again

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #231 on: August 04, 2011, 11:38:05 AM »
Oh, by miles and miles. Although it's been a while since I've seen Nemesis (release, probably) so I can't remember if the cast was shit (the regulars aside) or if it was just the script.

I do love one part though: "Romulan ale should be illegal..."

"It is illegal, Worf."
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline ACID_FOX

  • DTF's Offical Arctic Monkeys Fanboy.
  • Posts: 1408
  • Gender: Male
  • But You're Just Fiction, And I'm A Twisted Boy.
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #232 on: August 04, 2011, 12:21:02 PM »
I did not know that, wow.
I only like ablums that I can xanascholithoun.

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36224
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #233 on: August 04, 2011, 12:22:41 PM »
Oh, by miles and miles. Although it's been a while since I've seen Nemesis (release, probably) so I can't remember if the cast was shit (the regulars aside) or if it was just the script.

I do love one part though: "Romulan ale should be illegal..."

"It is illegal, Worf."

Say what you will about Nemesis, but Data dying was intensely sad. Brent Spiner and the rest of the cast handled it perfectly.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline Cool Chris

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 13607
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #234 on: August 04, 2011, 12:22:58 PM »
I do love one part though: "Romulan ale should be illegal..."

"It is illegal, Worf."

FYI, it is also not recommended for diplomatic functions.
"Nostalgia is just the ability to forget the things that sucked" - Nelson DeMille, 'Up Country'

Offline ReaPsTA

  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 11205
  • Gender: Male
  • Addicted to the pain
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #235 on: August 04, 2011, 12:51:37 PM »
Oh god, I just found out I share a birthday with a famous star ship captain... Janeway.

On one hand, it's poetic because I grew up watching Voyager.  On the other hand, she was everything you don't want in an officer.
Take a chance you may die
Over and over again

Online Dream Team

  • Posts: 5693
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #236 on: August 04, 2011, 01:34:04 PM »
So, Shatner's pretty busy . . . he's got a documentary out where he interviews all of the Star Trek captains and also a new novel (which I will definitely read) where a retired Kirk tries to solve the the mystery of Spock's murder.

Offline ReaperKK

  • Sweeter After Difficulty
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 17837
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #237 on: August 04, 2011, 02:16:19 PM »
So, Shatner's pretty busy . . . he's got a documentary out where he interviews all of the Star Trek captains and also a new novel (which I will definitely read) where a retired Kirk tries to solve the the mystery of Spock's murder.

I'd like to seem him interview all the different captains, I'd also probably read the book.

Online Dream Team

  • Posts: 5693
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #238 on: August 04, 2011, 02:41:22 PM »
Ranking my favorite regular characters, regardless of writing/direction/etc:

Spock
Kirk
Picard
Data
McCoy
Worf
Ro
Riker
Scotty
Holograph Doctor
O'Brien

I'm a weird Trekkie, I know everything there possibly is to know about TOS and TNG (including novels, behind-the-scenes stuff, geeky stuff, etc), but almost nothing about the rest . . . I did watch many episodes of DS9 when it first aired.

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #239 on: August 04, 2011, 02:59:29 PM »
Oh, by miles and miles. Although it's been a while since I've seen Nemesis (release, probably) so I can't remember if the cast was shit (the regulars aside) or if it was just the script.

I do love one part though: "Romulan ale should be illegal..."

"It is illegal, Worf."

Say what you will about Nemesis, but Data dying was intensely sad. Brent Spiner and the rest of the cast handled it perfectly.

And that.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #240 on: August 05, 2011, 04:36:31 PM »
Oh, by miles and miles. Although it's been a while since I've seen Nemesis (release, probably) so I can't remember if the cast was shit (the regulars aside) or if it was just the script.

I do love one part though: "Romulan ale should be illegal..."

"It is illegal, Worf."

Say what you will about Nemesis, but Data dying was intensely sad. Brent Spiner and the rest of the cast handled it perfectly.

Say what you want about Nemesis - the amount of nods to The Wrath of Khan was ridiculous.

1.Genetically Engineered Villain
2.Massive weapon ( Genesis device, Shinzons weapon )
3.References to Romulan Ale being illegal in both movies
4.Final battle in a Nebula
5.Death of crew member
6.Data downloading his memory into B4. Spock transferring his mind to McCoy.

Any others i've forgotten ?

Offline Super Dude

  • Hero of Prog
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16265
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #241 on: August 05, 2011, 04:37:18 PM »
And pulled off not nearly as well.
Quote from: bosk1
As frequently happens, Super Dude nailed it.
:superdude:

Offline Kotowboy

  • Yes THAT Kotowboy.
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 28561
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #242 on: August 05, 2011, 04:48:16 PM »
Well no but it's so blatant they were trying to remake TWOK.

Star Trek 2009 did it so much better. That film gives TWOK a serious run for it's money in the best Trek movie ( in my book ).

I am so glad they are taking their time on the sequel and making sure that everything is ready before they start, not rushing out

a sequel for the sake of it. As long as it's as good as ST2009 I can wait as long as it takes. We waited 7 years for the last one and it was

amazing. :)

Online Adami

  • Moderator of awesomeness
  • *
  • Posts: 36224
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #243 on: August 05, 2011, 05:51:37 PM »
Well no but it's so blatant they were trying to remake TWOK.

Star Trek 2009 did it so much better. That film gives TWOK a serious run for it's money in the best Trek movie ( in my book ).

I am so glad they are taking their time on the sequel and making sure that everything is ready before they start, not rushing out

a sequel for the sake of it. As long as it's as good as ST2009 I can wait as long as it takes. We waited 7 years for the last one and it was

amazing. :)


The new movie was really fun and pretty good. But it had A LOT of problems. Way too many to even think about qualifying it for best.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline ReaPsTA

  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 11205
  • Gender: Male
  • Addicted to the pain
Re: All Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #244 on: August 05, 2011, 05:52:29 PM »
I still wish I understood why so many people like the new Star Trek.  I thought it was painfully bad.
Take a chance you may die
Over and over again