Author Topic: In Flames  (Read 76057 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Zantera

  • Wolfman's brother
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13442
  • Gender: Male
  • Bouncing around the room
Re: In Flames
« Reply #350 on: August 18, 2014, 04:05:47 AM »
I don't think people bash on the new In Flames albums only because they are different, but the quality just hasn't been there. I know some of the more hardcore fans are very vocal about how Clayman was the last great IF album. Personally, I was along for the ride up until, and beyond Come Clarity. I think that album is under-appreciated and it was also my first IF-album. I think it's a pretty good album. A Sense of Purpose was the album that lost me and the stuff they have out since is not just bad because it's another direction, it's bad because the songs are awful. The band used to write some really great melodic death metal and now they sound like a watered down version of Breaking Benjamin.

I honestly can't think of another band who had a worse decline than In Flames had. Some bands I love have put out sub-par albums and dropped a bit in quality, but the career of In Flames could best be described as a car crashing off the road and diving 50 miles down a cliff. It's a shame. :/

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #351 on: August 18, 2014, 05:33:51 AM »
Once you get over the fact that In Flames of today and the last couple of albums, bear no resemblance to the old IF melodic death metal sound, then I reckon your on the right track.
I don't care what kind of metal IF play, as long as the songs are good.

Pretty much this.  And I'm loving their later stuff, I think they have found a good sound lately.


I honestly can't think of another band who had a worse decline than In Flames had. Some bands I love have put out sub-par albums and dropped a bit in quality, but the career of In Flames could best be described as a car crashing off the road and diving 50 miles down a cliff. It's a shame. :/

I can't disagree with this more.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline gazinwales

  • Posts: 2184
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #352 on: August 18, 2014, 05:55:31 AM »
Zantera, you've answered your own question.
They used to write some really good melodic death metal, now they just write great songs.
They left behind the MDM stuff more than a decade ago.

Offline Zantera

  • Wolfman's brother
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13442
  • Gender: Male
  • Bouncing around the room
Re: In Flames
« Reply #353 on: August 18, 2014, 06:06:37 AM »
I think you can change styles and continue delivering but that's not what In Flames have done IMO. A lot of people give Metallica shit for their decline, but in my opinion albums like Load and ReLoad look like modern masterpieces in comparison to A Sense of Purpose or Sounds of a Playground Fading.

Yeah they have changed styles and whether or not you like the new direction is obviously 100% subjective. I'm not even a big fan of melodic death metal, but I think that's a genre where In Flames really shined when they put out some really strong albums and were one of the pioneers of the genre. Now they have changed into something different, which in my opinion would be a more radio metal sound, and whether or not you like their new sound, I think it's safe to say that they used to be a very influential band that inspired many other bands to make the same kind of music, but it's not like they're relevant at all these days. Again, quality of the music aside, their status has changed. It's kinda similar to how bands like Trivium or KoRn were very hot during a time of their career, but they didn't hit that final homerun and they kinda faded away.

Offline LCArenas

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2511
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #354 on: August 18, 2014, 10:51:59 AM »
Zantera is laying it down as it is. I tend to look In Flames as two separated bands, the second one being born with Reroute to Remain. The second In Flames has had some really good albums like RtR or Come Clarity (Which I think is really underappreciated, mostly because Anders Fridén can't do the same growling vocals anymore and people don't like to accept that). Hell, even some songs of A Sense of Purpose and Soundtrack are really good. But Sounds of a Playground Fading sounded... Uninspired in a lot of parts. I don't think they're going for the Hard Rock audience right now but they're definitely not going for the MDM audience either. I just don't know what are they trying to do with their music right now.

Offline ?

  • Apparently the best username
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 11742
  • Gender: Male
  • Less=Moore, Even Less=Wilson
Re: In Flames
« Reply #355 on: August 18, 2014, 12:55:09 PM »
Samples of new songs: https://vk.com/wall-7425815_585744?reply=585783 Anders should consider taking singing lessons... His vocals aren't as whiny as before, but he still has a long way to go if he wants to make clean vocals the main focus of their music (which seems to be happening on the new album). Hell, he needs a backing track for the chorus of Come Clarity live, even though there are no harmonies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ9oVfGRJeQ

It feels like they went from being leaders of the melodeath scene to being followers of whatever style of metal is popular in America. STYE includes a lot of nu metalish chugga chugga riffing, CC and ASOP have a bit of metalcore, and I guess the new stuff is aimed at fans of... modern alt rock or something like that? I'm not saying they sold out, but it looks like they've been taking cues from younger bands and altered their music to keep up with the times and find a new audience. Good for them, because obviously they make more money now, and a lot of people seem to be happy with the new direction, but it's not my cup of tea. Come Clarity is a passable album and the rest have a couple of decent songs, but they have little to nothing to do with the In Flames of 90s, especially now that Jesper is gone and there are no members left from the original line-up.

Offline gazinwales

  • Posts: 2184
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #356 on: August 18, 2014, 01:54:11 PM »
Anders can actually sing pretty well, when he wants to.
Proof is in the side project he did in 2003 called Passenger.

IF are in a no win situation, regardless of what style they play.
Had they continued with the MDM style on every single album, people would be bitching that every album was sounding the same.

Offline Dark Castle

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6532
  • Gender: Female
  • SmegmaPrincessX
Re: In Flames
« Reply #357 on: August 18, 2014, 01:57:27 PM »
Anders can actually sing pretty well, when he wants to.
Proof is in the side project he did in 2003 called Passenger.

IF are in a no win situation, regardless of what style they play.
Had they continued with the MDM style on every single album, people would be bitching that every album was sounding the same.
Not really, because they could have evolved that MDM sound.

Offline adace

  • Posts: 2267
Re: In Flames
« Reply #358 on: August 18, 2014, 03:13:03 PM »
Can't say those samples got me too excited for the album. :-\

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #359 on: August 18, 2014, 04:42:01 PM »
Anders can actually sing pretty well, when he wants to.
Proof is in the side project he did in 2003 called Passenger.

Never heard of this one, will have to check it out.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline MrBoom_shack-a-lack

  • I hit things for a living!
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9241
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #360 on: August 18, 2014, 05:48:15 PM »
Anders can actually sing pretty well, when he wants to.
Proof is in the side project he did in 2003 called Passenger.

Never heard of this one, will have to check it out.
Wow that is one project I haven't heard in ages. Brought back some flashbacks for me. Despite that it's not a very good album they did, some highlights but for the most part i'm not very fond of Anders contribution to that project but that's just me.

https://youtu.be/kBcJR85KC5o
"I said to Nigel Tufnel, 'The door is open if you want to do anything on this record,' but it turns out Nigel has a phobia about doors." /Derek Smalls

Offline gazinwales

  • Posts: 2184
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #361 on: August 19, 2014, 12:53:47 AM »
Yeah I always remember the Passenger album being pretty good.
I've dug out the CD and will give it another listen.
Surprisingly, it's not OOP and available at Amazon UK for a decent price.

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #362 on: August 19, 2014, 01:05:27 AM »
Samples of new songs: https://vk.com/wall-7425815_585744?reply=585783 Anders should c

I think Filtered Truth was really quite good, but Everything Is Gone was pretty ordinary.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline fadetoblackdude7

  • Posts: 2542
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #363 on: September 01, 2014, 07:32:55 PM »
Half way through my first listen of Siren Charms. Very melodic and more aggressive than people might think.

Paralyzed......WOW!!!

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #364 on: September 01, 2014, 08:39:15 PM »
Half way through my first listen of Siren Charms. Very melodic and more aggressive than people might think.

Paralyzed......WOW!!!

This is great to read.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline Xenon

  • Posts: 369
Re: In Flames
« Reply #365 on: September 01, 2014, 08:51:17 PM »
I'm not a fan, but I think it's pretty good. Really like the vocals.

Offline adace

  • Posts: 2267
Re: In Flames
« Reply #366 on: September 01, 2014, 10:32:06 PM »
The new album is slightly better than I thought it would be but it still has nothing that would make me want to listen to it again. Too radio-friendly and weak vocals, especially the screams.

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #367 on: September 08, 2014, 08:07:57 PM »
I've listened to the new album a few times, and I guess you can call me an In Flames fanboy, I really enjoy it.  It's certainly different, but the songs IMO are still great.  I would have liked some more traditional newer In Flames style songs like Rusted Nail, cause I think there is a little too much clean vox from Anders, but I like it.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline LCArenas

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2511
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #368 on: September 10, 2014, 09:19:50 PM »
Sorry people, but I think this album isn't any good. I think it's the first In Flames album in history that has actually made me yawn. The riffs do nothing, the vocals and drums are bland to me... I don't know. Maybe I'm not made for this kind of album.

Except "Dead Eyes". It's a pretty great song.

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #369 on: September 10, 2014, 09:33:40 PM »
Dead Eyes is top 3, terrific song.  i can see why people wouldn't dig this album, but I'm loving it.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 1500
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #370 on: September 11, 2014, 12:24:27 AM »
I liked the last album better, but this one is not bad at all!

Filtered Truth was pretty damn catchy.

Offline gazinwales

  • Posts: 2184
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #371 on: September 11, 2014, 01:08:40 AM »
In Flames touring AU in November as special guest to Trivium.

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #372 on: September 11, 2014, 05:46:11 AM »
In Flames touring AU in November as special guest to Trivium.

WTF?!  This sentence doesn't make sense.  Is this the bizarro world?
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline gazinwales

  • Posts: 2184
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #373 on: September 11, 2014, 01:31:00 PM »

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #374 on: September 11, 2014, 03:34:18 PM »
What exactly dose not make sense?
https://www.soundwavetouring.com/news/trivium-with-very-special-guests-in-flames-announce-australian-tour/

It should be named an In Flames tour with Trivium as special guests, not the other way around IMO.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: In Flames
« Reply #375 on: September 11, 2014, 03:53:47 PM »
Wut? Trivium are way bigger than IF. ???

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline fadetoblackdude7

  • Posts: 2542
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #376 on: September 11, 2014, 04:32:10 PM »
I've seen Trivium open for IF twice, once in 2006 and in 2012.

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #377 on: September 11, 2014, 08:50:29 PM »
Wut? Trivium are way bigger than IF. ???

Yeah, I guess these days to the masses and mainstream audience, Trivium are a little bigger, but I didn't think so much that In Flames would be bumped to support act.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.

Offline Shadow Ninja 2.0

  • Heir Transparent
  • Posts: 7669
  • Gender: Male
  • Transcribing Existence Rivets
Re: In Flames
« Reply #378 on: September 11, 2014, 08:53:57 PM »
I don't know what things are like in other parts of the world, but in the US at least I think Trivium are way bigger.

Offline MrBoom_shack-a-lack

  • I hit things for a living!
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9241
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #379 on: September 12, 2014, 12:15:43 AM »
Yea I was about to say that. I have a feeling IF may be bigger in europe but not in the US.
"I said to Nigel Tufnel, 'The door is open if you want to do anything on this record,' but it turns out Nigel has a phobia about doors." /Derek Smalls

Offline ariich

  • Roulette Supervillain
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 28050
  • Gender: Male
  • sexin' you later
Re: In Flames
« Reply #380 on: September 12, 2014, 12:26:24 AM »
Not in the UK either. Maybe in contintental Europe, but I doubt it.

Ariich is a freak, or somehow has more hours in the day than everyone else.
I be am boner inducing.

Offline MrBoom_shack-a-lack

  • I hit things for a living!
  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9241
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #381 on: September 12, 2014, 12:43:23 AM »
In Sweden IF is definitly bigger than Trivium.  :P
"I said to Nigel Tufnel, 'The door is open if you want to do anything on this record,' but it turns out Nigel has a phobia about doors." /Derek Smalls

Offline ?

  • Apparently the best username
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 11742
  • Gender: Male
  • Less=Moore, Even Less=Wilson
Re: In Flames
« Reply #382 on: September 12, 2014, 01:32:34 AM »
In Sweden IF is definitly bigger than Trivium.  :P
Same here in Finland. When IF and Trivium toured Europe together in 2009, Trivium headlined in the UK while IF closed the rest of the shows: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taste_of_Chaos_2009#Taste_of_Chaos_2009:_Europe

Offline Zydar

  • Creep With Tonality
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 19281
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #383 on: September 12, 2014, 01:45:30 AM »
In Flames are one of the biggest bands here in Sweden, if not THE biggest.
Zydar is my new hero.  I just laughed so hard I nearly shat.

Online wolfking

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 46853
  • Gender: Male
Re: In Flames
« Reply #384 on: September 12, 2014, 06:34:50 AM »
Here in Australia neither are that big at all.  :lol  Although, come to think of it, Trivium do make the charts with their new albums, not sure if In Flames ever has.
Everyone else, except Wolfking is wrong.