Arcade Fire Thread

Started by skydivingninja, April 02, 2010, 06:37:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which is better?

Funeral
21 (63.6%)
Neon Bible
12 (36.4%)

Total Members Voted: 33

KevShmev

Interesting analogy, but I don't necessarily agree with it entirely.  Yes, it is a like a ride with ups and downs, but the downs are still pretty "up," so to speak.  16 tracks and not a single weak link. :)

shadowfex

This is the first arcade fire album i've purchased and I am really enjoying it. I love the 80's vibe and the the flow of the album. Great stuff!

KevShmev

The end of "Suburban War" is heavenly. :coolio

antigoon

Bumping this thread to say that I'm just watching a recording of the MSG live stream right now. Rococco is damn hypnotizing. Didn't like it at first, but it's a really neat track.

RO
COCCO!

Also, I didn't realize how much they all switched instruments. Really cool.

KevShmev

Looks like Arcade Fire is doing two shows in Chicago in late April.  The aggravating thing about this is, you have to figure that they will be doing other shows in the States around the same time, but what happened to announcing them all at the same time?  With the Chicago shows already on sale, they are likely to sell out fast, which blows for someone like me, who would consider making the trip up there to see them, but not if they are gonna come here (but just haven't announced it yet).  Given the high ticket demand, I guess we could get tickets for the Chicago show, and then sell if them if they do end up coming to St. Louis, but that is still an annoying way to handle it.  Grrrrrr...

antigoon

Yeah, sounds like a pickle, Kev. I would travel to see them anywhere in the Northeast.

antigoon


ClairvoyantCat


SPNKr

What would make me REALLY wanna check out Funeral?

antigoon

It's fucking good so just do it.

ClairvoyantCat

Quote from: SPNKr on February 13, 2011, 08:57:55 PM
What would make me REALLY wanna check out Funeral?

The fact that they won a grammy.  That means they're a good artist. 

SPNKr

^Knew you'd reply ;)

Quote from: antigoon on February 13, 2011, 09:02:04 PM
It's fucking good so just do it.
OKAY FINE, DAD

antigoon

AND DONT BURN THE FUCKING RISOTTO THIS TIME

SPNKr

Fuck it, starting with the EP so I can have the whole discog.

KevShmev


antigoon

I still can't believe that just happened. And did you see them play Ready to Start after? Win couldn't stop smiling it was adorable.

KevShmev

#86
I think they were generally shocked that they won.  The Grammys stink, but that was cool to see (I only tuned in to see them play).  

As for their performances, "Month of May" was a trainwreck (too loud and all of the lights were annoying and distracting), but "Ready to Start" was good.  Shoulda sent everyone home with "Sprawl II," though. :hat

antigoon

I think EVERYONE was shocked! And I agree about the performances. You know what else was weird? Those BMX riders during Month of May :lol

skydivingninja

Quote from: antigoon on February 13, 2011, 09:09:52 PM
AND DONT BURN THE FUCKING RISOTTO THIS TIME

ITS.  RAW.

Glad to see they won album of the year!  Also cool to see Maiden and Muse win grammys (even if they weren't ENTIRELY deserved this time around).

Sigz

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win_ButlerAt the age of 15, Butler started attending the Phillips Exeter Academy preparatory school in New Hampshire. There he played varsity basketball and club softball, and performed obscene acts with several young boys, including Willy Wanker and the Chocolate Factories.

wat

Sigz


antigoon

AWWW POOR BABIES

(but really, who is esperanza spalding?)

Sigz


skydivingninja

Quote from: Sigz on February 14, 2011, 05:13:39 AM
Also, the rage about the grammies is delicious: https://whoisarcadefire.tumblr.com/

"Arcade Fire is the name of the song, the band is called The Suburbs"
:rollin :rollin :rollin

Gorille85

 :tup for the Grammy! Although it doesn't mean much. Also glad that a MontrĂ©al band got it! :P

Dittomist

I was shocked to hear Arcade Fire won the biggest award of the night-- I never thought The Grammies would actually recognize a truly sophisticated, adventurous, and thoughtful concept album like The Suburbs, when they have a history of honoring simple mainstream teen-pop garbage like Katy Perry. You could tell Barbara Streisand hadn't even prepared to say those words, "Arcade Fire-The Suburbs."
I think Month of May was a pretty good choice and I actually liked the intense strobes. The only thing that bothered me was how I could barely hear Regine's vocals. But I agree, Sprawl II would have been better :)

KevShmev

Quote from: Sigz on February 14, 2011, 05:13:39 AM
Also, the rage about the grammies is delicious: https://whoisarcadefire.tumblr.com/

The big mistake all of those people are making is thinking that the Grammys mean anything.  They don't.  Sure, it is cool to see a band we like win, especially the biggie like Album of the Year, but it ultimately doesn't mean a damn thing.

antigoon

I mean I think it has cultural significance.

Edit: not Arcade Fire winning, specifically. The awards in general.

skydivingninja

Eh, like that article posted in the PT thread said, the Grammys just promote the same very small subset of music that's out there.  Maybe they decided to make it an upset, or maybe they actually thought The Suburbs was the best album, who knows, but normally that award would have been going to Taylor Swift or someone of that sort.  I don't think the grammys have any real cultural significance when only ten bands get mentioned across several categories. 

Of course, award shows are pointless anyways, but its nice to see a band I like get even more mainstream recognition.  Unfortunately, they're too cool for me to listen to them now.

ClairvoyantCat


MetalManiac666

I guess I should actually legitimately give this band a chance instead of writing them off as a shitty indie/hipster band.

*downloads The Suburbs*

antigoon

Quote from: skydivingninja on February 14, 2011, 10:54:28 AM
Eh, like that article posted in the PT thread said, the Grammys just promote the same very small subset of music that's out there.  Maybe they decided to make it an upset, or maybe they actually thought The Suburbs was the best album, who knows, but normally that award would have been going to Taylor Swift or someone of that sort.  I don't think the grammys have any real cultural significance when only ten bands get mentioned across several categories. 

Of course, award shows are pointless anyways, but its nice to see a band I like get even more mainstream recognition.  Unfortunately, they're too cool for me to listen to them now.

I'm just talking about the fact that they clearly mean something to the performers nominated and the majority of the people who tune in to watch the show.

skydivingninja

If there's one thing I've learned in the past few years is that you should never write off a band because of whatever silly fans they have.  Otherwise I wouldn't have gotten into Dream Theater, Porcupine Tree, Coheed & Cambria, Genesis, Marillion, Tool, etc. etc. etc...

@Antigoon: Oh no doubt they mean something to those people.  I kinda expanded "cultural significance" to mean "everybody," which probably isn't the case.

Fluffy Lothario

This band is still yet to make it any further than my to-check-out list.

MetalManiac666

About half way through The Suburbs.



I...........................like it. :|