I don't know whether SB has enough left to go on yet another "sound searching" mission. It already took them way too long after Neal left.
SB always had a ton of parallels to Genesis, sound and career-wise. I'm wondering whether this isn't their Calling All Stations.
Considering many fans are hailing BNADS to be as good as
X, if not better in some cases (or at least better than the pre-X Nick-Era albums), I think SBv3.0 will last and thrive a lot longer than CAS-era Genesis did. There was a LOT running on CAS, and it just didn't live up to the expectations. Sure, it's got some great tracks, some good tracks, but there's a lot of flaws on that album (constant fade-outs, some mediocre song-writing, having two different drummers, etc.), and it just wasn't going to take-off from Day 1.
This version of SB has a lot going for it - Jimmy has been with the live band for nearly a decade now, so he's got their sound and style DOWN to a TEE, and his playing on the new album is equaled to anything Nick has done on SB's first ten albums. And Ted - well, he's different than Neal or Nick, but his voice still captures a certain power and essence that is vital to the SB sound.
I don't think BNADS will fail like CAS did - this is the start of a new era and I believe the band will flourish because of this album! If it wasn't for the HUGE success that
X was, you can bet this album may not have been as well received. Then again, with Genesis,
We Can't Dance was a huge success, but we're speaking relatively. Genesis were a huge, world-wide success when WCD came out - they filled stadiums and large venues to capacity. They were pop-prog/rock icons, and dominated. SB hasn't quite done that, and they barely tour, so while their success is only relative, their latest album is still a success nonetheless.
-Marc.