DreamTheaterForums.org Dream Theater Fan Site

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Ħ on January 26, 2011, 11:27:14 AM

Title: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ħ on January 26, 2011, 11:27:14 AM
I used to be a butterfingers guy, but I think I'm undergoing a paradigm shift...right now it's about equal for me, leaning toward Reeses.  But they both have their strong points (and weak points). 

Butterfingers are more filling, have better texture, plus they take longer to eat if you're a candy pig like me.  On the downside, they are really messy and stick in your teeth.

Reeses are more flavorful and delicate.  They are much richer than Butterfingers.  Unfortunately, you only get two per pack (four if king size) and they get downed in two bites apiece.

...I can't decide! >_<
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: sonatafanica on January 26, 2011, 11:30:43 AM
Butterfingers are horrible.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: MykeHavoc on January 26, 2011, 11:36:51 AM
Reeses are superior. I don't mind Butterfinger though.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Dr. DTVT on January 26, 2011, 11:40:11 AM
Reeses are superior. I don't mind Butterfinger though.

My thoughts exactly.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: glaurung on January 26, 2011, 11:41:39 AM
I slightly prefer Reeses, but also love Butterfingers.

Butterfingers are horrible.

no u
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 11:42:36 AM
I don't eat candy much, but I fucking love Reeses. Every now and again I buy a butterfingers and always end up thinking to myself, "why did I get this?".
 And lets not forget.

(https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ytTt9w_Xeq0/R3HHuwuVfUI/AAAAAAAAAJk/Dc-iwR-K9uY/s320/friendlys-reeses-peanut-butter-cup-cake-760310.jpg)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Orbert on January 26, 2011, 11:45:39 AM
I used to like Butterfinger too, but for some reason I don't get the same satisfaction I used to out of the crunching.  I much prefer the smoothness of Reese's.  Also, the crunchy stuff seems to coagulate into some kind of sticky substance that I can't get off my teeth, and that's really the dealbreaker.

Also, I want a big piece of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups Premium Ice Cream Cake.  That looks fantastic!
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: 7StringedBeast on January 26, 2011, 12:00:52 PM
Reese's cups are the perfect candy.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 12:08:55 PM
Reese's cups are the perfect candy.

False.

Reese's Christmas trees are the perfect candy.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Sigz on January 26, 2011, 12:09:30 PM
I'd actually say Snicker's Eggs are the best candy.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: juice on January 26, 2011, 12:23:25 PM
Tough choice.  When I was a little kid Reeses used to be the most valued candy because it was the one everyone wanted but now I think i prefer Butterfingers slightly.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Dimitrius on January 26, 2011, 12:26:30 PM
I like both of them, but I slightly prefer Reese's.

Though, Snicker's is the best them.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 12:32:50 PM
Reeses Fastbreaks were my favorite Reeses product for a long time. Then they put in more peanut butter and less nugget which kinda ruined it. Lets all get serious though. Kit Kat bars are easily the best them.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: HarlequinForest on January 26, 2011, 12:45:37 PM
I prefer Butterfinger because of the texture.

My favorite candy bar, though, is either Snickers or Skor/Heath.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: setrataeso on January 26, 2011, 12:55:17 PM
I like Butterfingers. I love Reeses.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Rina on January 26, 2011, 12:57:16 PM
I like Butterfingers. I love Reeses.

This is wisdom.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: yeshaberto on January 26, 2011, 01:07:20 PM
absolutely butterfingers...I will eat reeses if laying out, but wouldn't pay money for them
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ultimetalhead on January 26, 2011, 01:09:26 PM
Butterfinger is the world's most amazing candy bar. If I ever get a craving for candy, it's this.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Volk9 on January 26, 2011, 01:13:31 PM
Reeses definately. Butterfingers are gross.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: blackngold29 on January 26, 2011, 01:17:28 PM
Butterfingers are good, but Reeses are the king candy bar.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: bosk1 on January 26, 2011, 01:32:12 PM
absolutely reeses...I will eat the souls of banned DTF members if laying out, but wouldn't pay money for them

Me too, with the above corrections.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 26, 2011, 01:34:42 PM
Well, there you go.

Borlag awaits!
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Space Invader on January 26, 2011, 01:57:24 PM
Reeses by a mile.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Gadough on January 26, 2011, 02:01:23 PM
On the downside, they are really messy and stick in your teeth.

This is why I don't like Butterfingers. I spend half the time scraping them off my teeth.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Elsydeon on January 26, 2011, 02:04:43 PM
reeses times a billion
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: orcus116 on January 26, 2011, 02:16:02 PM
Reeses Fastbreaks were my favorite Reeses product for a long time. Then they put in more peanut butter and less nugget which kinda ruined it. Lets all get serious though. Kit Kat bars are easily the best them.

They ruined the Fastbreak?!
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Kosmo on January 26, 2011, 02:17:03 PM
We don't have those in Finland..  :yeahright So i'll say Snickers even though it's not an option!  :hat
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: yorost on January 26, 2011, 02:19:12 PM
I rarely eat candy, but when I do, I prefer Reese's.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: MykeHavoc on January 26, 2011, 02:31:54 PM
Butterfinger is the world's most amazing candy bar. If I ever get a craving for candy, it's this.

I tend to give this honor to Pay-Days. They are without a doubt the one I get the most cravings for.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: jsem on January 26, 2011, 02:36:01 PM
I don't eat candy,  :-\
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: EasterDavy on January 26, 2011, 02:42:22 PM
I rarely eat candy, but when I do, I prefer Reese's.

(https://blogington.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Dos-Equis-Man.jpg)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: MetalManiac666 on January 26, 2011, 02:43:05 PM
I like Butterfingers. I love Reeses.

This.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: King Postwhore on January 26, 2011, 02:51:40 PM
Reeses by a landslide.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Jamesman42 on January 26, 2011, 03:16:50 PM
I don't eat candy anymore (unless it is like 90% dark chocolate or above, though 100% is just nasty). But when I did, Reese's was my favorite.

Now, the flavor of Butterfingers is amazing (as seen in the BF Crunch bar). But on its own, the teeth stickiness kills it.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: kári on January 26, 2011, 03:23:23 PM
No candy.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: j on January 26, 2011, 03:27:32 PM
I don't eat candy very often, but I think i slightly prefer Butterfingers.  But both are delicious.

-J
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: yorost on January 26, 2011, 03:51:36 PM
I don't eat candy anymore (unless it is like 90% dark chocolate or above, though 100% is just nasty).
I don't consider dark chocolate candy, particularly at the level you're eating.  I have similar tastes, but I don't mind going down to 80% if the sweet isn't that noticeable.  I'd bet you're wrong, on your own tastes, about 100% if you like 90%.  You have to explore more to find 100% that's palatable.  In my mind the higher the percentage on darks the more skill it takes to perfect.

At 70% almost any bar is too sweet so most places have no trouble getting it ok.

At 80% most are at least ok, but some places make the sweet too strong(as a cover imo) and others start to have bad taste.

At 90% it is hard to find a good bar, sweet can't be used  well as a cover any more so badly done products can't hide anymore.

At 100% almost everything is bad.  There's just no room to hide if you can't make a good bar.

See if you can find a Cuorenero 100% bar.  I was amazed when I first had it.  Distinctly 100% chocolate without all the negatives you expect.  No need at all to nibble at it to negate bitterness or vileness, it's great stuff.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 04:29:33 PM
Dark Chocolate blows.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: orcus116 on January 26, 2011, 04:37:31 PM
Unless it's good dark chocolate it's a complete waste.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: bosk1 on January 26, 2011, 04:39:39 PM
Your avatar makes that post seem funnier.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ħ on January 26, 2011, 05:58:19 PM
Reeses is milk chocolate, is it not?

Kit Kat bars are easily the best them.

Those go down even faster than Reeses! (I will concede that white chocolate Kit Kats are the best them)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Voyage 34 on January 26, 2011, 06:05:03 PM
NOOOOOOOOOO! I voted Reeses, but I meant to vote Butterfinger. I like Reeses but not as much.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: bout to crash on January 26, 2011, 06:23:00 PM
I like Butterfingers. I love Reeses.

This.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: axeman90210 on January 26, 2011, 06:24:30 PM
I voted Reeses. Both are delicious, but only one created a debacle in my mouth afterwards. Reese's Pieces are the real winner though :metal
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: pogoowner on January 26, 2011, 06:27:10 PM
I like Butterfingers. I love Reeses.

This is wisdom.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: ehra on January 26, 2011, 06:28:04 PM
Definitely Reeses. If I'm going to have a candy bar, I'm going to take a Three Musketeers over a Butterfinger any day.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: MetalManiac666 on January 26, 2011, 06:35:35 PM
Reese's Pieces are the real winner though :metal

Though I love Reese's Cups, I've never really been a fan of Reese's Pieces.  Dunno why.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: bout to crash on January 26, 2011, 06:36:50 PM
Reese's Pieces are the real winner though :metal
:yarr
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: bosk1 on January 26, 2011, 06:38:24 PM
Reeses is milk chocolate, is it not?

Kit Kat bars are easily the best them.

Those go down even faster than Reeses! (I will concede that white chocolate Kit Kats are the best them)

Big Kats own Kit Kats (when you can find them, anyway).
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ħ on January 26, 2011, 06:53:16 PM
Never heard of Big Kats but if they exist like you say I might have to abandon Reeses.

This inspires a new question in my mind...



Reeses King Size...or Reeses Big Cup?

 :yarr
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: skydivingninja on January 26, 2011, 07:02:08 PM
What you need are the giant Resse's cups.  The whole package is bigger than my head, and totals 12 servings.

So yeah, Reese's.  Butterfingers are good as well, but Clark bars are better than Butterfingers, so I don't eat them as much anymore.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Mr. Beale on January 26, 2011, 08:19:49 PM
I'll take a Reese anytime if offered. Butterfingers are something I need to be in the mood for.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Jamesman42 on January 26, 2011, 08:26:33 PM
I don't eat candy anymore (unless it is like 90% dark chocolate or above, though 100% is just nasty).
I don't consider dark chocolate candy, particularly at the level you're eating.  I have similar tastes, but I don't mind going down to 80% if the sweet isn't that noticeable.  I'd bet you're wrong, on your own tastes, about 100% if you like 90%.  You have to explore more to find 100% that's palatable.  In my mind the higher the percentage on darks the more skill it takes to perfect.

At 70% almost any bar is too sweet so most places have no trouble getting it ok.

At 80% most are at least ok, but some places make the sweet too strong(as a cover imo) and others start to have bad taste.

At 90% it is hard to find a good bar, sweet can't be used  well as a cover any more so badly done products can't hide anymore.

At 100% almost everything is bad.  There's just no room to hide if you can't make a good bar.

See if you can find a Cuorenero 100% bar.  I was amazed when I first had it.  Distinctly 100% chocolate without all the negatives you expect.  No need at all to nibble at it to negate bitterness or vileness, it's great stuff.

I guess I lump candy and chocolate together, since it's usually all chocolate based anyway.

I guess Baker's chocolate is not the way to go? I am trying to kill off all the sugar. I bought a Ghierdella (whatever that name is, too lazy to Google it) 100% bar and it is still kinda nasty, but not as bad as baker's chocolate.

I'm also trying to avoid the soy lecithin that is found in the chocolates. I'm not worried though as I haven't had any craving for chocolate nowadays.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 08:49:37 PM
Tomorrow I am going to enter a new realm of deliciousness. I am going to eat a butter finger, a kit cat, and a resees... all at the same time.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: yorost on January 26, 2011, 08:49:48 PM
Baker's chocolate isn't even an attempt to make it edible plain.  Kind of like how low end brandy isn't meant to be drank in a sniffer but works well for mixed drinks.  Good Baker's chocolate should work well in baking, not tasting it straight.

The Ghirabaldi 100% is not a good chocolate bar.  Lots of places make 100% and 99% chocolate bars, and most of them are as bad as Ghirabaldi, overpowering bitterness and/or the sensation that you're eating bark.  I think these places do it for novelty, not because they actually know how to do it well.  You know when you've found someone that really understands how to work chocolate when you find a good 100% bar.

If you want to really try 100%, track down the one I mentioned above.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 08:50:51 PM
Reeses is milk chocolate, is it not?

Kit Kat bars are easily the best them.

Those go down even faster than Reeses! (I will concede that white chocolate Kit Kats are the best them)

Big Kats own Kit Kats (when you can find them, anyway).

You'll find a Big Kat in literally every gas station in CT. I always wanted a Big Kat king size.... Basically a regular Kit Kat but quadrupole the size.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: DarkEternalNight on January 26, 2011, 08:55:41 PM
Not a big fan of Butterfingers but Reese's is my 2nd favorite candy to Hershey's Cookies and Cream  :)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 26, 2011, 08:58:04 PM
Not a big fan of Butterfingers but Reese's is my 2nd favorite candy to Hershey's Cookies and Cream  :)

:barf:
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ħ on January 26, 2011, 09:03:33 PM
After doing some research, I found out that Japan has a wide assortment of Kit Kat flavors...some look appetizing but some are like those nasty Harry Potter every flavor jellybeans...the grossest I found is an Earl Grey Tea Kit Kat.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: SPNKr on January 26, 2011, 09:05:34 PM
Post pics!
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ħ on January 26, 2011, 09:07:47 PM
...by "research" I meant wikipedia
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: bosk1 on January 27, 2011, 08:07:54 AM
Big Kat .... Basically a regular Kit Kat but quadrupole the size.

That.  It's like one segment of a Kit Kat blown up to the size of a baby's forearm.  The chocolate is much thicker on it, which makes the chocolate-to-wafer ratio perfect.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Jamesman42 on January 27, 2011, 08:10:36 AM
Big Kat .... Basically a regular Kit Kat but quadrupole the size.

That.  It's like one segment of a Kit Kat blown up to the size of a baby's forearm.  The chocolate is much thicker on it, which makes the chocolate-to-wafer ratio perfect.

I think I would break my not eating candy thing for a Big Kat. For real. I used to love eating the chocolate off of the bar (like you said, it is thick), and then eating the huge wafer.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 27, 2011, 08:13:08 AM
Big Kat .... Basically a regular Kit Kat but quadrupole the size.

That.  It's like one segment of a Kit Kat blown up to the size of a baby's forearm.  The chocolate is much thicker on it, which makes the chocolate-to-wafer ratio perfect.

eating the chocolate off of the bar (like you said, it is thick), and then eating the huge wafer.

Totally. I do that with most candy bars that are made out of multiple pieces of goodness.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Dublagent66 on January 27, 2011, 08:25:44 AM
Reeses  :metal
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: King Postwhore on January 27, 2011, 08:59:37 AM
The thing I don't like about Butterfingers is that it sticks to your teeth.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: lordxizor on January 27, 2011, 09:04:29 AM
I love the miniature Resse's PB Cups. They have a higher ratio of chocolate to PB, which I like. My wife loves the Christmas trees which have a ton more PB to chocolate. I'm pretty much an equal opportunity eater when it comes to candy. I love pretty much all of it.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Elsydeon on January 27, 2011, 09:27:11 AM
Usually I'll pick up the reeses big cups, I love a higher peanut butter to chocolate ratio and these things are....well.... big.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: King Postwhore on January 27, 2011, 09:28:11 AM
Usually I'll pick up the reeses big cups, I love a higher peanut butter to chocolate ratio and these things are....well.... big.
The Christmas Trees or Easter Eggs are the best.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Elsydeon on January 27, 2011, 09:36:12 AM
Usually I'll pick up the reeses big cups, I love a higher peanut butter to chocolate ratio and these things are....well.... big.
The Christmas Trees or Easter Eggs are the best.
I'll agree with you on that. But the big cups are all year round!
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 27, 2011, 09:40:59 AM
Usually I'll pick up the reeses big cups, I love a higher peanut butter to chocolate ratio and these things are....well.... big.
The Christmas Trees or Easter Eggs are the best.
I'll agree with you on that. But the big cups are all year round!

But cost like $1.39 for one....
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Elsydeon on January 27, 2011, 09:55:16 AM
Usually I'll pick up the reeses big cups, I love a higher peanut butter to chocolate ratio and these things are....well.... big.
The Christmas Trees or Easter Eggs are the best.
I'll agree with you on that. But the big cups are all year round!

But cost like $1.39 for one....
Come to Torrington Price Chopper, we got them for .99 ea
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: chrisbDTM on January 27, 2011, 10:46:34 AM
this thread scares me, because i was literally eating a reese's as i saw it

weird
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Plasmastrike on January 27, 2011, 10:52:30 AM
Reeses!

.. Those eggs *drool*
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Orbert on January 27, 2011, 11:26:27 AM
Big Kat .... Basically a regular Kit Kat but quadrupole the size.

That.  It's like one segment of a Kit Kat blown up to the size of a baby's forearm.  The chocolate is much thicker on it, which makes the chocolate-to-wafer ratio perfect.

I had one once, and it was awesome. But I couldn't figure out if the ratio was slightly different, improving it a bit, or it was just amazing because it was huge and I could take huge bites at a time.

Same with the Reese's eggs. Is the ratio different, or it is just amazing because you can chomp down mass quantities at a time?
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: GuineaPig on January 27, 2011, 11:37:39 AM
Americans only get two Reese's cups per package?  What the fuck is this shit?

Reese's is the best chocolate.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 27, 2011, 11:40:20 AM
We have a 2 pack and a 4 pack. I could have sworn at one time there were 3 packs....
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Orbert on January 27, 2011, 11:42:53 AM
I've seen 3-packs, usually as a special promotion for the same price as a 2-pack.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on January 27, 2011, 11:44:39 AM
I think when I was a cub scout we would see candy to raise money. I think we had 3 packs of resees, and kit kats that were 6 pieces.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on March 25, 2011, 09:46:23 AM
I had the Reeses mini's last night.... Holy shit.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Jamesman42 on March 25, 2011, 10:23:36 AM
Yesterday I had TWO (I KNOW) Godiva chocolate bars, 31% Cocoa, with salted caramel. Oh. My God.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Fiery Winds on March 25, 2011, 11:27:25 AM
*Drool*

(https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/3631497937_7604a58914.jpg)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on March 25, 2011, 11:33:59 AM
(https://i660.photobucket.com/albums/uu328/zerosignal/mother-of-god-super-troopers.jpg)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Jamesman42 on March 25, 2011, 10:03:00 PM
Break me off a piece of that next level Big Kat bar. Smart.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: MetalJunkie on March 27, 2011, 01:42:15 AM
I can't eat Butterfinger, for a reason that might sound silly to some.

My grandmother's favorite candybar was Butterfinger, and the only time I can remember eating them is when she bought one for her and one for me. As she got older, it got harder for her to eat them, so one time I bought her the Butterfinger Crisp. She could sort of let it dissolve in her mouth and still enjoy it. It meant a lot to me to see her enjoy something she thought she could no longer enjoy.

After she passed, I bought a Butterfinger. I couldn't bring myself to finish it because I felt it was a "Grandma and me" thing I was doing without her. My eyes are about to tear up as I write this... But yeah. I haven't eaten a Butterfinger since she died.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Orbert on March 27, 2011, 06:45:35 AM
That's... kinda sad.  :(  Maybe you can turn it around.  Enjoy one in her memory, instead of being sad that you can't enjoy them together anymore.

There's these Chinese candies called Haw Flakes that my grandfather used to get for me every time we went to visit him in Toronto. I love them, and I still think of my grandfather every time I eat them.

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/180649_1570013412182_1290888855_31343296_5083621_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: splent on March 27, 2011, 07:56:33 AM
I used to be a butterfingers guy, but I think I'm undergoing a paradigm shift...right now it's about equal for me, leaning toward Reeses.  But they both have their strong points (and weak points). 

Butterfingers are more filling, have better texture, plus they take longer to eat if you're a candy pig like me.  On the downside, they are really messy and stick in your teeth.

Reeses are more flavorful and delicate.  They are much richer than Butterfingers.  Unfortunately, you only get two per pack (four if king size) and they get downed in two bites apiece.

...I can't decide! >_<

Reese's fast break.  Problem solved.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Ultimetalhead on March 27, 2011, 09:33:21 AM
Fast Break is no better when it comes to the complaints about Reese's. The problem is that since Butterfinger is crunchy, it takes longer to eat. Anything Reese's makes can be downed in like 20 seconds.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Chino on March 27, 2011, 03:27:12 PM
Fast Break is no better when it comes to the complaints about Reese's. The problem is that since Butterfinger is crunchy, it takes longer to eat. Anything Reese's makes can be downed in like 20 seconds.

Im almost certain Reeses makes something with nuts and crunch in it.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Pirate on March 27, 2011, 03:42:35 PM
Reeses are in 3-packs in the Great White North. Must be painful to be confined to a two-pack.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Aramatheis on March 27, 2011, 03:48:36 PM
We have a 2 pack and a 4 pack. I could have sworn at one time there were 3 packs....

In Canada, we have packs of 2, 3 or 4. Oddly enough, if you go to a dollar store, you can normally find the 3 and 4 packs for the same price  :-\
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: LieLowTheWantedMan on March 27, 2011, 03:49:22 PM
We have a 2 pack and a 4 pack. I could have sworn at one time there were 3 packs....

In Canada, we have packs of 2, 3 or 4. Oddly enough, if you go to a dollar store, you can normally find the 3 and 4 packs for the same price  :-\
Yeah. :-\
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: pogoowner on March 27, 2011, 03:54:46 PM
Reeses are in 3-packs in the Great White North. Must be painful to be confined to a two-pack.
You can find them in packs of 2, 3, or 4 in the U.S.
Title: Re: Reeses vs. Butterfingers
Post by: Pirate on March 27, 2011, 04:01:39 PM
Yeah but our regular is 3. Whatever, it's a futile argument anyway, I could just buy 2 packs of 2 in the states for the same price we pay for 1 pack of 3 up here.   :yeahright