So basically you're complaining that people don't say "in my opinion" before saying they think something is terrible, which should be implied anyway when you've already established that they view morals as objective. What is this, general music?
The entire basis of your argument hinges on some elusive strawman that has no idea what the words subjective and objective even mean.
This will likely be my last post on the matter (wouldn't want to get banned, now, would I), but I've made my point fairly clear. It is insulting to be repeatedly misrepresented or misunderstood with such consistency. And let's not pull out the dictionary on "subjective" and "objective" again, shan't we?
Since apparently this wasn't your last post on the matter (is it ever when people say this?), I didn't misunderstand your argument at all. The entire foundation of this supposed "contradiction" you've set up is some strawman that says morals are subjective while claiming theirs are objectively right. Anyone who thinks morals are subjective obviously
doesn't think their beliefs are objectively right, and you're just complaining about semantics. This is your argument:
"ICP is rad."
"No they're not, they're terrible."
"But musical taste is subjective."
"Yeah. And ICP is terrible."
"See; you're trying to say your opinion is fact!"