The post funny stuff thread v.insert number here.

[Zydar]

[Lucien]

 

[Zydar]

One of Colin Mochrie's many funny jokes on Whose Line Is It Anyway

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH5oQ05Bs70

[Nekov]

[cramx3]

That is the anti this (stolen from the GIF thread):

[Phoenix87x]

[Orbert]

That is the anti this (stolen from the GIF thread):

  Yep, first thing I thought of, too!


I love the shocking twist in the "eat that pussy" comic. 

[cramx3]

  Yep, first thing I thought of, too!

It's great because they both give the exact same look at the end and that look is classic.

[Ben_Jamin]

Hahaha great batch. Hard to drink my beer while reading this thread.

[Chino]

Maybe it's just the beer, but I can't stop laughing at thing. Nicki Minaj's Anaconda: The Fart Version

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=933_1409205793

[TioJorge]

That gif of the couples:
 

Jesus fucking cunt, that look of utter disdain makes me want to blow them the fuck up with a rocket launcher. That fucking look...it's the reason I probably won't ever be in a relationship again. That kind of bullshit is just...just makes me wanna go all Hannibal on someone. Fuck that shit.  PHEW! Laughter out of complete abhorrence is interesting. SO much said in a single glance. ASL;ETIHAWEPOTUIQH2Y3P598UAWDLFGNAW39846YWQ3PJROTHAPOUIGYH

[hefdaddy42]

Drunk much?

[King Postwhore]

 

What the hell?!

[T-ski]

someone hacked Alabama's football website and change the bio for offensive coordinator Lane Kiffin...

[Orbert]

Ouch!

[hefdaddy42]

Doesn't look hacked to me.

[Genowyn]

Drunk much?

I think this may have something to do with how it's being marketed or a meme. I went by a Starbucks today and a sign said "We have the Pumpkin Spice Latte. We know- we "can't even" either."

[Sacul]

[TioJorge]

  Beautiful.

I thought at first that the picture of the 'safety poster' and the 'never eat alone' guy were the same picture and I was just all, "PERFECT MOMENT IN TIME".

[jammindude]

It makes me feel better that I actually felt bad about laughing so hard at this...

https://www.theonion.com/articles/new-subway-promotion-to-honor-subtember-11,33768/

[TioJorge]

 

It makes me feel better that I laughed at that with no regard for the loss of humanity or the moral implications because I'm striving to become Hell's greatest new leader with a heart for small animals, infants between the ages of 3 - 4 1/2 years old and Pokemon.

[jingle.boy]

Well, you know the old formula ... time + tragedy = comedy.  I guess 13 is the magic number telling us enough time has passed now.

[TioJorge]

I just wish it had a big fat Jared flying towards the sandwiches.

[sneakyblueberry]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TisMsYavFUY

[MetalJunkie]

[Nekov]

[jingle.boy]

You have no idea how great that is.

Math nowadays is f'n retarded.  At least in these here parts, your marks on based on three components.

1 - get the right answer
2 - show your work on how you got the right answer
3 - explain how you did it in words.

Um... re: #3... da fuq?  Since when do you use words to describe math.  We don't use numbers to write essays!  Like, explaining how you got the right answer matters in real life.

"I'm sorry officer, but unless you can explain to me how you came to the result that I was going 25 over the speed limit, I'm not required to pay that ticket".

[rumborak]

I have no problem with describing math in words. Because usually the description in words shows whether the "solver" understood what the fuck he was doing, or just followed a set of rules like an automaton with no understanding.
Shitting on Common Core is such a knee-jerk reaction these days, kinda like ... an automaton.

[Jaffa]

I have no problem with describing math in words. Because usually the description in words shows whether the "solver" understood what the fuck he was doing, or just followed a set of rules like an automaton with no understanding.

Not really.  I don't know about you, but when I was in school, the 'explain your work' portion of the process basically consisted of me writing down the rules and demonstrating how they applied to the problem I had just solved.  It didn't prove that I understood the material; it proved that I had read the textbook.  Which was kind of a stupid process for me, because I really didn't need to read the textbook in order to the understand the material.  Math always came naturally to me.  What ruined it for me was the fact that I constantly had to write out everything just to prove that I wasn't a cheating moron, which created a set of rambling and inefficient steps for a process that should be as simple and precise as possible. 

[Shadow Ninja 2.0]

I'm all for people learning to understand the process, but everything I've seen from this Common Core stuff just seems completely bizarre.

[Lucien]

You have no idea how great that is.

Math nowadays is f'n retarded.  At least in these here parts, your marks on based on three components.

1 - get the right answer
2 - show your work on how you got the right answer
3 - explain how you did it in words.

Um... re: #3... da fuq?  Since when do you use words to describe math.  We don't use numbers to write essays!  Like, explaining how you got the right answer matters in real life.

"I'm sorry officer, but unless you can explain to me how you came to the result that I was going 25 over the speed limit, I'm not required to pay that ticket".

Never had to do 3 in high school, and didn't always have to do 2. 2 was never required, but it generally happened anyways depending on whatever problem we were doing that we couldn't do in our head 

[jammindude]

I seem to remember that #2 was fairly new when I was doing math in school (class of 88 btw).   But what I do remember is that the teacher must have thought even that was retarded, because he would only make us show our work on the first few problems...not *every* one. 

[Orbert]

I always encouraged students to show their work, but if they got the right answer, then they were in the clear.  If the answer was wrong, but they'd shown their work, I could usually grant partial credit if they'd shown that they understood the process but just screwed up on something minor.

Yes, in the real world, getting it right is all that counts, but school isn't the real world.  In school, the idea is to learn the process.  If a problem takes ten steps to solve and you got nine of the steps correct, I have to have some way of differentiating between that and the guy who literally had no idea what to do and left it blank.

[Jaffa]

Isn't the fact that he left it blank a pretty solid indicator that he didn't know what to do? 

[Orbert]

Yes, and he gets zero points for that answer.  Do you also give zero points to the person who got nine of the ten steps correct and clearly knew the process but made a simple mistake somewhere?