Time for a different direction.
In the 80's, Phil Collins' solo career was taking off, while Genesis seemed to be taking more/longer breaks, and their music was also getting simpler. Less prog, more pop. The conclusion most people drew (including myself) was that Phil was leading Genesis into the land of pop music. Compare albums like the self-titled or Invisible Touch to any Gabriel-era album, and there's no question that the prog side was losing out to the pop side.
But... Banks and Rutherford were always first to defend Phil and claim that the band, as a committee, had chosen to strip down the sound and simplify things. I still didn't believe it for a long time. Then I picked up a few Tony Banks solo albums (which no one actually does). Every song on Bankstatement was written by Tony, but it's a collection of pop songs. A few of them have some depth, show a little of Tony's famous knack for cool chord and key changes, but it's not prog at all, and in general it's much more like 80's Genesis than 70's Genesis.
I also picked up a really cool album called Strictly, Inc. While it was meant to be the self-titled album by a new band, it's sometimes filed under Tony Banks, since he's the only recognizable name. Jack Hues (from Wang Chung) is the vocalist. I've always liked his voice. It's mostly "regular" songs in the four-to-six minute range, but with Tony's amazing chords and sounds, and while simple compared to 70's Genesis, each has considerably more depth than "regular" pop songs. Some are about as prog as, say, early Kansas or Styx. Shorter, not too complex, but definitely more going on than what you'd hear on the radio. The album closes with a 17-minute epic which is definitely prog.