But some people really don't understand, and really never will understand.
I don't know, Stads, I don't see anything objectionable in anything that Kyo or M posted there, or anywhere else, especially given the context of what they were responding to.
I don't disagree; I noted that with the reference to "lazy". But that's where it stops, no? A listener need not understand in order to get enjoyment out of the work, and if they don't get enjoyment out of the work, then it is what it is.
I also don't understand 13/27 grooving like 4/4. The drawing point for me with their odd time sigs has always been that they were ODD, and most certainly DIDN'T groove like 4/4, regardless of drummer. ANYONE can groove in 4/4. That's what has always set DT apart. One big difference between them and other complex bands is that they've always had great melody to go along with their, well, oddness.
I think, sort of, we're saying the same thing. Words fail here because we're trying to describe something undescribable. But what I mean isn't "groove" in the same sense of "easy" or "simple"; this isn't that shuffle with brushes you hear at jazz shows. I mean it in the sense of not being distracting. Yeah, there are moments where it's "odd", but there was a cohesiveness to it all that allowed the listener to take from it what they could/wanted, whether it's that rhythm, a vocal melody, a tone, whatever. It's not DT, but "Turn It On Again" by Genesis is a fantastic example of this; it's NOT 4/4, it's 13/8* and it turns around every two bars, but it feels RIGHT. It "grooves". It's not simple; the ear knows something isn't adding up, but it still makes sense. Though Erwinrafael called me out on "examples", I did give another one albeit facetiously (I don't know what time signature "Bird On A Wire" is). Regardless of the time signature or complexity of playing there always seemed to be a tension and resolution. I accept that it's me, and what I'm in tune with, but the new album is almost uncomfortable at times because it seems almost for "odd" for odd's sake. "Hey let's count to 27!". "Why?" "Because we can!"
If someone doesn't agree, that's fine. I'm cool with that, and I get that people perceive music in different ways. But I'm not denigrating the band, belittling them, or anything like that, and none of this is knowledge-based. Me taking additional music theory isn't going to change that.
* That's according to Phil; others have put it at 13/4 (verse/chorus) or 9/4 (intro/bridge).