A few things:
Re: Dublin 10/29/90 -- this was the first show on the Building Empires tour. Setzer is right, anyone can have an off night. I listened to that whole clip of Resistance, and a little bit of Walk in the Shadows and it sounds like the whole band is off a bit at the start, although it could be the quality of the recording. It IS the first time they are playing "Resistance" live, and while rehearsed, flubs can happen. Tate doesn't sound bad, at least to my ears. Not sure what the complaint would be except for a couple of little screeches at the start. And that song, if you're a singer, it's in your head voice and high the entire time. It's actually not an easy song to sing, right off the bat. I saw them do it in 2009, and Tate was having trouble getting high enough to sing it. After the solo he was better, but it's still difficult.
Here was my recording of Tate in 2009 (done on an old digital camera) -
https://youtu.be/qgC0IYqMemUHere is La Torre doing it in 2020 (on my phone) -
https://youtu.be/NT3VypPJcJA>>>>You be the judge. Again, it's totally subjective. Both are not the greatest vocal performances. I prefer Tate when comparing those two videos, personally. And it's not even close. Again, it is not an easy song to sing. It's high the entire time. No breaks. I give La Torre credit for giving it a whirl. I doubt Tate can even get close to his 2009 performance of it today. That is a bitch of a tune. Which is why it was pretty incredible to see QR play it pretty damn well (particularly Tate) every show from October 29, 1990 to January 1992. Tate was just incredible back then.
re: Band's Idaho 2021 performance and "mailing it in." - my response to that is...its a one-off gig and the first time they played live in a year. They probably didn't even rehearse as a band and they are missing their second guitar player. I mean, when I watched the video, I knew what I was going to get before I even clicked on it.
re: QR being a "job." Well, it IS a job. And some of them have jobs outside of QR. Parker, for instance, at least in the last year owned a guitar store in the Seattle area. that may be why he was unavailable. Or it could be something personal. I know some of the others have regular other jobs too. It's different than it used to be. If it starts to seem that way to folks when they go see them and they don't like the vibe, they can choose NOT to go to future shows.
I saw them in 2020 on The Verdict tour for personal reasons. Once it was over, I had made up my mind that I don't need to see them live ever again (I may end up seeing them anyway, but it would be because of other reasons). Nor do I feel the need to see Tate (plugged in) ever again (I'd make an exception if he came around doing all-acoustic, but I'll pass on this current Empire/Rage tour even though there is a local date). Queensryche is a band, but at least in this biographer's opinion (seems weird to say that, but I'm going with it, since a friend called me that the other day - lol), it is more about earning money and maximizing earnings these days. And that's my personal opinion. Creating the albums satisfies the artistic urge, but playing live is all about making bread, not expanding the band's fan base and reach, like it was in the 80s and early 90s when they were young. Think about how old their two remaining original members are. Retirement has to be looming, no?
re: EPICVIEW -- dude, I'm not a mod here to tell you what to do or not to do, just a historian of QR and one of the biggest fans of their original lineup. Many agree that they'd prefer Tate to sing with QR as opposed to Todd. I'm one of them. I feel like Tate has a much richer tone, and while Todd hits higher notes and can really belt out that EP-Rage stuff in a classic power metal fashion, I feel like he struggles with the Mindcrime-PL material because his voice isn't as rich and full as Tate's was/is. That's all subjective and my personal opinion, obviously.
But almost every single one of your posts looks to start that kind of back and forth argument. (Obviously, that was a bit of a dramatic statement, but you know what I mean.) If you want people to take your commentary more seriously, you may want to contribute in a less biased and more helpful way.
re: Stone filling in for Parker -- I love Stone. not his tone, but the dude. He is one of the nicest guys. I met him at various meet and greets over the years. The last time my wife and I met him though, it was his last show before being canned by the Tates. The Pain in the Grass Festival in August 2008 (or was it July). He was in the airport on the way home to Wisconsin, and we said hello and chatted for a few minutes. Slater loved Stoney. Said Stone worked his ass off for the band. So while I'm not really a big fan of his tone, any time I see Stoney up there jammin' on some Ryche, I smile. Good dude.
Overall, at this point in Queensryche's history, people who are still fans should just be thankful. It's not easy to keep afloat. And after 40 years, they keep on keeping on. There's something to be said for that, even if you're not as happy with some of what they do, or the people in the group.