I know I've mentioned this before but I'll say it again: Just like Judas Priest made Painkiller for the people who wanted an album where every song was a "Freewheel Burning", and DT did much the same with Train of Though being nearly 70 min of non-stop "Pull Me Unders", Symphony X made Paradise Lost so they could have an album where every song was a supercharged symphonic thrash fest a la "Sins and Shadows" or "Smoke and Mirrors". So when people bad mouth PL, it's basically the same as when people hate on Painkiller or TOT: "Why does it have to be so METAL?!?!" Ummmm.... maybe because they are a metal band, and many metal bands at one point or another do an album that is just pure adrenaline from top to bottom. There is nothing wrong with it, just another side of the band. And it is rarely something that becomes the norm for every successive album. Even Slayer didn't try to out-metal Reign In Blood. Also, for better or worse, it is songs like "Sins and Shadows" that people know Symphony X for, just like when most people hear the name Dream Theater, odds are the first song that pops into their head is not gonna be "Anna Lee" or "Space Dye-Vest". It's gonna be "Pull Me Under", "Metropolis", "Take the Time", "Lie" or, for younger fans, something like "As I Am" or "Panic Attack". So it is perfectly natural that Symphony X would want to do a pure metal album at least once in their career. I don't see what the problem is with that. PL isn't my favorite SX album; V is, but I still think that PL is great in the same way the above mentioned Pure-Metal albums are. It is what it is. If you don't like it, don't listen to it, but understand that is your personal taste, not some indication that the album is fundamentally flawed just because it isn't as proggy or has less ballads then the previous ones.