The only thing S&A has going for it is that it sounds great. But it has the be the most uninteresting album they've ever made. And to me, the whole Neil Peart is a great lyricist jumped the shark with me on this. Yeah, he writes the bands lyrics and a lot of them are really interesting. OK. You can stop shoving that down my throat now. S&A literally feels like they wrote the music around the lyrics. There's really just nothing going on with this album.
The Larger Bowl isn't any good? It's neat how he built that lyric on a pantoum (a type of lyrical poem). I agree that not all the record is A+ lyrically, but there are some bright spots.
The Larger Bowl is the perfect example. Here's some lyrics and let's form some music around it. I don't care if it's The Gettysburg Address. If the music sucks, what the hell good are the lyrics?
Yep. Great lyrics can make a good song great, and crappy lyrics can make a great song good (or worse), but great lyrics can't make a bad/mediocre song good. That said, I don't think the lyrics to the Larger Bowl are at all interesting. It's a lot of the same lines repeated over and over and over.
And, by the way, I'm almost positive that most, if not all, 21st century Rush songs were created by taking lyrics that Neil had written independently of the music and trying to fit them into music that Geddy and Alex had written (as opposed to writing the music and then writing lyrics to fit it or taking existing lyrics and writing music around them).
Can't imagine thinking "Hmm, do I want to listen to S&A, or Roll The Bones?" and going "Roll The Bones it is!"
That's just crazy talk. Roll The Bones is good stuff.
I saw them on that tour, it was incredible! The album is great.
I saw the tour twice and it was jaw-dropping. The album, on the other hand...
Fo shizzle. The best thing about the tour was that only 5 of the 20+ songs were from RTB, and one was the instrumental (on the other hand, they never played the best song from the album).