I guess if there's one positive thing I can say about this album it's that I haven't heard anything cringworthy yet. I'm not even sure I've heard the whole thing though. I've never been the biggest fan of acoustic songs (ironically the only Nirvana song I like is an acoustic cover song) but if written more upbeat, they can be really great. If Thank you aiMe had different drums I'd definitely like it more. As is it just sounds like the rest of them. Definitely better than Lana Del Rey, but still so boring. I suppose she'll never go back to the fun pure pop of 1989, but I wish she'd write catchy tunes again. Blue balls, and "what was that?" and "oh my god this is awful!" and "where's the hook?" and "why is this a song?" are all it is for me with Taylor Swift anymore.
Weather Systems and Distant Satellites are how you write this type of music. I don't mind slower music. Not everything has to be upbeat or fast or balls and chunk for me. I think Taylor Swift has lost the plot and really needs to take a break and regroup. Take a few years off, and really let the creative juices build up. She writes so many damn songs that they all sound the same, and of course my opinion is subjective and a minority one, but that's how I feel.
If we're all still here in 2 years, I'll let you all know how much my wife is torturing me with the newest Taylor Swift album. Or maybe she'll actually do something different for a change. Both my wife in listening to something else and Taylor for writing music I actually enjoy.
I don't know; I respect your opinion and you like what you like, for sure. You owe no one any apologies for that.
But that line in the bold is sort of the one that sticks with me. I don't THINK you meant it this way, but it READS as if she's doing this for you (or for any fan). And I don't get that sense at all. I think, in the way the greatest artists (like Bruce, Dylan, and Neil Young) do, she's not doing this for you. She's doing this for HER. If she zigs for one, two or three albums before she feels the urge to zag again, so be it. I mentioned Neil, this overall conversation sounds so much like the "Wow, except for Harvest, Neil Young blows" argument. 40 years later, now that we know what the impetus was, "Tonight's The Night" is still a harrowing, desolate listen, but it has CONTEXT and it's art in it's truest form.
I think Kevin said it already, but the reality is, this is only the second or so record that sounds like this. Radiohead has made the same (IMO) shitty (IMO) record since 2000. (The point being, I'm not immersed in Radiohead, I'm not invested in them, and I don't care for what little I hear, so for me it's "all the same").