Look, here is what I think: your position that pedophilia is a genuine sexuality that should be respected is wrong. And here is why I say that. There is more to a real sexuality than who you want to diddle. Heterosexuals want to be in relationships with other heterosexuals, not just have sex with them. Homosexuals want to be in relationships with other homosexuals, not just have sex with them (hence the push to legalize gay marriage). Pedophilia is not like that. There is no real relationship to be had between a pedophile and the object of his passion (much like necrophilia, or treeophilia, or whatever else there is out there). There is no give and take - there is only take, and that taking involves more than just physicality, but also a sense of authority and borders and all kinds of other things. In a way, seeking to equate pedophilia with an actual sexuality is a slap in the face to all the strides that have been made in the area of gay rights over the last 25 years. And please, I don't want to hear anymore about thoughts, or your so-called majority of pedophiles that haven't actually touched a child. They haven't touched one yet, or they haven't been caught. If they have child porn, then a child was violated in the making of that porn, so their possession is a party to it. I have never heard of a case of a pedophile only being caught with child porn art or cartoons. But even if they were, that is still an indication of an unnatural sexual leaning, like I mentioned above.
Frankly, the most disturbing thing about your point of view is your age.
Now, if none of that makes a dent in your thinking, then we probably really are done with this discussion, because neither of us will budge from our viewpoints. But please, either way, enough of the "you don't understand what I'm saying" comments. Because yes, I do, and I'm sure that everyone else does, too. And no, people don't think about murder all the time.