News:

Dream Theater Forums:  Biggest Dream Theater online community since 2007.

Main Menu

The setlist so far... (DT-Side Tour Thread)

Started by ImNewDontKillMe, January 19, 2014, 06:09:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CodyWanKenobi

Quote from: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on January 22, 2014, 04:20:42 PM
For a band like Dream Theater, that's not really about "stage presence" anyway, I think that makes a lot of sense.
I think Helicopter James would like to have a word with you.

:lol
My latest concept album "IV: Timber" IS OUT NOW!
linktree = STARCOMMANDStudios

?

Quote from: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on January 22, 2014, 04:20:42 PM
For a band like Dream Theater, that's not really about "stage presence" anyway, I think that makes a lot of sense.
Yeah, but wouldn't it be awesome if James started doing the court jester dance and aerobics on stage again? :D

Shadow Ninja 2.0


wolven74

I think the set list is pretty well rounded, but also odd. What is the point of writing your own intro music if you're not playing it? Why use an intro tape? I haven't seen the show, so how does that work? Are they not playing FAS or the easter egg? ???

BlobVanDam

Quote from: wolven74 on January 22, 2014, 10:22:18 PM
I think the set list is pretty well rounded, but also odd. What is the point of writing your own intro music if you're not playing it? Why use an intro tape? I haven't seen the show, so how does that work? Are they not playing FAS or the easter egg? ???

It was written to fit as intro music for the show, not ever intended to be something they played as far as I know.
It takes the role of music they've used for the intro (and video) in the past that for copyright reasons haven't been able to include on their DVD releases. It's there to build up for the audience before the curtain drops and the band starts playing, like an overture of sorts. If the band were to play it live, they'd still need a song before it for that role, which would kind of defeat the purpose.
I haven't seen clips of it, but from what I've read, it sounds like the easter egg is used like "credits" music, to give the show a more theatrical closing, which I think is a nice idea.

erwinrafael

Quote from: wolven74 on January 22, 2014, 10:22:18 PM
I think the set list is pretty well rounded, but also odd. What is the point of writing your own intro music if you're not playing it? Why use an intro tape? I haven't seen the show, so how does that work? Are they not playing FAS or the easter egg? ???

I don't think that intro music is meant to be played live. it is meant as an entrance music, like the music played when a boxer enters the ring. :p


The Stray Seed



wasteland

Again, I'm not getting this pissed-off face thing about James. He was smiling all the time in Florence, and TSSeed can confirm this.  :|

wolfking

I think people need to give the guy a bit of a break.


Zydar

Probably removed due to copyright with the video visuals.

cramx3

Will FAS join the very small list of songs DT has never played live if in fact it was never meant to be played live?


Perpetual Change

#120
Quote from: OctavariumElite on January 23, 2014, 05:45:14 AM
Here it is, enjoy :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9oK6MQPBdw

Max

Thanks dude. It's definitely good to hear JLB get it done like that.

He sounds like he's working his tail off to do it, too, though.

mikeyd23


mikeyd23

Quote from: DarkLord_Lalinc on January 22, 2014, 06:04:04 PM
Quote from: erwinrafael on January 22, 2014, 05:50:15 PM
I think not having a rotating setlist makes sense in this age where concerts have become a full multi-media experience with snchronicity in the lights, backing tracks and videos. It would be hell for any production to have rotating setlists in a tour especially with a multimedia setup as elaborate as DT.
I agree completely. The rotating setlist thing (as awesome and as was hard for the band to pull off) was far more likely back when DT's stage setup wasn't 50% of what it is today. I like Rudess' interpretation of things, saying that they feel that this show is like a theater play. People know what they're gonna get, but they're gonna get an incredibly rehearsed and solid version of what they know is coming to them. Their times, video cues, lightning cues, etc. are far more precise now that they're playing to a click track and a constant set, and these elements make this show the most professional they've put out so far.

Great post, totally agree with everything you said!

cyberdrummer

Quote from: cramx3 on January 23, 2014, 04:08:09 AM
Will FAS join the very small list of songs DT has never played live if in fact it was never meant to be played live?

Until the Boston show perhaps?

Elite

Quote from: bosk1 on January 21, 2014, 04:29:36 PM
Scarred is a bit of an oddball choice to me since (1) it has been played fairly recently, (2) JP has said he doesn't think it gets a good crowd response, and (3) it is long and takes up a lot of set time.  Either somebody in the band really likes it, or they felt the flow of having it in there really worked.

James LaBrie once stated in an interview that Scarred is one of his favourite songs to play live, so that could indeed be the case.
Quote from: Lolzeez on November 18, 2013, 01:23:32 PMHey dude slow the fuck down so we can finish together at the same time.  :biggrin:
Quote from: home on May 09, 2017, 04:05:10 PMSqu
scRa are the resultaten of sound nog bring propey

Laughingplace56

Quote from: cyberdrummer on January 23, 2014, 06:58:30 AM
Quote from: cramx3 on January 23, 2014, 04:08:09 AM
Will FAS join the very small list of songs DT has never played live if in fact it was never meant to be played live?

Until the Boston show perhaps?
I have no doubt  they 'll open the second set with the orchestra playing that song. It'd be such a waste for them not too. But with the full band? I hope so.

Setlist Scotty

Quote from: DarkLord_Lalinc on January 22, 2014, 06:04:04 PM
Quote from: erwinrafael on January 22, 2014, 05:50:15 PM
I think not having a rotating setlist makes sense in this age where concerts have become a full multi-media experience with snchronicity in the lights, backing tracks and videos. It would be hell for any production to have rotating setlists in a tour especially with a multimedia setup as elaborate as DT.
I agree completely. The rotating setlist thing (as awesome and as was hard for the band to pull off) was far more likely back when DT's stage setup wasn't 50% of what it is today. I like Rudess' interpretation of things, saying that they feel that this show is like a theater play. People know what they're gonna get, but they're gonna get an incredibly rehearsed and solid version of what they know is coming to them. Their times, video cues, lightning cues, etc. are far more precise now that they're playing to a click track and a constant set, and these elements make this show the most professional they've put out so far.
I beg to differ regarding the stage set up (lighting and video) being a problem with rotating setlists. With everything being computerized these days (aside from the individual spotlight cues), it wouldn't take any more effort for those responsible to put the correct songs/settings in order than it did for JR to do so with his keyboard rig. Regarding being well-rehearsed, that is true, but it can also cause the band to fall into a routine leading to performances on autopilot, whereas rotating setlists keep them on their toes.

While I loved the rotating setlists, I can understand why the band may opt not to do them so much. However, I do think that at least having an "A" and "B" setlist to switch out from night to night is still a fair compromise. I don't have a problem with the current setlist at all, but I think it would be nice for them to perform the Awake block of songs one night, and the SFaM the other night, besides rotating a couple of the new songs and one other older one.
Quote from: BlobVanDam on November 13, 2015, 07:37:14 PMAs a basic rule, if you hate it, you must solely blame Portnoy. If it's good, then you must downplay MP's contribution to the band as not being important anyway, or claim he's just lying. It's the DTF way.
Quote from: TAC on July 10, 2024, 08:26:41 AMPOW is awesome! :P

The Stray Seed

Quote from: wasteland on January 23, 2014, 03:53:44 AM
Again, I'm not getting this pissed-off face thing about James. He was smiling all the time in Florence, and TSSeed can confirm this.  :|

And I do!!! He was definitely happy and self confident =) Also, he was wearing a supercool black coat he borrowed from Neo!!!

serrano

Great performance! He seems to be able to nail it now.

cramx3

Quote from: Elite on January 23, 2014, 07:03:11 AM
Quote from: bosk1 on January 21, 2014, 04:29:36 PM
Scarred is a bit of an oddball choice to me since (1) it has been played fairly recently, (2) JP has said he doesn't think it gets a good crowd response, and (3) it is long and takes up a lot of set time.  Either somebody in the band really likes it, or they felt the flow of having it in there really worked.

James LaBrie once stated in an interview that Scarred is one of his favourite songs to play live, so that could indeed be the case.

And well it is set up that they are doing the second half of Awake in order so skipping Scarred would seem odd.

wolfking

Quote from: mikeyd23 on January 23, 2014, 06:25:58 AM
Quote from: OctavariumElite on January 23, 2014, 05:45:14 AM
Here it is, enjoy :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9oK6MQPBdw

Max

Yeah thanks man, that was a real solid performance from James!

Yeah, this is pretty good.  JP still has a few parts to iron out though.

TAC

Quote from: wkiml on June 08, 2012, 09:06:35 AMwould have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Quote from: Stadler on February 08, 2025, 12:49:43 PMI wouldn't argue this.

Perpetual Change

I'm all for giving him a break, but for me, I think it's more like, give him a break in the writing department. He obviously struggles with those really high parts, like in Illumination Theory. Even when he nails it, he looks like he's working so hard for it, I wonder if it's healthy for him to be singing that way? I am just a bit worried that he might blow out his voice again. And, at the risk of being a little overly critical, right from the very beginning DT vocal melodies relied way too much on those soaring moments to make an impact. Around Scenes and Six Degrees they got away from that, but it seems like lately they're veering back.

James doesn't need to hit an F#5 or G5 to make the melody impactful, in my opinion. If the lyrics and melody need to go the powerhouse route to work, and it's going to be a constant struggle for James to sing it right, then maybe it's the wrong melody for James? I think fans would be willing to accept that soaring vocals are just not part of the DT sound anymore, and would be cool with it. The fact James sings a different, more limited but just as impactful way on his solo records is pretty telling, too. I'd love to see JP go more in that direction with James, if he's gonna continue as the primary songwriter.

Sycsa

For me, hearing the "Mothers for their children" section on DT12 was an incredible experience and an extremely pleasant surprise. I did not expect to hear anything like that after ADTOE, which I perceived to be too safe and uninteresting at places, from a JLB viewpoint (otherwise it's a prime album). I understand and expect that they would tone things down, but damn, those powerhouse moments send shivers down my spine. I'm confident that his technique is refined enough at this point that he isn't putting his voice in harm's way.

Tis BOOLsheet

Quote from: Perpetual Change on January 23, 2014, 03:40:26 PM
I'm all for giving him a break, but for me, I think it's more like, give him a break in the writing department. He obviously struggles with those really high parts, like in Illumination Theory. Even when he nails it, he looks like he's working so hard for it, I wonder if it's healthy for him to be singing that way? I am just a bit worried that he might blow out his voice again. And, at the risk of being a little overly critical, right from the very beginning DT vocal melodies relied way too much on those soaring moments to make an impact. Around Scenes and Six Degrees they got away from that, but it seems like lately they're veering back.

James doesn't need to hit an F#5 or G5 to make the melody impactful, in my opinion. If the lyrics and melody need to go the powerhouse route to work, and it's going to be a constant struggle for James to sing it right, then maybe it's the wrong melody for James? I think fans would be willing to accept that soaring vocals are just not part of the DT sound anymore, and would be cool with it. The fact James sings a different, more limited but just as impactful way on his solo records is pretty telling, too. I'd love to see JP go more in that direction with James, if he's gonna continue as the primary songwriter.

I can't say I agree that if the band has a vision for a melody over their song that they should scrap it in order to give a guy a "break." I don't believe the vocal lines they prescribe are unreasonable. At all.

That is not what artists do. They don't change their vision because they think "well, this guy's having some problems doing this; maybe we should give him a break."  If someone writes a song and brings in somebody to play or sing what he's written and it isn't working out, does he say "well, maybe I should change it because this isn't the part for him"?

They aren't asking him to paint the Sistine Chapel perfectly every night. They're asking him to sing simple melodies that they believe are within his capabilities. They obviously ARE within his capabilities, otherwise they wouldn't be on the album. Plus, I think that last link was pretty decent except the outro. That last part of IT is a fantastic and powerful moment. That is what DT envisioned when they wrote it. I think JLB totally delivered it on the album. It's probably one of his best moments EVER in my opinion. DT should not have settled for less.


Shadow Ninja 2.0

So, if, hypothetically speaking, their "vision" was for JLB to sing melodies extremely far from his comfortable range, that would probably adversely affect his voice in the process, he should just man up and deal with it?

Also, a lot of the stuff he sings can't really be characterized as "simple".

Tis BOOLsheet

Quote from: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on January 23, 2014, 04:45:40 PM
So, if, hypothetically speaking, their "vision" was for JLB to sing melodies extremely far from his comfortable range, that would probably adversely affect his voice in the process, he should just man up and deal with it?

Also, a lot of the stuff he sings can't really be characterized as "simple".

What is the point of that hypothetical? Has that ever happened? No. Will that ever happen? No.

If DT wanted those melodies in a totally different range they would have gone with a different vocalist, or have gotten a new one.

Shadow Ninja 2.0

The point of the hypothetical is that, at James' age, it is entirely possible that the super high stuff is going to take a serious toll on him.

Tis BOOLsheet

Quote from: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on January 23, 2014, 04:51:29 PM
The point of the hypothetical is that, at James' age, it is entirely possible that the super high stuff is going to take a serious toll on him.

So if the notes are so high that it's likely to produce physical damage to him, why doesn't he sing it down an octave?

Shadow Ninja 2.0

Wait, so you're okay with that? That seems to clearly conflict with this.
Quote from: Tis BOOLsheet on January 23, 2014, 04:43:01 PM
I can't say I agree that if the band has a vision for a melody over their song that they should scrap it in order to give a guy a "break." I don't believe the vocal lines they prescribe are unreasonable. At all.