News:

Welcome back, Mike Portnoy!

Main Menu

In the Name of God

Started by Evatallica, June 13, 2012, 02:43:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Another_Won

Quote from: bosk1 on June 14, 2012, 09:11:41 AM
Great song.  It doesn't make my DT top 10, but it's still great.  The 3-song run of Vacant->Stream of Consciousness->In The Name Of God is amazing.

Wasn't there a thread for best 3-song runs?

Scorpion

If there was, then I guess that this won by a landslide. The only one that I think comes close is LSOAD -> Scarred -> SDV.

Elite

Quote from: Scorpion on June 14, 2012, 12:56:51 PM
If there was, then I guess that this won by a landslide. The only one that I think comes close is LSOAD -> Scarred -> SDV.

No, that one surpasses the final tracks of ToT by miles.
Quote from: Lolzeez on November 18, 2013, 01:23:32 PMHey dude slow the fuck down so we can finish together at the same time.  :biggrin:
Quote from: home on May 09, 2017, 04:05:10 PMSqu
scRa are the resultaten of sound nog bring propey

Scorpion

By inches, maybe. Not by miles.

bosk1

Quote from: Scorpion on June 14, 2012, 12:56:51 PM
If there was, then I guess that this won by a landslide. The only one that I think comes close is LSOAD -> Scarred -> SDV.

I think all the AMBI fanboys would take issue with that.

theseoafs

IMO, quite a bit is wrong with this song. My main problem with it is that it's very unimaginative, which is a shame since TOT is full of really good, really creative songs.

GasparXR

I think it's the best song on TOT, and is in my top 10 definitely, probably around #5 or #6. Even though there's a handful of songs I like better, it's not by a whole lot. It's a damn great song. I really enjoy both the album ending and the LaB ending, although that's usually the case with songs that end differently live. (ie. Scarred, A Change of Seasons [the last guitar part is usually omitted], The Ministry of Lost Souls, Take the Time, Learning to Live, TROAE on this most recent tour)

Scorpion

Quote from: bosk1 on June 14, 2012, 01:18:59 PM
Quote from: Scorpion on June 14, 2012, 12:56:51 PM
If there was, then I guess that this won by a landslide. The only one that I think comes close is LSOAD -> Scarred -> SDV.

I think all the AMBI fanboys would take issue with that.

True, I didn't think of that. Going back now, it completely fits the bill but I had somehow managed to interpret it in a way that only the last three songs of an album would count. Stupid me.  :facepalm:

Estiui

Quote from: OsMosis2259 on June 14, 2012, 08:18:00 AM
First DT song I heard that made me a fan  :metal

Same here too. Top 5 for me.

SystematicThought

Quote from: theseoafs on June 14, 2012, 01:28:46 PM
IMO, quite a bit is wrong with this song. My main problem with it is that it's very unimaginative, which is a shame since TOT is full of really good, really creative songs.
The Morse Code section is not unimaginative... once the message is decoded it is...  :P

Scorpion

#45
theseoafs, could you explain what you consider to be unimaginative in this song? I'm not trying to ridicule your opinion or anything, but if I had to describe ITNOG, then unimaginitive would definitely not be on the list.

theseoafs

Quote from: Scorpion on June 17, 2012, 03:20:23 AM
theseoafs, could you explain what you consider to be unimaginative in this song? I'm not trying to ridicule your opinion or anything, but if I had to describe ITNOG, then unimaginitive would definitely be on the list.

It's hard to say what I find unimaginative about the song, because everything is. Notable offenders include: the fact that the majority of the song is based off a really obvious, plodding 4/4 riff in that Indian mode every metal band uses; the fact that Rudess is playing, more often than not, exactly what Petrucci is playing; and the fact that it's one of DT's safest, most evidently prog-by-numbers songs.

Scorpion

Hmmmm... I get where you're coming from, but it doesn't really bother me, tbh, because it all fits the tone of the song, I think, and I like the song, therefore wouldn't necessarily use negative words such as "unimaginative" when describing it. However, after taking a more thourough look at the sond, I can understand why people who don't like it consider it unimaginative.  :tup

GasparXR

Quote from: theseoafs on June 19, 2012, 05:48:25 PM
Quote from: Scorpion on June 17, 2012, 03:20:23 AM
theseoafs, could you explain what you consider to be unimaginative in this song? I'm not trying to ridicule your opinion or anything, but if I had to describe ITNOG, then unimaginitive would definitely be on the list.

It's hard to say what I find unimaginative about the song, because everything is. Notable offenders include: the fact that the majority of the song is based off a really obvious, plodding 4/4 riff in that Indian mode every metal band uses; the fact that Rudess is playing, more often than not, exactly what Petrucci is playing; and the fact that it's one of DT's safest, most evidently prog-by-numbers songs.

The majority of the song is not in 4/4. Every chorus and all the pre-choruses, the second verse, and the entire end of the song following the last chorus, is in 6/8.

Scorpion

It isn't?  :lol I didn't even check before answering theseoafs.

theseoafs

Quote from: GasparXR on June 20, 2012, 08:45:01 AM
Quote from: theseoafs on June 19, 2012, 05:48:25 PM
Quote from: Scorpion on June 17, 2012, 03:20:23 AM
theseoafs, could you explain what you consider to be unimaginative in this song? I'm not trying to ridicule your opinion or anything, but if I had to describe ITNOG, then unimaginitive would definitely be on the list.

It's hard to say what I find unimaginative about the song, because everything is. Notable offenders include: the fact that the majority of the song is based off a really obvious, plodding 4/4 riff in that Indian mode every metal band uses; the fact that Rudess is playing, more often than not, exactly what Petrucci is playing; and the fact that it's one of DT's safest, most evidently prog-by-numbers songs.

The majority of the song is not in 4/4. Every chorus and all the pre-choruses, the second verse, and the entire end of the song following the last chorus, is in 6/8.

I'm not going to check because I don't care but what I meant is that the song's "main riff" is in 4/4. Even if it's not necessarily the majority, a huge fraction of the song of the song is in 4/4, including the entire introduction and first verse, as well as the bridge and instrumental section.

GasparXR

Quote from: theseoafs on June 20, 2012, 09:47:16 AM
Quote from: GasparXR on June 20, 2012, 08:45:01 AM
Quote from: theseoafs on June 19, 2012, 05:48:25 PM
Quote from: Scorpion on June 17, 2012, 03:20:23 AM
theseoafs, could you explain what you consider to be unimaginative in this song? I'm not trying to ridicule your opinion or anything, but if I had to describe ITNOG, then unimaginitive would definitely be on the list.

It's hard to say what I find unimaginative about the song, because everything is. Notable offenders include: the fact that the majority of the song is based off a really obvious, plodding 4/4 riff in that Indian mode every metal band uses; the fact that Rudess is playing, more often than not, exactly what Petrucci is playing; and the fact that it's one of DT's safest, most evidently prog-by-numbers songs.

The majority of the song is not in 4/4. Every chorus and all the pre-choruses, the second verse, and the entire end of the song following the last chorus, is in 6/8.

I'm not going to check because I don't care but what I meant is that the song's "main riff" is in 4/4. Even if it's not necessarily the majority, a huge fraction of the song of the song is in 4/4, including the entire introduction and first verse, as well as the bridge and instrumental section.

Yes. But some of the instrumental section isn't in 4/4. I'm not sure what the changes are, but they're not straight counting for sure :P

theseoafs

Basically, what I'm saying is "you know what I meant". :tup

GasparXR

Quote from: theseoafs on June 20, 2012, 10:45:34 AM
Basically, what I'm saying is "you know what I meant". :tup

Hahaha yeah I know what you meant XD I'm just a smartass.

comment

Quote from: Scorpion on June 14, 2012, 12:37:40 PM
OtBoE, you're personal text had me laughing for like a minute, especially in combination with your avatar.

:lol

Yeah, they arranged Vacant, Stream of Cons and ITNOG just right on this album.   

IMO, ITNOG's one of DT's most powerful songs.  It makes me think about tolerance, reasonableness and the excessive use of Patriot Missles.  :biggrin:  JP's and JR's solos and unison playing in this song is some of their best work.  I don't care for the battle hymn of the republic fade out either.