Hahaha. I complained. I wasn't going to - I hate being the nobcheese who tells the BBC how to run their TV station. But then Charlie Brooker, Simon Pegg and the showrunner for Ashes to Ashes all complained, and I thought "hey, tell you what, this isn't just me being facetious - let's burn this fugger down."
I'm currently checking out some the older stuff, a friend of mine recommended a few good serials for each of the doctors. Interesting stuff, seeing the origins of the show.
This completely undermines my Doctor Who credentials, but I really struggle to get excited about the old stuff. I mean there are some cracking ideas, but it's all a bit half-formed. I had a look at The Caves of Androzani, which is meant to be the best Doctor Who story by fan opinion, and while I liked it, I couldn't say I was hugely engaged. I wasn't thinking "damn, I really can't wait to see what happens next" - which is a feeling I get each
minute with the revived run. Even in the patchier stories in the current run, I feel like I care a lot more about the characters. Plus, the plot feels tighter, and littered with revelations. You don't really get them in the slower building older stories.
Caves, while I liked it, struck me as mainly being army blokes strategically running through a catacomb. Sharaz Jek was kinda cool, but again, not a particularly staggering villain.
That said, I recently started The Talons of Weng-Chiang and quite liked it.
I dunno. Maybe I'm just not "of its time." I'll keep trying. And it's still a fairly cool show. But the old stuff doesn't make me feel feelings.