Author Topic: Another Amazing Winter Rose Bootleg "Winter Rose In The Dream"  (Read 4114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeRoX

  • DTF.org Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2439
  • Gender: Male
  • The VoiceMaster
Another Amazing Winter Rose Bootleg "Winter Rose In The Dream"
« on: October 30, 2009, 09:52:46 AM »


Release Date : 1996
Type: 1 CD
Total Time: 71:00


Track List

(BBC radio1 session 01/95, A)
1-Caught In A Web
2-Lifting Shadows Off A Dream
3-6:00

(Audition John Arch 1991, C)

4-The Killing Hand
5-Only A Matter Of Time (extrait)
6-Don't Look Past Me

(John Arch 1991, C/D)

7-A Fortune In Lies
8-An Unknown Song

(demo Winter Rose 89, C)
9-My Time
10-Never Let Me Go
11-Never Fall In Love Again
12-Saved By Love
13-Can't Talk To Me

(Editing and Mixing)

14-Lie (edit)
15-Status Seeker (remix by Terry Brown, A)
Quote from: Plasmastrike
SeRoX is right!
Quote from: Nihil-Morari
SeRoX is DTF's JLB!
As usual, SeRoX is correct.

Offline BlobVanDam

  • Future Boy
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 38940
  • Gender: Male
  • Transform and rock out!
Re: Another Amazing Winter Rose Bootleg "Winter Rose In The Dream"
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2009, 11:05:14 AM »
Damn. Only a third of this is actually Winter Rose. The rest I couldn't care less about.

But I wonder if the Winter Rose songs are any different to what I have. It says 89, but wouldn't those demos have been much earlier, like around 86?
Only King could mis-spell a LETTER.
Yep. I think the only party in the MP/DT situation that hasn't moved on is DTF.

Offline Perpetual Change

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 12264
Re: Another Amazing Winter Rose Bootleg "Winter Rose In The Dream"
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2009, 05:43:15 PM »
Can we share?

Offline lutima

  • Posts: 239
  • Gender: Female
Re: Another Amazing Winter Rose Bootleg "Winter Rose In The Dream"
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 01:38:11 AM »
Damn. Only a third of this is actually Winter Rose. The rest I couldn't care less about.

But I wonder if the Winter Rose songs are any different to what I have. It says 89, but wouldn't those demos have been much earlier, like around 86?

I don't think so, they are more likely to be from 89.