I got into Kansas because of LudwigVan, but I am very conflicted about this.
On one hand, I applaud Kansas for trotting out Leftoverture for fans who never got to see it, but still are supporting their new music (The Prelude Implicit) on the tour as well. It seems like they understand, more than some other bands, the importance of noting important musical anniversaries, and still staying relevant by putting an emphasis on newer material as well.
On the other hand, I've been really hesitant to give Kansas post-Livgren, and now, post-Walsh any listens. It makes me a bit hypocritical to say that, as I pushed really hard when Queensryche lost DeGarmo, and then lost Tate, to embrace the newer lineups. But as time has gone on, I've realized that it really isn't the same band, and I enjoy it much, much less. So I don't really want to give a Walsh and Livgren-less Kansas a shot, even if I do know that Ronnie Platt fronting them makes them a better live act.
I have three opportunities in September to see them, in cities fairly close to me (they played a year or two ago two blocks from my office, but I didn't go). Part of me wants to, but the other part just doesn't.
It'd be like going to see Dream Theater perform Images and Words without JP and JLB. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I'm not hating on Kansas' decision to do what they are doing. I just don't know if I could enjoy it as much as I would like to. I love Livgren era Kansas, and bought the special edition Miracles Out of Nowhere package from the band when it came out. Sure there are classic members still in the band (Rich and Phil) and longtime guys like Billy and David. But I just don't know.
Gah.
I probably should have seen them when Walsh was still in the band, and I just didn't do it.