Author Topic: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?  (Read 1143 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gzarruk

  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #35 on: September 01, 2017, 10:31:05 PM »
A version of Dream Theater, but with different/younger members? Where have I seen that before?  :justjen *Looks at MP Shattered Fortress*  :lol

Now, seriously, I have no problem with new people replacing the current members, one by one, after they leave, retire or whatever. That's happened with many bands through the years (Megadeth, Stratovarius, Yes, etc). IMO, as long as the band leader/main writer remains, it's no big deal, really.

In the case of DT, like some have already said, Petrucci is (and has always been, no matter what people say about MP) clearly the leader and main songwriter there. As long as there's JP in DT, the band can carry on with different members (of course, the quality should still be up to the DT standards), and it would work just fine.

Take JM, for example, it would suck to see him leave, but aqfter some time has passed, it would't be such a big deal, and he's still one of the two DT members, along with JP, who don't get some/a lot of criticism for their style (JLB, JR and MM usually do).

As I've previously said on a couple other threads, I see James leaving (or being asked to leave) because of his voice limitations in a couple years. Same with Jordan, he'll probably retire after a couple more album cycles due to his age. Should DT continue without them? Sure. As long as the band keeps JP and continues to make great music, I'm in  :metal
"I believe the sacrifices in life give more than they take"

Offline Drinktheater

  • Posts: 53
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #36 on: September 02, 2017, 06:05:47 AM »

Interesting Dream Theater album  "Beyond this life!"

Offline |KirK|

  • DT Addicted
  • Posts: 67
  • Gender: Male
  • Seize The Day
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2017, 01:54:26 AM »
A version of Dream Theater, but with different/younger members? Where have I seen that before?  :justjen *Looks at MP Shattered Fortress*  :lol

Now, seriously, I have no problem with new people replacing the current members, one by one, after they leave, retire or whatever. That's happened with many bands through the years (Megadeth, Stratovarius, Yes, etc). IMO, as long as the band leader/main writer remains, it's no big deal, really.

In the case of DT, like some have already said, Petrucci is (and has always been, no matter what people say about MP) clearly the leader and main songwriter there. As long as there's JP in DT, the band can carry on with different members (of course, the quality should still be up to the DT standards), and it would work just fine.

Take JM, for example, it would suck to see him leave, but aqfter some time has passed, it would't be such a big deal, and he's still one of the two DT members, along with JP, who don't get some/a lot of criticism for their style (JLB, JR and MM usually do).

As I've previously said on a couple other threads, I see James leaving (or being asked to leave) because of his voice limitations in a couple years. Same with Jordan, he'll probably retire after a couple more album cycles due to his age. Should DT continue without them? Sure. As long as the band keeps JP and continues to make great music, I'm in  :metal
James leaving in a couple years?! I'm not ready for this... :omg: Do you really think he'll be quitting in a few years?!

Offline gzarruk

  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2017, 06:58:22 AM »
James leaving in a couple years?! I'm not ready for this... :omg: Do you really think he'll be quitting in a few years?!

Well, of course there's really no way to know if this is going to happen or not. Maybe James gets his voice in much better shape in the next couple years and stays in the band for the rest of their career. However, judging by his recent (2016-2017) live performances, he seems to be struggling a lot to keep up with the songs (both old and new), so I think there's a strong chance of him being replaced sometime in the not-so-distant future. Just my thoughts, though.
"I believe the sacrifices in life give more than they take"

Offline |KirK|

  • DT Addicted
  • Posts: 67
  • Gender: Male
  • Seize The Day
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #39 on: September 12, 2017, 08:08:59 AM »
Performing I&W every evening in its entirety has not been the best choice for his voice. Of course I appreciated it so much, but just a couple of songs here and there from those years would be OK as well!!!

Offline Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 9040
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #40 on: September 12, 2017, 08:57:39 AM »
To answer the OP, anything is possible.    Yes, technically, has no original members.   

The statement that "Petrucci is irreplaceable" is just opinion, and might ruin the DT experience for you personally, but there is absolutely no reason that he could not be replaced, should he (or more correctly, the group that owns the name) allows it to happen.

I have no doubt that Gene Simmons has an angle that involves money, but Paul has said the same thing, and I think - at least in some of the interviews - that it was meant more existentially.  That "KISS" the entity was bigger than any one person, and whether you like the various incarnations or not, it IS.   They have, at various times, played with replacements for ALL FOUR members, and survived.   

It's all down to the ownership of the name and the authority of the members that control that name.  And it need not be a band member.   Let's say I was the manager of "Yes", and let's say Chris Squire was the sole owner of the name.  If as part of the estate planning process, he transferred that name to me upon his death, I could, legally, float an official version of "Yes", and pick five new members to comprise that band.  Whether it would sell music, whether it would attract fans, whether it would be credible, these are all legit questions, but none of them actually decide whether it's possible or not.   

Except in the event that one member - Steve Harris (Maiden), David Coverdale (Whitesnake), Neal Schon (Journey) likely fall into this group - owns the name and controls the entity, the idea that a band member is "irreplaceable" is largely opinion, and largely about taste and preference.   For example, to me, Sabbath isn't Ozzy or Iommi (though also Iommi) but Geezer.  I saw Sabbath multiple times with Geezer and without, and it's a different band without him, and an inferior band if you ask me in my humble opinion.   I am a die-hard Kiss fan, and frankly, having seen the band multiple times with and without Peter Criss, he's a liability.  It's a better, truer Kiss WITH Eric Singer in the band than with Peter Criss, if you ask me in my humble opinion.    I understand and respect that others see different, but at the end of the day, our opinions are meaningless, and only Tony and Ozzy can decide (for Sabbath) and Paul and Gene (for Kiss).  We can only choose not to go or not to buy.

Offline Tony From Long Island

  • Posts: 184
  • Gender: Male
  • No Day But Today
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #41 on: September 12, 2017, 01:42:34 PM »


When MP left he may have been thought irreplaceable, but he wasn't.


Some people still disagree with you   :-)
https://soundcloud.com/user-831858763       Listen to my mediocre recordings!

Offline Tony From Long Island

  • Posts: 184
  • Gender: Male
  • No Day But Today
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #42 on: September 12, 2017, 01:43:51 PM »
As a DT tribute band, sure.  As DT?   Nope.
https://soundcloud.com/user-831858763       Listen to my mediocre recordings!

Offline WheyWaffles

  • Posts: 220
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #43 on: September 12, 2017, 05:36:10 PM »
I don't really see them doing that. And I don't even want them to. Even more than anyone else, I consider Petrucci the key member. When he retires that's it. It's no longer Dream Theater

It stopped being Dream Theater the day Charlie Dominici laced up his high tops and swaggered out of the room.

Offline Cable

  • Posts: 1453
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #44 on: September 12, 2017, 06:07:45 PM »
I don't think it has been mentioned? Sorry if I'm repeating it. Is there a precedent for a rock band continuing after all original members have died?
---

Offline gzarruk

  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #45 on: September 12, 2017, 07:51:13 PM »


When MP left he may have been thought irreplaceable, but he wasn't.


Some people still disagree with you   :-)

But not the DT guys :-)
"I believe the sacrifices in life give more than they take"

Offline WheyWaffles

  • Posts: 220
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #46 on: September 12, 2017, 08:48:34 PM »


When MP left he may have been thought irreplaceable, but he wasn't.


Some people still disagree with you   :-)

But not the DT guys :-)

Myung wishes MP was still in the band. When MP wanted back in shortly after his impulse-driven departure, Myung suggested they let him come back to play his Taurus 3 pedals. Unfortunately, he was overruled.

Offline Grizz

  • Posts: 1601
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #47 on: September 12, 2017, 09:29:58 PM »
This mostly depends on where you stand with the problem of Thaddeus' Ship.

My personal belief is that "Thaddeus' Ship" (within the context of the problem) is a tangibly meaningless name, an identity made by humans who just did so to simplify things, which we all do, constantly, at a subconscious level. The strength of its identity is significantly, but not completely, based on the sum of the contributions of its parts to said identity.

In my opinion the name and the identity of Dream Theater does not hinge on the presence of John Petrucci. If the ship had been completely replaced gradually, except the sails were original, the ship would not cease to be worthy of the title "Thaddeus' Ship" if the sails were replaced. If JP retired, and at some point in the future, a band called Dream Theater was touring with JR, MP, MM, JLB, and a worthy guitarist, I would take no issue. I feel similarly in the practical example of Robert Fripp. This applies even moreso because King Crimson's identity as a music group is dominated with several generations of frontmen, and his contributions are a minority to that identity.

Dream Theater, however, has not had "new parts" since it was new itself. The five original members of Majesty were born in 1967. Every band member that has joined since 1987 has been older than these five (Sherinian only marginally so, but he was still not younger), so the idea of new members perpetually keeping the band active doesn't really work. Additionally, DT's identity has become fairly solidified by now. ADToE and DTXII generally seem to be considered very "safe" albums that do not tread much new ground. The three albums of the past ten years that tried to deviate from the formula have been rather controversial. Live performances have become quite a bit more predictable and "Greatest Hits"-oriented in recent years. JP and JLB are considered vital parts of DT's identity. JM has to a similar extent. JR is also closely associated, but the history of keyboardists in the band kind of limits how heavily his contributions play into the identity. MM came when DT's identity was pretty solid, and was selected because of how well he can maintain the stylistic status quo (aka his "chemistry" with the rest of the band).

Basically, unless DT starts to become more stylistically dynamic again, to the point that their identity starts to grow (think the radical shift of 80s King Crimson), the era from Images and Words through about Octavarium or so will probably be what people think of when they think "Dream Theater." Thus, the spirit of the band wouldn't be able to survive further replacements. Couple that with the fact that the original members were the youngest, so there wasn't really any generational torch-passing, and the answer is no, IMO.
"I raised the baby, I changed the baby's diapers.  Whenever the baby had projectile diarrhea, I was there in the line of fire.  I even got a little in my mouth!  I sacrificed so much for my baby.  Now my baby hates me and thinks Mike Mangini is its real father!"

Online MirrorMask

  • Posts: 3513
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #48 on: September 13, 2017, 01:12:43 AM »
I agree with you, Grizz. The general idea of original band members being gradually replaced could work, but in Dream Theater's case, it simply won't. Hell, if DT should colonize Mars to fill it with prog metal leaving Earth behind, and Mike Portnoy would claim the name for Sons of Apollo, that would still feel weird, and at least MP is a founding member. A generational shift with no original members would feel even weirder and just wrong.

Offline Dublagent66

  • RIP My Love 1964 - 2016
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 6532
  • Gender: Male
  • I will see you on the other side...
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #49 on: September 13, 2017, 10:03:26 AM »
DT's got about 10 years to go max.
Everything that CAN go wrong, WILL go wrong ...and if nothing has gone wrong...you obviously DON'T UNDERSTAND the situation.

"Bow your heads and abandon hope."   -Symphony X - Reign in Madness

Offline gzarruk

  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #50 on: September 13, 2017, 10:43:25 AM »
I agree with you, Grizz. The general idea of original band members being gradually replaced could work, but in Dream Theater's case, it simply won't. Hell, if DT should colonize Mars to fill it with prog metal leaving Earth behind, and Mike Portnoy would claim the name for Sons of Apollo, that would still feel weird, and at least MP is a founding member. A generational shift with no original members would feel even weirder and just wrong.

Yes has no original members and are still around, same with Stratovarius.

DT's got about 10 years to go max.

I agree.
"I believe the sacrifices in life give more than they take"

Online MirrorMask

  • Posts: 3513
  • Gender: Male
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #51 on: September 13, 2017, 11:30:58 AM »
Nobody cared about the first incarnation of Stratovarius (sorry to the few fans of that era). The first incarnation of DT already had Myung, Petrucci and Portnoy.

Offline Grizz

  • Posts: 1601
Re: Could DT still be touring in 50 years time?
« Reply #52 on: September 13, 2017, 11:34:57 AM »
I agree with you, Grizz. The general idea of original band members being gradually replaced could work, but in Dream Theater's case, it simply won't. Hell, if DT should colonize Mars to fill it with prog metal leaving Earth behind, and Mike Portnoy would claim the name for Sons of Apollo, that would still feel weird, and at least MP is a founding member. A generational shift with no original members would feel even weirder and just wrong.

Yes has no original members and are still around, same with Stratovarius.
Yes's identity isn't strongly tied to any set of members, especially founding members. Bruford is closely associated with Yes, but Alan White has been playing with them long enough to count as a "legitimate member" of Yes. Squire's dying wish was for Sherwood to  keep it going, and Sherwood has history with Yes. Banks isn't as closely associated with Yes as Squire despite being a founder. Kaye isn't too relevant to Yes's identity; most think of Wakeman. Wakeman and Anderson have their own Yes.

Plus, Yes' membership has been a lot more fluid than that of DT, so young blood like Sherwood and Davidson wouldn't be as egregious.
"I raised the baby, I changed the baby's diapers.  Whenever the baby had projectile diarrhea, I was there in the line of fire.  I even got a little in my mouth!  I sacrificed so much for my baby.  Now my baby hates me and thinks Mike Mangini is its real father!"