Listen to everything until Wind and Wuthering, then stop.
This.
Anything without Gabriel or Hackett isn't worth soiling your ears with.
ori-elias5, these people are fucking with you. They're trying to hog the good music for themselves, but don't let them! Fight the power! Duke AND Abacab have neither a Hackett or a Gabriel between them, and they will SMOKE what you've listened to already (except, of course, for Abacab itself, which you've listened to before. But I digress.).
Steve Hackett may be the single most over-rated guitar player - in terms of his contribution to his "big name band" of any rock guitarist since 1970.
Ouch. I'm not sure what evidence you have for that or what is your basis for comparison.
Well, read what I wrote carefully. KevSchmev gets it.
Hackett was and is awesome. Just because he was underused at times doesn't mean he wasn't great when he was.
He's an amazing guitar player in the absolute sense - when you've influenced Alex Lifeson and Eddie Van Halen, it's hard to say you're not - but in my opinion, you'd have to go to his solo albums to get that. IN GENESIS, he was a bit player. He just was. Even when there was guitar - Musical Box comes to mind - Mike was playing as well and sometimes - Supper's Ready I think, but I'm going off memory here - Tony was as well. Firth of Fifth is an AMAZING solo, no question, and he has some great work on Return of the Giant Hogweed. But when you're on six albums, and you can name the nightlights in five songs or less, you're not a main contributor.
Add to that, when you can reasonably have half of the band's top five albums be albums you're not even on (and you were never formally replaced) it's hard to say you were an integral part of the machine.
I'm not at all saying Hackett sucks; I'm just saying that if you look at ONLY the Genesis catalogue, it's hard to put that work in the pantheon of greats.