I mean, I feel there's a decent discussion somewhere buried underneath your anti-left rants and agenda.
If you feel like dropping the constant insults and digs against leftists/progressives/liberals, whatever, we might be able to discuss what could be an interesting topic.
Edit: Also, comparing protesters you don't like to the KKK really doesn't help your points either. And this happened before the board got shut down, your points being overlooked by all of your hyperbole and anti-liberal agenda. Just discuss the points.
I'll check back in a bit to see if that happens, but I'll leave you guys with this thought.
Do you think the way we have it now, where one party always has much more power than the other, that this gives way for the less powerful people to feel the need to be more extreme in their resistance or views? If so, would assuring a coalition of both (or more) parties at all times help alleviate that, or is it better to make sure two people (Prez and Vice) are of the same party and the same agenda/values?