Author Topic: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?  (Read 57536 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Accelerando

  • Disciple of Mark Tremonti
  • Posts: 3135
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #455 on: April 19, 2017, 02:34:36 PM »
Take that for data!!!

Offline Nekov

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10719
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #456 on: April 20, 2017, 06:12:56 AM »
Everyone killing the Celtics should not forget what happened to IT4 sister because even if he's playing on a high level it seems pretty clear to me that the whole team took a it with that and they are more concerned with him than with the game and that has to be factored in. I will agree with King though that I don't think the Celtics have what it takes to change to a playoff gear and that Al Horford is being overpayed, he's not a max contract guy.
When Ginobili gets hot, I get hot in my pants. 

Offline bosk1

  • King of Misdirection
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12827
  • Bow down to Boskaryus
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #457 on: April 20, 2017, 09:19:37 AM »
the Warriors are just scary when they want to be.  Who would think that on a might when they are missing both Durant and Livingston, and when Curry and Thompson combine for only 36 points and play only 31 minutes each, that they would beat Portland by 29?  Between Kerr being a master at maximizing his bench and the ability to absolutely stifle a team defensively, this team is ALWAYS a threat.  So much fun to watch!
"The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."

Offline TheOutlawXanadu

  • The Original Unseasoned Fan
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6986
  • Gender: Male
  • The Original Unseasoned Fan
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #458 on: April 20, 2017, 03:34:23 PM »
The Warriors are insanely good. I can't think of too many other teams in league history that could theoretically lose their best/second-best player (Durant) for the playoffs and still be favored to win it all.

Please note that I'm not saying Durant is going to miss the rest of the playoffs. It sounds like he's going to be back before the end of the series. Just speaking in hypotheticals.
:TOX: <-- My own emoticon!

Offline Accelerando

  • Disciple of Mark Tremonti
  • Posts: 3135
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #459 on: April 20, 2017, 07:55:38 PM »
Indiana got cocky with that 26 pt lead, played soft defense, and ended up losing.

Are blowing big leads just commonplace now? Warriors 3-1 lead. Falcons up 28-3. I don't get it.

Online jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44847
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #460 on: April 20, 2017, 08:15:17 PM »
Toronto....

That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline T-ski

  • Posts: 2921
Is all that we see or seem, but a dream within a dream?

Online jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44847
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #462 on: April 21, 2017, 04:25:20 AM »
Well played.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #463 on: April 21, 2017, 05:53:11 AM »
I am just glad I ain't a Raptors fan.. 
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Offline Nekov

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10719
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #464 on: April 21, 2017, 06:12:39 AM »
Indiana got cocky with that 26 pt lead, played soft defense, and ended up losing.

Are blowing big leads just commonplace now? Warriors 3-1 lead. Falcons up 28-3. I don't get it.

Not just that, it was like they forgot how they had played their offense in the first half. They weren't moving the ball, relying just on pick and rolls, no player movement, nothing at all, it was a complete disaster.

Regarding the Bucks, I truly wasn't expecting them to be putting up this kind of competition because of their young age and because of the bad decisions Kid usually makes during games however it's been fun to watch. I also think this is happening because Toronto is playing pretty badly, they don't look like a team that wants to compete
When Ginobili gets hot, I get hot in my pants. 

Offline TheOutlawXanadu

  • The Original Unseasoned Fan
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6986
  • Gender: Male
  • The Original Unseasoned Fan
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #465 on: April 21, 2017, 06:14:48 AM »
I'm not entirely surprised, but it's still confusing to me how the Raptors manage to continually suck in the playoffs. They lost in the first round of 2014 and 2015 despite being the higher seed, and barely squeaked by last year. Now, it's looking like an early exit again. I hope they can turn things around. :facepalm:
:TOX: <-- My own emoticon!

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41965
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #466 on: April 21, 2017, 06:27:42 AM »
LeBron F'ing James.  :hefdaddy :hefdaddy

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #467 on: April 21, 2017, 06:31:37 AM »
I'm not entirely surprised, but it's still confusing to me how the Raptors manage to continually suck in the playoffs. They lost in the first round of 2014 and 2015 despite being the higher seed, and barely squeaked by last year. Now, it's looking like an early exit again. I hope they can turn things around. :facepalm:

I do not hate the Raptors, but I highly doubt they could turn it around. Like you have mentioned, they ain't newbies to the playoffs, and they even got as far as the ECF last year; yet I just don't see a sense of urgency in their plays through the first 3 games. Except for Ibaka playing with some passion and energy, the rest of the team just don't seem to play with the same level of energy for the most part.

On the other hand, though I don't see enough of the Bucks during the season, they clearly play with a ton more energy in these first few games. Like in game 2, where they eventually lost, they just never gave up when they were down by 13 or something in the 3rd qtr.
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Online jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44847
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #468 on: April 21, 2017, 06:58:37 AM »
Both DeRozan and Lowry can be hot/cold players.  And when they're both cold, the team has virtually no chance.  Last night was an example of that, and as demonstrated by Game 2, they typically bounce back in a strong way when they go ice cold.  I expect a better performance, and W for Game 4.

But yeah... as a "top" seed/team in the East, they should be able to bring it every single night.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline King Postwhore

  • Couch Potato
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 59445
  • Gender: Male
  • Take that Beethoven, you deaf bastard!!
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #469 on: April 21, 2017, 07:05:36 AM »
LeBron F'ing James.  :hefdaddy :hefdaddy

Everything the C's are missing.  Leaders step up.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down'.” - Bob Newhart
So wait, we're spelling it wrong and king is spelling it right? What is going on here? :lol -- BlobVanDam
"Oh, I am definitely a jackass!" - TAC

Online jingle.boy

  • I'm so ronery; so sad and ronery
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 44847
  • Gender: Male
  • DTF's resident deceased dictator
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #470 on: April 22, 2017, 04:20:27 PM »
As predicted.

Best of 3 now after that defensive battle.
That's a word salad - and take it from me, I know word salad
I fear for the day when something happens on the right that is SO nuts that even Stadler says "That's crazy".
Quote from: Puppies_On_Acid
Remember the mark of a great vocalist is if TAC hates them with a special passion

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #471 on: April 22, 2017, 08:39:30 PM »
Kawhi Leonard!!!  :omg: That last fade away was Kobe-que!!!  :omg:

And then there is Mike Conley!!! Wow!!! What a game!!!  :omg:
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Online TAC

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 74573
  • Gender: Male
  • Arthritic Metal Horns
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #472 on: April 22, 2017, 08:46:57 PM »
Yes. Watching!!
would have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Winger Theater Forums........or WTF.  ;D
TAC got a higher score than me in the electronic round? Honestly, can I just drop out now? :lol

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #473 on: April 22, 2017, 09:04:54 PM »
Despite the loss, Kawhi Leonard's performance tonight was legendary! He is no doubt my new fav player in the league! Like I've said toward the end of the season, he IS a serious MVP candidate! Triple-doubles are cute, but the difference is Leonard carries the Spurs and they are winning games!
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Offline Accelerando

  • Disciple of Mark Tremonti
  • Posts: 3135
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #474 on: April 22, 2017, 10:40:16 PM »
I knew the Grizzlies were going to show some grit in this series. They have all season, despite being a 7th seed. However, I think we can take this series at home, especially IF LA starts playing some ball on both ends of the court. I've been dissapointed with his inconsistent play all season. He's the X factor on how far we can go into the playoffs. If we ever play the Warriors, we need him to crash the boards. Kawhi was masterful tonight, but he cant do it all on his own.

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #475 on: April 22, 2017, 11:08:52 PM »
And how about the Dubs? They looked dead in the water early on, but they came alive in the second half! Wow!  :omg:
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41965
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #476 on: April 23, 2017, 04:24:02 PM »
Westbrook 42 for 118 from the field through four playoff games.  That's 36%, for those scoring at home. 

Yeah, that's an MVP.

Online TAC

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 74573
  • Gender: Male
  • Arthritic Metal Horns
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #477 on: April 23, 2017, 05:27:56 PM »
Watching the Celtics/Bulls game. OMFG, the officiating is fucking horrible. WTF is this? It's a joke.

There is nothing worse than NBA officiating in any other sport.
would have thought the same thing but seeing the OP was TAC i immediately thought Maiden or DT related
Winger Theater Forums........or WTF.  ;D
TAC got a higher score than me in the electronic round? Honestly, can I just drop out now? :lol

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #478 on: April 23, 2017, 07:21:10 PM »
Westbrook 42 for 118 from the field through four playoff games.  That's 36%, for those scoring at home. 

Yeah, that's an MVP.

You get no argument from me, as I keep saying the MVP should goes to Kawhi Leonard!  :hat
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41965
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #479 on: April 23, 2017, 08:13:38 PM »


There is nothing worse than NBA officiating in any other sport.

Yep. It is not close.  I get that basketball is difficult to officiate, but the preferential treatment stars always get when it comes to calls is so ridiculous.

Offline Nekov

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10719
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #480 on: April 24, 2017, 06:45:20 AM »
There is nothing worse than NBA officiating in any other sport.

You clearly don't watch a lot of soccer  :P
When Ginobili gets hot, I get hot in my pants. 

Offline TheOutlawXanadu

  • The Original Unseasoned Fan
  • DTF.com Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6986
  • Gender: Male
  • The Original Unseasoned Fan
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #481 on: April 24, 2017, 07:08:27 AM »
Can I go on a bit of a rant? Feel free to skip if you don't like soap boxes...

I get that triple-doubles are impressive feats. The ability to impact the game in three of the major facets is huge. I do not subscribe to the idea that triple-doubles are meaningless. However, with that said, I am tired of the media acting like a triple-double is the most significant accomplishment a player can achieve. Every time a player gets one, it's headline news. Even if a player doesn't get one but comes close, it is still mentioned. It's like these guys feel obligated to always be on "triple-double watch" because if they're not, they're not doing their job. At this point, I think that triple-doubles are even more common than 40-point games, so I don't get the fascination. I think I'm just annoyed because there are actual important stats that you almost never hear about, such as true shooting percentage and turnover percentage, probably because that kind of thing is getting too analytical and ESPN would prefer to keep their analysis as bare bones as possible.

OK, I'm done. Sorry. :lol
:TOX: <-- My own emoticon!

Offline bosk1

  • King of Misdirection
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12827
  • Bow down to Boskaryus
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #482 on: April 24, 2017, 10:22:41 AM »
And how about the Dubs? They looked dead in the water early on, but they came alive in the second half! Wow!  :omg:
I am curious to see how things are going to shape up with Kerr being out.  Right now, whether he will even return at all during this post-season is completely up in the air.  It's easy to forget that he was out for most of last season's record-setting 73 win regular season.  But I think that team would have been more easily able to do what they did without Kerr than this season's team.  That team was mostly the same team that had won the championship the prior year.  I kind of feel that they could have done it on autopilot with or without Kerr in the post season.  But Walton was a pretty good coach in his own right and had been pretty ingrained in Kerr's system. 

This year, the team chemistry is different with so many new faces.  And while I feel like they have really gelled as a team, I'm not sure I'm as comfortable that they can just instinctively do what they do with or without key coaching decisions as well as last year's team might have been able.  But maybe I'm just overthinking it.  And Mike Brown certainly has more than enough coaching cred, so, again, maybe it isn't even an issue to spend much time thinking about.  But this team just keeps finding itself in situations that keep things interesting.
"The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."

Offline KevShmev

  • EZBoard Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 41965
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #483 on: April 24, 2017, 05:09:49 PM »
Can I go on a bit of a rant? Feel free to skip if you don't like soap boxes...

I get that triple-doubles are impressive feats. The ability to impact the game in three of the major facets is huge. I do not subscribe to the idea that triple-doubles are meaningless. However, with that said, I am tired of the media acting like a triple-double is the most significant accomplishment a player can achieve. Every time a player gets one, it's headline news. Even if a player doesn't get one but comes close, it is still mentioned. It's like these guys feel obligated to always be on "triple-double watch" because if they're not, they're not doing their job. At this point, I think that triple-doubles are even more common than 40-point games, so I don't get the fascination. I think I'm just annoyed because there are actual important stats that you almost never hear about, such as true shooting percentage and turnover percentage, probably because that kind of thing is getting too analytical and ESPN would prefer to keep their analysis as bare bones as possible.

Could not agree more.  :tup :tup

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #484 on: April 24, 2017, 07:11:37 PM »
I am curious to see how things are going to shape up with Kerr being out.  Right now, whether he will even return at all during this post-season is completely up in the air.  It's easy to forget that he was out for most of last season's record-setting 73 win regular season.  But I think that team would have been more easily able to do what they did without Kerr than this season's team.  That team was mostly the same team that had won the championship the prior year.  I kind of feel that they could have done it on autopilot with or without Kerr in the post season.  But Walton was a pretty good coach in his own right and had been pretty ingrained in Kerr's system. 

This year, the team chemistry is different with so many new faces.  And while I feel like they have really gelled as a team, I'm not sure I'm as comfortable that they can just instinctively do what they do with or without key coaching decisions as well as last year's team might have been able.  But maybe I'm just overthinking it.  And Mike Brown certainly has more than enough coaching cred, so, again, maybe it isn't even an issue to spend much time thinking about.  But this team just keeps finding itself in situations that keep things interesting.

The ability to make precise in-game adjustment is what I think Kerr will be missed most. Like you mentioned, Mike Brown is a good enough coach, but as a Lakers fan, while I think he is good at preparation for each match up; yet his real-time in-game adjustments are iffy sometimes. Then again, with KD back for Game 4, I think the Dubs will have to "feel" each other on the floor in the 1st qtr all over again. I bet the Blazers are not going to lay down and go away, so I fully expect a very tight game! For the Dubs' sake, they'd better close it out in 4 and get some rest and practice before the next round.
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Offline bosk1

  • King of Misdirection
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12827
  • Bow down to Boskaryus
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #485 on: April 25, 2017, 06:51:05 AM »
I bet the Blazers are not going to lay down and go away, so I fully expect a very tight game!
Um...  :lol
"The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."

Offline Azyiu

  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #486 on: April 25, 2017, 09:07:17 AM »
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953,
1954, 1972, 1980, 1982,
1985, 1987, 1988, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2009, 2010... 2020

Offline bosk1

  • King of Misdirection
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12827
  • Bow down to Boskaryus
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #487 on: April 25, 2017, 09:18:24 AM »
And the Clippers/Jazz, both of whom were dominated by the Warriors in the regular season, are going to have to go at least through Friday, if not Sunday before their series is over.  Hate to say it, but I think the Warriors are going to cruise to the West finals.
"The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."

Offline Nekov

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 10719
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #488 on: April 25, 2017, 10:40:57 AM »
I'm worried about the Spurs lately, they're a machine during the regular season but when post-season time comes some players just disappear (I'm looking at you Aldridge). I think they would do a great favor to themselves if they traded him for good assets and got Paul Millsap as a free agent during the offseason but knowing how the Spurs work this is likely not going to happen.

And the Clippers/Jazz, both of whom were dominated by the Warriors in the regular season, are going to have to go at least through Friday, if not Sunday before their series is over.  Hate to say it, but I think the Warriors are going to cruise to the West finals.

No doubt.
When Ginobili gets hot, I get hot in my pants. 

Offline contest_sanity

  • Posts: 2346
  • Gender: Male
Re: NBA thread 2016-17 v. The Age of The Land?
« Reply #489 on: April 25, 2017, 11:31:50 AM »
If I were CP3, I'd be telling the Spurs to open up as much cap room as humanly possible... wouldn't that be a monster team with Chris Paul at the 1?