The last thing I purchased from Borders before they went out of business was this book:
I already liked The Beatles, and had heard about a lot of the "firsts" they had in their resumé, but what I read in this book blew my mind.
The book dissects 100 songs which the authors consider "the best" which of course is subjective, but let's face it; they have a lot of really, really great songs. And that doesn't change the objective facts they've given for each song. Extensive notes regarding the recording sessions, great "did you know?" tidbits about each song, etc.
The multitracking which we take for granted today was practically invented by George Martin and The Beatles, simply because they had arrangements in their heads that the four of them couldn't play in real time. Prior to The Beatles, albums were recorded very differently.
Augmenting the basic rock group (guitars, bass, drums) with instruments like horns ("Got to Get You Into My Life"), clarinets ("When I'm 64"), strings (many songs) was rare if not unheard-of. The Beatles did it. They had no problem doing whatever it took to serve the music. Adding the sitar and other Eastern instruments. Actually
writing and playing songs in that style, and putting them on the album. Never done before.
"Eleanor Rigby" is a double string quartet and three voices, period. The piano solo in "In My Life" was played and recorded at half-speed, so that upon playback it would sound one octave higher and have that timbre which many have mistaken for a harpsichord. Some of the tape loops on "Revolution 9" were so long they the had the tape running through the deck and around the room, kept taut by pencils taped to the desks and tables. Okay, I'll stop with the examples. Get the book.
Anyway, my appreciation for this band was only increased by reading about what they've done to revolutionize the art of recording. And as I said, I already liked them. I mean, I liked most of their songs anyway, without even thinking about what went into creating them in the studio. And I agree with those who say that no matter how big they are considered in the history of recorded music, they are still underrated.