I don't have a problem with a basic verse chorus verse bridge verse/chorus, but Lost Not Forgetten borrows similar riffs and the exact structure of UAGM down to a T. It might be 3 minutes longer, but it's still the same damn song.
And even though songs like Endless Sacrifice, Sacrificed Sons and TMOLS have the same structure, they aren't the same song. Lost Not Forgotten IS Under a Glass Moon.
Except that it's not.
I know they originated from a similar place, and I concede those similarities, but the end result, effect, meaning and mood of the song is entirely different. The riffs take inspiration from the older songs no more or less than the examples of similarities found in the likes of OTBOA/BAI. If you have a problem with this song, I'm surprised you don't have a problem with the entire album because the other more subtle song comparisons that haven't been mentioned still wouldn't exist the way they do without evolving (or 'borrowing' if you prefer) their ideas to become what they are now.
As nice as the Easter egg is, just like Eve, it's overrated as fuck.
Fair enough, I get people can think it's overrated. What I don't get is why people are comparing it to Eve like it's also a full cohesive song? Sure, they put off the same vibe and probably written to serve a similar purpose, but to me the 'Easter Egg' is just a bit of a much bigger piece. Everyone seems to forget that it's part of Illumination Theory, a piece of a greater whole. I don't expect it to be an amazing standalone piece, but for what it is, a subtle closer to the song (and album), works perfectly for what it was intended.
As others have pointed out, structural similarities are much different than musical copies. Writing something fresh with a similar structure is not ripping yourself off. I hear all kinds of self rip offs in DT12. The worst part is, the first rip off I hear in the album opener (FAS) isn't even their own. It sounds exactly like Symphony X. I thought I was listening to Iconoclast. Really? You're starting out a new self titled album and it sounds like the beginning of another band's album? Okie dokie.
Also, just because people have reasons for liking DT12 doesn't make it musically better than what they've done in the past. I don't think it's musically better at all. It has a few moments but I'll never like it in its entirety and if people disagree, fine. I won't tell them they need to pay more attention. Has nothing to do with that.
Inspiration for FAS was taken from DT interpreting what they'd want in an epic show intro, similar to the film pieces they've been using as intros for decades. Just because it's a very symphonic metal style piece, doesn't make it a rip off off Symphony X, and just because it reminded you of SX doesn't mean DT ripped it off...
Also, if people have reasons for liking DT12, then it can be described as 'musically better' by that person if they want. Obviously you won't make that statement because you think they're ripping themselves off somehow. But you can't objectively say whether it's better or worse unless you can give examples of why or how the music is significantly lacking in something that should be relevant to DT's sound. And I don't think that's possible to define because it'll just become subjective again. Either way, it seems like DT can't catch a break, either they're ripping off another band if they emulate a certain sound, or they're ripping off themselves because it sounds like something they'd do...
Whaah?