Sickening.
Why? If he says something you think is harmful, counter it. If he says something false, correct it. This is probably a better conversation for P/R, but while I'm vaguely aware of why he was banned in the first place, the reinstatement isn't that controversial. He was accused of wrongdoing, paid the price - literally (though that was, importantly, a CIVIL trial not a CRIMINAL trial) and we move on. Isn't that how it goes? When Joe Biden plagiarized that essay in Law School, he paid the price and we moved on. When he plagiarized that speech back in the... what was it, the 80's? He paid the price and we moved on. Why does that only apply to the people "we like"?