James Let Me Brie.
Admit that you stole this from me!
Anyway, has anyone else found it slightly contradictory that MP whines about MTV in the lyrics since Pull Me Under wouldn't have become as popular without the airplay on MTV? Obviously I know the quality of the stuff they've played on that channel since then but isn't it still slightly hypocritical? (Note: My intention isn't to make this a MP-bashing thread, I'm just wondering...)
Given the circumstances of FII, and the shift in the musical landscape between when PMU came out, and when FII came out, I don't believe so.
IaW didn't have so much record company meddling, and PMU was a fairly typical DT track that was a success despite not conforming to mainstream, so DT did that on their own terms. DT found an audience from MTV without doing what was popular.
Then we have FII, where the label was trying to force a more mainstream approach for hits (songs they could play on MTV), which was the cause of frustration for the band, because they weren't able to do things on their own terms, despite the fact that their greatest success as a hit and an album had not been mainstream at all.
The state of music had changed between IaW and FII, and it was much harder to do your own thing without playing by the record label's much more limited rules. It was a problem for many rock bands at the time. PMU was probably close to the borderline of getting MTV airplay in 1992, and I don't think it would have had any chance by 1997.
MTV had changed, music had changed, the record companies had changed, so I don't think the lyrics are criticizing the same MTV that gave them success back with PMU.
edit: And what TheGreatPretender said along similar lines.