Author Topic: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man  (Read 72377 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PowerSlave

  • Posts: 1522
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1435 on: July 27, 2017, 04:02:22 PM »
FOX's fixation on naughty teachers continues unabated, but now they're focusing on England, for some reason. America's Summer break, perhaps? Seriously, what the fuck?

Teacher, 28, banned from classroom after allegedly having sex with student on plane
British teacher accused of urging student to masturbate for stress relief keeps job
Oklahoma teacher who cartwheeled without underwear given probation

The Oklahoma link doesn't work. I was hoping for video.
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1436 on: July 27, 2017, 04:29:14 PM »
FOX's fixation on naughty teachers continues unabated, but now they're focusing on England, for some reason. America's Summer break, perhaps? Seriously, what the fuck?

Teacher, 28, banned from classroom after allegedly having sex with student on plane
British teacher accused of urging student to masturbate for stress relief keeps job
Oklahoma teacher who cartwheeled without underwear given probation

The Oklahoma link doesn't work. I was hoping for video.
Uh, be careful what you wish for.  In any case I fixed the link. FOX doesn't show the video but other FOX owned sites do.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Adami

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 24886
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1437 on: July 27, 2017, 04:35:43 PM »
Assault is a lesser charge than indecent exposure?
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline PowerSlave

  • Posts: 1522
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1438 on: July 27, 2017, 04:44:46 PM »
Assault is a lesser charge than indecent exposure?

That's what I was thinking. Maybe it has something to do with the sex offender registry. However, I don't see how the two things could be related (assault and indecent exposure). Maybe she wasn't well maintained and they meant that seeing it was an insult, not assault.  :biggrin:
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1439 on: July 27, 2017, 04:49:52 PM »
Assault is a lesser charge than indecent exposure?
Legally no. In practice absolutely.  The indecent exposure charge would bring with it a sex offender label that pretty much destroys your life. In Texas the assault charge gets you up to 1 year and a 4k fine. The exposure charge gets you up to 6 months, a 2k fine, and sex offender registration. You take the assault charge every single time. What a world.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Adami

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 24886
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1440 on: July 27, 2017, 04:53:03 PM »
Assault is a lesser charge than indecent exposure?
Legally no. In practice absolutely.  The indecent exposure charge would bring with it a sex offender label that pretty much destroys your life. In Texas the assault charge gets you up to 1 year and a 4k fine. The exposure charge gets you up to 6 months, a 2k fine, and sex offender registration. You take the assault charge every single time. What a world.

But she didn't assault anyone. Could you just be offered any charge? Could she be offered public intoxication at this point? It just seems like it's missing the point.
fanticide.bandcamp.com

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1441 on: July 27, 2017, 05:16:07 PM »
Assault is a lesser charge than indecent exposure?
Legally no. In practice absolutely.  The indecent exposure charge would bring with it a sex offender label that pretty much destroys your life. In Texas the assault charge gets you up to 1 year and a 4k fine. The exposure charge gets you up to 6 months, a 2k fine, and sex offender registration. You take the assault charge every single time. What a world.

But she didn't assault anyone. Could you just be offered any charge? Could she be offered public intoxication at this point? It just seems like it's missing the point.
You got me on that one. I honestly don't know how they came up with that. OK's assault statute is pretty short and sweet.

I guess they can just throw any charge they want at you if they know you'll take it. I've heard of similar things down here. In Texas they'll often offer up "obstructing a highway or waterway" as a plea bargain for DWI cases, for example, even though it probably wouldn't be factually correct.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1442 on: August 08, 2017, 10:25:24 AM »
In non-slutty teacher news, Time put out a simplified version of the points system proposed under the new immigration rules. For the record I don't really have much of a problem with this. However, I do find it interesting that I wouldn't even come close to qualifying. In fact, very few Americans actually would.

http://time.com/4887574/trump-raise-act-immigration/

Quote
You don't qualify to apply
Your score: 19
Minimum score: 30
And my 19 was based on a guess about what my 2 year degree might be worth. It's quite possibly 5 points lower.

On the bright side, I'm really close to being eligible for Canadian immigration. All I'd need is a job offer with a positive labor impact score. I ranked 63/67 on theirs.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline cramx3

  • Chillest of the chill
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 15704
  • Gender: Male
    • The Home of cramx3
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1443 on: August 08, 2017, 10:29:57 AM »
I got a 26 out of 30  :lol 

Offline PowerSlave

  • Posts: 1522
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1444 on: August 08, 2017, 10:34:00 AM »
17 out of 30. I lied about my english and said that I was fluent. It's the only language that I can speak, but I'm a lower middle-class knuckle dragger. There's no way in hell I'm fluent.
All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again

Online Chino

  • Be excellent to each other.
  • DT.net Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 19121
  • Gender: Male
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1445 on: August 08, 2017, 10:46:34 AM »

28/30

That's the dumbest questionnaire I've seen in awhile. So if you have a job lined up willing to pay you $76,000 per year (more than I make as a homeowner in a city with the 3rd highest mill rate in CT), you get 0 points, but if you have an olympic medal you get 15 points? That's exactly what we need in this country, more people that can run or throw a stick in an open field. You get no points if you plan on investing anything less than $1.35M? I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that 99%+ of Americans will never invest anywhere near that.

Offline pogoowner

  • Pancake Bunny
  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 2798
  • Gender: Male
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1446 on: August 08, 2017, 05:18:37 PM »
Yeah, those criteria are pretty steep. I got 23/30.

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1447 on: August 14, 2017, 12:30:20 PM »
Today's horny teacher article (it's early, so probably just the first) is an interesting one.  Seems this lady had the wherewithal to pull a Nugent and secure custody of the lad. Honestly not sure if that works in her favor or not.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/14/ohio-teacher-36-was-impregnated-by-teen-boy-student-during-3-year-sexual-affair-cops-say.html
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Dave_Manchester

  • Posts: 442
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1448 on: September 08, 2017, 02:22:07 PM »
Sensitive subject, and there's no need to make a thread just for it, but thoughts on this? Some old English guy got 8 months in prison for importing a 'child sex doll' (plus another 8 months for child porn offenses, which is less controversial). I know this is perhaps the last truly taboo subject, and obviously he's a sexually and psychologically troubled character, but does sending him to prison for shagging a lump of latex really help anyone here? At least he took expensive steps to carry out his fantasies on something other than an actual kid. I don't know, maybe he deserves it, just interested to see if anyone has thoughts on it. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41203239

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1449 on: September 08, 2017, 02:41:51 PM »
It's strange living in a world where depictions of past abuse will get you into more trouble than actually committing the abuse yourself.

The thing with the doll is is a trip, and rife with piss-poor arguments. What isn't a precursor to potential behavior? Seems to me that the same sorts of people who object to a dude porking a latex doll on the basis that he might go out and pork a real one are the same sorts of people who insist that owning a gun doesn't mean that you're going to shoot somebody with it. It's good that they're half right, but a little intellectual consistency would be nice.
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Dave_Manchester

  • Posts: 442
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1450 on: September 22, 2017, 12:02:23 PM »
Another bumper week for Rupert Murdoch's endlessly entertaining Women Are Predatory Godless Fornicators series, starting with this brazen hussy doing 2 kids a night...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/20/arkansas-high-school-teacher-slept-with-4-students-2-in-same-night-cops-say.html

...and continuing with this filthy cougar having a tumble in the cow shed...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/12/teacher-29-pleads-guilty-to-sex-with-her-boy-student-15-who-worked-on-her-farm.html

...before wrapping up with the token mid-20s blonde who sent nude pictures to an 18 year old student, thus ruining him for life...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/19/substitute-teacher-26-in-court-accused-sex-nude-pics-sent-to-18-year-old-student.html


Unfortunately, and presumably for reasons of space limitation, none of Righteous Rupert's media organs (The Times, The Sun, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, Sky, FOX News, HarperCollins Publishers, Dow Jones, and many, many others) have been able to report on the sexual transgressions of apparently every single aging male director of his empire's boards. Any suggestion that his recent obsession with stories of female teachers corrupting America's youth is a diversionary tactic is entirely unfounded.

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1451 on: September 22, 2017, 12:15:02 PM »
If you can stomach reading some of the comments, you'll notice that we're starting to see a lot of people claiming that this sort of thing is on the rise. Our moral depravity seems to be increasing. I'd say Rupert is being successful in guiding his minions to their conclusions.

Also, that first woman is facing 40 years or life. WTF? Three of her students were 18 and the 4th lied about his age (he was from another district).
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Stadler

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 9140
  • Gender: Male
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1452 on: September 22, 2017, 12:31:54 PM »
Another bumper week for Rupert Murdoch's endlessly entertaining Women Are Predatory Godless Fornicators series, starting with this brazen hussy doing 2 kids a night...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/20/arkansas-high-school-teacher-slept-with-4-students-2-in-same-night-cops-say.html

...and continuing with this filthy cougar having a tumble in the cow shed...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/12/teacher-29-pleads-guilty-to-sex-with-her-boy-student-15-who-worked-on-her-farm.html

...before wrapping up with the token mid-20s blonde who sent nude pictures to an 18 year old student, thus ruining him for life...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/19/substitute-teacher-26-in-court-accused-sex-nude-pics-sent-to-18-year-old-student.html


Unfortunately, and presumably for reasons of space limitation, none of Righteous Rupert's media organs (The Times, The Sun, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, Sky, FOX News, HarperCollins Publishers, Dow Jones, and many, many others) have been able to report on the sexual transgressions of apparently every single aging male director of his empire's boards. Any suggestion that his recent obsession with stories of female teachers corrupting America's youth is a diversionary tactic is entirely unfounded.

Apparently one of those kids must've given Ms. Brazen Hussy her haircut, because...

I got a feed on my phone today about a couple that got jail time because the woman jumped on her boyfriend in the middle of Dominos and consummated the sex act while they were waiting for their (other) pie.   Newsfeed?   Fox. 

Offline Dave_Manchester

  • Posts: 442
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1453 on: September 22, 2017, 12:42:40 PM »
I got a feed on my phone today about a couple that got jail time because the woman jumped on her boyfriend in the middle of Dominos and consummated the sex act while they were waiting for their (other) pie.   Newsfeed?   Fox.

It's happening everywhere. Schools, universities, family restaurants, parks. Women are shameless, and America has been going to hell ever since you allowed them to leave the kitchen and have a vote. Listen to the 86-year-old thrice-divorced cradle-robbing Australian media magnate.

Offline El Barto

  • DTF.org Alumni
  • ****
  • Posts: 18700
  • Bad Craziness
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1454 on: September 22, 2017, 12:47:05 PM »
From the Sun's article about the slutty one:
A MARRIED female school teacher is accused of having sex with four of her students - including two of them on the same night.
(emphasis theirs)
Argument, the presentation of reasonable views, never makes headway against conviction, and conviction takes no part in argument because it knows.
E.F. Benson

Offline Dave_Manchester

  • Posts: 442
Re: P/R side chat thread, v. I am not a number I am a free man
« Reply #1455 on: September 23, 2017, 05:32:56 AM »
Two more on today's front page, beginning in Barto country...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/22/texas-teacher-accused-inappropriate-relationship-with-student.html

...before scooting across to Georgia...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/22/ex-pe-teacher-40-accused-sex-romp-with-student-again.html


Sample comments on that 2nd article:

"Hey look another due paying Liberal paying member doing what they do best. Molesting Children. No wonder everyone hates the liberal base. Bill Clinton sure made an impact with these women"

And...

"Hopefully all these children can sue the Liberal Democratic party and the Clintons. I am sure we can make a case and show the connections of immorality"



Beware, Republican states, the child molesting libtards are coming for your children now...