DreamTheaterForums.org Dream Theater Fan Site

General => Movies and TV => Topic started by: Nick on August 22, 2014, 08:53:22 AM

Title: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Nick on August 22, 2014, 08:53:22 AM
Old one here: https://www.dreamtheaterforums.org/boards/index.php?topic=7519.0
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 22, 2014, 09:15:35 AM
Ooh, a new Dr Who thread.


I don't like it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on August 22, 2014, 10:02:20 AM
"v. Patrick Troughton"

I see what you did there. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lynxo on August 22, 2014, 10:05:35 AM
I am excite for the new Doctor.

That is all.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on August 22, 2014, 10:05:56 AM
I am excite for the new Doctor.

That is all.

Aren't we all? :biggrin: :hat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 22, 2014, 10:06:11 AM
"v. Patrick Troughton"

I see what you did there. :lol

So do I. The old thread was wearing a bit thin.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 22, 2014, 03:24:49 PM
Ooh, a new Dr Who thread.


I don't like it.

You stole my joke.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 22, 2014, 04:06:18 PM
"v. Patrick Troughton"

I see what you did there. :lol

So do I. The old thread was wearing a bit thin.

Hartnell regenerated in the Tenth Planet, the thread regenerated (almost) on the 100th Page. Makes sense.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 22, 2014, 04:11:58 PM
It's a shame that Tenth Planet is probably the most boring regeneration of them all.

Well okay aside from that pseudo-regeneration in Time and the Rani. That was complete horseshit.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 22, 2014, 05:22:29 PM
It's a shame that Tenth Planet is probably the most boring regeneration of them all.
Be fair, it was the first one ever, and that the time they never expected it to becomes such an iconic thing, it was just a way to deal with Hartnell's ill health but carry the show on.

And although it's nice to have a fresh new thread, it's a little sad as well. That last one had been going since Rob started it in 2009!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on August 22, 2014, 07:08:36 PM
Ooh, a new Dr Who thread.


I don't like it.

It'll never be as good as 7. MY Dr. Who Thread :neverusethis:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on August 22, 2014, 09:11:16 PM
So is everyone getting hype for tomorrow?!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on August 23, 2014, 01:30:27 AM
So is everyone getting hype for tomorrow?!
Yeah, it's going to be awesome! Gonna watch with some friends tonight and we'll have fish fingers and custard :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 23, 2014, 04:59:36 AM
:caffeine:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on August 23, 2014, 05:15:13 AM
As excited as I and my daughter are for this, I bet we have to wait until tomorrow or Monday to catch it, because the wife is not a fan.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 23, 2014, 05:55:12 AM
This airs at 5am local time, so I'll watch it as soon as I wake up. This will be my first season of watching Dr Who as it airs, since The Day of the Doctor was my first episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 23, 2014, 06:04:14 AM
This airs at 5am local time, so I'll watch it as soon as I wake up. This will be my first season of watching Dr Who as it airs, since The Day of the Doctor was my first episode.

Same here, except for the timey wimey part, of course! :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on August 23, 2014, 06:40:09 AM
First as-it-airs season for me too. Hopefully I'll be able to catch the new episode tonight.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: chknptpie on August 23, 2014, 08:30:52 AM
wooooo! I'm excited to see how the new doc works out.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 23, 2014, 12:24:07 PM
Half an hour!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 23, 2014, 02:11:26 PM
Well, that was absolutely great! What a belter!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on August 23, 2014, 02:20:43 PM
Minus a couple of lines, I thought it was fantastic!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 23, 2014, 02:23:29 PM
As expected the Facebook people said in order of frequency: "boring", "love david tennant", "bring back russel t davis", "want matt smith".

Oh, you.  :heart
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on August 23, 2014, 02:24:45 PM
That was anything but boring! That built very nicely to the end.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on August 23, 2014, 02:41:45 PM
That was great, loved it!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 23, 2014, 02:50:54 PM
Fab episode! Really liking Capaldi already, and I like the way they are hinting at a slightly darker side to his personality.

I also loved the reference back to the "woman in the shop" from the Bells of St. John. I've wondered that a number of times, and at some point recently remembered it again and wondered if they'd ever address it. Should have known to trust Moffat more. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 23, 2014, 02:56:53 PM
Well, at this point the woman in the shop has to be the promised land woman. I wonder who that might be, and what role she might have. Major one, of course, only major plot roles are introduced in the first episode.

So, people, the question is... How long till people will start claiming she's really the Rani?  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 23, 2014, 03:19:54 PM
That was my first thought, to be honest, she has that sort of look about her. :lol

We shall see.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 23, 2014, 03:27:55 PM
Well, I'm kinda ready to bet my shoes against the possibility. I would certainly like a new threat better. IF she is a foe and not a friend, something I am not even sure of.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on August 23, 2014, 06:18:51 PM
I don't watch DW very often but that was not bad .

Already prefer Capaldi to Smith though.

Every time I see an episode - it always has a life or death super emotional scene in it. Dos that happen in *every* episode ? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 23, 2014, 11:22:21 PM
Fab episode! Really liking Capaldi already, and I like the way they are hinting at a slightly darker side to his personality.

I also loved the reference back to the "woman in the shop" from the Bells of St. John. I've wondered that a number of times, and at some point recently remembered it again and wondered if they'd ever address it. Should have known to trust Moffat more. :lol

That's been bugging me the entire time! I'm glad they're addressing that. And it also looks like they're going to address Capaldi's two appearances in Dr Who / Torchwood, with the mention of his face to the hobo. This episode included a lot of story threads, both existing and new ones. It sets up an exciting start to the season.

Quite a good episode. The ties to The Girl in the Fireplace were a nice touch, but the dinosaur felt like it was mostly there for a cool trailer, since it didn't last long. Clara had a good part in this episode, and I like how they spent time dealing with Clara's emotions after the regeneration.

I really like Capaldi so far. I still have trouble understanding some of his lines. I guess I'm not fluent in Scottish mumble. He seems a bit more blunt and mean, but still with a good sense of humour. Great combo. As with every Doctor, there will be elements I miss from the previous Doctor, along with new elements that I'll miss once this Doctor is gone. I can already see those new elements developing that I'm going to enjoy from Capaldi's Doctor. His conversation with the hobo about his mean looking face and Scottish accent was hilarious, and I'm glad they're addressing these differences, since it is a departure from the newer Doctors.

After one episode I obviously couldn't say I like him as much as Tennant or Smith, but I already like him a lot more than Eccelston, and I can tell he's going to be a great Doctor in his own right. Bring on the rest of the season! :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: TioJorge on August 23, 2014, 11:29:27 PM
Fuckin brilliant. This is definitely going to be the season to get me fully on-board with the Doc. I love Capaldi in the few things I've seen him in and he's always been one of those actors that I really like but rarely see. Just the same, I've always only kind of been interested in the series, but god damn it all, I COULD NOT get pass the cheese-factor and the effects; on top of that, no one on the show made me want to watch it enough. I enjoyed the couple episodes I saw of Smith, and I really do like him, but it couldn't overrule the other factors for me. Now, with technology the way it is, and the actor being of fine choice, I'm on board. I really enjoyed this episode despite it being a bit flat. I'm one that doesn't judge a show by it's pilot though.

I know little to nothing about Doctor Who as a whole, but I'm ready to jump into it and hopefully I'll slowly open up to past seasons, but somehow I doubt it. I'd just love to dive in now and hopefully they'll get better and better for me. But yeah, Capaldi FTW. When I was watching Smith, I liked how quirky the Doctor was and apparently that's a staple of the character, but (OF COURSE) I'm the type that'd love a dark quirkiness...something on the fringe, that's funny, but also...he could obliterate you at any moment. Capaldi has that in spades and I FOOKIN' LOVE IT.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on August 23, 2014, 11:33:09 PM
In celebration of the fantastic new Doctor, and keeping in line with my tradition of pixeling the Doctor, a portrait I just made!

(https://i.imgur.com/QHtepnG.png)

I thought the episode was fantastic. Capaldi is a brilliant Doctor, and he brings a new gravitas to the role that really fits in the progression of recent events. I loved the callback to The Girl in the Fireplace, and the clockwork droids, while serving as a background element to character development and the "new Doctor" storyline, were still fantastic in their own right, and the ambiguity over the demise of the leader robot at the end was great.

Some people have complained about the pace-- I find that hilarious, because the same people were complaining it was too fast last series. The pace in this episode left room to breathe, imo, and I thought that worked well in the context of things. Some other notes-- the episode had some choice lines, very humorous at times, while it felt serious and dramatic at other points. The cameo from Smith was great, and not overdone nor cheesy, and it served as a way to assure new viewers that while this Doctor may be a bit rugged around the edges, that he is still the Doctor we know and love.

I'm looking forward to the overarching storyline, too. Everything is in place for what may be the best season of Doctor Who yet!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 23, 2014, 11:49:11 PM
I didn't have a problem with the pacing either. The episode went by pretty quickly, and all of the slower talking scenes were quite necessary for the characters to deal with the regeneration and the episode story. Had they rushed it along, you would have missed out on a lot of that, and the episode would have become a bit too familiar, and people would have criticized it for lacking drama. You can't please everyone!
And let's face it, a lot of people will just dump shit on whatever Moffat does.

As the season goes along, I think more and more of that episode will become relevant and important.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on August 24, 2014, 07:57:48 AM
Amazing. Already like Capaldi better than Matt Smith, and I loved Smith.

Clara is a great companion now.

I was cracking up at 12 going "Are you being cross with me?" at the restaurant. I already love how he will say something and not care and people react to it but he has already moved on.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jonny108 on August 24, 2014, 08:25:52 AM
Loved every minute of it. Capaldi was awesome, really looking forward to seeing how he progresses over the rest of the series. I think the best has been brought out in Jenna too, Clara had more character development in this episode than she did all of Series 7.  I have very high hopes for this series now! :metal
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on August 24, 2014, 10:07:22 AM
I loved the references to past doctors / tardis decor.

Made me smile a lot when he said " there used to be more circles on the walls" because that's the TARDIS I grew up with.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Dimitrius on August 24, 2014, 10:42:24 AM
TIL, Kotowboy smiles.


Also, very good episode. Clara was more developed in this one episode than in all of s7.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on August 24, 2014, 10:47:52 AM
TIL, Kotowboy smiles.

Urban Dictionary to the rescue.

Err... I mean TTR.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on August 24, 2014, 11:16:36 AM
I always love when doctor who goes in a darker direction. I really liked Deep breath and am really looking forward to the rest of the season.


The hot air "balloon" was a nice touch.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on August 24, 2014, 11:23:10 AM
Really enjoyed this! Loving Capaldi and loved the tie-in to Girl in the Fireplace. I've also missed my favorite lesbians   :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 24, 2014, 11:36:46 AM
Well that was pretty awesome. I really liked Capaldi, though I'm having trouble understanding some of his lines. Might have to rewatch it, though that's no chore with an episode as good as this. And that ending was great, though I don't think that that's the Rani. Dat Matt Smith telephone call though.

Also, Jenny is super super cute. :heart
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on August 24, 2014, 12:53:22 PM
I had completely forgotten about this due to some gaming frustrations. Time to catch up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on August 24, 2014, 02:09:09 PM
Peter, you can stay as long as you want. Great episode. Only complaint I have is he needs to lighten up the accent just a bit to understand him, for instance, I totally missed his line about Amy
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on August 24, 2014, 02:20:18 PM
Yeah it will take a few more episodes for me to adjust, I didn't understand a few bits here and there. What was that about Amy?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 24, 2014, 02:44:49 PM
When Clara was trying to reach his sonic with her feet, he said that he wanted Amy back. I think it was a reference to Amy having long legs?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on August 24, 2014, 03:12:33 PM
Absolutely loved the episode, and was thrilled to see Matt Smith one last (?) time. Capaldi will be a joy in this role.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on August 24, 2014, 03:24:35 PM
I liked the episode but not the story of it. The introduction of characters and some of the development was great, though. When the Doctor left Clara there on her own... And the restaurant scene was brilliant!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on August 24, 2014, 04:21:02 PM
Out of town yesterday, so I missed the episode (couldn't download it. Can't be arsed to watch the hatchet job BBC-A does to long episodes having to add commercial breaks) but I caught it today, and it was brilliant. Capaldi is brilliant, the episode was brilliant, everything from the moment the Doctor and Clara met in the restaurant was brilliant, and the sucker punch of Eleven calling Clara was played perfectly. Amazing, amazing, amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 25, 2014, 02:10:08 PM
New Season 8 wallpaper! :D

(https://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn105/SteveAudrey/desktop_zpsd123045c.png)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on August 25, 2014, 02:14:42 PM
Nice!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 25, 2014, 02:23:18 PM
Want. Please post.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 25, 2014, 02:34:30 PM
(https://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn105/SteveAudrey/timevort_zpsca6ed6b2.png)
(https://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn105/SteveAudrey/timevort2_zps9ae9cd8c.png)
(https://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn105/SteveAudrey/timevort4_zpsbde0f5b7.png)
(https://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn105/SteveAudrey/timevort3_zps444a45ea.png)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 25, 2014, 02:52:22 PM
Gorgeous, but sadly too small.  :-[
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: TioJorge on August 25, 2014, 03:00:22 PM
God, I get that all the fuckin' time.  :'(
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 25, 2014, 03:05:01 PM
Gorgeous, but sadly too small.  :-[

What do you mean? How big is your PC screen?  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 25, 2014, 03:10:12 PM
1440 x 900.

I've been told it's a good size.

:eyebrows:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 25, 2014, 03:17:27 PM
It's way thicker than it's long. Just sayin'   :yarr
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 25, 2014, 03:19:13 PM
As all good screens are.

At least, that's what she said.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: TioJorge on August 25, 2014, 04:10:01 PM
I'm rockin' dat 1920 x 1080.








CLEARLY over compensating. This is my big truck, guys.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on August 25, 2014, 08:03:52 PM
:lol, you guys. Imma try out that sweet third one for a while and see if I like it better than my creepy Steven Wilson "Index" wallpaper...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 30, 2014, 03:00:21 AM
Rant time!

It seems everywhere else on the internet is nothing but Moffat bitching. The comments on every Youtube video (yeah, that was my first mistake) are just facepalm-worthy.

They put up a clip of the 10th Doctor's fake-out regeneration, and people are bitching about Moffat counting it as a real regeneration. Is there any reason to believe it wasn't intended to use up a regeneration? Why wouldn't it have used up a regeneration? He still used up the regeneration energy, he just diverted it before it could change his appearance, and it was enough to create a whole new Doctor later on. Pretty sure that counts, but no, people are still blaming Moffat for RTD's copout regeneration anyway.

The 12th Doctor's first episode had him wearing pyjamas. But the 10th Doctor's first episode had him in pyjamas! So people bitch that Moffat's out of ideas and rehashing. Pretty sure pyjamas are not counted as an original plot idea. I'm pretty sure it's just clothing.

The next episode has a Dalek chained up in it. RTD already did an episode with a captured Dalek chained up. Let's criticize it for copying another episode before actually seeing the episode! These episodes are clearly identical! Moffat, you hack!

They're adding a new male character? Ooh Moffat has to put in his love stories. Doctor Who shouldn't have love stories. RTD would never have done this! Except for Rose being with Micky. Then falling in love with the Doctor and having the sappy happy ending with a human clone of The Doctor. That's like fan-fic levels of sap. They should have left it alone after the Doomsday ending. And Martha instantly loved the Doctor. The only RTD companion who didn't have a thing for the Doctor was Donna, and that's because she was old and people wouldn't want to see it.

Moffat ruined the Daleks by overusing them! Never mind the fact that RTD used them just as much. S6 barely used them at all, and not as a main plot point. I've heard that they have to use the Daleks every season to retain the rights to use them, although I'm not sure if that's just a myth. I like the majority of the Dalek episodes, and they're iconic, so I don't care how many times they use them, as long as they're original stories.

At this point, I think people just try way too hard to find criticism because they want to hate Moffat. The Moffat era certainly isn't perfect, and S7 was his weakest overall, but I can't imagine how it's any worse overall than the RTD era, with its farting aliens, cat doctors, flat skin people, werewolves, alien fat bastard with a mohawk who absorbs people, the girl who is evil because she draws pictures with crayons, the midget tweety bird doctor, getting attacked by a giant bee man etc.
And a lot of the criticisms are just because people aren't paying attention. How can The Doctor be over 2000 years old? RTD told me that he's only 900!

I don't know if it's nostalgia because people got used to 5 years of RTD first, but there must be some kind of rose coloured glasses effect going on (no pun intended). Both eras of Doctor Who have their strengths and weaknesses, but people only seem to criticize the Moffat era for doing things that were done to the same extent by RTD, yet people hold RTD up on a pedestal like he's untouchable. I don't get it.
I watched all of nuWho for the first time in one go over a couple of weeks, so I don't feel like I have any major bias towards either era, but for me the changeover at S5 was very much welcome, and when I've gotten other people into the show, I start from the Moffat era. I have trouble picking out great single episodes to show people from the RTD era (the double episodes are the better ones), and when I do, incidentally, they're the Moffat episodes anyway.


I'm glad DTF is apparently the one place on the internet where the Doctor Who fans don't suck. :lol Everyone here is pretty reasonable and fair, regardless of which era they prefer.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 30, 2014, 03:50:43 AM
You shouldn't get so angry about it Blob, it's the same as with anything else longstanding (see: Metallica, Dream Theater, etc.). Some people get on board at a certain point and THAT is the golden era and anything different is wrong.

And remember that a critical minority always appears bigger than it is online. Around the world, Doctor Who is as popular as it has ever been, probably more so, and I suspect those who don't like the new stuff are quite annoyed about that so speak up against it even more.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 30, 2014, 04:03:37 AM
Oh, I'm not angry about it, it just annoys me enough that I needed a good rant. :lol

Given Doctor Who's continuing popularity (and probably the most popular it's been since returning), I have no doubt it is a minority in the real world, but on the internet, it's effectively a majority, because the people who are content with the current state of the show don't have the need to complain about it, so the only people commenting are the detractors. It just bugs me as a new fan to have to put up with that everywhere. Dangit, I'm a new fan, I want to talk with other fans about how good the show is!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on August 30, 2014, 06:00:05 AM
Around the world, Doctor Who is as popular as it has ever been, probably more so, and I suspect those who don't like the new stuff are quite annoyed about that so speak up against it even more.
Fucking THIS.

Remember, some people are only happy when they're miserable.  This is called the internet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on August 30, 2014, 07:19:29 AM
I love when people rant about Doctor Who and prove that all they likely ever watched was the new series, and maybe not even the first season.

Jon Pertwee's Third Doctor was the prototype for "the Doctor lays in bed in his pajamas while recovering from regeneration." Back in, you know, 1970.  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 30, 2014, 07:22:51 AM
Well, clearly Robert Holmes was ripping off RTD. It is a show about time travel after all, it all makes sense.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 30, 2014, 07:29:24 AM
I love when people rant about Doctor Who and prove that all they likely ever watched was the new series, and maybe not even the first season.

Jon Pertwee's Third Doctor was the prototype for "the Doctor lays in bed in his pajamas while recovering from regeneration." Back in, you know, 1970.  :lol

Another strike against the haters!
It's even worse that some people don't get the callback for The War Doctor saying his body was wearing a bit thin before regenerating, and then have no idea why he was regenerating.
I haven't seen much of the old episodes, but damn, every fan should be familiar with the regeneration sequences at the very least.

I don't have the intention of watching the original episodes any time soon, because it's just a downright daunting amount to get through, but I like to at least make myself familiar with any references and gain a bit of insight as a fan. There's so much history there.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on August 30, 2014, 07:35:13 AM
If there's one classic Doctor Who episode everyone should have watched by now, it's Genesis of the Daleks.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on August 30, 2014, 09:25:20 AM
If there's one classic Doctor Who episode everyone should have watched by now, it's Genesis of the Daleks.

"The Caves of Androzani" would like to have a word with you.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 30, 2014, 09:32:01 AM
I didn't quite like Androzani as Genesis, which in turn was a real stunner!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on August 30, 2014, 01:24:54 PM
An interesting episode, with the concept of morality, but fell short I feel in making the Daleks feel scary again. Maybe not the point.

There was a great callback to the first Dalek episode of the new Doctor Who series.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 30, 2014, 01:50:07 PM
I liked the continuation of exploring his darker side, and I also liked that Missy/heaven is clearly a story arc they're going to stick with fairly prominently. She's gathering people up when they die - no clue how she's catching them though, but I imagine Moffat might start to reveal some information in the next few episodes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 30, 2014, 03:44:05 PM
I don't believe the point was to make the Daleks scary again, truthfully. The point was really the moral dicotomy within the doctor, the contradiction between his overreaching love for life and all its form and his parallel thousand-year hatred for the most vicious creatures in the universe.

I really believe it was an amazing thing to show what happened the moment the Doctor was given the opportunity to paint a maleable being's mind with his own memories. We saw in the end what color stuck to the canvas best.

Anther great episode, would and will watch again!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on August 30, 2014, 03:45:10 PM
Haven't seen any of the new episodes, but I don't believe anything can make a Dalek scary. They're just too lame.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 30, 2014, 04:02:43 PM
Haven't seen any of the new episodes, but I don't believe anything can make a Dalek scary. They're just too lame.
To this I say:

Youaretheweakestlink. Goobye.

You are unauthorized, your death will now be implemented.

YOU! ARE! AN! E-NE-MY! OF! DA! DA-LEKS! YOU! WILL! BE! EX-TEERMINATED!!

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on August 30, 2014, 04:06:20 PM
That entire first series of Doctor Who with Ecclestone really made the Daleks scary. Especially the episode "Dalek"
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on August 30, 2014, 04:25:28 PM
That entire first series of Doctor Who with Ecclestone really made the Daleks scary. Especially the episode "Dalek"

Too bad Journey's End happened then.  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on August 30, 2014, 04:46:03 PM
That entire first series of Doctor Who with Ecclestone really made the Daleks scary. Especially the episode "Dalek"

Even there I didn't think they were scary, but that's definitely the closest they've come. I was really impressed by Eccleston in that episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on August 30, 2014, 07:34:08 PM
Tonight is Dalek meets The Invisible Enemy
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 30, 2014, 07:59:01 PM
Luckily it's better than the latter.

EDIT: Now I've finished watching it, and I liked it a lot. I'm enjoying the darker side to the Doctor a lot - that scene when the antibodies were first introduced was brilliantly written and brilliantly performed. Also digging the seeds of the story arc, as welk as the hinted story of Danny Pink - he seems like a much more interesting character than recent male companions. The only thing that I'd criticise is the fact that the supporting characters weren't really interesing or really developed in any shape or form.

SPECULATION: Danny's introduced as a lady killer, yet acts in quite a bumbling manner when talking to Clara. Plus, we know he's killed a civilian. Maybe it's Moffat letting us know in a clever way that he actually killed a woman?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 30, 2014, 10:46:28 PM
I thought that episode was the scariest the Daleks have been in a little while, actually killing people and such, but they've never been close to legitimately scary.

I liked the idea of the episode, with the Doctor struggling with whether he's good or bad, and the change between initially not wanting to help the Dalek, then helping the Dalek, then trying to destroy it once it turned evil again, then deciding to help it again to turn good, then realizing that his own hate turned it bad again. There was a constant struggle throughout the episode that played out nicely, and he came out of it even less sure of who he is.

This Doctor is much more flawed, and cold, which makes Clara a lot more vital this season. It reminds me of the RTD era, where the Doctor had a tendency to become cold and dispassionate, while his companion helped give him perspective and humanity. I think Clara is much more than an obligatory tag-along this season, and that he needs her more than ever.

So far I don't like Missy or Danny Pink at all, there's just not enough connection there for me to care about yet. That should change as they reveal more about their story, but for now it's just an entirely separate thing taking up time.

There have definitely been changes this season. So far, I'm liking them. The editing also felt more timey-wimey.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on August 30, 2014, 11:55:58 PM
Augh, what a beautiful episode. Capaldi is SO dark, and his portrayal of the Doctor is fantastic. He's really coming into his character and he hasso much chemistry with Clara.

I loved the increased darkness and the Doctor not caring as much as he would have in the past-- he really has a "ain't nobody got time for that" attitude towards everything and he's here for business and business only. The full-circle change from "you would make a good Dalek" to "you are a good Dalek" was mindblowing, and as absolutely haunting as it was originally in "Dalek."

I enjoyed Pink's introduction-- much more real feeling than Rory, and his portrayal of his character is a bit more subtle than usual, which I'm enjoying. Missy's storyline/arc is also happily being inserted to each episode, and I'm really interested in where it all is heading-- Moffat's masterplan will certainly strike again.

Overall, great episode, great development, and if the other episodes are of the quality of the last two, series 8 MIGHT just be the best series of DW yet. Robot of Sherwood looks interesting, and I've heard good things about it, so hopefully next week's episode will be just as good as this one.

Also, did anyone else LOVE the psuedo-70's psychedelia of the crew entering the Dalek eyestalk? It reminded me of classic sci-fi, and that was great. 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on August 31, 2014, 07:23:53 AM
Overall, I thought this episode was just...ok. Capaldi kills it. Don't like Pink. I'd be cool with Journey being a future companion being foreshadowed, kinda like Donna. Daleks were cool here. This may make me sound like I am not a fan but I really am, sometimes the stories leave me feeling wanting more in a bad way though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on August 31, 2014, 10:48:56 AM
Personally I'd say that the point of "Into the Dalek" was that it was more of a Heart of Darkness-type story where the Doctor is forced to confront his own personal biases and hatred, rather than it specifically trying to make the Daleks scary again. If the latter happened, which I think it kinda did, it was more of a byproduct of the episode as a whole.

But yeah, I absolutely loved this episode. Next week's episode should be 'alright,' but I'm expecting it to be the dud of the season (or at least one of the more average episodes). It's "Listen" that I'm excited to see, personally.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 31, 2014, 11:06:29 AM
Next week's episode does look a bit fluff to me, but the name implies robot, and it could still be a good opportunity for character development from everyone. So I still expect it to be entertaining, even if it is ultimately one of the filler episodes of the season.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on August 31, 2014, 02:24:07 PM
Apparently on Dailymotion, it now looks like you can't watch full episodes of classic Who in one shot. There now split in thirds. I wonder why?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 31, 2014, 02:30:43 PM
Probably depends on the serial. I searched a random one (Spearhead from Space) and I found plenty people that uploaded them in the original 25-minute episodes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: James Mypetgiress on August 31, 2014, 02:38:42 PM
I'm still not sure I like Peter Capaldi as the doctor.  :sad:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 31, 2014, 02:49:32 PM
Do you feel like elaborating on that? (not trying to be a dick, just curious)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: James Mypetgiress on August 31, 2014, 03:48:13 PM
Ok.
I can't understand what he is saying a lot of the time (talks too quick)
He is too serious. All the jokes come from elsewhere, instead of from him (all doctors since the reboot have been funny)
And, on another note (not just Peter Capaldi)
The stories haven't been all that good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on August 31, 2014, 03:50:05 PM
Ok.
I can't understand what he is saying a lot of the time (talks too quick)
He is too serious. All the jokes come from elsewhere, instead of from him (all doctors since the reboot have been funny)
And, on another note (not just Peter Capaldi)
The stories haven't been all that good.

Closed captioning is your friend.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on August 31, 2014, 03:52:23 PM
Loved the episode! Great concept and I love Capaldi as the Doctor.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on August 31, 2014, 04:05:12 PM
I can't understand what he is saying a lot of the time (talks too quick)
It's definitely not the speed, because he talks MUCH slower than Matt Smith. It's probably just his accent, but I think you'll get used to that.

Quote
He is too serious. All the jokes come from elsewhere, instead of from him (all doctors since the reboot have been funny)
Disagree strongly here - he jokes a lot but with more of a dry, sarcastic humour (more like Ecclestone than the last two doctors).

Quote
And, on another note (not just Peter Capaldi)
The stories haven't been all that good.
Fair play, that's a matter of taste/preference.

As indeed is the Doctor overall. None of the Doctors are universally liked (Tenant easily comes closest). He may grow on you, but no harm done if not!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: James Mypetgiress on August 31, 2014, 04:38:02 PM
Yeah, maybe it's just his accent. As for his humor, as a very sarcastic person (aka, a twat who never takes anything seriously) I loved the humour of ecclestone, and wish that he could have stayed longer. But, I don't think his humour is the same to that of Capaldi.
Although. I do think ill get used to him, at the present moment, I'm not a fan.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: James Mypetgiress on August 31, 2014, 04:39:29 PM
Ok.
I can't understand what he is saying a lot of the time (talks too quick)
He is too serious. All the jokes come from elsewhere, instead of from him (all doctors since the reboot have been funny)
And, on another note (not just Peter Capaldi)
The stories haven't been all that good.

Closed captioning is your friend.
My dad watches it with me, and closed captioning pisses him off to no end  :rollin
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 31, 2014, 11:50:57 PM
I can't understand what he is saying a lot of the time (talks too quick)
It's definitely not the speed, because he talks MUCH slower than Matt Smith. It's probably just his accent, but I think you'll get used to that.


It's not the accent (at least not primarily). I never had a single problem with Amelia/Amy Pond's Scottish accent. The problem is that Capaldi mumbles, which in combination with talking fast with that the accent makes it really difficult to make out on first go.
He needs to enunciate a bit better. It's only an occasional problem, but both episodes have required skipping back to listen to some lines multiple times. I'm just starting to accept that this is going to be the norm for this Doctor.

I also disagree that he's too serious though. I very much dislike serious characters, and the thought of a "darker" Doctor worried me at first, because I don't generally like that direction. But this Doctor definitely has a great blunt, dry sense of humour, and a lot of the humour comes from him being a bit of a jerk to people, and not caring.

-Do you use it to shrink the surgeons so they can climb inside the patients?
-Exactly
-Fantastic idea for a movie. Terrible idea for a proctologist.

:lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 01, 2014, 12:37:23 AM
Karen Gillan's accent isn't very strong. Capaldi is proper Scottish. I think you'll get used to it - I am already as my girlfriend and her family are Scottish (plus I have a number of Scottish colleagues) and I've followed every line in the two episodes so far!

-Do you use it to shrink the surgeons so they can climb inside the patients?
-Exactly
-Fantastic idea for a movie. Terrible idea for a proctologist.

:lol
:lol Love it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lynxo on September 01, 2014, 01:51:31 AM
I haven't watch anything of the new season but I love your reactions so far. :) I'm really, really excited, but I'm gonna hold off until every episode is released so I can watch them anytime I desire.

By the way, is there any legal way for a fellow Swede to watch these? Doctor Who is one show I'll gladly pay to watch, is there any international stream or anything of the sort? Netflix took a really long time to get the latest season's, especially Netflix in Sweden.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 01, 2014, 02:55:06 AM
Karen Gillan's accent isn't very strong. Capaldi is proper Scottish. I think you'll get used to it - I am already as my girlfriend and her family are Scottish (plus I have a number of Scottish colleagues) and I've followed every line in the two episodes so far!


I hope you're right! I otherwise think Capaldi is perfect so far. It's just frustrating missing the occasional great line and having to decipher it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 01, 2014, 11:06:42 AM
A very interesting and in-depth Q&A with Into The Dalek writer Phil Ford!

https://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-08-30/i-pitched-it-as-die-hard-in-a-dalek---spoilerific-qa-with-into-the-dalek-co-writer-phil-ford
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 01, 2014, 02:10:05 PM
That was a great read. It must have been a challenge writing for a Doctor that wasn't even cast yet! Crazy that the script turned out as good as it is.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 02, 2014, 01:01:08 AM
That's a really great interview, thanks for the link Marco :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 03, 2014, 02:20:59 PM
:( I still fail to see what everyone likes about the show in general. I like Capaldi but i've never liked the writing of the show. ***

Into the Dalek was not bad but the things I get from watching the show are extremely vague motivations for anything and a crisis which is solved in a jiffy.



Like why did they capture a Dalek in the first place ? And why did the Doctor and Clara suddenly agree to be shrunk down and put inside it ?









*** This is just me though. I wish I enjoyed it more than I do.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on September 03, 2014, 03:09:34 PM
Do you like any of DW since the reboot?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 03, 2014, 03:10:07 PM
Although the following is all speculation since they didn't explain these 'vague motivations', I believe they are possible explanations.
They might have captured the Dalek becaused it was damaged and because they therefore had the opportunity to catch it. When fighting something like Daleks you'd probably jump at any opportunity to get a better understanding of how they work, what they look like inside and what their weak points may be. Those are probably also the reasons they needed someone to go inside. The Doctor and Clara I think agreed to be shrunk down and put inside because a good Dalek was something the Doctor never would have thought possible. It's mainly the Doctor's motivation though, not so much Clara's.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 03, 2014, 03:20:19 PM
Do you like any of DW since the reboot?

I do !

I didn't see very much of Chris. I saw a lot of Tennant and mostly liked it. I think the writing has nosedived since Matt's era though.

I don't quite get how the show is written like it's for kids but is on too late to be a kids show - hence the Sarah Jane Adventures.

But it's not as adult as Torchwood.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on September 03, 2014, 03:22:29 PM
I don't know, I never felt it was being written specifically for kids, just that it didn't necessarily exclude them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 03, 2014, 03:24:56 PM
I'm not saying the show is bad becasue I know people do love it. And I wish I did love it too. I loved it around the Baker / Davidson /        / McCoy era.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 03, 2014, 03:25:51 PM
I would say the writing is stronger now than during Tenant's era, though it was of course still good then.

I think it's a matter of taste. Those questions you asked Kotow, they're not the point of that story. It doesn't matter why they captured the dalek. It's a story about the Doctor's journey, trying to figure out if he's good or not, because since his regeneration he genuinely doesn't know. The "story" of the episode is backdrop to that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 03, 2014, 03:43:09 PM
While I agree with that, I actually thought that that whole "trying to understand the Daleks" thing was explained, possibly in a throw-away line... and it makes sense! If you have a Dalek that wants to kill other Daleks, then of course you'll try to study how it came to be, possibly trying to recreate the effect further down the line.

What made far less sense to me was the fact that the Doctor was thought to be a Dalek spy but was then allowed to leave to collect Clara. I mean, if he really were a spy and not a relentlessly curious Time Lord, what's to stop him from never returning? But like ariich said, that's backdrop to the main dilemma, which, in my opinion, was explored quite masterfully.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on September 03, 2014, 08:44:16 PM
12 was obviously intrigued by a good Dalek, he couldn't even resist being involved.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 03, 2014, 11:26:35 PM
They explained why they captured a Dalek. It appeared to be dead in space, so it seemed like a great opportunity to study the Daleks to help them fight the war against them. Then once they started taking it apart, they realized that it wasn't just a machine, but a living creature inside, so they stopped torturing it and it became a prisoner of war. They still had enough compassion left in them to let it live, since it was seemingly harmless at that point. Yet that didn't extend to the Doctor when they were going to kill him, so they were pretty conflicted with the whole war, I think. Fighting the Daleks was a necessity for survival. I think they used this story not only to explore the Doctor, but as a parallel too.

I think the Doctor's motivations were clear. The Doctor would want to do it out of pure curiosity regardless, but he was also conflicted about it, which is why the first thing he did was grab Clara. He didn't want to help a good Dalek, because he didn't believe there was such a thing. He asked Clara if he was a good man, and she wasn't sure, then she told him he was being prejudiced against the Daleks. Clara has become the Doctor's moral compass as he struggles with who he is. He needs her as his conscience.
There was the typical benevolent part of the Doctor that wanted to help another living being in need, one that had shown signs of change. If one Dalek can become good, it could influence the rest, and prove that nobody is beyond redemption, not even the Doctor's oldest nemesis. Maybe the Doctor had to prove this to himself too, that if they can be redeemed, so can he.
On the other hand, there's a cynical side to this Doctor that hates the Daleks so much that he doesn't believe there's such a thing as a good Dalek, because he's had 2000 years of his life telling him otherwise, and he wants to see why this one is good, and prove that it's a malfunction, and not a sign of growth.

I think this also ties into the idea of disliking soldiers that ran through the episode, because they fight the same internal battle constantly. The Doctor didn't want another soldier like himself on board, that could justify killing and hatred. The Doctor's dark side comes from fighting the Daleks in the time war, and fighting them on Trenzalore for hundreds of years. He needs Clara with him, the girl who wanted him to find another way to end the time war, and only wants to see the good in people, to help him be the good man he always aspires to be, The Doctor.

I thought that was all done well in this episode, but the show does move very fast, so even missing a line or two of dialogue can leave a hole in your understanding of why something is happening. But the more I think about it, the more all of the dialogue in the episode (and season) fits with these themes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 04, 2014, 12:55:40 AM
Well said Blob!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 04, 2014, 01:15:45 AM
Blob is right and I completely and wholeheartedly agree with every word he wrote.

Mark the day, people.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 04, 2014, 06:01:34 AM
Finally caught the episode, and I also agree with Blob.

"She's my carer.  She cares, so I don't have to."
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 06, 2014, 10:16:34 PM
Another great episode. It was nice to see them have a lighter episode in the mix to break up the seriousness of the first two and next week's episode. I especially loved the banter between Riley and Capaldi
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 06, 2014, 11:18:10 PM
An enjoyable episode, and the duo of Robin Hood and The Doc was great. Any other Doctor would have had the time of his life finding out that Robin Hood was real, but the 12th Doctor was not having any of it. :lol

I thought the ending with shooting the arrow being enough to get them into orbit was beyond ridiculous, and I still don't know how a sonic screwdriver could make a wooden target blow up like that. Aside from that, a good fun episode. If this is a filler episode, then this season is looking pretty good so far.

Any guesses on the whole promised land story arc?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 07, 2014, 01:39:31 AM
I thought the ending with shooting the arrow being enough to get them into orbit was beyond ridiculous
I've read this comment elsewhere, but what was so ridiculous about it? Obviously it was a bit silly and cheesy, but I've seen people describing it as a plot hole.

Anyway, loved the episode! Probably my favourite of the series so far, my favourite from Gatiss, and one of the best "fun" DW episodes they've ever done. I'm loving Capaldi's grumpy Doctor, it brings a whole side of humour to the show that hasn't been there with the last few Doctors!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 07, 2014, 01:50:24 AM
I thought the ending with shooting the arrow being enough to get them into orbit was beyond ridiculous
I've read this comment elsewhere, but what was so ridiculous about it? Obviously it was a bit silly and cheesy, but I've seen people describing it as a plot hole.

First of all, requiring gold to power the engines was kinda contrived to fit with the time period of the story, but I can let that one slide easily enough.
But just look at the large amounts of gold they required for the thing, and how the gold needed to be pressed into those specific shapes for the "matrix" of the engine or whatever it was. And then the Doctor knows they don't have enough gold to make it to orbit, but a tiny little arrow just happens to be enough to push it over the edge to make the difference. The amount of gold in that thing would have been completely negligible compared to the gold they were gathering, much too small an amount for The Doctor to intuitively know they didn't have enough, or to have made any difference. And it wasn't even put into an engine, it was just shot randomly into the side of the ship.
Basically it came down to them needing a way for Robin Hood to save the day that fit with his mythology, and that was all they had. A king would have had enough gold lying around to power those engines long before The Doc showed up. How was it not ridiculous?


It was a good episode, but that was silly. But it wasn't a serious episode, so it didn't ruin the episode or anything. I'm not sure I'd call it a plot hole, it was just a whopping major inconsistency.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 07, 2014, 01:57:03 AM
I thought the ending with shooting the arrow being enough to get them into orbit was beyond ridiculous
I've read this comment elsewhere, but what was so ridiculous about it? Obviously it was a bit silly and cheesy, but I've seen people describing it as a plot hole.

First of all, requiring gold to power the engines was kinda contrived to fit with the time period of the story, but I can let that one slide easily enough.
And then the Doctor knows they don't have enough gold to make it to orbit, but a tiny little arrow just happens to be enough to push it over the edge to make the difference.
Well yes, that's how escape velocity works. Once you're in orbit you need very little fuel to do anything after that, it's getting into orbit that's the hard part. That's basic real-word science, not even sci-fi.

Quote
And it wasn't even put into an engine, it was just shot randomly into the side of the ship.
Ok I suppose that wasn't really explained. But then from what we saw the gold was being used to make circuitry, rather than as a pure fuel, so it's hardly that outlandish, as the outside of the ship will be connected to the rest of it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 07, 2014, 02:15:00 AM
I thought the ending with shooting the arrow being enough to get them into orbit was beyond ridiculous
I've read this comment elsewhere, but what was so ridiculous about it? Obviously it was a bit silly and cheesy, but I've seen people describing it as a plot hole.

First of all, requiring gold to power the engines was kinda contrived to fit with the time period of the story, but I can let that one slide easily enough.
And then the Doctor knows they don't have enough gold to make it to orbit, but a tiny little arrow just happens to be enough to push it over the edge to make the difference.
Well yes, that's how escape velocity works. Once you're in orbit you need very little fuel to do anything after that, it's getting into orbit that's the hard part. That's basic real-word science, not even sci-fi.

Quote
And it wasn't even put into an engine, it was just shot randomly into the side of the ship.
Ok I suppose that wasn't really explained. But then from what we saw the gold was being used to make circuitry, rather than as a pure fuel, so it's hardly that outlandish, as the outside of the ship will be connected to the rest of it.

1. That doesn't explain how it worked. The amount of power required for escape velocity is huge, and the order of magnitude of gold they were working with rendered that arrow negligible. It would not have been the difference between barely hovering 100m off the ground, and suddenly shooting off quickly into orbit. For it to be plausible scientifically, it would have made the difference between barely making it into space but burning up from skimming the atmosphere, and achieving escape velocity. That's not what happened at all.
It looked more convincing that the arrow just pushed it into orbit, which is even more outlandish. I couldn't even accept it for scifi, let alone any resembling any real world science. And I don't hold Doctor Who to very high standards of scientific accuracy to begin with. :lol

2. That's not how circuitry works either. I can't think of any justification for how that worked. If it was used in the sense of circuitry, it wasn't part of a closed loop, or connecting anything to anything else, and it had to go through the ship's hull, which shouldn't function in any way as part of engine OR circuitry, for oh so many reasons. If it was a "fuel" in the sense of being used up, then it wasn't even connected to the engine.
It's like duct taping a loose wire or a AA battery to the side of your laptop when the power is low, and expecting it will do something.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 07, 2014, 02:30:14 AM
For it to be plausible scientifically, it would have made the difference between barely making it into space but burning up from skimming the atmosphere, and achieving escape velocity. That's not what happened at all.
Well no, because they stopped that from happening before it got that far. :lol But that's exactly what the Doctor was worried about - that it would burn up, explode, and take out half of England.

Quote
That's not how circuitry works either. I can't think of any justification for how that worked.
Does that matter though? It's an alien spacecraft, it could work in all sorts of ways. I mean, yeah they could explain how that ship works, where the metal alloy casing for the ship conducts energy from the outside to help power it, for example. That sort of thing, and far more outlandish sciencey ideas, happen in DW all the time. Within the context of the show, it's completely plausible. But I'm glad they don't explain every little thing like that, personally, as I think that would get a bit boring.

Anyway, it's a bit silly to be arguing over the fictional science in a show about a time-travelling alien. :lol I myself found that resolution of the episode a bit overly cheesy, and the weakest part of the episode. It just irritates me a bit when people shout "plot hole" at anything that hasn't been fully explained in detail. I know you didn't do that, but I've seen it elswhere.

EDIT: Another example was in Deep Breath, where people complained about the fact that Clara was so upset about the Doctor changing, even though when she went into his timeline she saw and met all his other incarnations. Again people shouted "plot hole", and didn't seem to consider that there might be a difference between understanding that the Doctor regenerates and changes, and actually losing both the appearance and personality of the one that you know and who is your friend.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 07, 2014, 03:32:52 AM
A plot hole is when something is inadvertently overlooked or incorrect in the plot. The arrow thing was done very poorly, but it worked how they intended it to, however flimsily. Some people just throw around the term plot hole for any kind of mistake, but it refers to a specific kind of mistake.

In scifi, I expect some level of internal consistency with the rules it establishes, whatever those are. I didn't feel this was internally consistent with what the episode established. Even if they only had one block, I figured the arrow was half a percent of that, at a stretch. And they showed at least two blocks (hard to tell exactly with editing, could have been more). It doesn't even matter how the arrow was supposed to work, because I don't believe it could.
It's much more interesting and immersive when they do explain the science (at least enough for me to reasonably fill in the blanks with real world knowledge), because that's what makes it science fiction, as opposed to lazy fantasy, and it's what makes it the most rewarding genre for me. 
The only way I can justify that ending to myself is that the ship had enough power to make orbit anyway, and The Doctor was completely wrong and the arrow made no difference. That's the only way it works in my mind. Move along, Blob.

Also, I just remembered that the last laser reflecting bit was ridiculous too (just that last bit where it bounces in the circle of people to the final robot). I accepted them being able to reflect the laser back, but it ignored the third dimension entirely. It would only work if everyone could keep the rotational axis of the mirrors exactly perpendicular to the ground. Even one degree off with that many bounces means someone's toast. Luckily none of the robots were smart enough to not shoot for the feet. :P

But I don't want to dwell too much on the problems, as they didn't affect the episode much. It was a fun, filler episode, with Robin Hood. It didn't take itself too seriously, so I don't either.

I forgot to mention, I actually understood Capaldi this week! There was one line at the end I thought I heard wrong, and was like "What? He gave him a present?" but then it turns out I heard right.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 07, 2014, 05:04:08 AM
I kind of agree with Blob.

I must say also, that of the first three episodes of the Capaldi era, this one is definitely in third place.  I agree that we need light episodes, but this seemed very light indeed compared to the first two.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 07, 2014, 05:44:15 AM
I kind of agree with Blob.

I'll take it!

I agree it's the weaker of this season's episodes so far, but still enjoyable thanks to Capaldi.
I don't expect the big important stories every episode, but with all they've introduced in the first two episodes, and spending a decent amount of time last episode introducing Danny Pink, I would expect an episode this light would have been better placed a bit later. At least it did introduce The Doctor to the mystery of the promised land, so it still had its place in the season arc.

After rewatching the episode, at first the gold was to rebuild the circuits, then a few minutes later, the gold was to seal the radiation leak, and then a few minutes later the golden arrow was to power the engines because they didn't have enough power to get into orbit. Then the ship exploded because of the radiation leak. Now I'm even more confused. That gold is some magical stuff!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 07, 2014, 06:00:56 AM
That's Doctor Who writing for you.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 07, 2014, 01:18:03 PM
I just watched the episode and since Dr. Who is so ludicrously silly even when it's trying to be serious - it kind of worked this week I thought.

I like Capaldi as the Doctor though. I may keep watching just for him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 07, 2014, 03:35:03 PM
That was weird. I kinda liked it and also not. I'll have to rewatch it.

One thing that irked me was the whole scene in the cell - I think that you can show that the Doctor has trouble getting along with Robin Hood without the whole thing descending into slapstick (I'm talking about the bit with the key specifically here).

Clara was fantastic again, though, that moment with the Sheriff was great, though it did feel a little repetitive because it was very similar to the Clara / Half-Face Man scene. I liked Clara in S7, but I feel she's reaching new heights this season. Though I do wish that we would have seen a resolution of the whole "Robin Hood interoggates Clara" thing.

I also really liked Capaldi. His grumpy demeanour makes him such a welcome change from the previous Doctors and allows him to be funny without sacrificing the general seriousness of his character.

So I guess all in all I really liked most of the characters, it was just the writing that was a little iffy in places. And I won't even touch the resolution which wasn't only scientifically bullshit (not that I expect hard science from Doctor Who anyway), but it was also so cheese-drenched that I became lactose allergic just from watching it. :P Maybe it fares better on a second viewing, I dunno. We'll see.

Also yay at the nod to one of my favourite Classic Who stories ever in Carnival of Monsters. Everyone go watch that one, now. It's awesome.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 07, 2014, 05:42:37 PM
Where was the nod to Carnival? Must have missed that
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on September 07, 2014, 08:25:47 PM
Great episode. I usually don't like shows/movies in those sort of times, but this one actually was great. I love Capaldi's short rudeness he exudes from time to time. He doesn't care, he is a jerk, and it is really entertaining.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on September 07, 2014, 10:47:26 PM
Anyone who watches Doctor Who and can't appreciate the Doctor and Robin Hood shooting a bloody gold arrow into a spaceship to make it able to achieve orbit is clearly taking the show the wrong way. That's what Doctor Who is made to do.  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 07, 2014, 10:57:20 PM
Maybe it fares better on a second viewing, I dunno. We'll see.

It does not. :lol
But I find I appreciate the character moments more on second viewing this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 08, 2014, 12:17:43 AM
The humour in this episode is just brilliant. It's my favourite of the three so far because of it!

Every interaction between Robin and the Doctor is golden.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 08, 2014, 12:35:46 AM
Where was the nod to Carnival? Must have missed that
When the Doctor mentioned the Miniscope at the beginning.

Btw, I liked it quite a bit on my second viewing. The only thing that I really didn't like was the scene with the Doctor and Robin in the cell where they kick away the key, it just felt really forced and slapstick-y. The rest was really good however, though I would have liked some more background on who the robots are.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 08, 2014, 12:39:03 AM
That was probably my favourite scene. :lol The dialogue is fantastic, pretty much the opposite of slapstick as the humour was all in the wit of the script. The only slapsticky bit really was the spoon fight.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 08, 2014, 12:40:51 AM
I don't mean the whole scene - that part where the Doctor tells the guard that Robin soiled himself is brilliant. Just that moment when they knock him unconscious and then kick the key away.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 08, 2014, 12:50:15 AM
Ah ok, well yeah that's a bit cheesy but it's classic Doctor Who. That sort of thing has been around since probably the second Doctor!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 08, 2014, 12:51:13 AM
Well I didn't much like it with Troughton either, so I guess that makes sense. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 08, 2014, 01:13:07 AM
I loved the whole scene in the jail cell. Individually, they both could have easily gotten that key, but they were trying so hard to one-up each other that they made a silly mistake, and made things harder for themselves.
And I liked how they first did away with the simple solution of using the sonic screwdriver as he often does, then did away with the next easiest solution of getting the key, and had to resort to carrying the whole block. It was funny, but I don't think it got too slapstick.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on September 09, 2014, 10:40:44 AM
When I saw them gathering all that gold I thought it was a group of robots gathering gold to fight the Cybermen.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 09, 2014, 10:55:46 AM
That might be something that comes up later. I mean, the Cybermen do feature in the season finale, as does the Promised Land (presumably - I don't think that this will another two-season arc, plus that on is called Death in Heaven).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 10, 2014, 09:26:14 AM
I really really don't like the cybermen.. Weakest of the DW bad guys.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 10, 2014, 09:46:30 AM
They are as weak and bad as the daleks. But at least the daleks had better stories written around them to carry them and it overshadowed the 60s cheesiness and generally being lame.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 10, 2014, 10:16:10 AM
I love both the Cyberman and the Daleks, because I'm a sucker for robots (technically cyborgs, but they are very robot-y). Even when their episodes are bad, I like them. :lol

I generally much prefer the Dalek stories to the Cyberman ones, even though the Daleks are more overused. I have a feeling the Cybermen episode this season will be one of their better ones, given that it seems to tie into the overall season arc (no spoilers please).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on September 10, 2014, 10:19:00 AM
I want a Star Trek TNG cross over with Q in it. I think there would be a cool chemistry between Picard and Calpaldi. /dream
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 10, 2014, 11:17:36 AM
Q is a time lord, he has to be
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 10, 2014, 12:02:39 PM
Q is the doctor before the Time War, travelling about and visiting TNG every once in a while.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 10, 2014, 12:08:59 PM
If anything, Q is The Master
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 10, 2014, 12:34:04 PM
If anything, Q is The Master
Sure, just ask him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
I think the Daleks are a bit overused too, but at least they have this reputation of being the ultimate unstoppable war-and-killing 'machine' of the universe. And the ones who fought against the Time Lords in a universally infamous war. That's a lot cooler than the lameness that is the Cybermen.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 13, 2014, 04:31:40 PM
Ok, so I caught up today and watched Robot of Sherwood before watching the new one. Especially Listen was absolutely amazing, wow. Loved that episode. Robot of Sherwood was also pretty good. I think the 'Promised Land' storyline so far is really interesting as well!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 02:50:45 AM
I just finished watching Listen. I don't even know what to make of it yet. So much happening that I think I'm going to need to watch it again to digest. It wasn't at all what I expected. I was expecting monsters, but it was a lot more than that. I think I loved it. I'm not sure yet. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 14, 2014, 05:25:11 AM
The impression I got from the episode was that it was great. But I'm a bit confused though. Was there a hiding-creature or not? I feel like they tried to end it as if there never was anything (given that they always careful to provide an 'alternate explanation' for the weird things that happened), but that means that some things in the episode made little sense.

But still, the impression I have is that it was great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 05:36:49 AM
The impression I got from the episode was that it was great. But I'm a bit confused though. Was there a hiding-creature or not? I feel like they tried to end it as if there never was anything (given that they always careful to provide an 'alternate explanation' for the weird things that happened), but that means that some things in the episode made little sense.

I wondered about that too, as that was the major lingering point for that twist to work to me. Wikipedia's plot summary says "...the Doctor decides there is no such creature under the bed, and Rupert Pink's 'monster' was in fact another child at the children's home scaring him."
I don't recall that being specified, so I think that's just speculation, as this is Wikipedia. The "monster" was kept pretty vague, just a humanoid shape under the sheets who didn't do or say much, although you wouldn't expect a kid to act like that. But there's nothing that goes against it either. A lot of the rest of the tension of that scene could be explained by everyone else getting caught up in the paranoia and overreacting truly believing it was a monster in the moment.

I'm rewatching the episode right now to get a better grasp on the whole thing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 14, 2014, 06:12:22 AM
I think the monsters do exist, but since their whole purpose is to hide, they should never be seen. Clara ended up somewhere in time where the Doctor was still a child, and as a result provided the first instance for the Doctor to experience the 'something under your bed' thing. But in this case, it was Clara, not a monster. This instance may have caused the Doctor's longing of finding the creatures under the beds, but it also resulted in the Doctor understanding not to look for them (the "LISTEN" thing on the blackboard, which was what Clara repeated to the young doctor all the time). I think. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 06:25:16 AM
I think the monsters do exist, but since their whole purpose is to hide, they should never be seen. Clara ended up somewhere in time where the Doctor was still a child, and as a result provided the first instance for the Doctor to experience the 'something under your bed' thing. But in this case, it was Clara, not a monster. This instance may have caused the Doctor's longing of finding the creatures under the beds, but it also resulted in the Doctor understanding not to look for them (the "LISTEN" thing on the blackboard, which was what Clara repeated to the young doctor all the time). I think. :P

I don't think the monsters ever existed. The Doctor's experience as a kid subconsciously gave him the obsession to search for answers when he read about similar dreams, and made him see patterns in things that weren't really there.
I finished rewatching the episode, and I quite liked it. I think The Doctor / Clara / Danny Pink all had some good development here, and a lot of things tied together in ways that will no doubt fit into the greater arcs of the season.


Also, Orson Pink makes reference stories from his grandparents and hands Clara the toy. My guess is this means Danny Pink is going to figure out that Clara is the one who visited him, and will be let in on The Doctor and travel with them, and pass down the story, so that Orson recognized Clara from the stories and gave her the figure. Or something like that. I'm guessing The Doctor will never find out that Clara was his monster under the bed. He didn't appear to recognize the toy, and the influence of that moment in his youth seems only to be a subconscious memory for him after those 2000+ years.

I've found that the episodes this season have had a more details and subtlety, so I've gotten a lot more from them on second viewing this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 14, 2014, 08:30:47 AM
How do you explain the whole knocking on the space door then? I like Onno's theory. I was a bit disappointed that there was no reveal, but it was still a solid episode. Somebody on IMDB argued this might be the best first 4 episode run of nuWho, with possibly only season 5 to compete with it
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Dimitrius on September 14, 2014, 08:39:31 AM
Yeah, I really liked 'Listen' even if that Clara bit towards the end in the cottage confused me a bit and was unnecessary.

I was liking Capaldi's Doctor but this episode made me love him!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 14, 2014, 09:15:54 AM
Holy shit dat callback to "An Unearthly Child". And that scene in the barn.

I really really really loved this episode. Easily my favourite of the season so far, everything was just really good. Danny Pink seems to be such an interesting character (though it is a little tiresome that we're having the third companion in a role with a huge tie-in and a backstory and timey-whimey, but it doesn't bother me a lot), and that whole exploration of fear itself was geniusly handled.

Much like Hide, this was a very small story that operated on the principle "Less is More" and it was all the better for it. Huge props to Steven Moffat, this is one of his best episodes on the show and a shining example of why he's my favourite scriptwriter.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 14, 2014, 10:14:15 AM
Well, this was easily one of my favourite DW episodes of all time. I just want to quote the ending of a review I found online:

"That is the triumph of this episode – not that the pieces thud together at the end, although they do, but that in an era when Doctor Who is written with cleverness and brazenness and cheek, this one is written with love."
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on September 14, 2014, 11:27:56 AM
I loved every second of that episode! Especially the end!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 14, 2014, 11:59:31 AM
That was absolutely bloody brilliant!

My two cents - the monsters probably are real. The fact that all the characters seem to conclude that they are not doesn't mean anything - that's the whole point, the things stay hidden. I think that's probably the vibe that Moffat was going for.

And yes, it's very strongly implied that Osron is Danny and Clara's great grandson. But this is Moffat, and if it's very strongly implied then it is almost certainly not that simple. Blob, never trust Moffat!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on September 14, 2014, 12:06:52 PM
The monster not being defined is the point, actually.

Because the episode is really about the Doctor trying to figure out, in a moment when he was alone and bored and with nothing better to do, what grabbed him from under the bed as a child. Being the Doctor, of course he couldn't just say "someone was there", he had to invent a monster to justify his fear of the dark.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 14, 2014, 12:53:13 PM
Wasn't that big of a fan of the new episodes, even though they were good. They missed the "magic" of most of other Who. But like last season's Hide, this one was truly outstanding. There should be more episodes in this type, seems to be working much better than when they are trying to do "typical" who.

Finally Moffat delivers on the quality I expect. The creepiness was through the roof, this is why I think he should write solo much more and maybe put Sherlock on the back burner for a while.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 14, 2014, 02:07:11 PM
Also, how the hell can they time travel to Gallifrey? That planet is gone from space and time, right? Isn't the Doctor's new life goal to find it? That would seem unnecessary if he could just time travel back to it with the Tardis.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 14, 2014, 06:03:57 PM
Just downloaded it. Will watch tomorrow probably.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 07:07:34 PM
Yeah, I really liked 'Listen' even if that Clara bit towards the end in the cottage confused me a bit and was unnecessary.

I was liking Capaldi's Doctor but this episode made me love him!

You mean the barn? It wasn't unnecessary, it was what tied the whole episode together! The kid was The Doctor when he was young, and the barn was the same place he came back to as the War Doctor to activate The Moment to end the time war. Clara inadvertently became the reason The Doctor became obsessed with this dream being real, along with being a big influence on his life.


That was absolutely bloody brilliant!

My two cents - the monsters probably are real. The fact that all the characters seem to conclude that they are not doesn't mean anything - that's the whole point, the things stay hidden. I think that's probably the vibe that Moffat was going for.

And yes, it's very strongly implied that Osron is Danny and Clara's great grandson. But this is Moffat, and if it's very strongly implied then it is almost certainly not that simple. Blob, never trust Moffat!

It's not directly implied that Clara gets together with Danny (and I didn't mention so because I don't believe it's the case), and they expect and want fans to make that extrapolation, but that possibility felt like a bit of a red herring to me, so I agree it's not going to be that simple. Danny could just as easily have a kid with someone different, or it could be something different altogether, something more timey whimey, especially if he becomes a companion. But I like the possibilities it leaves open for the future.

And I personally think we were supposed to conclude the monsters could have been real. The reveal with Clara to me made it obvious it was never supposed to be something more, and for it to be monsters downplays the importance of that scene in the barn with Clara imo. They were careful to give everything a rational explanation, so that after you've been along for the same emotional ride that The Doctor and Clara went through, and they give you the twist, you can look back with a more rational and informed point of view and realize there was nothing to be afraid of, just like how that fear works in real life. It was quite clever. You knew in your head all along there was a reasonable explanation, but you went along with everything at the time. The episode played the audience perfectly.

Also, how the hell can they time travel to Gallifrey? That planet is gone from space and time, right? Isn't the Doctor's new life goal to find it? That would seem unnecessary if he could just time travel back to it with the Tardis.

The TARDIS was being controlled by Clara, I assume still without the safeguards in place, and it locked onto that place from The Doctor's history. I'm sure it was a dangerous thing to try, and it could have been so catastrophic for The Doctor (or anyone else like Clara) to do anything there due to paradoxes, that it's effectively impossible to attempt. That's why Clara had to immediately get The Doctor to leave.
It seems that Clara had always been part of those events somehow, which I think she realized once she accidentally grabbed the young Doctor's foot, which somehow avoids any further paradoxes for her, because it was self fulfilling. There have been little loopholes to connect to Gallifrey before, such as The End of Time, so it's not unprecedented.

Aside from Robot of Sherwood, this has been a great season so far. It's well on track to possibly be the best season of the modern series, and I think a lot of these episodes will only get better once we see how they fit into the grand scheme of the story arc.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 14, 2014, 07:26:48 PM
Really enjoyed this episode! Like others have said, I'm still a bit confused about that whole scene in the children's home if there really was no monster-type-thing (also, the chalk? was that the Doctor's fear actually having the power to write?).
It also seemed to me like they were implying that Clara and Danny get together, since I thought he said Orson was part of Clara's timeline (could be wrong there), plus the toy is a "family" heirloom so there must be some kind of familial connection for him to give it to her.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 07:49:13 PM
Really enjoyed this episode! Like others have said, I'm still a bit confused about that whole scene in the children's home if there really was no monster-type-thing (also, the chalk? was that the Doctor's fear actually having the power to write?).
It also seemed to me like they were implying that Clara and Danny get together, since I thought he said Orson was part of Clara's timeline (could be wrong there), plus the toy is a "family" heirloom so there must be some kind of familial connection for him to give it to her.

For the writing on the chalkboard, Clara said it looked like his handwriting, so the alternative is that he had a lapse and didn't realize / forgot that he wrote it himself. Coming from Capaldi's Doctor, it wouldn't surprise me either. :lol

My suspicion is that Orson handed her the toy because he heard the stories passed down about Clara and The Doctor from Danny, including the bit in this episode when Danny was young, and any future episodes where Danny might be a companion. I think there will be a future episode where it clicks for him and realizes that Clara visited him as a kid, and she'll have to introduce The Doctor and bring him into the fold. That's my guess.

Orson said he didn't recognize Clara from family photos, but he made reference to time travel running in the family, so it might all refer only to Danny Pink.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on September 14, 2014, 08:55:11 PM
Holy cow. The new version of DW story-telling is amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 14, 2014, 09:28:27 PM
Really enjoyed this episode! Like others have said, I'm still a bit confused about that whole scene in the children's home if there really was no monster-type-thing (also, the chalk? was that the Doctor's fear actually having the power to write?).
It also seemed to me like they were implying that Clara and Danny get together, since I thought he said Orson was part of Clara's timeline (could be wrong there), plus the toy is a "family" heirloom so there must be some kind of familial connection for him to give it to her.

"Listen" is a masterpiece. Definitely a strong contender for one of, if not my favorite Doctor Who episodes ever. It just gets better and better with each viewing I have of it. It's an incredibly nuanced and subtle episode. This is what brings me to the thing that's confusing everyone: "Was there a monster or not?"

The beauty of "Listen" is that it doesn't matter whether or not there was really a monster. It's deliberately ambiguous, because the point of "Listen" isn't the monster. It's about fear itself. It's an emotion that we all feel, even the Doctor, and it is explored via the oldest nightmare out there: something hiding underneath the bed.

However, as "Listen" demonstrates, fear isn't entirely a negative emotion. Clara and Danny bond over their shared fears and insecurities over their newfound relationship together. The Doctor describes fear as being a super power of sorts and Clara even quotes Hartnell near the end by calling fear a constant companion. "Listen" analyzes the emotion of fear and tells us that it is perfectly alright to be afraid.

Furthermore, "Listen" is a character study on the Doctor himself. Peter Capaldi turns in one hell of a performance as the Doctor in this episode, presenting us with a Doctor unhinged and obsessed on a Sherlockian level over this old theory of his, being completely willing to risk his own life just for the chance to see if he can find any answers. The Doctor wants to justify his fear by proving the existence of a supposed creature, which might be real. We don't know. We don't have to know. In the end, Clara's realization as to the actual origins of the Doctor's theory could be a red herring, but it offers her, the Doctor and Orson an out from the Doctor's potentially lethal obsession and helps him remember that it's fine to be afraid.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on September 14, 2014, 09:33:32 PM
Also, how the hell can they time travel to Gallifrey? That planet is gone from space and time, right? Isn't the Doctor's new life goal to find it? That would seem unnecessary if he could just time travel back to it with the Tardis.

The Gallifrey of the Time War-the one that was time locked and all that hubbub-is gone from space and time.

Gallifrey of the PAST isn't. It's clearly still tricky and dangerous to go there, but it's still there.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 14, 2014, 09:39:54 PM
Also, how the hell can they time travel to Gallifrey? That planet is gone from space and time, right? Isn't the Doctor's new life goal to find it? That would seem unnecessary if he could just time travel back to it with the Tardis.

The Gallifrey of the Time War-the one that was time locked and all that hubbub-is gone from space and time.

Gallifrey of the PAST isn't. It's clearly still tricky and dangerous to go there, but it's still there.


Exactly. It's even foreshadowed earlier on in the episode when the Doctor tells Clara that the TARDIS isn't supposed to go all the way to the end of the universe,  but someone turned off the safeties. That was what presumably allowed them to go to the past Gallifrey.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 09:46:58 PM
Furthermore, "Listen" is a character study on the Doctor himself. Peter Capaldi turns in one hell of a performance as the Doctor in this episode, presenting us with a Doctor unhinged and obsessed on a Sherlockian level over this old theory of his, being completely willing to risk his own life just for the chance to see if he can find any answers. The Doctor wants to justify his fear by proving the existence of a supposed creature, which might be real. We don't know. We don't have to know. In the end, Clara's realization as to the actual origins of the Doctor's theory could be a red herring, but it offers her, the Doctor and Orson an out from the Doctor's potentially lethal obsession and helps him remember that it's fine to be afraid.

I think a part of The Doctor's personality is that he's always risked his life if only to find answers, and also to help others. In showing The Doctor as a kid, we see Clara effectively helping plant that seed that made him The Doctor, helping him overcome his fear. And this episode was all about defining that core trait, as he feels the need to find answers, and also helps Rupert, even though to me The Doctor looked thoroughly terrified inside as he was telling Rupert not to look. He looked like he was almost in tears. It was subtle, but great. I also think that's why The Doctor didn't just pull the covers off whoever it was, because he was too scared to confirm his subconscious childhood fear. To me that was atypical for him, in a way that worked so perfectly for the episode.

I still don't believe it was supposed to be ambiguous that it could have been a monster. I think it was supposed to be ambiguous throughout the episode, then I feel it was resolved at the end that it was nothing, but that the fear we feel in these moments is a good thing, and we should use it to our advantage to overcome it. I do agree that the episode was making a message that it doesn't matter whether there's really a monster, but I don't think we were supposed to have any doubt by the end, only during the ride. And being such a core part of The Doctor's character that she planted, I don't think she wanted to reveal her part.

Either way, it says a lot about the depth of the episode that we can analyze it at this level, and also come to different conclusions.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on September 14, 2014, 09:52:14 PM
Man, Listen might be the best episode in a good, good while (not counting TDOTD). It had one of the best atmospheres yet, and the ambiguity of the ending is just perfect. The creepiness factor was there, but not overplayed, and the character moments were just brilliant. Easily one of Moffat's best scripts yet, and definitely the best of S8 thus far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 14, 2014, 10:13:40 PM
I think a part of The Doctor's personality is that he's always risked his life if only to find answers, and also to help others. In showing The Doctor as a kid, we see Clara effectively helping plant that seed that made him The Doctor, helping him overcome his fear. And this episode was all about defining that core trait, as he feels the need to find answers, and also helps Rupert, even though to me The Doctor looked thoroughly terrified inside as he was telling Rupert not to look. He looked like he was almost in tears. It was subtle, but great. I also think that's why The Doctor didn't just pull the covers off whoever it was, because he was too scared to confirm his subconscious childhood fear. To me that was atypical for him, in a way that worked so perfectly for the episode.

That's true, but I don't think we generally, if ever, get scenes like the one where the Doctor unlocks the door of Orson's spaceship and orders Clara to go back into the TARDIS. Yes, the Doctor's curiosity has often found him and his companions in danger and he is often compelled to save others, but this is a bit different from that.

This is a situation where the Doctor is deliberately setting up a potential disaster, just to see what the hell might happen. He chose to unlock the door and he chose to stay outside of the TARDIS while Orson's ship was quickly falling apart around him. All so he can see if he can find out what is causing those noises outside and get an answer to his question.

Quote
I still don't believe it was supposed to be ambiguous that it could have been a monster. I think it was supposed to be ambiguous throughout the episode, then I feel it was resolved at the end that it was nothing, but that the fear we feel in these moments is a good thing, and we should use it to our advantage to overcome it. I do agree that the episode was making a message that it doesn't matter whether there's really a monster, but I don't think we were supposed to have any doubt by the end, only during the ride. And being such a core part of The Doctor's character that she planted, I don't think she wanted to reveal her part.

Eh. I still disagree and I have heard a lot of equally solid arguments from others that there was most certainly a monster in the episode. To me, I feel like the episode loses a fair chunk of its power if you give it a straight answer either way. I like that the ending has left me asking a lot of questions with potentially really interesting answers. We'll never actually get them, but that's fine. The point is that "Listen" has made us all think really hard about the episode. :hefdaddy

Quote
Either way, it says a lot about the depth of the episode that we can analyze it at this level, and also come to different conclusions.

Completely agreed.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 14, 2014, 11:56:47 PM
That's true, but I don't think we generally, if ever, get scenes like the one where the Doctor unlocks the door of Orson's spaceship and orders Clara to go back into the TARDIS. Yes, the Doctor's curiosity has often found him and his companions in danger and he is often compelled to save others, but this is a bit different from that.

This is a situation where the Doctor is deliberately setting up a potential disaster, just to see what the hell might happen. He chose to unlock the door and he chose to stay outside of the TARDIS while Orson's ship was quickly falling apart around him. All so he can see if he can find out what is causing those noises outside and get an answer to his question.

I didn't mean that it was The Doctor as usual, but I think it was an extension of an existing part of his personality, in fact it led to what the episode implies helped him develop that personality in the first place. But at the same time, it was also driven by a level of fear and curiosity unlike anything we've seen from The Doctor, because it was related to such a defining childhood moment of fear. So it was something new, but also a natural extension of his existing character. It didn't feel out of place that he was acting differently. It was great writing to be able to add something new to the character, but make it feel like it was there all along.


Eh. I still disagree and I have heard a lot of equally solid arguments from others that there was most certainly a monster in the episode. To me, I feel like the episode loses a fair chunk of its power if you give it a straight answer either way. I like that the ending has left me asking a lot of questions with potentially really interesting answers. We'll never actually get them, but that's fine. The point is that "Listen" has made us all think really hard about the episode. :hefdaddy

I actually feel the episode gains from it being nothing.
A monster who has apparently perfected hiding to the point of going undetected throughout all of time and space despite appearing to everyone ever, and then they very easily find one, and then tell it to go when they could have confirmed it right there. Why would the perfect hiding creature just sit on the bed when you have two people there having a conversation, and just hang and let you see it? And aside from that "monster", the rest was very explainable too. It's not a believable idea, and the possibility of a monster wasn't a necessary part of the point.

The Doctor wasn't actually looking for the monster at all. It was a means to an end, which was to be scared. Rationally, The Doctor can deal with most things easily enough, but this was an almost primal fear from his childhood, perhaps the only thing he could think of that he was truly afraid of.

I think it's telling that The Doctor in that moment didn't just pull the sheets back as anyone would have done. Why did he look away from the monster and make it leave, but then keep searching to find if it exists? Because it was about him overcoming his own fear. He didn't look at the monster under the sheet once. He was taking his mind off it, reading the book, keeping his look fixed on the kid, then quickly turning his back on it and looking out the window, because he was terrified.
He didn't reveal the monster, because then there would be nothing to fear at all, because I think in his head he knew it was nothing. All along he knew the rational explanations, but deep down that's not what it was about for him. He let it go when he could very easily have found his evidence right there, and then went right on to find another. Proving it was real would have made it even more scary knowing there was such a terrifying and elusive creature, so I think he knew that it wasn't going to prove true. When he opened the door, it was going to be scary as hell regardless of any monsters, and it couldn't disprove the monsters either. He didn't want to find a monster. He wanted to find something he knew he could be afraid of.

Why does he want to be afraid? To become a good man. The Doctor is not sure whether he's a good man, but he wants to be. Refer to Clara's speech.
"Listen.....Please just listen. I know you're afraid. Being afraid is alright.....Fear is a super power..... Fear doesn't have to make you cruel or cowardly, fear can make you kind...... If you listen to nothing else, you're always going to be afraid, even if you learn to hide it......". And there was Clara's earlier bit about "A soldier so brave he doesn't need a gun....keep the whole world safe."

The Doctor wants to be brave, he doesn't want to repeat his past mistakes, which got brought up for him recently when he met the War Doctor and dealt with the Time War again, and also having trouble finding himself after the regeneration. The writing on the board wasn't from a monster, he wrote it himself subconsciously recalling that earlier speech (which we know he remembers subconsciously, because he recited it to Rupert for the same dreamed monster). "LISTEN" was a subconscious reminder to himself about that speech, where the word listen was emphasized several times to make the connection and reveal it to the audience, with all he needs to be a better man, so he goes on a search for that fear to learn to use it to be brave in the face of danger.

And the moment with Clara at the end realizing she was The Doctor's monster, and then coming back to the TARDIS knowing where The Doctor's quest came from was the "aha!" moment to me where it was a clear reveal to the audience. I didn't feel like there was any ambiguity at that point. I was very surprised to see anyone take it another way.
And I think it was intended to work as an allegory for fear for the audience, where we were given some relateable scary moments where we're scared of something irrational, then we learn and grow and realize there was nothing to fear, but that it's ok to be scared. It wasn't a story about a real monster, but about the monster we create for ourselves. Fear created it, fear can overcome it. The Doctor was learning to use that fear to overcome monsters, not to find them.

Maybe it was designed for people to make of it what they want, but for me that ending was very clear that it was nothing all along, and I didn't even consider it was supposed to be ambiguous by that point in the episode. That was the moment the episode clicked with me from being a little bit of a silly monster, to being a masterful episode that was so much deeper. To believe there was a chance of a physical monster like that would detract a little for me.

The more I think about the episode, the more I like it. Even though I disagree with some points brought up here, just the process of analyzing the episode gives me more appreciation for it, and how it fits into the story arcs. I now think it the best of the season so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Cruithne on September 15, 2014, 02:29:42 AM
And yes, it's very strongly implied that Osron is Danny and Clara's great grandson. But this is Moffat, and if it's very strongly implied then it is almost certainly not that simple. Blob, never trust Moffat!

It's implied in that moment and I think they played Clara's reaction such that she was assuming it was her who was being mentioned, but Orson Pink plays the pronoun game - "one of my grandparents" - which leaves it ambiguous. Since I think we're going to see Danny Pink travelling in the Tardis before the season is out it could well be just him was who was being referred to.

However, the very fact that Orson Pink looked exactly like Danny Pink could well be less due to lazy casting/storytelling and more down to the whole repetition of Clara throughout time expressing itself through her descendants...

Meh, I think I'm over thinking it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 15, 2014, 02:38:40 AM
As always, people online are saying that "Moffat must go".

lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 15, 2014, 02:49:04 AM
As always, people online are saying that "Moffat must go".

lol

:lol
I'm starting to think that a lot of these people just don't pay much attention to the episodes. A lot of criticisms I see are just things that people missed in the episode. This episode was so loaded with subtlety that Moffat haters won't analyze and pay attention to.
I did happen to notice the episode has a current rating of 9.3/10 on imdb, so I think overall the response to this episode has been as positive as it deserves.

Speaking of Moffat, in this week's Doctor Who Extra episode for Listen, Clara says that they refer to the timey whimey stuff like her bit at the end in the barn as "Moffat loops". :lol I like it. Moffat is now synonymous with causality!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 15, 2014, 08:41:53 AM
Really enjoyed this episode! Like others have said, I'm still a bit confused about that whole scene in the children's home if there really was no monster-type-thing (also, the chalk? was that the Doctor's fear actually having the power to write?).
It also seemed to me like they were implying that Clara and Danny get together, since I thought he said Orson was part of Clara's timeline (could be wrong there), plus the toy is a "family" heirloom so there must be some kind of familial connection for him to give it to her.

For the writing on the chalkboard, Clara said it looked like his handwriting, so the alternative is that he had a lapse and didn't realize / forgot that he wrote it himself. Coming from Capaldi's Doctor, it wouldn't surprise me either. :lol

My suspicion is that Orson handed her the toy because he heard the stories passed down about Clara and The Doctor from Danny, including the bit in this episode when Danny was young, and any future episodes where Danny might be a companion. I think there will be a future episode where it clicks for him and realizes that Clara visited him as a kid, and she'll have to introduce The Doctor and bring him into the fold. That's my guess.

Orson said he didn't recognize Clara from family photos, but he made reference to time travel running in the family, so it might all refer only to Danny Pink.

True... he seemed like a total crazy/paranoid person in the beginning of the episode especially, so I guess I wouldn't be surprised if he had done it but that's still a bit of a stretch for me.

I agree that Danny is probably going to be brought into the fold, but what I don't get is why Orson would give Clara a family heirloom if she wasn't family.
Also, I don't think I'd recognize my great-grandma as a very young woman. I've only seen one or two photos and she was already pretty old in them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 15, 2014, 11:31:43 AM
I've mentioned it already, but seeing the date scene with Danny and Clara in Listen cemented that belief for me - that Danny actually killed a woman, which is what Moffat was referencing with him being introduced as a "lady killer", because he sure as isn't a very smooth talker in that date scene. As to who he killed... maybe Missy? I mean, she is in Heaven already and interacts with dead people, so that's one possibility, though I'm not completely sold on that one. But I'm quite willing to bet something that the civilian that Danny killed is a woman.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 15, 2014, 02:14:31 PM
That was definitely one of the best episodes i've seen in a while.

:clap:

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 15, 2014, 02:18:46 PM
I don't watch very much DW - please can someone explain the War Doctor for me ? :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 15, 2014, 02:22:32 PM
Basically, the War Doctor was the result of the 8th Doctor deciding that he couldn't do any more good as The Doctor (the one who heals), so, in his dying moments, he became a warrior instead, fighting the Time War, which culminated in the destruction of Gallifrey, leading future incarnations to deny the existance of the War Doctor, due to feeling shame towards his/their actions that he/they committed.

It's explained in The Day of the Doctor, but you might want to check that one out, 'cause it's not easy to explain and also a really awesome episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 15, 2014, 02:25:20 PM
I *think* i saw that episode but I can't remember.

I'll have to check the synopsis on Wiki.

Basically I barely saw any Chris episodes. I saw most of the David episodes and didn't really like Matt at all. :/
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 15, 2014, 07:23:09 PM
I've mentioned it already, but seeing the date scene with Danny and Clara in Listen cemented that belief for me - that Danny actually killed a woman, which is what Moffat was referencing with him being introduced as a "lady killer", because he sure as isn't a very smooth talker in that date scene. As to who he killed... maybe Missy? I mean, she is in Heaven already and interacts with dead people, so that's one possibility, though I'm not completely sold on that one. But I'm quite willing to bet something that the civilian that Danny killed is a woman.

He dug a well, and she fell in.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 15, 2014, 11:21:40 PM
I *think* i saw that episode but I can't remember.

I'll have to check the synopsis on Wiki.

Basically I barely saw any Chris episodes. I saw most of the David episodes and didn't really like Matt at all. :/

Go do yourself a favor and watch the entirety of Chris's run ASAP. It's literally only thirteen episodes, but some of the best Who episodes ever are in that season (i.e. Dalek) and Chris was one of the absolute best Doctors ever. In fact, up until Capaldi arrived, I'd say he was easily the best of the Modern Who Doctors.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 15, 2014, 11:23:23 PM
I think Capaldi could wind up being remembered as the best Dr.

At *least* in the RTD / Moffatt era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 15, 2014, 11:27:08 PM
I think Capaldi could wind up being remembered as the best Dr.

At *least* in the RTD / Moffatt era.

He's already a strong contender for being my absolute favorite Doctor. In fact, he probably already is.

No disrespect to any of his predecessors, but Peter Capaldi is easily the best actor to have ever played the role. He has the same natural charisma and unearthly presence that Tom Baker exuded, but he has an insane amount of control and range to match it. To make a Dream Theater comparison here, Capaldi is the acting equivalent of I&W/Awake-era Petrucci.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 15, 2014, 11:52:45 PM
I *think* i saw that episode but I can't remember.

I'll have to check the synopsis on Wiki.

Basically I barely saw any Chris episodes. I saw most of the David episodes and didn't really like Matt at all. :/

Go do yourself a favor and watch the entirety of Chris's run ASAP. It's literally only thirteen episodes, but some of the best Who episodes ever are in that season (i.e. Dalek) and Chris was one of the absolute best Doctors ever. In fact, up until Capaldi arrived, I'd say he was easily the best of the Modern Who Doctors.

Really? I really disliked Eccelston, and he's generally ranked very low among the Doctors, especially compared to Tennant/Smith. A lot of those early episodes were pretty terrible too. Dalek was a great episode, and the final two parter was pretty good, and the two parter Moffat wrote is considered one of the better ones (thought it was average personally). Aside from that, farting aliens, attack of the killer mannequins, time dragons, stretched out skin people. How far the show has come! :lol

Capaldi's Doctor is so different that I can't really compare him to the rest. As usual, there are elements I really miss from the previous Doctor, along with new elements in their place that I'll miss once he's replaced. Tennant/Smith/Capaldi are all amazing Doctors. The strength of the writing this season is really elevating Capaldi quickly though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 16, 2014, 12:07:03 AM
I loved Ecceleston's Doctor. As for the quality of his season, I respectfully disagree with you. The Slitheens were shit, definitely, but I enjoyed the rest of that season a lot. In fact, Tennant's first season was largely utter crap in comparison. Hell, even Mark Gatiss had a pretty decent episode in Series 1 with The Unquiet Dead!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 16, 2014, 12:18:41 AM
Tennant's first season wasn't much better, as it undoubtedly had its fair share of crap too, such as Love and Monsters, and Fear Her.
But I think I'd give it the edge for the two parters, and it also had The Girl in the Fireplace, but there wasn't that much difference in quality. I think the quality was on a gradual increase for all of the RTD era, but the Tennant episodes were better just for having Tennant to carry them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on September 16, 2014, 12:22:09 AM

Honestly IMO, the series with Eccleston is a must see. Especially The Empty Child/ The Doctor Dances. And i don't get why Eccleston is constantly rated so low in the fandom, in my list he is fifth after Tom Baker/ Pertwee/ Davison and Capaldi.

The last episode got me thinking. What if there were monsters after all. What if this episode was a teaser for a new enemy, something they are gonna use later, maybe in series 9? Some invisible alien race, that is gonna cause some headache for the doctor later. If i remember correctly, The Silence were introduced in a same way.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 16, 2014, 12:22:56 AM
Tennant's first season was about equal overall imo, as it undoubtedly had its fair share of crap too, such as Love and Monsters, and Fear Her.
I think I'd give it the slight edge for the two parters though, and it also had The Girl in the Fireplace, but there wasn't that much difference in quality. I think the quality was on a gradual increase for all of the RTD era, but the Tennant episodes were better just for having Tennant to carry them.

I'm honestly cringing just reading this. :lol

Series 1 is probably my favorite season of NuWho so far, although Series 5 is a strong contender too, so to see it being compared to what is probably my absolute least favorite season is astounding. But that's the thing with opinions; we all have 'em.

Also I have to disagree with Ecceleston vs. Tennant as far as their acting goes. Both are terrific actors, but I personally prefer the more subtle approach that Ecceleston demonstrated.


Honestly IMO, the series with Eccleston is a must see. Especially The Empty Child/ The Doctor Dances. And i don't get why Eccleston is constantly rated so low in the fandom, in my list he is fifth after Tom Baker/ Pertwee/ Davison and Capaldi.

The last episode got me thinking. What if there were monsters after all. What if this episode was a teaser for a new enemy, something they are gonna use later, maybe in series 9? Some invisible alien race, that is gonna cause some headache for the doctor later. If i remember correctly, The Silence were introduced in a same way.

THANK YOU. Someone who agrees with me on this! :lol :tup :metal
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 16, 2014, 12:30:13 AM
Tennant's first season was about equal overall imo, as it undoubtedly had its fair share of crap too, such as Love and Monsters, and Fear Her.
I think I'd give it the slight edge for the two parters though, and it also had The Girl in the Fireplace, but there wasn't that much difference in quality. I think the quality was on a gradual increase for all of the RTD era, but the Tennant episodes were better just for having Tennant to carry them.

I'm honestly cringing just reading this. :lol

Series 1 is probably my favorite season of NuWho so far, although Series 5 is a strong contender too, so to see it being compared to what is probably my absolute least favorite season is astounding. But that's the thing with opinions; we all have 'em.

Also I have to disagree with Ecceleston vs. Tennant as far as their acting goes. Both are terrific actors, but I personally prefer the more subtle approach that Ecceleston demonstrated.


I just found Eccelston to be completely wrong for the part of The Doctor. He looked like a thug, and always had that out of place goofy smile. He wasn't believable as The Doctor as all of the more recent ones were.

S5 is my favourite, so at least we can find some common ground, but I have no idea how S1 could be considered on par with that. I'd easily consider it the weakest of the RTD era, and I'm not that big on any of the RTD era to begin with. Heck, the best thing about the RTD era was still Moffat. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 16, 2014, 12:41:17 AM
Tennant's first season was about equal overall imo, as it undoubtedly had its fair share of crap too, such as Love and Monsters, and Fear Her.
I think I'd give it the slight edge for the two parters though, and it also had The Girl in the Fireplace, but there wasn't that much difference in quality. I think the quality was on a gradual increase for all of the RTD era, but the Tennant episodes were better just for having Tennant to carry them.

I'm honestly cringing just reading this. :lol

Series 1 is probably my favorite season of NuWho so far, although Series 5 is a strong contender too, so to see it being compared to what is probably my absolute least favorite season is astounding. But that's the thing with opinions; we all have 'em.

Also I have to disagree with Ecceleston vs. Tennant as far as their acting goes. Both are terrific actors, but I personally prefer the more subtle approach that Ecceleston demonstrated.


I just found Eccelston to be completely wrong for the part of The Doctor. He looked like a thug, and always had that out of place goofy smile. He wasn't believable as The Doctor as all of the more recent ones were.

S5 is my favourite, so at least we can find some common ground, but I have no idea how S1 could be considered on par with that. I'd easily consider it the weakest of the RTD era, and I'm not that big on any of the RTD era to begin with. Heck, the best thing about the RTD era was still Moffat. :lol

I disagree, but I think we're just stuck on different opinions here. I found him to be perfect for the part.

Well, for starters, neither season is completely perfect. Both have some duds in them; S1 has the Slitheen stories and S5 has The Beast Below, Victory of the Daleks and The Vampires of Venice. But both have some pretty freaking incredible episodes too.

I do agree that Moffat was generally the best thing about RTD's run, but I do think that he's generally suffered a bit in quality since taking over as showrunner. This series seems to be a return to form on his part.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 16, 2014, 12:57:19 AM
Well, for starters, neither season is completely perfect. Both have some duds in them; S1 has the Slitheen stories and S5 has The Beast Below, Victory of the Daleks and The Vampires of Venice. But both have some pretty freaking incredible episodes too.

I do agree that Moffat was generally the best thing about RTD's run, but I do think that he's generally suffered a bit in quality since taking over as showrunner. This series seems to be a return to form on his part.

I agree with most of that. I'm certainly not saying Moffat is perfect, as every season has had weaker episodes, and S7 was his weakest yet (although Name/Day/Time of the Doctor were great). And so far S8 has the makings of being the best season of the series since its return, with only Robot of Sherwood letting it down.

But even the weaker episodes you mentioned don't come close to being as weak as the stuff I've mentioned from the RTD era. I could name several dud episodes from the Moffat era, but then I remember that we used to get episodes like this-
(https://basementrejects.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/doctor-who-season-2-10-love-and-monsters-the-abzorbaloff-peter-kay.jpg)
(https://frankiecreviews.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/end-of-the-world.jpg)
And suddenly Moffat's worst doesn't seem so bad after all. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 16, 2014, 02:18:13 AM
Beast Below and Vampires of Venice are great episodes. The only "dud" in that season really is Victory of the Daleks, and even that's not bad, it's just a bit nothingy.

And I like Ecclestone, but I don't think I'd describe his performances as more subtle than the others.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 16, 2014, 02:23:56 AM
I think I liked Victory of the Daleks a little more than you guys (I don't think it's amazing, but I don't consider it one of the duds). The only downer for me is those ugly Dalek designs that quickly got ditched for the old ones again. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 16, 2014, 03:03:50 AM
Eccleston was the first doctor I saw, so for that whole "first" season, he was naturally the only doctor in my mind, and watching him regenerate away was sad. Now after seeing it all I think both Tennant and Smith were better Doctors, but Eccleston will always be that first one for me. So I like every doctor of the new-who era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 16, 2014, 09:14:17 AM
Eccleston was the first doctor I saw, so for that whole "first" season, he was naturally the only doctor in my mind, and watching him regenerate away was sad. Now after seeing it all I think both Tennant and Smith were better Doctors, but Eccleston will always be that first one for me. So I like every doctor of the new-who era.

This exactly. And though there were some pretty lame episodes that first season... The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances <3
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 16, 2014, 10:01:13 AM
Eccleston was the first doctor I saw, so for that whole "first" season, he was naturally the only doctor in my mind, and watching him regenerate away was sad. Now after seeing it all I think both Tennant and Smith were better Doctors, but Eccleston will always be that first one for me. So I like every doctor of the new-who era.
I like them all as well. Even with the classic era there aren't any that I dislike, though of course I much prefer some to others. But I enjoy the variety of having different Doctors with different personalities.

So far I am loving Capaldi.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 16, 2014, 11:34:57 AM
The only episodes from Nine's run I never cared for were the Slitheen episodes. I enjoyed End of the World. Sounded like something Douglas Adams would have written
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 16, 2014, 12:17:09 PM
The only episodes from Nine's run I never cared for were the Slitheen episodes. I enjoyed End of the World. Sounded like something Douglas Adams would have written

Completely agreed. :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on September 16, 2014, 01:20:26 PM
Whenever telling anyone about DW I've always said that 9 has some of the best episodes and some of the most pure shit episodes. The writing just wasn't strong with 9 but as DW progressed the writing grew better and better. I would rank the Doctors as

1. Smith
2. Eccelston
3. Tennant
4. Capaldi

Story wise
1. Smith/Tennant
2. Eccelston
3. Capaldi

I think Capaldi will over take all of them for me if it continues to be this good, well maybe except for Smith.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 16, 2014, 04:06:56 PM
Ooh, we haven't ranked Doctors yet in this new thread!

It's way too early to rank Capaldi, but so far I'm expecting him to end up right near the top. I also don't really know how and where to rank John Hurt. I know McGann was also only in one story, but at least he was the star of it, plus he was in Night of the Doctor, plus he has all the audio dramas.

1. Matt Smith
2. David Tennant
3. Tom Baker
4. Patrick Troughton
5. Chris Eccleston
6. Paul McGann
7. Peter Davison
8. John Pertwee
9. Colin Baker
10. Sylvester McCoy
11. William Hartnell

Numbers 9-11 move around a lot depending on my mood.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 16, 2014, 04:26:41 PM
I liked McCoy a ton more than Colin Baker.

Even as a wee bairn I was disappointed when Davidson regenerated into him and I didn't care for his Dr.

It was a relief when McCoy came along and I enjoyed his Doctor if I remember rightly.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 16, 2014, 04:38:33 PM
I didn't care for CB in his first few episodes either, but that was the writing more than anything else. I appreciate what they were trying to do, making him more antagonistic and so on, but they pushed it a bit too far and he ended up just being annoying. He settled in though and the writing improved, and by the end I was really liking him. I think my opinion of him has also improved because of the audio dramas, where his Doctor is really very witty and entertaining.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 16, 2014, 04:44:24 PM
So how many Scottish actors have played the Doctor ?

I know of at least Sylvester McCoy, David Tennant and now Peter Capaldi.

Were any of Hartnell, Troughton or Pertwee Scots ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 16, 2014, 04:50:42 PM
Nope, just those three I believe. And Capaldi is the first to sound properly Scottish (McCoy slightly did, but not really).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 16, 2014, 04:52:51 PM
Nope, just those three I believe. And Capaldi is the first to sound properly Scottish (McCoy slightly did, but not really).

Indeed. Tennant's English was so perfect I thought he was English until i heard him do his actual accent.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 16, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
Hello, rankings, so glad to see you...

1. Matt Smith
2. Tom Baker
3. Peter Capaldi
4. Sylvester McCoy
5. David Tennant
6. Patrick Troughton
7. Jon Pertwee
8. Christopher Eccleston
9. Colin Baker
10. Peter Davidson
11. Paul McGann
12. William Hartnell

I really like McCoy, even though I don't care for most of his first season (with the exception of Paradise Towers), but his second and third season are of amazing quality. Remenbrance of the Daleks, The Happiness Patrol, The Greatest Show in the Galaxy, Ghost Light, The Curse of Fenric... all those are among some of my very favourite Classic Who episodes.

McGann is really only so low because he's only really in the movie, and that one, while McGann is quite good, is just so atrociously written that I never really connected with his Doctor - going with TV appearances, at least. I read some of the BBC-published Eighth Doctor Adventures, and they are really quite interesting.

Never cared about William Hartnell. I'm not quite sure what it is, but I just never liked his portrayal of the Doctor, though I like some of his serials - The Time Meddler, for instance, is really quite good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on September 16, 2014, 08:04:27 PM
such as Love and Monsters, and Fear Her.

You should be permabanned for saying those words. I am disgusted.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on September 16, 2014, 08:06:26 PM
Are you saying those episodes were good?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on September 16, 2014, 10:54:56 PM
So, rankings...

1. Tom Baker
2. Jon Pertwee
3. Peter Davison
4. Peter Capaldi
5. Christopher Eccleston
6. Matt Smith
7. Patrick Troughton
8. David Tennant
9. Sylvester McCoy
10. William Hartnell
11. Paul McGann
12. John Hurt
13. Colin Baker

Despite Colin Baker being in the bottom, i still don't hate his doctor. Peter Capaldi is slowly creeping his way to no.1!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 17, 2014, 12:11:09 AM
Are you saying those episodes were good?

I liked the concept of Fear Her, despite its flaws.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 17, 2014, 07:51:55 AM
Fear Her is the only New Who episode I haven't watched! :ontome:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on September 17, 2014, 07:57:46 AM
Are you saying those episodes were good?

I liked the concept of Fear Her, despite its flaws.

But surely you concur that Love and Monsters is indefensible.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 17, 2014, 08:02:22 AM
That one was pretty  :\ but I didn't hate it as strongly as a lot of folks here.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 17, 2014, 08:26:48 AM
The biggest thing I hated about Fear Her was that the little girl was a terrible actress IMO
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 17, 2014, 08:29:10 AM
The biggest thing I hated about Fear Her was that the little girl was a terrible actress IMO

The majority of kids on TV are. And it was a stupid story too.
At least Love and Monsters was the fun kind of stupid that was so bad that it's almost good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 17, 2014, 08:33:25 AM
I had no serious problem with Fear Her, it was silly yes, but some of the stories are that silly. Love and Monsters however was so absolutely out of this world terrible I don't know what the hell people were thinking.

Also, just saw 50th again. So awesome. Although someone forgot to tell Tennant's hair stylist that he didn't look like that while he was the Doctor.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on September 17, 2014, 09:39:29 AM
My favorite doctor is Patrick Troughton, and my second favorite is Tom Baker. Beyond that I have no idea because I am terrible at making lists.

My least favorite Is a tie between Davison and Tennant.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 17, 2014, 06:34:46 PM
1. Peter Capaldi
2. Tom Baker
3. Christopher Ecceleston
4. Jon Pertwee
5. David Tennant
6. Sylvester McCoy
7. Patrick Troughton
8. John Hurt
9. Paul McGann
10. Peter Davison
11. Matt Smith
12. William Hartnell
13. Colin Baker

That's my ranking of the Doctors. Hartnell, McGann and Hurt would all be higher if there was more out there from them though. It struck as being a little odd at how low I rank Smith, because he was the first Doctor I watched, but then again he really isn't my sort of Doctor. I loved him in the role though!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on September 17, 2014, 08:00:27 PM
Are you saying those episodes were good?

No, I am saying they sucked so bad that they should never be mentioned.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 17, 2014, 11:51:40 PM
The biggest thing I hated about Fear Her was that the little girl was a terrible actress IMO

The majority of kids on TV are. And it was a stupid story too.
At least Love and Monsters was the fun kind of stupid that was so bad that it's almost good.

Well, I liked that Fear Her touched on the issue of abuse and whatnot. I was pleasantly surprised to see that on the show. It was corny but not after-school special caliber.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 18, 2014, 06:22:38 AM
Finally got to catch "Listen."  Holy crap, that was one of the best, most interesting episodes of DW I've ever seen.

I think it was definitely left ambiguous as to whether the hiding monsters are real.  That is the power of the story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 18, 2014, 09:25:50 AM
Finally got to catch "Listen."  Holy crap, that was one of the best, most interesting episodes of DW I've ever seen.

I think it was definitely left ambiguous as to whether the hiding monsters are real.  That is the power of the story.

Completely agreed. "Listen" is a masterwork!

Also, here's some very interesting details for the second half of this season! I'm really looking forward to "Kill the Moon" and "Mummy on the Oriental Express" right now.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/tantalising-details-on-series-8-episodes-5-8-66791.htm
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 20, 2014, 10:39:28 AM
Are we ready to rob(*) the Bank Of Karabaxos?

* Short for for the verb "to robwebster", that is to say "to convince somebody to do something with the sheer power of appropriate words and reasonable argomentation".
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 20, 2014, 11:37:37 AM
I'm excited for tonight's episode. Looks like it's going to be a fun one
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 20, 2014, 12:07:00 PM
When does it start? As in how many hours from now?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on September 20, 2014, 12:11:00 PM
19 or so minutes from my post time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 20, 2014, 12:23:11 PM
Awesome, thanks. Gonna make my night shift slightly more pleasant.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 20, 2014, 01:22:53 PM
I'm actually much more excited to see the episodes that are coming our way starting next week. Should really interesting to see where we go from here.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 20, 2014, 02:59:24 PM
Wasn't bad but wasn't that great either. Seems like the season so far is rotating between one good and one meh episode. And in concept it reminded me a lot to Hide.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 20, 2014, 04:01:12 PM
Wasn't bad but wasn't that great either. Seems like the season so far is rotating between one good and one meh episode. And in concept it reminded me a lot to Hide.

From the sound of things, it looks like the second half of the season is going to be a lot stronger, or at least more consistent, than the first. Aside from the two-part finale by Moffat and next week's episode by Gareth Roberts, the remaining four episodes (Kill the Moon, Mummy on the Oriental Express, Flatline and In the Forests of the Night) are all going to be written by screenwriters that are brand new to the show. Plus the details that we have on those episodes so far all seem to indicate that they're at least going to attempt to be a bit more daring and experimental with these episodes.

Contrast that with having two incredibly generic Who episodes written by veteran screenwriters (Robot of Sherwood, Time Heist). I'll give Deep Breath a little bit of slack, since most post-regeneration episodes tend to be a bit shaky, but RoS and TH are both rather bland. Especially in comparison to episodes like Into the Dalek and Listen. Capaldi is clearly at his best when he's handed darker, more serious scripts and aside from The Caretaker next week, it looks like that's exactly what the rest of the season is going to be like. Dark and serious.

And even then, I'm still excited for The Caretaker, because I think that Roberts tends to hand in more interesting and original comedic episodes than someone like Gatiss, whose schtick is generally about poorly modeling his episodes after Classic Who eras. Capaldi showed himself to be absolutely hysterical in RoS, which was what made that episode work in the end, so I'm hopeful he'll do even better when given a (hopefully) stronger comedic script.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on September 20, 2014, 05:47:26 PM
Payday 2: The Doctor Who episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 20, 2014, 07:27:02 PM
Good episode, although I think I expected it to be more tied into the season arc, given Moffat's writing credit.

Definitely a much better episode than Robot of Sherwood. I figured The Doctor was the architect pretty early on, and I liked the way the story unfolded with none of them knowing what they're doing. I thought the reason they were robbing the bank would end up being a bit more of a revelation than saving the aliens, but it still wrapped up pretty nicely.

But the Galaxy's most secure bank still hasn't figured that human sized vents to every room are a bad idea. :P

edit: And I liked his comments about his outfit looking like a magician. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 21, 2014, 05:27:49 PM
Yeah, that Doctor/Architect tie-in was pretty obvious, but other than that, I liked this one. I think that the Doctor's darker direction is already beginning to pay off, because it was a genuine surprise that Psi and Saibra were actually still alive, something that I would have figured out pretty early in earlier stories, but it worked here because the past stories have shown us that the Doctor isn't shy about letting people die.

Though yeah, it's pretty ridiculous that it's so easy to break into the Most Secure Bank in the Galaxy.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 21, 2014, 07:05:26 PM
I wasn't expecting the other two to be alive either, especially after the earlier precedent of Into the Dalek where people sacrificed their lives so he could survive, without much emotion from The Doctor.

I think they let the bank's policy of putting their criminals on show got in the way of making it seem that secure a bank, when they brought out this big slow monster to slowly scan someone's brain and nuke them rather than just bring out a bunch of guys to shoot them, but I guess they also needed to utilize the monster to that degree for the purpose of the story too.

The little nitpicks really didn't affect my enjoyment of this episode at all though, unlike Robot of Sherwood.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on September 21, 2014, 07:59:36 PM
Time Heist worked because it moved so fast you didn't get a chance to go "wait, what?" about it. It was Doctor Who meets Hollywood heist movie, and it played that perfectly. I loved it, but I figure multiple viewings will make me go "oh come now."

The show, I will say, has finally found the way it wants to tell stories visually now for the Moffat era, which it's been working towards since the middle of series 7 (and said change pretty much required the change from Smith, who I loved, to Capaldi, who I love as well.) It would just be so weird to see Smith's physicality in these stories. Capaldi's acting just fits the current visual style.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 22, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
I enjoyed that episode a lot again - definitely more typical Doctor Who episode, both in style and in the twist, but very nicely done. Capaldi really is fast becoming one of my favourites, and this season has been excellent so far!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 22, 2014, 04:38:27 AM
Nearly flawless I would say
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 22, 2014, 04:47:06 AM
For me they're 4/5 great episodes so far, with the 5th still being enjoyable. I think S8 is well on track to be the best season of the modern series so far, and I expect it will only get better towards the end. I don't think any of the previous seasons have been this good at this point in the season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 22, 2014, 05:56:09 AM
So far, I'd say:

1. Listen






2. Into the Dalek
3. Time Heist
4. Deep Breath






5. Robot of Sherwood

Though I've enjoyed pretty much everything so far, and I hope that that continues - though with the exception of The Caretaker, all of the remaining stories sound like absolute winners so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 22, 2014, 05:58:49 AM
I'd agree with that ranking, although I'm really not sure which I prefer out of Into the Dalek and Time Heist yet. Once I rewatch Time Heist I might make up my mind, but they're about tied for me right now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 22, 2014, 09:19:46 AM
We do love ranking things on DTF don't we. :lol

1. Listen
2. Robot of Sherwood
3. Time Heist
4. Deep Breath
5. Into the Dalek

I've really enjoyed all four though. Really great consistency in quality so far, which combines very well with a variety of styles to make the overall quality fantastic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 22, 2014, 09:58:10 AM
1. Listen
2. Dalek
3. Sherwood
4. Deep Breath
5. Time Heist
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on September 22, 2014, 10:50:56 AM
1. Listen (Unsurprisingly)
2. Deep Breath
3. Time Heist
4. Into The Dalek
5. Robot Of Sherwood
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 22, 2014, 11:03:34 AM
This might be the first time that I've seen a consensus on the first spot.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 22, 2014, 01:20:02 PM
1. Listen
2. Into the Dalek

3. Time Heist
4. Deep Breath


5. Robot of Sherwood

I'm really looking forward to the next half of the season. I hear "Kill the Moon" is going to be a fantastic episode in particular.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 22, 2014, 01:46:46 PM
The ones that I am anticipating the most are "Kill the Moon", "Mummy on the Orient Express" and the two-part finale.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 22, 2014, 03:02:15 PM
I can't wait for Kill The Moon! But I have a feeling The Caretaker will be surprisingly good as well!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 22, 2014, 03:03:45 PM
I've yet to see a Capaldi episode that I didn't enjoy, but it seemed to be the least interesting of the remaining ones for me, and that robot that you saw in the Next-Time-trailer looked pretty darn campy.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 22, 2014, 04:28:12 PM
Well, put one of the most alien doctors of all time undercover as a janitor, the comedy alone should be worth it! Plus, I think it will kickstart the chain of events leading up to all the future developements.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 22, 2014, 05:49:00 PM
What's so special about Kill The Moon?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 22, 2014, 08:07:01 PM
I don't know anything about future episodes aside from episode names, but I'm excited for the ending two parter. How could it not be amazing?

Next week's episode looks like another "filler" episode. I don't mean that as a negative thing, it just doesn't appear to be like an important episode to the season. But The Doctor as a janitor? That looks like a lot of fun!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 23, 2014, 03:20:36 AM
Next week's episode looks like another "filler" episode. I don't mean that as a negative thing, it just doesn't appear to be like an important episode to the season.
I dunno, hard to tell. It certainly seems to do more than previous episodes on the whole Clara/Danny thing, which seems to be a big part of the arc (having met Orson as well). As is often the case with Moffat, we won't really know until the end of the season!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 23, 2014, 03:52:02 AM
Next week's episode looks like another "filler" episode. I don't mean that as a negative thing, it just doesn't appear to be like an important episode to the season.
I dunno, hard to tell. It certainly seems to do more than previous episodes on the whole Clara/Danny thing, which seems to be a big part of the arc (having met Orson as well). As is often the case with Moffat, we won't really know until the end of the season!

Oh right, the Danny Pink thing! Moffat has a writing credit on it too. The Doctor currently knows very little of Clara's latest love interest, so things will likely progress there. I was only thinking of the monster itself, so it doesn't seem to be a really pivotal episode.

But even then, we may still see more of Missy and the promised land. This week looks to be another robot, and we've already had a few other robots involved with that story line. Coincidence? Maybe, but I'm all for more robots. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 23, 2014, 06:07:23 AM
Next week's episode looks like another "filler" episode. I don't mean that as a negative thing, it just doesn't appear to be like an important episode to the season.
I dunno, hard to tell. It certainly seems to do more than previous episodes on the whole Clara/Danny thing, which seems to be a big part of the arc (having met Orson as well). As is often the case with Moffat, we won't really know until the end of the season!

Oh right, the Danny Pink thing! Moffat has a writing credit on it too. The Doctor currently knows very little of Clara's latest love interest, so things will likely progress there. I was only thinking of the monster itself, so it doesn't seem to be a really pivotal episode.

But even then, we may still see more of Missy and the promised land. This week looks to be another robot, and we've already had a few other robots involved with that story line. Coincidence? Maybe, but I'm all for more robots. :lol

Actually from what I've heard, there's another character besides Danny that appears in The Caretaker that carries over to the following episode, Kill the Moon, which seems to set up the rest of the season.

What's so special about Kill The Moon?

Well, for starters, the writer of the episode (Peter Harness) was instructed by Steven Moffat to "Hinchcliffe the shit out of the first half of the episode." Furthermore, apparently the last scene in the episode is Moffat's favorite moment in the entire season.

Here's the official plot summary that was announced:
"In the near future, the Doctor and Clara arrive on a decrepit shuttle making a suicide mission to the Moon. Crashing on the lunar surface, they find a mining base full of eviscerated corpses, spider-like creatures scuttling about in the dark, and a terrible dilemma."
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 23, 2014, 06:13:50 AM
What is Hinchcliffe? I want to know whether it's something that should excite me or not. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 23, 2014, 06:17:12 AM
What is Hinchcliffe? I want to know whether it's something that should excite me or not. :lol

Not what; Who. Hinchcliffe was the showrunner for the early Tom Baker years, which are generally considered to be the golden age of Doctor Who. So yes, that's something that should definitely excite you. :hefdaddy
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 23, 2014, 06:20:13 AM
Eh, I'm not really into classic Who, so that doesn't excite me. Nothing about that episode jumps out at me, but I'm sure it will be fantastic like the rest of the season. The season arc is unfolding so slowly and subtly that I can't wait to see the later half of the season and how it all comes together.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 23, 2014, 06:32:00 AM
Eh, I'm not really into classic Who, so that doesn't excite me. Nothing about that episode jumps out at me, but I'm sure it will be fantastic like the rest of the season. The season arc is unfolding so slowly and subtly that I can't wait to see the later half of the season and how it all comes together.

Eh, fair enough. I'm generally not the biggest fan of Classic Who either, but when it was good, it was generally great. Especially the Hinchcliffe era, imo. It was a great blend of sci-fi and gothic horror. :metal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geMx6y8ctFk

In fact, just rewatching this clip, it really stands out to me how similar Peter Capaldi's Doctor is to Tom's. Capaldi is definitely a darker Doctor, but he often sounds like a Scottish version of Tom and he has that same presence of authority too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 23, 2014, 09:34:26 AM
I think he's still more Pertwee mixed in with Smith
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 23, 2014, 09:38:01 AM
I think he's still more Pertwee mixed in with Smith

I see the Pertwee influence in his outfit, but I can hardly see any real influence on how Capaldi acts anything like Pertwee, or more especially like Smith. The big influence on his acting really seems to be Tom Baker.

His Doctor as a whole though really seems influenced by 1, 4, 6, 7 and 9.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 23, 2014, 09:43:50 AM
Yeah I would say so far he is most similar to Tom Baker. He can be a bit antagonistic at times which reminds me slightly of Colin Baker as well. Early days though, and really he's a little different to all of them, which is exactly how it should it be with DW.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on September 23, 2014, 09:50:52 AM
Well, put one of the most alien doctors of all time undercover as a janitor, the comedy alone should be worth it! Plus, I think it will kickstart the chain of events leading up to all the future developements.

Well at least he won't be disguised as a maid again.

(https://www.dvdactive.com/images/reviews/screenshot/2013/7/vlcsnap2013070310h45m00s170.jpg)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 27, 2014, 09:14:21 PM
Another good episode. My favourite attribute of the current Doctor is that he's a bit of a jerk to people, so this was a great episode for him. Lots of funny lines. I underestimated this episode.

After the trailer for The Caretaker, everyone was saying that the random school teacher looked like the 11th Doctor, which I thought was just going to be a small nugget at best. I liked that it became an important part of the story. :lol

I wonder if in future The Doctor will still have the invisibility watch? If it was one-use, they probably should have had it destroyed or worn out or something.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 28, 2014, 04:14:43 AM
Really liked the episode. 12th seems to developing a bit more of a wider personality than before, which is awesome.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 28, 2014, 06:00:10 AM
Another good episode. My favourite attribute of the current Doctor is that he's a bit of a jerk to people, so this was a great episode for him. Lots of funny lines. I underestimated this episode.

After the trailer for The Caretaker, everyone was saying that the random school teacher looked like the 11th Doctor, which I thought was just going to be a small nugget at best. I liked that it became an important part of the story. :lol

I wonder if in future The Doctor will still have the invisibility watch? If it was one-use, they probably should have had it destroyed or worn out or something.
Really liked the episode. 12th seems to developing a bit more of a wider personality than before, which is awesome.

I'm amazed that neither of you, nor any of the other Whovians here at DTF, are raving about the moment in the episode where 12 whistles Pink Floyd. :lol

So yeah, 12 is definitely my Doctor now. :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on September 28, 2014, 06:06:51 AM
Aaaand I must have missed that! Did he really?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 28, 2014, 06:25:34 AM
I'm amazed that neither of you, nor any of the other Whovians here at DTF, are raving about the moment in the episode where 12 whistles Pink Floyd. :lol

So yeah, 12 is definitely my Doctor now. :tup

I caught it on second viewing, but since I hate PF, I didn't think it was worth raving about. :biggrin:

Aaaand I must have missed that! Did he really?

Yep, he whistles a bit of Another Brick in the Wall (or whatever, I don't really know The Wall) right after Clara tells some kids off.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 28, 2014, 06:35:35 AM
Aaaand I must have missed that! Did he really?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=306wiHz20fI

It's even better when you realize what lyrics he's whistling at that part too. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on September 28, 2014, 06:43:50 AM
Incredible

I enjoyed the episode though one scene made me absolutely hate Danny.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 28, 2014, 06:49:48 AM
Incredible

I enjoyed the episode though one scene made me absolutely hate Danny.

The bit where he's getting all "YES SIR" with The Doctor in the TARDIS? TBH, most of his scenes make me hate him, so it could be anything. :lol But I still enjoy the story arc.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on September 28, 2014, 08:53:36 AM
Yeah. Especially considering how he lied to Clara too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 28, 2014, 12:09:28 PM
I liked the episode a lot until Danny came into the picture. Getting more and more annoying with each episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 28, 2014, 02:30:33 PM
Here's my review for both Time Heist and The Caretaker.

~

Two weeks ago, I decided that I would do a weekly review of each airing episode of Doctor Who Series 8. One week in, I botched it up by never bothering to write a review for Time Heist. As a result, I figured that I might as well get back to the swing of things by doing a two-part review.

With the airing of Time Heist, I am reminded that Doctor Who is a show that is all about change. Companions come and go, the Doctor regenerates and the showrunners switch around into other projects. As a result, there are that many more fans out there that can love Doctor Who, because it’s ultimately an eclectic show.

Unfortunately, change does not please everyone. Sure, nothing can please everyone, but change often frightens people. It’s understandable. After all, the new Doctors and companions tend to take awhile for the general fanbase to accept and appreciate.

I point all of this out because the changes that we have seen thus far in Series 8 have all been things that I have absolutely adored. Peter Capaldi’s weekly performances as the darker and more alien Twelfth Doctor has been exactly what I wanted from the show. I think it says a lot that my previous Top 3 Doctors before Twelve were Four, Seven and Nine.

The first half of Series 8 has been comprised of a blend of old and new. Every episode has featured a veteran Who screenwriter, all working with a brand new and very different Doctor. Everything has been either a romp or a character piece. The villains, aside from Rusty, haven’t been very interesting at all. However we’ve gotten to see a lot from Twelve already and Clara has finally been properly established as a singular and definitive character, rather than being an all-encompassing idea (“The Impossible Girl”).

I loved episodes like Into the Dalek and Listen, because they embraced the best and most interesting elements of Capaldi’s Doctor. These are bold and thought-provoking episodes. After all of the silly romps and adventures we had with the Eleventh Doctor, this was a great change for me.

Time Heist, like Robot of Sherwood, is an incredibly basic romp. Ms. Delphox and the two other members to the Doctor and Clara’s team are simple characters. There isn’t much to see about them, though I will give them credit for being better fits to the Twelfth Doctor than the Paternoster Gang were in Deep Breath.

It’s rather odd to think about how average this episode feels, because Doctor Who hasn’t ever really had a full-on heist episode before. By all accounts, this episode should feel far more exciting and original than it did.

Someone pointed out to me that a mistake the episode makes is having the Doctor trick himself and the rest of the team, rather than it being about the Doctor and the team tricking security the entire way through. The tension of the episode is inward, rather than outward. This would work brilliantly in a horror or psychological thriller episode like Listen or Into the Dalek, but it feels incredibly flat here.

I will give credit to the episode’s direction. When Peter Capaldi described this episode as being a “cross between Ocean’s Eleven and 2001,” I figured the latter comparison would be more of a reference to the incredible cinematography featured. In that regard, I completely agree with Mr. Capaldi.

Of the episodes that comprised the first half of Series 8, the three I looked most forward to were Into the Dalek, Listen and The Caretaker. While all three were episodes that had veteran Who scribes to their credit, these were scribes that had a habit of making interesting and dynamic episodes for the show, unlike the generic scripts of Robot of Sherwood and Time Heist.

The Caretaker is a tricky episode to talk about, because it tries to be to Twelve what The Lodger was for the Eleventh Doctor, while also trying to set up the plot for the second half of Series 8. As a result, it leaves me with mixed feelings like Deep Breath did at the start of the season.

Don’t get me wrong, The Caretaker has plenty of hilarious moments. Gareth Roberts comes up with some very interesting and memorable jokes that are well delivered by the cast, whereas Mark Gatiss’s decidedly average script for Robot of Sherwood was elevated entirely by great acting. There’s something that I feel is far more rewarding and memorable in seeing the Doctor whistle Pink Floyd’s “Another Brick in the Wall” than the squabbling that comprised most of Robot of Sherwood.

As with Into the Dalek and Listen, The Caretaker is very much a character piece. We finally get a lot more to see from Danny, we see Clara’s struggle in attempting to prevent her three lives (personal-human, personal-Doctor and professional) come crashing together and we get a little bit of a better understanding how nasty Twelve can get.

The core problem with this episode is Danny and Clara’s relationship. I enjoyed watching the seeds of their romance being planted in Into the Dalek and Listen, but The Caretaker breaks the rule of “Show, don’t tell” in order to move their relationship into a more ‘serious’ position. If you pay close attention to Danny’s dialogue when he speaks to Courtney’s parents and cross-examine that with the dialogue said in Into the Dalek, you’ll learn that there has been a subtle year long time-skip somewhere in-between Listen and The Caretaker.

Presumably, this was all done in order to add credit to Clara’s declaration of love to Danny during the three-way argument between them and the Doctor that occurs in the middle of the episode. While it helps a little bit, it still doesn’t change the fact that this episode is forcing us to like Danny, as well as his relationship with Clara. We’re informed that they’re in love, rather than actually getting to see it for ourselves throughout the series thus far.

As stated before, The Caretaker gives us a bigger view into the darker parts of Twelve’s personality. He’s incredibly grumpy and more than a little bit manipulative. Not to mention his previously established disliking of soldiers, which results in some pretty big tension between him and Danny. Furthermore, we see how envious and jealous the Doctor is of Danny and his relationship with Clara.

The other weak point of the episode is the Mons- er, Robot of the Week. It’s just there. Sure, this episode isn’t supposed to be about the robot, but it felt like a waste of a really good design. Maybe next time!

With the first half of Series 8 out of the way, I now turn towards the second half with a great deal of excitement and eagerness. From what I understand, the final shifts into what will really define Peter Capaldi’s era as the Doctor will be made in next week’s episode, Kill the Moon, which is pinned by the first of three new writers, Peter Harness. I am eager to see how the new blood will influence the show and Capaldi’s run, especially since it is supposed to transition into a much darker and scarier direction, which is exactly what I love about Doctor Who.

Remember fellow Whovians: Change is a part of the show.

Time Heist: 7.5 out of 10

The Caretaker: 8 out of 10
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: James Mypetgiress on September 28, 2014, 02:42:01 PM
Here's my review for both Time Heist and The Caretaker.

~

Two weeks ago, I decided that I would do a weekly review of each airing episode of Doctor Who Series 8. One week in, I botched it up by never bothering to write a review for Time Heist. As a result, I figured that I might as well get back to the swing of things by doing a two-part review.

With the airing of Time Heist, I am reminded that Doctor Who is a show that is all about change. Companions come and go, the Doctor regenerates and the showrunners switch around into other projects. As a result, there are that many more fans out there that can love Doctor Who, because it’s ultimately an eclectic show.

Unfortunately, change does not please everyone. Sure, nothing can please everyone, but change often frightens people. It’s understandable. After all, the new Doctors and companions tend to take awhile for the general fanbase to accept and appreciate.

I point all of this out because the changes that we have seen thus far in Series 8 have all been things that I have absolutely adored. Peter Capaldi’s weekly performances as the darker and more alien Twelfth Doctor has been exactly what I wanted from the show. I think it says a lot that my previous Top 3 Doctors before Twelve were Four, Seven and Nine.

The first half of Series 8 has been comprised of a blend of old and new. Every episode has featured a veteran Who screenwriter, all working with a brand new and very different Doctor. Everything has been either a romp or a character piece. The villains, aside from Rusty, haven’t been very interesting at all. However we’ve gotten to see a lot from Twelve already and Clara has finally been properly established as a singular and definitive character, rather than being an all-encompassing idea (“The Impossible Girl”).

I loved episodes like Into the Dalek and Listen, because they embraced the best and most interesting elements of Capaldi’s Doctor. These are bold and thought-provoking episodes. After all of the silly romps and adventures we had with the Eleventh Doctor, this was a great change for me.

Time Heist, like Robot of Sherwood, is an incredibly basic romp. Ms. Delphox and the two other members to the Doctor and Clara’s team are simple characters. There isn’t much to see about them, though I will give them credit for being better fits to the Twelfth Doctor than the Paternoster Gang were in Deep Breath.

It’s rather odd to think about how average this episode feels, because Doctor Who hasn’t ever really had a full-on heist episode before. By all accounts, this episode should feel far more exciting and original than it did.

Someone pointed out to me that a mistake the episode makes is having the Doctor trick himself and the rest of the team, rather than it being about the Doctor and the team tricking security the entire way through. The tension of the episode is inward, rather than outward. This would work brilliantly in a horror or psychological thriller episode like Listen or Into the Dalek, but it feels incredibly flat here.

I will give credit to the episode’s direction. When Peter Capaldi described this episode as being a “cross between Ocean’s Eleven and 2001,” I figured the latter comparison would be more of a reference to the incredible cinematography featured. In that regard, I completely agree with Mr. Capaldi.

Of the episodes that comprised the first half of Series 8, the three I looked most forward to were Into the Dalek, Listen and The Caretaker. While all three were episodes that had veteran Who scribes to their credit, these were scribes that had a habit of making interesting and dynamic episodes for the show, unlike the generic scripts of Robot of Sherwood and Time Heist.

The Caretaker is a tricky episode to talk about, because it tries to be to Twelve what The Lodger was for the Eleventh Doctor, while also trying to set up the plot for the second half of Series 8. As a result, it leaves me with mixed feelings like Deep Breath did at the start of the season.

Don’t get me wrong, The Caretaker has plenty of hilarious moments. Gareth Roberts comes up with some very interesting and memorable jokes that are well delivered by the cast, whereas Mark Gatiss’s decidedly average script for Robot of Sherwood was elevated entirely by great acting. There’s something that I feel is far more rewarding and memorable in seeing the Doctor whistle Pink Floyd’s “Another Brick in the Wall” than the squabbling that comprised most of Robot of Sherwood.

As with Into the Dalek and Listen, The Caretaker is very much a character piece. We finally get a lot more to see from Danny, we see Clara’s struggle in attempting to prevent her three lives (personal-human, personal-Doctor and professional) come crashing together and we get a little bit of a better understanding how nasty Twelve can get.

The core problem with this episode is Danny and Clara’s relationship. I enjoyed watching the seeds of their romance being planted in Into the Dalek and Listen, but The Caretaker breaks the rule of “Show, don’t tell” in order to move their relationship into a more ‘serious’ position. If you pay close attention to Danny’s dialogue when he speaks to Courtney’s parents and cross-examine that with the dialogue said in Into the Dalek, you’ll learn that there has been a subtle year long time-skip somewhere in-between Listen and The Caretaker.

Presumably, this was all done in order to add credit to Clara’s declaration of love to Danny during the three-way argument between them and the Doctor that occurs in the middle of the episode. While it helps a little bit, it still doesn’t change the fact that this episode is forcing us to like Danny, as well as his relationship with Clara. We’re informed that they’re in love, rather than actually getting to see it for ourselves throughout the series thus far.

As stated before, The Caretaker gives us a bigger view into the darker parts of Twelve’s personality. He’s incredibly grumpy and more than a little bit manipulative. Not to mention his previously established disliking of soldiers, which results in some pretty big tension between him and Danny. Furthermore, we see how envious and jealous the Doctor is of Danny and his relationship with Clara.

The other weak point of the episode is the Mons- er, Robot of the Week. It’s just there. Sure, this episode isn’t supposed to be about the robot, but it felt like a waste of a really good design. Maybe next time!

With the first half of Series 8 out of the way, I now turn towards the second half with a great deal of excitement and eagerness. From what I understand, the final shifts into what will really define Peter Capaldi’s era as the Doctor will be made in next week’s episode, Kill the Moon, which is pinned by the first of three new writers, Peter Harness. I am eager to see how the new blood will influence the show and Capaldi’s run, especially since it is supposed to transition into a much darker and scarier direction, which is exactly what I love about Doctor Who.

Remember fellow Whovians: Change is a part of the show.

Time Heist: 7.5 out of 10

The Caretaker: 8 out of 10
This being the first time I've seen your avatar.... That is fucking genius! Love it  :rollin
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Dimitrius on September 28, 2014, 03:03:10 PM
I liked the episode except for two things: 1) we're suppose to believe and d'aaaaww that Clara "loves" Danny even though all interaction we've seen from them is either awkward conversations where Clara makes Danny feel bad or straight up arguments. Yeeeaaah... no. 2) Danny went from crying in front of his class and being timid and awkward to somersaulting-over-lasers and being judgmental in just over, what, 50 minutes of screentime in 6 episodes? Where's the character growth?

Also, there's no reason Clara should be either running late or just getting off from the TARDIS to their dates... it's a freaking time machine!!!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 28, 2014, 03:04:09 PM
This being the first time I've seen your avatar.... That is fucking genius! Love it  :rollin

Thanks! What did you think of my review? :)

I liked the episode except for two things: 1) we're suppose to believe and d'aaaaww that Clara "loves" Danny even though all interaction we've seen from them is either awkward conversations where Clara makes Danny feel bad or straight up arguments. Yeeeaaah... no. 2) Danny went from crying in front of his class and being timid and awkward to somersaulting-over-lasers and being judgmental in just over, what, 50 minutes of screentime in 6 episodes? Where's the character growth?

Also, there's no reason Clara should be either running late or just getting off from the TARDIS to their dates... it's a freaking time machine!!!

Exactly. The whole thing with Danny (both his character and his romance with Clara) went from being set-up in Into the Dalek/Listen and straight into the other direction. Completely broke the "Show, don't tell" rule and made him far less interesting than he originally could have been for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 28, 2014, 07:37:49 PM
I liked the episode except for two things: 1) we're suppose to believe and d'aaaaww that Clara "loves" Danny even though all interaction we've seen from them is either awkward conversations where Clara makes Danny feel bad or straight up arguments. Yeeeaaah... no. 2) Danny went from crying in front of his class and being timid and awkward to somersaulting-over-lasers and being judgmental in just over, what, 50 minutes of screentime in 6 episodes? Where's the character growth?

Also, there's no reason Clara should be either running late or just getting off from the TARDIS to their dates... it's a freaking time machine!!!

That stuff bugs me too. Point 1 is the same thing we got with River, where they skipped showing all of the relevant stuff to make it feel believable, although Clara/Danny has still been much better in that regard, because we have seen them establish a real relationship, we just saw pretty much nothing between the awkward first date, and being apparently completely in love. We never saw that dynamic change, or really saw why Clara would like this bumbling weirdo.
And there's no reason Clara couldn't have taken some time to clean herself up before returning back to her time. The tan was understandable, since that's going to last a while, but the fish people? Girl, at least look in a mirror before going on your date! And maybe change your clothes at some point? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 29, 2014, 08:43:55 AM
I liked the episode except for two things: 1) we're suppose to believe and d'aaaaww that Clara "loves" Danny even though all interaction we've seen from them is either awkward conversations where Clara makes Danny feel bad or straight up arguments. Yeeeaaah... no. 2) Danny went from crying in front of his class and being timid and awkward to somersaulting-over-lasers and being judgmental in just over, what, 50 minutes of screentime in 6 episodes? Where's the character growth?

As I mentioned in my review, it seems Moffat sneaked in a subtle timeskip in The Caretaker. If you pay attention to when Danny is talking to Courtney's parents, you'll find out that he's been teaching at the school for a year now (he had just joined in Into the Dalek). Still, it breaks the "Show, don't tell" rule and makes me disappointed with how they handled him and his romance with Clara. 

Quote
Also, there's no reason Clara should be either running late or just getting off from the TARDIS to their dates... it's a freaking time machine!!!

Actually, I can think of a reason: accidentally meeting her past self, which is an established no-no in the show. Still, I could imagine her trying to find ways around it.
That stuff bugs me too. Point 1 is the same thing we got with River, where they skipped showing all of the relevant stuff to make it feel believable, although Clara/Danny has still been much better in that regard, because we have seen them establish a real relationship, we just saw pretty much nothing between the awkward first date, and being apparently completely in love. We never saw that dynamic change, or really saw why Clara would like this bumbling weirdo.
And there's no reason Clara couldn't have taken some time to clean herself up before returning back to her time. The tan was understandable, since that's going to last a while, but the fish people? Girl, at least look in a mirror before going on your date! And maybe change your clothes at some point? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 29, 2014, 02:01:57 PM
If you pay close attention to Danny’s dialogue when he speaks to Courtney’s parents and cross-examine that with the dialogue said in Into the Dalek, you’ll learn that there has been a subtle year long time-skip somewhere in-between Listen and The Caretaker.

Presumably, this was all done in order to add credit to Clara’s declaration of love to Danny during the three-way argument between them and the Doctor that occurs in the middle of the episode. While it helps a little bit, it still doesn’t change the fact that this episode is forcing us to like Danny, as well as his relationship with Clara. We’re informed that they’re in love, rather than actually getting to see it for ourselves throughout the series thus far.
I don't think it's forcing anything - I thought it was pretty obvious that she hadn't realised that she loved him prior to saying that, as it came out suddenly and surprised all three of them.

I would also add that before this episode we've seen the first few dates between them. The opening scene was a montage of a load more dates and a load more adventures. And then, as you say, it's hinted that he's been at the school for a while now.

So yeah, it's fairly quick, but I don't see a problem with that. Companions generally last a couple of seasons at most, and so in order to have proper relationships they generally come with partners already (Amy, Rose) or romance never really comes into it. Back in the classic series companions would often meet a character for the first time on another planet and then decide to stay behind with them forever at the end of that serial. But I think it's good that this time we're seeing the whole relationship developing, just at a slightly quicker pace.

EDIT: Oh and yeah, I loved the episode. Great humour and some nice touching moments - Gareth Roberts really is the master of those sorts of episodes!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 29, 2014, 02:57:15 PM
Sorry to be a parrot :p

Just finished Time Heist. I still have the same problem - as much as I enjoy watching Capaldi and I know it's only a short runtime to shove everything in ...

But these 4 people woke up in a place with no memory and told to rob a bank and they all sort of go " Yep, definitely " and get on with it immediately.

I think DW would work a lot better if it had Sherlock's run time. You could have time to write in and film all the discussions and motivations.

Capaldi is very Tom Baker though. Agreed.

Currently downloading The Caretaker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on September 29, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
Sorry to be a parrot :p

Just finished Time Heist. I still have the same problem - as much as I enjoy watching Capaldi and I know it's only a short runtime to shove everything in ...

But these 4 people woke up in a place with no memory and told to rob a bank and they all sort of go " Yep, definitely " and get on with it immediately.

I think DW would work a lot better if it had Sherlock's run time. You could have time to write in and film all the discussions and motivations.

Capaldi is very Tom Baker though. Agreed.

Currently downloading The Caretaker.

This is why I kinda prefer the classic format.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 29, 2014, 03:28:54 PM
But these 4 people woke up in a place with no memory and told to rob a bank and they all sort of go " Yep, definitely " and get on with it immediately.
Well, no, they didn't. In fact they all looked very sceptical until they heard the recordings of themselves pledging to do it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 29, 2014, 03:42:27 PM
Agreed. But there still wasn't much deliberating after that or " what do we do then ? " .

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 29, 2014, 08:17:40 PM
Agreed. But there still wasn't much deliberating after that or " what do we do then ? " .



They woke up to evidence from themselves that they apparently agreed to do it, and immediately had security on them, so they didn't have a lot of time to think about it at that point. They all kept going because of the group mentality and pressure, and already being incriminated anyway, and then when they had time to stop during the episode, then they discussed it more. I liked the way that unfolded. The episode wouldn't have gained anything from having them sit around for an extra 10 minutes beforehand talking.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 30, 2014, 12:04:06 AM
Yeah exactly. Character motivations in Doctor Who are rarely very complicated, I'm not sure why you struggle to follow them Kotow.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 30, 2014, 04:27:55 AM
I guess they just move too quickly for me personally. :)

I watched one episode where each time something was set up - it was paid off in the very next scene.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 30, 2014, 06:04:22 AM
I can understand where Kotowboy is coming from here, actually. Moffat apparently isn't a very big fan of doing two-parters and tries to push for as many singular episodes per season as possible.

I do think that played a part in why Series 7 wasn't as strong as it could have been, because the writers struggled in making the episodes paced right under such a short time span. Aside from maybe Time Heist, I think Series 8 has done a pretty good job in making the singular episode pace work to its advantage. That being said, Robot of Sherwood is easily the weakest episode so far, not because of pacing but because of how generic it felt. 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 30, 2014, 06:11:00 AM
I can understand where Kotowboy is coming from here, actually. Moffat apparently isn't a very big fan of doing two-parters and tries to push for as many singular episodes per season as possible.
I'm not aware that it's a general preference (as Kotow mentioned before, the Sherlock running time is much longer). But I remember him saying in interviews around the mid-point in series 6 that Doctor Who had been doing regular two-parters since it came back, and they wanted to switch to individiual episodes for a while, so that each episode was a bit more standalone/more of an event.

I don't agree with his reasoning at all, and I wish we'd get some two-parters back. Fair enough that they tried doing it a bit differently, and I agree that they settled better into getting the pacing much better and series 8 has been absolutely cracking so far. But I do miss the slower buildup that we sometimes got in two-parters.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 30, 2014, 06:20:21 AM
I can understand where Kotowboy is coming from here, actually. Moffat apparently isn't a very big fan of doing two-parters and tries to push for as many singular episodes per season as possible.

I do think that played a part in why Series 7 wasn't as strong as it could have been, because the writers struggled in making the episodes paced right under such a short time span. Aside from maybe Time Heist, I think Series 8 has done a pretty good job in making the singular episode pace work to its advantage. That being said, Robot of Sherwood is easily the weakest episode so far, not because of pacing but because of how generic it felt. 

I personally don't think pace had anything to do with it. S7 wasn't good stories told badly, they were just weak stories, which wouldn't have improved by drawing them out longer.

While the double episodes were usually the better ones of the RTD era, they also often felt overly drawn out for what they were. Doctor Who is a fast paced show. I prefer them just having longer episodes if needed, as they do for the specials, and the S8 opener. To me that's a good middle ground that lets them expand the episode with more of those extra moments, without the padding that their double episodes often have. And it means the episode is only as long as it needs to be, instead of being compelled to fill 2 x 45 minutes. Usually I love the idea of double episodes in scifi, but for Doctor Who, I'm pretty indifferent to it.

But I don't have a problem with the pacing of the show. I actually like the changes they've made this season to editing, and the new things they've been trying. I still think this season is on track to be the best of the modern era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 30, 2014, 06:49:40 AM
I personally don't think pace had anything to do with it. S7 wasn't good stories told badly, they were just weak stories, which wouldn't have improved by drawing them out longer.

A fair point, but I certainly don't think the pacing helped those episodes either.

For example, I think Nightmare in Silver could have been improved on if it had been expanded into a two-parter. Use the first episode to set up the rise of the new Cybermen and their siege against the protagonists, with the second episode dealing with the Doctor and Cyber-Planner. Still would've had to deal with those dumb kids, but I think more time could have helped make the Cybermen more intimidating than they ended up being.

I also think both of the finales for Series 6 and 7 could have worked better as two-parters.

Quote
While the double episodes were usually the better ones of the RTD era, they also often felt overly drawn out for what they were. Doctor Who is a fast paced show. I prefer them just having longer episodes if needed, as they do for the specials, and the S8 opener. To me that's a good middle ground that lets them expand the episode with more of those extra moments, without the padding that their double episodes often have. And it means the episode is only as long as it needs to be, instead of being compelled to fill 2 x 45 minutes. Usually I love the idea of double episodes in scifi, but for Doctor Who, I'm pretty indifferent to it.

But I don't have a problem with the pacing of the show. I actually like the changes they've made this season to editing, and the new things they've been trying. I still think this season is on track to be the best of the modern era.

Oh believe me, I agree that singular episodes are fine in Doctor Who. Episodes like Blink, Midnight, Listen or Dalek are paced absolutely perfectly. But I think that the recent push towards avoiding two-parters has been a bit of a detriment to the show, at least until this season came along. The writers seem to have figured out to how to properly write a good paced Doctor Who episode in forty-five minutes.

Oh and a review just came out for this upcoming episode, Kill the Moon. Apparently it's right up there with Listen as the best of the season so far!

https://www.cultbox.co.uk/reviews/episodes/doctor-who-s08e07-spoiler-free-review-kill-the-moon
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 30, 2014, 07:23:09 AM
I still have caretaker to watch tonight. :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on September 30, 2014, 08:05:09 AM
I still have caretaker to watch tonight. :)

It's a funny and smart episode overall (the Danny stuff aside), but it took me a second viewing to really appreciate it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 30, 2014, 09:39:09 AM
Thanks to one Mr. Capaldi - this may be the first ever season of "Modern" Dr Who i've watched in full.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 30, 2014, 02:58:10 PM
So I liked The Caretaker a lot, but I didn't love it. There was some great stuff, but some awkward stuff - like the robot being "one of the most deadly killing machines ever" and then it misses EVERY FUCKING SHOT, or that Danny salto - but it featured some nice character development, and I have to say that I never felt that the Clara/Danny dynamic was unrealistic.

A theory I've heard: Missy is a Time Lord - either female Master or The Rani - and Heaven is her TARDIS. We've seen the Doctor saving Journey Blue from what seemed like a certain death in Into the Dalek by materialising the TARDIS around her just nanoseconds before she actually died, could Missy be doing the same?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 30, 2014, 03:04:38 PM
Well, we did see the incinerated forearm of the poor police officer after his unfortunate meeting with the Scovox Somethinkz. I believe those people are quite dead.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 30, 2014, 03:14:13 PM
Was that really the Police Officer though? I mean, there were quite a few mannequins standing around in that abandoned warehouse...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 30, 2014, 03:20:20 PM
Anyway, I am not sold on the Master/Rani theory. Maybe because it's one of the most common Missy theories up there floating. I tend to favour those claiming that Missy is a personification or at least in some way connected to all the Doctor's mistakes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 30, 2014, 03:25:46 PM
Wouldn't that be The Valeyard? That's a theory that I'm not sold on.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 01, 2014, 03:44:38 PM
Just watched Caretaker. A good episode I think. Better than Robot Of Sherwood yes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 01, 2014, 03:47:45 PM
Finally caught up tonight by watching Time Heist and The Caretaker both tonight. I really loved them. It's really cool that Robot of Sherwood is the 'worst' episode yet this series, but it's still quite good! It's a lot better than a few other 'lows' like The Rings of Akhaten or Victory of the Daleks.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 01, 2014, 07:40:30 PM
Finally caught up tonight by watching Time Heist and The Caretaker both tonight. I really loved them. It's really cool that Robot of Sherwood is the 'worst' episode yet this series, but it's still quite good! It's a lot better than a few other 'lows' like The Rings of Akhaten or Victory of the Daleks.

I don't know why Victory of the Daleks is so disliked! I liked it a bit more than Robot of Sherwood, but Robot of Sherwood is better than Rings of Akhaten. If Robot of Sherwood didn't have such a weak ending though, I'd probably rank it higher than both.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 02, 2014, 03:24:18 AM
I agree about the weak ending; I thought the whole Robin Hood vs. Villain face-off was a bit cheesy, and the rest of the ending was very cheesy as well. About VotD: I just think it was quite silly.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 02, 2014, 12:51:32 PM
So I caught up watching Night and the Doctor - which I didn't know was a thing until earlier today - and it's definitely recommended and works pretty damn well, especially with regards to the whole River arc in First and Last Night, and some great character moments between the Doctor and River.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 02, 2014, 02:33:01 PM
I finally got caught up.  The last two episodes were fantastic.  Sherwood remains the season's weakest link for me. 

I love Capaldi.

SHUT UP!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 02, 2014, 04:42:54 PM
Top 5 Steven Moffat scripts, go!

1. Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead
2. The Day of the Doctor
3. Listen
4. Blink
5. The Pandorica Opens / The Big Bang
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 02, 2014, 07:49:12 PM
Top 5 Steven Moffat scripts, go!

1. Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead
2. The Day of the Doctor
3. Listen
4. Blink
5. The Pandorica Opens / The Big Bang

It just wouldn't be DTF without mindless ranking, would it? :lol

My approximate list would be-

The Day of the Doctor
Listen
Blink
The Pandorica Opens / The Big Bang
The Eleventh Hour or The Time of the Doctor

Not 100% on the order, but close enough.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 02, 2014, 08:47:43 PM
Top 5 Steven Moffat scripts, go!

1. Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead
2. The Day of the Doctor
3. Listen
4. Blink
5. The Pandorica Opens / The Big Bang

1. Listen
2. The Day of the Doctor
3. Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead
4. Blink
5. The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances

I will say, the monsters in Silence in the Library are definitely the scariest Moffat has ever invented. That's probably because he's never brought them back, unlike the Weeping Angels, which diminished in quality with each appearance.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 02, 2014, 08:50:52 PM
For the RTD era, I much prefer Moffat's single episodes to his doubles. I still liked those episodes, but I don't rank them as highly as Blink or The Girl in the Fireplace, which were clear standouts for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 02, 2014, 08:55:20 PM
For the RTD era, I much prefer Moffat's single episodes to his doubles. I still liked those episodes, but I don't rank them as highly as Blink or The Girl in the Fireplace, which were clear standouts for me.

That makes enough sense, I suppose. The pacing might be a bit better in his single episodes. However I think the monsters in the Library episodes were immensely more disturbing and nerve-wrecking than anything else Moffat ever whipped out. Listen shines because it's an ambiguous, psychologically driven horror.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 03, 2014, 02:11:16 AM
Pretty standard list it seems:

1. Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead
2. Blink
3. Listen
4. Day of the Doctor
5. Girl in the Fireplace
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on October 03, 2014, 04:35:47 AM
1. Silence In The Library / Day Of The Doctor / Listen
2. The Impossible Astronaut / Day Of The Moon
3. The Girl In The Fireplace
4. Blink
5. Pandorica
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 03, 2014, 05:54:29 AM
1. Silence In The Library / Day Of The Doctor / Listen
2. The Impossible Astronaut / Day Of The Moon
3. The Girl In The Fireplace
4. Blink
5. Pandorica
Cheat!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 03, 2014, 07:43:32 AM
May I just say that I am excited as hell for the next episode? I've read three different spoiler-free reviews and nobody has anything bad to say about it. Plus, it's supposed to be dark, scary, some great characters and have an awesome moral dilemma at the heart - which is basically everything that I want from Doctor Who.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on October 03, 2014, 08:07:53 AM
1. Silence In The Library / Day Of The Doctor / Listen
2. The Impossible Astronaut / Day Of The Moon
3. The Girl In The Fireplace
4. Blink
5. Pandorica
Cheat!
Ban me! :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 03, 2014, 08:17:28 AM
1. Silence In The Library / Day Of The Doctor / Listen
2. The Impossible Astronaut / Day Of The Moon
3. The Girl In The Fireplace
4. Blink
5. Pandorica
Cheat!
Ban me! :P
Ok. :neverusethis:

May I just say that I am excited as hell for the next episode? I've read three different spoiler-free reviews and nobody has anything bad to say about it. Plus, it's supposed to be dark, scary, some great characters and have an awesome moral dilemma at the heart - which is basically everything that I want from Doctor Who.
I'm hearing it's quite similar to Waters of Mars but even more dark/bleak in some ways.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 03, 2014, 09:19:54 AM
May I just say that I am excited as hell for the next episode? I've read three different spoiler-free reviews and nobody has anything bad to say about it. Plus, it's supposed to be dark, scary, some great characters and have an awesome moral dilemma at the heart - which is basically everything that I want from Doctor Who.

My thoughts exactly. Been looking forward to Kill the Moon for awhile now! I'm also excited for next week's episode too! Apparently these next two episodes are both going to be some really dark moments for Doctor Who. :metal
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 03, 2014, 11:33:56 AM
Totally different topic: re-watched the The _____ of the Doctor quadrology (I'm including Night in this) yesterday, and I while I certainly understand where its detractors are coming from, I still loved every moment of them. The Day of the Doctor is the clear highlight, but The Time of the Doctor really does a great great job at wrapping everything up. Especially if what I read is true and Smith actually wanted to stay on for one more season, meaning that Moffat had to cram everything of Smith's initial final season into the Christmas special when Smith changed his mind and left after S7.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 04, 2014, 02:14:26 PM
Kill The Moon is my favourite episode of the season without a doubt. That was incredible.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 04, 2014, 03:02:19 PM
Kill The Moon is my favourite episode of the season without a doubt. That was incredible.

I'm still reeling from that episode. It was fantastic! I'm not sure what my exact thoughts on the episode are yet, because it's definitely a thought-provoking episode. All I know at the moment was that I definitely loved it!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 04, 2014, 04:10:18 PM
Jesus fuck Courtney please leave.

The rest of the episode was really good, but... geez. It's been a while since I last disliked a Doctor Who character this much. Well... not since Angie, I suppose.

EDIT: I want to be more positive on this. I really loved the acting, both from Capaldi and Jenna, it was properly scary, the spiders were great and the moral dilemma at the core was all something else. Yes, the whole "it laid a new egg" required some suspension of disbelief, but it is biologically possible. Plus, how good was Hermione Norris?

1. Listen
2. Kill the Moon
3. Deep Breath
4. Into the Dalek
5. The Caretaker
6. Time Heist
7. Robot of Sherwood
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 04, 2014, 05:17:37 PM
Well, I thought the whole script was pretty stupid and actually quite lame. Saved by the acting.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 04, 2014, 08:07:53 PM
I thought Courtney was alright. And boy, the Doctor telling Courtney she wasn't special really shows how different he has become. I forget which of the new Doctors made that speech about how everybody on Earth is special. Really great episode. Still, not as great as Listen though. I also like how the teaser didn't show if Clara was going to be there or not. I'm thinking we won't see her next week, but maybe the following one
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 04, 2014, 08:23:48 PM
I think the last 3 doctors all said about people being special at some point in any form.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on October 04, 2014, 08:28:06 PM
I know it's Doctor Who, but the science was really bad here. Again, no need to tell me what show I am talking about.

Not sure how I felt about it besides the ending. That scene between the Doctor and Clara made it worth the adventure.

Also, no Clara in the trailer for next week.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 04, 2014, 09:18:05 PM
I know it's Doctor Who, but the science was really bad here. Again, no need to tell me what show I am talking about.

Not sure how I felt about it besides the ending. That scene between the Doctor and Clara made it worth the adventure.

This. This episode was so hyped, and I tried to keep my expectations low, but I didn't think it was that great.
The science was super hinky even for Doctor Who (and what happens to those 100 bombs that were sitting on the moon?), and the story was kind of average to me. It was good, but not on the level of Listen by any stretch.

I'll have to watch it again, because I didn't hear everything because other people were talking, but did The Doctor know that the moon was a giant egg and hatched in 2049? Or was that still left open? Hopefully I like it more on second viewing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 04, 2014, 10:16:12 PM
I'm not sure if I personally rank Kill the Moon over Listen or not, but they're easily the top two episodes so far this season for me. I spent a lot of time thinking about the episode and came out of it with a better appreciation for it with a second viewing. Here's my review for it.

https://chained-prometheus.tumblr.com/post/99195397194/doctor-who-kill-the-moon-review
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 05, 2014, 12:34:14 AM
Sorry, your review lost me at "masterpiece". :lol :P

I thought the Clara/Doctor stuff was excellent, and I liked how different his approach was to past Doctors to helping humanity.
But as an overall episode, there were just too many issues from the start that lost me. It wasn't a bad episode, but it had the kind of fundamental problems that also brought Robot of Sherwood down too. It was still much much better than Robot of Sherwood, due to the great character stuff, but the underlying story upon which they built those character moments wasn't all that strong.

I expect on second viewing I'll appreciate the character stuff even more, but I think the story just holds it back.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 05, 2014, 01:27:45 AM
Sorry, your review lost me at "masterpiece". :lol :P

I thought the Clara/Doctor stuff was excellent, and I liked how different his approach was to past Doctors to helping humanity.
But as an overall episode, there were just too many issues from the start that lost me. It wasn't a bad episode, but it had the kind of fundamental problems that also brought Robot of Sherwood down too. It was still much much better than Robot of Sherwood, due to the great character stuff, but the underlying story upon which they built those character moments wasn't all that strong.

I expect on second viewing I'll appreciate the character stuff even more, but I think the story just holds it back.

Fair enough. I'm curious to see how next week's episode will turn out.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 05, 2014, 01:48:50 AM
The story itself for next week looks like a filler monster, but this season so far has made me eat my words whenever I say that. :lol
Put that together with the Clara situation, and I'm sure it will be a lot better than I expect. After all, Listen looked thoroughly average to me from the previews, and we all know how that one turned out.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 05, 2014, 01:53:03 AM
I agree with some of the stuff said above. I thought the story was an absolutely interesting concept, but had some flaws in the details through which it was presented. The acting was great, though I am really bothered by Courtney. She annoys the hell out of me. Jenna Coleman did a fantastic job with that last scene between her and the Doctor. Probably my favorite scene from the episode because of her acting.

This episode also looked amazing. Great CGI and beautifully shot. It was probably the episode of this season which visually felt most like watching a movie rather than a TV series.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 05, 2014, 02:18:22 AM
I agree with some of the stuff said above. I thought the story was an absolutely interesting concept, but had some flaws in the details through which it was presented. The acting was great, though I am really bothered by Courtney. She annoys the hell out of me. Jenna Coleman did a fantastic job with that last scene between her and the Doctor. Probably my favorite scene from the episode because of her acting.

Clara's acting fell a bit flat for me in S7, but I think they're writing much better for her this season, and her performances have been great as a result. I like that she has a more personal dynamic with The Doctor this season, instead of just being an obligatory tag-along character.

And does anyone like Courtney? :lol She is quite an annoying character.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 05, 2014, 02:44:29 AM
I always wonder if writers hate the previous one for writing a story with a kid joining the tardis.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 05, 2014, 02:47:32 AM
I don't have any problem with Courtney, and I like the way Doctor Who occasionally includes younger characters. Remember, it's a family show. It's particularly good when the show is getting a bit darker/more intense, as it sort of allows them to do so while still keeping an element of suitable-for-children.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on October 05, 2014, 07:50:07 AM
The inclusion of Courtney was much more well done than the 2 brats that tagged along last season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 05, 2014, 08:23:00 AM
I have Kill The Moon to watch on iPlayer tonight along with the first episodes of a new series of QI and Have I Got News For You :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 05, 2014, 04:31:16 PM
A great episode ! Not as good as listen but still good.

I really liked the visual when you finally see the creature hatch. The colours of the beach and sky etc . Really nice.

Looks like Frank Skinner is in next week's episode !
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on October 06, 2014, 03:14:48 AM
The science was REALLY wacky on this one, but I overall enjoyed quite a lot. I would have enjoyed more on first viewing had it not been hyped so much. Like robwebster, I think I should better check out from early spoiler free reviews and comments for the rest of the season, as those do more bad than good for me.

Anyway, a great story with some of the best acting we have seen this season and an overall defining situation for Clara as a character. Science aside (how did the moon increase mass, why did the shard disintegrate, how could a mass shift cause just one room to have zero-gravity effects and so on) it was really good and very refreshing.

Too bad the internet community seemed to hate it for one reason or another. I've seen this one labeled more than once as the worst episode in the show history, which to me, tolerant as I am of the other's ideas, seems very much laughable.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 06, 2014, 04:40:44 AM
I'm glad I'm not the only person bothered by the science on this one, but despite that, it's nowhere near the worst episode they've done. I wouldn't even call it the weakest of the season, and this season has had an overall high standard.
The Clara/Doctor scenes alone made it worthwhile, and I think like a lot of this season, it's a case of something that becomes more meaningful in retrospect as the season unfolds.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 06, 2014, 08:52:19 AM
I thought it was fantastic, wonky science be damned. 

It was a fucking space dragon!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 06, 2014, 02:23:11 PM
I find it really random/arbitrary which episodes people decide to complain about the science. I can't see what was any worse in this episode than in, well, most episodes. :lol

And yeah, fantastic episode!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 06, 2014, 02:28:52 PM
I give it a pass since it's a mostly bonkers show about a 2000 year old time travelling alien.

It's more about the stories and the characters than presenting hard science.

Besides - when they were all on the beach looking up at the moon breaking apart - it looked gorgeous.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on October 06, 2014, 03:38:25 PM
Besides - when they were all on the beach looking up at the moon breaking apart - it looked gorgeous.

An incredible scene I have watched at least 7 times in the past two days! :D

And I really hope the theme starting when the doctor tunes in with the new course of time is the 12th Doctor's theme. It really was glorious.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 06, 2014, 07:49:27 PM
I find it really random/arbitrary which episodes people decide to complain about the science. I can't see what was any worse in this episode than in, well, most episodes. :lol

And yeah, fantastic episode!

Doctor Who certainly isn't a show you hold up to the highest scrutiny (heck, next week's episode is a plain old train looking spaceship flying in a wiggly line through space huffing out smoke, wtf), but some things are more excusable than others. It's not arbitrary.

You have to accept the bad science that is part of the premise, like anything related to the TARDIS and its handling of time travel. It's very very soft scifi at the best of times.
But when you do an episode about Earth, you've got too many facts and known confines to contend with, and can't do such silly things without it sticking out. Our moon is an egg that has existed for millions/billions of years, but has only noticeably grown in the last 10 years, a space shuttle that flies directly to the moon and can crash land safely with enough bombs on board to destroy the moon, gravity issues, a giant alien hatches and can immediately lay another egg (hopefully smart enough to put it in a similar and stable orbit for another billion years until it hatches so it doesn't just burn up in our atmosphere), and flies off with no word of the hundred bombs that are probably floating towards the Earth.

If it's something completely alien, you can try to shrug this stuff off with "well it's an alien planet, maybe it just works differently there", but when it's Earth, it's just poorly thought out science fiction.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 06, 2014, 08:16:53 PM
See, I agree with the science being especially weak this episode, and it's largely for the reasons that Blob stated. However, since the episode doesn't exactly centre on that anyway, I don't really find it all that bad - though a convincing science backdrop might have elevated this one to the top spot of the season. But at the heart of this episode remains Clara and the increasingly straining relationship with the Doctor, and while the situation she was put in was engineered through a manner of scientific impossibilities, that doesn't take away from the fact that the relationship was realistically developed and extremely well portrayed by our two leads.

Plus that shot of the moon breaking up did look gorgeous.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 06, 2014, 08:36:04 PM
See, I agree with the science being especially weak this episode, and it's largely for the reasons that Blob stated. However, since the episode doesn't exactly centre on that anyway, I don't really find it all that bad - though a convincing science backdrop might have elevated this one to the top spot of the season. But at the heart of this episode remains Clara and the increasingly straining relationship with the Doctor, and while the situation she was put in was engineered through a manner of scientific impossibilities, that doesn't take away from the fact that the relationship was realistically developed and extremely well portrayed by our two leads.

Plus that shot of the moon breaking up did look gorgeous.

I agree to all of that too. The monster in Caretaker wasn't all that important to the episode either, but there was plenty of character development there instead. The character moments in this week's episode were the highlight, and the main focus of the episode. I just wish that the episode they built those moments around was also equally good, then it would have been something really special, instead of having mixed feelings about it.

And your new avatar is throwing me off. I didn't recognize you! :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on October 06, 2014, 09:11:07 PM
Agreed with BoobVanDam
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 07, 2014, 02:40:17 AM
It's not arbitrary.
Well, I think people have defined some criteria for what counts as bad science and what counts as acceptable, but I find those criteria pretty arbitrary. Apart from the bit where Courtney started floating (which wasn't so much bad science as simply being unexplained), I didn't think ANYTHING in this episode was any better or worse than pretty much any other episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on October 11, 2014, 09:13:47 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10516827_976766815670679_6036687006120459021_n.jpg?oh=7ce1d2da4efc4032ab35b214f75ee6b0&oe=54BA1D78&__gda__=1420679332_a9993a5d06c36ac6e5929780c8321c6f)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 11, 2014, 10:14:57 AM
NO STOP THAT.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 11, 2014, 01:32:34 PM
that must be the oldest joke known to man :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 11, 2014, 02:50:25 PM
that must be the oldest joke known to man :P
Well, in itself yes, but in this context it's more a reference to a key line from one of the episodes in series 1.

I really enjoyed tonight's episode, and I just have to say, Clara was looking SMOKIN'! :heart
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 11, 2014, 02:51:48 PM
Frank Skinner had to be my favourite guest star Doctor Who has ever had.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 11, 2014, 04:54:01 PM
I loved every aspect of the episode, both the big things - the acting, the plot, the whole idea behind it all - and the little things - the ARE YOU MY MUMMY joke, Clara being seriously hot, the whole conversation at the end about the impossible choice - but I do wish there would have been some more closure on what happened at the end of KtM. Yeah, it sorta worked, but it was a little handwaved, and I think that it would have been better had Clara exited the TARDIS like she had originally planned and would then join The Doctor again in the next episode - which seems to be set in her time as well, so it could be like, I dunno, six months for her during which she comes to the realisation that she wants to continue travelling with the Doctor more gradually than the fliparound at the end.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 11, 2014, 07:15:33 PM
I really enjoyed tonight's episode, and I just have to say, Clara was looking SMOKIN'! :heart

She's looked amazing all season, and tonight was still one of her better ones. I think my favourite is still when she stepped out of the TARDIS at the start of Robot of Sherwood with the long hair and dress.  :heart

I thought this was a very good episode, but I also felt the Clara thing was a bit rushed. I thought they'd at least have one episode where she was apart from him, and talking it over with Danny, while The Doctor was on his own adventure, so to see her come out of the TARDIS with The Doctor right at the start was a bit jarring, and they resolved it a bit quick. The episode did a reasonable job of dealing with it throughout, so it was mostly fine, just unexpected.

Aside from that, no complaints. Some good callbacks to earlier episodes, and I liked the story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 11, 2014, 08:04:35 PM
I was really hoping for an are you my mummy joke and they did not disappoint. Really good episode, and yes, Jenna looked really good tonight. Robb Stark is one lucky bastard
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 12, 2014, 01:17:26 AM
In terms of the angry Clara thing, I was a bit surprised at first, but then they made it clear that a few weeks had passed where they hadn't seen each other. So in plot terms it all makes sense, we just didn't get to see it, which is a shame. I thought they covered it very nicely - right from the start you could tell something was up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 12, 2014, 01:57:43 AM
In terms of the angry Clara thing, I was a bit surprised at first, but then they made it clear that a few weeks had passed where they hadn't seen each other. So in plot terms it all makes sense, we just didn't get to see it, which is a shame. I thought they covered it very nicely - right from the start you could tell something was up.

They did a good job throughout the episode, but they've made a habit of telling rather than showing this season. The Clara/Danny Pink relationship has been very weak for that reason, basically skipping from awkward first date to deeply in love, so that's still not believable at this point. Telling the audience something happened with a passing remark doesn't have any of the emotional connection or impact of actually showing it, which is important for drama.

In this episode it was jarring to have Clara pop out after The Doctor at first as if nothing happened, and even taking the rest of the episode into account it felt like they skipped over an important part of the process of her returning, given how big the blowup was last episode, which devalued the ending of Kill the Moon slightly too.

It didn't affect the episode itself, but it still felt like an emotional gap to me. I think there should have been something inbetween the two episodes to bridge that. Yes, we were told things happened inbetween, but without showing it, it's not going to be as effective.


With that said, what they've showed on screen has been very strong this season, and the episode did a good job of picking things up after that, so I don't hold that point against this episode at all. It's a minor gripe with the progression of the season itself more than anything. I thought the episode itself was great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 12, 2014, 03:35:36 AM
I thought this episode was really great. Still love series 8 so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 12, 2014, 07:40:19 AM
I really enjoyed tonight's episode, and I just have to say, Clara was looking SMOKIN'! :heart

She's looked amazing all season, and tonight was still one of her better ones. I think my favourite is still when she stepped out of the TARDIS at the start of Robot of Sherwood with the long hair and dress.  :heart

Yeah, Jenna was actually voted as the Sexiest Companion in Who history almost immediately after she first joined the cast and had only appeared in Asylum of the Daleks at that point, if my memory serves me right. This was definitely the hottest she's looked all season long, imo. :heart

Also, this episode was full of sexual tension between her and the Doctor. I definitely prefer this over the blatant flirting we had with 11 and Clara. This feels more distinctive and fresh in comparison to previous Doctor romances lately.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 12, 2014, 08:46:12 AM
Yeah, Clara looked really great with that short hair.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 12, 2014, 09:19:18 AM
When the doctor says " a mummy that only the victim can see " - he sounded exactly like Tom Baker.

Was it supposed to be the fourth doctor speaking through him ?



PS - someone explain the " are you my mummy " *joke* - other than the literal meaning of it.

Is it significant in DW ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on October 12, 2014, 09:57:28 AM
I don't think so, just how much of an influence Tom Baker's performance is on Capaldi as the Doctor. He draws a LOT from that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 12, 2014, 09:58:33 AM
I don't think so, just how much of an influence Tom Baker's performance is on Capaldi as the Doctor. He draws a LOT from that.

I've noticed he mentions the fourth doctor a few times.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 12, 2014, 10:04:10 AM
The 'mummy' joke is a referense to the series 1 episodes 'The Empty Child' and 'The Doctor Dances'. The 9th doctor and Rose encounters a small child with a gas mask who wanders around WWII London saying nothing but "Are you my mommy". Also Moffat's first Doctor Who episodes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 12, 2014, 10:21:03 AM
Speaking of the Fourth, anybody catch the jelly babies?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 12, 2014, 10:30:12 AM
Speaking of the Fourth, anybody catch the jelly babies?

YES. :tup

As for the talking to himself bit, apparently it's been hinted at before that the preceding Doctors still exist as part of the Doctor's subconscious (i.e. "This is exactly what it's like in my head" in Day of the Doctor), so I could actually believe that Capaldi was imitating T. Baker as a means of Twelve chatting with Four for advice.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on October 12, 2014, 10:30:28 AM
Was kind of hard to miss.  :lol And speaking as someone who still rates Tom Baker as the best Doctor, the more they draw on the Fourth Doctor, the better in my book.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 12, 2014, 10:37:00 AM
I wonder if Capaldi suggested he channel the 4th Doctor or whether it was a decision by the writers / creators.


Anyway - I can't help but smile every time he references T. Baker with the

" There used to be more circles on the wall " or " I miss my long scarf " and of course the jelly babies. Seems he can imitate his voice quite well too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 12, 2014, 10:40:26 AM
I wonder if Capaldi suggested he channel the 4th Doctor or whether it was a decision by the writers / creators.


Anyway - I can't help but smile every time he references T. Baker with the

" There used to be more circles on the wall " or " I miss my long scarf " and of course the jelly babies. Seems he can imitate his voice quite well too.

From the sound of things, it was probably Capaldi. Apparently, aside from being a massive fan of the Pertwee and Baker years to begin with, he went into the show immediately knowing how he wanted to play the role and how his Doctor should be written.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 12, 2014, 10:46:16 AM
Speaking of the Fourth, anybody catch the jelly babies?
Yeah that cracked me up. Especially because the professor guy seemed to think it was perfectly normal and selected a particularly exquisite one. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Dimitrius on October 13, 2014, 03:02:27 PM
Really liked the episode! Love Capaldi's Doctor!

And even though I was expecting it, the "are you my mummy?" still creeped me out. Goddamned you, The Empty Child!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 17, 2014, 03:26:33 PM
Re-watched it, and I felt a lot better about the whole Clara/Doctor thing this time around. This is definitely one of my favourites, such a great episode all around! I've seen some people bash on Frank Skinner in reviews, which I can not for the life of me understand, Perkins is such a great character - I love how he's not at all intimidated by the Doctor.

Rankings (this is DTF, yo)

1. Listen
2. Mummy on the Orient Express
3. Kill the Moon

4. Deep Breath
5. Into the Dalek
6. The Caretaker
7. Time Heist




8. Robot of Sherwood

Also seasons:

S5
S8
S7
S1
S6
S4
S3
S2
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 17, 2014, 07:14:50 PM
Flatline looks like it's going to be a trippy episode. The previews of it have some crazy crap going on. It looks like The Doctor is mostly going to be stuck in the TARDIS for the episode, but I think it may end up being one of my favourites from the season so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 18, 2014, 03:12:23 AM
Finally caught up again yesterday -  I thought Kill the Moon was good but it somehow felt a bit weird because the science was just bad. Mummy on the Orient Express was WAY better than I expected it to be, I loved it!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 18, 2014, 11:23:35 AM
I just caught up on the last four episodes.

I enjoyed Time Heist but couldn't get past the paradox of how it all went down (like, how did she call him if he wasn't there giving the number to her, but how did he get there without her calling?).
The Caretaker was okay but probably my least favorite of the four.
Kill the Moon was really enjoyable, despite the science. I also don't mind Courtney.
Mummy was great! Can't wait for today's!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 18, 2014, 08:53:25 PM
I loved Flatline. Lots of great visual effects and creative ideas, and the mini TARDIS exterior was a fun concept. The only thing that I didn't buy was that kid being able to spray paint a photo realistic image like that. Aside from that, it was great.
And I guess Missy's line at the end sort of confirms that she was the one who gave the TARDIS phone number to Clara? It was expected anyway, but I'm glad to see a bit of progress on that arc.

Next week's episode doesn't look too exciting. Hopefully it proves me wrong.

I enjoyed Time Heist but couldn't get past the paradox of how it all went down (like, how did she call him if he wasn't there giving the number to her, but how did he get there without her calling?).

You should be well used to causality loops by now with Doctor Who! :lol

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 18, 2014, 11:20:33 PM
Having known some street graffiti artists and seen some work around where I live, I can.

Enjoyable episode, very freaky creatures and it does add another wrinkle to the Doctor/Clara interaction.

Next episode will have the complaint, I suspect, we've had previously: It'll tell us about something big but not show us. In this case, Clara/Danny/Doctor argument.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 18, 2014, 11:30:36 PM
Having known some street graffiti artists and seen some work around where I live, I can.

It's more to do with the circumstances than the ability to do so. With what they had on hand, the pressure and time limit, and seeming lack of reference, it seemed unbelievable to me.
But I don't want to dwell on it, as it's a pretty minor thing. It's certainly no golden arrow. :lol This would definitely be my favourite episode since Time Heist.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 19, 2014, 02:12:55 AM
Yeah, I feel ya. One visible can of paint and voila! A perfect door! Still a cool idea though, and I really enjoyed the episode.
I'm still hella confused by this whole Missy thing, but we'll find out.


You should be well used to causality loops by now with Doctor Who! :lol

I know, I know... It just kept bothering me after i watched it  :lol

And yeah, I agree next week's doesn't look great but who knows?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 19, 2014, 06:49:33 AM
Flatline and Mummy were both fantastic. I hope Jamie Mathieson writes more for the show.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 19, 2014, 11:11:52 AM
Really creepy and unsettling. I expect big things next week since it's the last episode before the 2 part finale
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: lucky7 on October 19, 2014, 08:06:06 PM
I loved this episode.... when his hand comes out of the tardis it did make me think of Evil Dead just for a second.  :smiley:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on October 19, 2014, 09:07:03 PM
Awesome episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 20, 2014, 08:12:50 AM
Caught up with the last two episodes.  The Mummy was OK, but Flatline was fantastic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 20, 2014, 11:06:04 AM
I more or less feel the opposite of what Hef said. I thought Mummy was great, and Flatline was ok. Not bad, it was a perfectly fine DW episode, but not fantastic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 22, 2014, 11:32:18 AM
Just watched Flatline. Really great episode! This series has been great so far!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 22, 2014, 01:12:05 PM
I've got Flatline in my iPlayer downloads and haven't got around to watching it yet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 22, 2014, 04:13:38 PM
...And now I have ! Another great one !
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 22, 2014, 04:14:02 PM
Top 3 so far this series :

1.Listen
2.Mummy On The Orient Express
3.Flatline


Haha. I was going to ask about the psychic paper from Flatline. Then I randomly put on Chris Ecclestone episode End Of The World and he explains it in that. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2014, 12:14:38 AM
If I remember rightly, that was when it was first introduced, as a device to explain why the Doctor is able to get into a load of places and situations without supporting characters asking too many questions.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 23, 2014, 08:34:47 AM
Right, but in this episode it doesn't work on that one guy because his imagination sucks or whatever.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2014, 08:38:42 AM
I was expecting him to be an alien or something because of that. Only special people should be able to see past the psychic paper dangit!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 23, 2014, 08:39:17 AM
Yeah, I was hoping for that too. Nope, just a lame-ass  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2014, 08:44:25 AM
He was also so much of a jerk that I figured something was up, but nope, just a regular old human jerk. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 23, 2014, 08:55:55 AM
RE : the end of the world.

I was surprised the 9th just let Cassandra(?) die. I thought The Doctor didn't let anyone die. Even if they were murderers ?


I'm not familiar with Chris' Doctor that much though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2014, 09:02:16 AM
RE : the end of the world.

I was surprised the 9th just let Cassandra(?) die. I thought The Doctor didn't let anyone die. Even if they were murderers ?


I'm not familiar with Chris' Doctor that much though.

The Doctor doesn't often directly kill anyone/thing, but if it's indirect, and if it's some sort of poetic justice for that person's own evil deeds, then he's allowed it on occasion.
Also, at that point I think they wanted to establish that the 9th was a a more calloused Doctor, harderened by just coming off the Time War, which you find out a bit more about as it goes on.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 23, 2014, 09:41:00 AM
I might start watching it from the beginning ( of the RTD era ) - since I really enjoy Capaldi's episodes and I occasionally liked a David Tennant episode.

There's like 7 series to get through though :P


Zoe Wannamaker has a great voice for a villain too !
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 23, 2014, 10:37:18 AM
RE : the end of the world.

I was surprised the 9th just let Cassandra(?) die. I thought The Doctor didn't let anyone die. Even if they were murderers ?


I'm not familiar with Chris' Doctor that much though.

thats nothing, he once sent an entire fleet of ice warriors into the sun.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 24, 2014, 07:46:24 AM
You really should Kotow. It helps to show the effect that Rose had on the 9th. I think you can't just blame regeneration for the personality shift from 9 to 10
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on October 25, 2014, 08:51:30 PM
About the only comment I have to make about this week's is the people who try to apply science to Doctor Who are going to flip their wigs over this one.  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 25, 2014, 09:49:37 PM
About the only comment I have to make about this week's is the people who try to apply science to Doctor Who are going to flip their wigs over this one.  :lol

GOD.

That was possibly even worse than Kill the Moon. You can't just make up silly crap about Earth like that and have it work at all. Forests growing over everything overnight (and everything apparently disappearing to nothing more than the occasional lawn chair and fence, and even covering the entire ocean, and where the hell were the people?), and then have this giant solar flare directed right at Earth and be saved by flameproof trees, and the trees magically save Earth and disappear to nothing and have caused no damage to ANYTHING.
On top of that, the one girl who can somehow tell what's happening just happens to be in Clara's class, and just happens to be with Clara and Danny at the time on an overnight excursion. And yet again something bad happens right at Clara's time and place. Think about it, a lot of bad shit just happens to occur right around her.
And Danny saving them from a tiger with a flashlight (you brought a bunch of kids right up to a tiger?). And there were just too many kids in the episode.

And yet again, The Doctor had no damn clue what was happening and didn't know this had happened before, and humanity were just going to forget that a giant forest appeared and disappeared overnight, in the age of the internet where even the kids were taking selfies to document it all. That is the lamest cop-out reasoning.

We didn't need another episode of The Doctor being clueless, helping them to do nothing, and everything magically sorting itself out and being beyond bizarre and believable. We also didn't need another episode on Earth, in London, in the present day, that centers around Clara's school. Enough of Clara and Danny's small world already. There's an entire universe of time and space out there to explore!

Kill the Moon, Robot of Sherwood, and this week's episode were easily the worst of the season, with the rest being great. At least the finale is looking amazing, so I can't wait for that. If the finale is as good as I hope, it should really round out this season nicely.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 25, 2014, 10:19:40 PM
Ok, this was a really stupid episode :lol Something has been going wrong with DW since that first break and after the end of the Ponds. There's something missing from the show that only very occasionally shows up in episodes like Listen and Hide. I also miss the semi-secret existence of this - aliens, disasters, attacks, etc. And just about half of London knows and has been in the Tardis.

Not even going to comment on the plot. They must have smoked a lot of trees.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 03:39:15 AM
I just watched the episode again, and I realized another thing that made the episode so weak. It spent all of its time focusing on kids, and The Doctor was ultimately useless to the story.

They wasted a lot of time developing backstories for all of these kids, missing sister, allergies, anger issues, pointless flashbacks only to show character personalities that didn't aid the story. The young girl was made important to hear the little glowy things to figure out the story. Then it clicked. This episode was written by a kid's writer, written to appeal to kids.
The one tiny thing The Doctor was going to do to help the story, and he let the kids do it out of the kindness of his heart. But even that was a waste of The Doctor. There was no evidence that what the humans were doing to the trees was going to stop it from working. The entire planet was covered, including the oceans.

Between that, and more Clara/Danny stuff, there wasn't much time left for The Doctor to take the spotlight.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 26, 2014, 05:25:37 AM
This was clearly an episode for the kids, as we've had a lot more adult-focussed stories this season. It was alright, some very nice ideas, but overall a little childish and easily the weakest of the season for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 05:37:07 AM
I think that's also what made it stick out a bit too, because Capaldi has been a darker Doctor, and it has been a darker season. It seems like odd placement for an episode like that, just as Robot of Sherwood seemed like an odd placement for that one.

I couldn't be more excited for the upcoming two parter though. I haven't been more excited for any episode this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Bolsters on October 26, 2014, 06:08:55 AM
I've been avoiding this thread for fear of major spoilers as I've only recently started watching this show. But, I had to ask about something. Earlier I watched the premiere episode of season five, and...I didn't like it. At all. I'd even go so far as to call it "fucking terrible". :lol

It was too silly (Amelia cooking all that stuff for him especially, and the library pool, among other things), I thought the humour was too silly and slapstick, and it missed the mark with me completely. Even the music was bad, going back and forth between cliched over-dramatic and annoyingly comical. The tone of the episode was a bit strange to be honest, though I'm not sure how to pinpoint why I feel that way about it. It's ridiculous, but seems to be taking itself too seriously at the same time, and it didn't work. The pacing seemed pretty slow too, every scene felt like it took a long time for very little to happen.

I was paying attention and was actually looking forward to season five because I knew Moffat was taking over as showrunner and he wrote two of my favourite episodes of the show so far (Blink and The Girl in the Fireplace). But this premiere was disappointing in almost every possible way (I liked the more sophisticated camera work, and Amy Pond is really hot).

So...is this episode indicative of what the show is going to be from this point onward? I'm probably going to struggle to remain interested if this is what it's going to be like. Or does it get better?

Am I overreacting? Probably. :\
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 06:13:06 AM
WTF? The Eleventh Hour is a great episode and a strong introduction to the 11th Doctor, and that's where I'd start when showing someone new Who.
I love the music too. The music got noticeably better once Moffat took over imo, even though it's the same guy composing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Bolsters on October 26, 2014, 06:19:33 AM
Well...that's not what I was expecting. :rollin If I had started with this episode, I probably wouldn't be watching the show at all. Though admittedly, I almost gave up on it after The End of the World (the trampoline woman being a big part of that), but am glad I stuck it out. I do intend to watch some more episodes this week, I'm not giving up. But I just had to ask because I really didn't like The Eleventh Hour. (https://i1337.photobucket.com/albums/o669/bolsters/shrug-1.gif~original)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 06:22:54 AM
My only suggestion is that you're broken and should give up on enjoying good things.

The Eleventh Hour was a huge breath of fresh air to me after the RTD era, like the entire show just took a giant leap in quality all around. Loved every minute of it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Bolsters on October 26, 2014, 06:27:26 AM
It had the opposite effect on me: After watching it, I'm dreading what the show might become. :( I have little confidence at this point and you're not helping. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 06:39:00 AM
I ONLY HELP THOSE WHO HELP THEMSELVES!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 26, 2014, 06:40:47 AM
I must admit, Eleventh Hour made me uncertain as well, but Beast Below should hook you in.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 06:42:05 AM
Beast Below was weaker imo. Silly clown thingies and kids, and I didn't like the twists (which I won't spoil for now). I preferred Victory of the Daleks. haters gonna hate!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on October 26, 2014, 06:43:18 AM
Then... Victory of The Daleks?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on October 26, 2014, 07:33:03 AM
It had the opposite effect on me: After watching it, I'm dreading what the show might become. :( I have little confidence at this point and you're not helping. :lol

Honestly, Doctor Who is all over the place. You might just be watching episodes you don't like. I didn't like a lot of David Tennent's run, I found most of his companions annoying much all of these damn kids appearing in Capaldi's run.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on October 26, 2014, 08:28:27 AM
Eh, don't worry, the 11th Doctor will hook you slowly. I also wasn't sold the first time when I watched The 11th Hour. I do like the episode now, but at the time I first watched it I wasn't as impressed.

Then again, I had just came off of binging season 4, still my current favorite season of DW. You just gotta accept that the episode is taking DW in a new direction (much like Capaldi is now, which is amazing).


Still need to watch last night's, but I have very low expectations based off of the trailer.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 26, 2014, 11:56:03 AM
@Bolsters: Moffat's way of of story-telling isn't everyone's cup of tea, and there are indeed quite a few that prefer the RTD era. There's nothing wrong with that, I just think that you'll find yourself in the minority on this forum if you think that. Though definitely keep watching, Season 5 is just great all around and I wouldn't even place Eleventh Hour in the Top 3 (though I really like it, so your mileage may vary).

About the episode: it was STUPID STUPID DUMB and had lots of elements that I didn't like: stupid stupid "science", so many children, plots left dangling all around, an ending that made no sense - but strangely I didn't dislike it as much as Robot of Sherwood. I don't know why, really, that one wasn't as stupid as this one, but I was just kinda apathetic towards this, whereas RoS just made me rage... even though, on paper, it's a vastly superior episode (and still quite abysmal).

1. Listen
2. Mummy on the Orient Express
3. Flatline
4. Kill the Moon
5. Deep Breat
6. Into the Dalek
7. Time Heist
8. The Caretaker


















9. In the Forest of the Night
10. Robot of Sherwood
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 26, 2014, 12:01:02 PM
I don't understand the hate for Robot of Sherwood, it's one of my favourites of the season. :lol

I get why some adults won't like Forest though, it was definitely a children's episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 26, 2014, 01:56:59 PM
It was alright, but it was the weakest episode of the series so far
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 26, 2014, 04:36:01 PM
It doesn't seem like 10 episodes - but seeing all the titles there - i've definitely watched them all :P

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 26, 2014, 05:18:34 PM
Just watched In The Forest Of Night. It was okay to watch, definitely not my favourite of this series so far. Maybe even my least favourite.
The 'Next week' preview of the series finale was amazing. I probably will watch both episodes back to back though; I can't stand having to wait a week between two parts of a double episode  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 26, 2014, 05:52:04 PM
Yeah, this last one wasn't my favorite but it wasn't TOO bad. I agree with some of what's been posted, like too much of Clara and Danny's little world. I was mostly stimulated by the preview at the end and wondering wtf is going to happen next. I won't be able to watch next week so I'll be staying out of here til I catch up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2014, 07:48:57 PM
Just watched In The Forest Of Night. It was okay to watch, definitely not my favourite of this series so far. Maybe even my least favourite.
The 'Next week' preview of the series finale was amazing. I probably will watch both episodes back to back though; I can't stand having to wait a week between two parts of a double episode  :lol

That's a nice idea in theory, but I know I couldn't possibly have the willpower to do it. I'm gonna be right here after seeing the first episode speculating away on the finale. :lol

I much preferred Robot of Sherwood to In The Forest of the Night, because it was only the ending of Robot of Sherwood that really let it down. The rest was fun, with a lot of good comedy moments from The Doctor. In The Forest of the Night was flawed from start to finish, and The Doctor was mostly useless in it. I think Kill the Moon was a bit better than In the Forest of the Night. So I suppose that would make it the weakest of the season imo.
I'll hold off on the obligatory ranking until the season is over.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Bolsters on October 26, 2014, 10:38:25 PM
Well, I just watched both The Beast Below and Victory of the Daleks, and they were both pretty good. Not at all like The Eleventh Hour. I think the slapstick elements, serious/cold tone, and sluggishness of that episode just threw me off. These two episodes weren't like that at all, so I guess I can just consider The Eleventh Hour to be an anomaly and I can get back to enjoying the show. Even the music was a lot better.

Essentially:
Am I overreacting? Probably. :\
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 27, 2014, 02:17:55 AM
I didn't really care for The Eleventh Hour the first time I saw it either. Something was just off about the whole thing, it felt sort of bleak. But I did enjoy Smith's introduction, and thought he did a fine job. And of course, Amy in that "police" outfit looks pretty damn good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 27, 2014, 03:38:50 AM
I'm surprised by those comments. I mean, it's not my favourite from that season, or even one of my top ones, but it's widely loved and many people consider it the best DW episode. And frankly that season is just so damn good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on October 27, 2014, 08:06:03 AM
And now the case for the defense for Forest.

One of the reasons I loved it so-and I did, even with the wonky science and the kids and the odd plot hole-was that it did something that hasn't really been done in a while. It reconnected Doctor Who to its roots, to the traditions of fairy tales and magic that infused so much of the early series, before the Doctor became clarified as a Time Lord from Gallifrey and all that muckety muck. It connected Doctor Who to what it more truly is. See, when RTD brought the show back, it was a colossal gamble, and so RTD had to couch it in terms that were familiar to cult/sci fi viewers, to make it appeal to the sort of people who watched what the BBC thought Doctor Who would be. And so you got arcs and romances straight out of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (come on, where did you think the Doctor loving Rose came from?) and when you managed to get away from Earth for five seconds you were presented with Star Trek lite episodes and everything clicked on that level and people liked it and we're here talking about it today.

But that's not what Doctor Who is, nor is it what the Doctor is.

You know what the Doctor is?

The Doctor is a wizard. Don't believe me? Just look at him. Man speaks every language in the universe. Can go anywhere. Anywhen. Lives in a magic box. He even has a magic wand that can do bloody anything. The Doctor is a wizard of Time and Space. And this episode restores some of that to him. Come on, when an episode starts with a little girl running through the forest to find the man in the magic box to ask for help, you should know what you're in. All the signals and symbols are there. You're in a fairy tale. You're in a fantasy. If you're watching it via the prism of what cult TV is supposed to be, well, you're looking at the wrong symbols. Of course it's preposterous that a forest of trees grew up overnight to protect the world from a solar flare if the logic system you're approaching the show with is Star Trek (though you'd be okay with Buffy.) If you look at it as what it is-a fairy tale-it's doing precisely what it's supposed to. It's got a wizard, it's got a chosen child, it's got a brave heroine and hero to help with the kids, it hits all the marks.

That's why I loved it. It's the best example of Doctor Who as Fairy Tale-and you got that a lot way back when-you're ever going to see. It's a lousy bit of science fiction, yes, but the notion that Doctor Who does one thing and one thing only is so wrong headed it amazes me. Doctor Who does EVERYTHING. That's why I've loved it for thirty-five years.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 27, 2014, 09:39:06 AM
I completely agree that Doctor Who is a fairytale story rather than sci-fi (which is why I love it, and something I think Moffat has particularly embraced), and I think a lot of people don't really get that (see my previous comments on arbitrary complains about bad science). However, where I think this story falls down a bit in that regard is that the Doctor is a bit of a passenger.

I've seen some reviews which say that he's completely pointless because if he hadn't been there, everything would have been fine, but people who say that weren't paying attention because he was the one who realised that the trees were good and got the humans not to stupidly kill them all. So in that moment he was pretty pivotal. But he did feel a little incidental for much of the story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 27, 2014, 01:08:09 PM
Yeah, I totally see what you're saying but him being incidental doesn't bother me. In the beginning Clara's all like "Kids, this is The Doctor. He's gonna fix everything." And that's usually the formula, but here it wasn't and that's actually kinda cool. Sure, he was the one who figured out the trees weren't dangerous but do we really think the humans would've had time to wipe out a significant enough amount of them out to nullify their effect?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 27, 2014, 02:19:40 PM
Yeah, I totally see what you're saying but him being incidental doesn't bother me. In the beginning Clara's all like "Kids, this is The Doctor. He's gonna fix everything." And that's usually the formula, but here it wasn't and that's actually kinda cool. Sure, he was the one who figured out the trees weren't dangerous but do we really think the humans would've had time to wipe out a significant enough amount of them out to nullify their effect?
Yeah the principle doesn't bother me at all, like you say it's kinda cool and it's good to have a bit of variety. I think it's probably more the writing generally, and I didn't feel the story held together that well.

I didn't dislike the episode by any stretch, I just didn't think it was that great really.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 27, 2014, 07:07:12 PM
Yeah, I hear you. I didn't love it, but it was fine.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2014, 08:05:57 PM
I've seen some reviews which say that he's completely pointless because if he hadn't been there, everything would have been fine, but people who say that weren't paying attention because he was the one who realised that the trees were good and got the humans not to stupidly kill them all. So in that moment he was pretty pivotal. But he did feel a little incidental for much of the story.

As I said earlier, whatever the humans were doing would have had basically no impact in the grand scheme. I got the impression they were only hearing about this happening in England anyway. The trees were covering the entire planet, including the oceans (you could clearly see the world covered in green), and in that time, they could only have covered a tiny blip in the time until the flare in the best case scenario.
But the scenario was much worse, that the planet was covered in trees. They couldn't have possibly gotten a plane up, because there would be no runway or opening. They might barely have gotten a helicopter up through the trees by chopping them down or something (I didn't see them try it, but I don't see why that wouldn't have worked), which would be slow and cover no ground. Or if they had to do it by ground, forget about it. That's all assuming they had something ready to go that would kill the trees. They didn't have the time to really test anything, and it would have taken time to work, likely much longer than the short time until the solar flare. Given the timeframe, they may not have even gotten into the air yet. I doubt the magical tree pixies know the exact formula for calculating how many trees are required to save Earth from an oncoming solar flare, but the margin of error would be far larger than the fraction of a percentage the humans could have impacted in that time.

The whole contrivance with the kids stopping the chemicals was only so it felt like there was a neat resolution to the story, and to make the kids appear useful with an environmental message. No wonder The Doctor let them do it, because it was pointless. :P
The episode was just poorly thought out from start to finish.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on October 27, 2014, 09:01:09 PM
You know, I had a thought that I wouldn't mind if Missy was some how River Song. It would be a way to redeem the woman that married the Doctor and make her less annoying.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2014, 09:08:56 PM
Please no. If River Song is never in the show again, it would still be too much River Song. :lol

Theoretically, it would have to be the virtual River Song, as I don't really see how else it could work with her timeline. It's been implied that Missy was the woman who gave Clara The Doctor's number in the shop, which if that's the case, I don't think it could work. Also it would seem too obvious with Missy saying she's The Doctor's girlfriend (or whatever it was).

I've seen a lot of fan theories for other characters she could possibly be, everything from River Song to The Master, but I'm hoping Missy isn't an existing character at all, and is just a new character that will be explained in the finale.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on October 27, 2014, 09:16:54 PM
River Song was awesome.

I know nothing about the current season of DW. Just gonna interject that and then go.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on October 27, 2014, 09:20:31 PM
Please no. If River Song is never in the show again, it would still be too much River Song. :lol

Theoretically, it would have to be the virtual River Song, as I don't really see how else it could work with her timeline. It's been implied that Missy was the woman who gave Clara The Doctor's number in the shop, which if that's the case, I don't think it could work. Also it would seem too obvious with Missy saying she's The Doctor's girlfriend (or whatever it was).

I've seen a lot of fan theories for other characters she could possibly be, everything from River Song to The Master, but I'm hoping Missy isn't an existing character at all, and is just a new character that will be explained in the finale.

I don't think its the case at either. I'm just saying I wouldn't mind it. River for most of her run was such a shit character but the concept of her was great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2014, 09:40:18 PM
I thought the concept was great too, but I didn't think it was well executed, and I never bought that they had a real relationship that was based on more than predetermination. And even though she met The Doctor many times, and her first episode was with 10, it feels like something that should remain an 11 thing. At least she'd be age appropriate for Capaldi though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 27, 2014, 10:31:26 PM
I'm really excited for the finale. Moffat was the guy behind the best Cyberman moment in Modern Who (that brief bit in The Pandorica Opens) and it sounds like an interesting concept. Plus it's the first two parter in quite some time.

It's time for the Cybermen to get a chance to properly shine.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2014, 10:37:08 PM
This is the first two parter since the middle of S6, right?
I'm super excited for the finale too. I wasn't a big fan of Nightmare in Silver, and I like the Cybermen the most when they're overrunning Earth rather than somewhere in space. And the episode all around just looks amazing. Every bit of it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 28, 2014, 02:30:22 AM
Yeah, first two-parter since Rebel Flesh/Almost People.

I mean, in some ways the Name/(Night)/Day/Time of the Doctor was a sort of trilogy, but not so directly connected - I assume this will be a more traditional two-parter.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 29, 2014, 04:03:27 PM
:biggrin: Right. So I plan to miss next weeks episode ( I still haven't watched the forest episode :P :P )

Then download both of the finale and watch the entire thing on one evening. Saves waiting.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 29, 2014, 05:14:53 PM
:biggrin: Right. So I plan to miss next weeks episode

Then download both of the finale and watch the entire thing on one evening. Saves waiting.
Same here. Gonna do it with some friends, should be fun! :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: MrBoom_shack-a-lack on October 29, 2014, 08:04:40 PM
So I come here as a total n00b on the show. Never watched the original show and haven't watched a single episode on the revival show. Is it necessary to have some knowledge on the original show before you start on the revival because i'm a bit overwhelmed by the amount of seasons I have to get truth on just the revival.


Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 29, 2014, 08:25:13 PM
So I come here as a total n00b on the show. Never watched the original show and haven't watched a single episode on the revival show. Is it necessary to have some knowledge on the original show before you start on the revival because i'm a bit overwhelmed by the amount of seasons I have to get truth on just the revival.




I've only watched the modern series, and I had no trouble following it. I think it's pretty self explanatory if you start with the modern series, as they want to bring in new fans. There are references to older Doctors and episodes and enemies, but they're not essential to understanding and enjoying it. The Doctor's companion is sort of a proxy for the audience, so a lot of that stuff gets explained as they encounter things for the first time.

All you really need to know is The Doctor is an alien who travels through time and space in the TARDIS, and when he dies he regenerates into a new body.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 30, 2014, 02:29:18 AM
Fully agreed with Blob! Have fun watching!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: MrBoom_shack-a-lack on October 30, 2014, 03:24:53 AM
Great guys!  :tup I will soon begin.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 30, 2014, 03:27:46 AM
Oh and a word of warning - the way it starts is pretty low-budget in terms of effects, and the very first episode is quite cheesy in terms of style/direction. Those things may not bother you at all anyway, in which case great, but if you're a bit unsure, stick with it because in those regards it gets (mostly) better and better.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on October 30, 2014, 06:34:35 AM
Oh and a word of warning - the way it starts is pretty low-budget in terms of effects, and the very first episode is quite cheesy in terms of style/direction. Those things may not bother you at all anyway, in which case great, but if you're a bit unsure, stick with it because in those regards it gets (mostly) better and better.

It depends where you choose to start. That's definitely true if he starts with Series 1 and the Ninth Doctor, but the effects and stuff are improved if he starts at Series 5 and the Eleventh Doctor. Either place would be a great place to start watching the show at. 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 30, 2014, 09:01:12 AM
Oh and a word of warning - the way it starts is pretty low-budget in terms of effects, and the very first episode is quite cheesy in terms of style/direction. Those things may not bother you at all anyway, in which case great, but if you're a bit unsure, stick with it because in those regards it gets (mostly) better and better.

It depends where you choose to start. That's definitely true if he starts with Series 1 and the Ninth Doctor, but the effects and stuff are improved if he starts at Series 5 and the Eleventh Doctor. Either place would be a great place to start watching the show at. 

I agree. I introduced my brother to the show with S5, and he's now a big fan of the show (he hasn't seen anything pre-Smith). The Moffat era feels like a fresh beginning, effectively "rebooting" all of the stuff that happened on Earth during the RTD era, new Doctor, so it works just as well as a starting point as S1 did.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 30, 2014, 09:48:38 AM
I would recommend starting at S1. I just wouldn't want anyone to miss the chance to get to know Tennant's Doctor, or some of the impressingly emotional beats his run delivers from time to time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on October 30, 2014, 10:19:05 AM
I definitely wouldn't advise skipping the RTD era, but I think it's best to start at S5, and then go back later, because some of those first S1 episodes are just terrible.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: MrBoom_shack-a-lack on October 30, 2014, 11:49:48 AM
It' s ok guys i'm not gonna abandon the show just because the production standard wasn't fully fletched at S1, the production standard usually gets higher when the budget increase, i'm aware of that and will continue no matter what. I begin with S1 and work myself up, should be interesting given my complete lack of knowledge of anything Dr Who related.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 30, 2014, 04:00:14 PM
Oh and a word of warning - the way it starts is pretty low-budget in terms of effects, and the very first episode is quite cheesy in terms of style/direction. Those things may not bother you at all anyway, in which case great, but if you're a bit unsure, stick with it because in those regards it gets (mostly) better and better.

It depends where you choose to start. That's definitely true if he starts with Series 1 and the Ninth Doctor, but the effects and stuff are improved if he starts at Series 5 and the Eleventh Doctor. Either place would be a great place to start watching the show at. 
For sure, I was basing my comments on his posts which suggested that he'd be starting from s1. Which I do think is the best place to start.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on October 30, 2014, 06:11:17 PM
Start at Season 1 of the new era imo. Season 5 is also a good start.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 30, 2014, 06:21:23 PM
I think going from S1 is best, even if you happen to like S5 and onwards better. There's something special in witnessing regenerations in chronological order, that fresh feeling that hits you initially - not sure if you hate or love what's happening, nostalgic already but looking forward to what the change will bring.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 31, 2014, 04:02:50 AM
When Capaldi's current series is over - I think i'll start watching from S1 - maybe one episode a night.

I'm slightly more familiar with the "classic" Who - so I may even understand any throwbacks - ( like I have done with Capaldi )...

I only watched " The Day Of The Doctor " to see Tom Baker anyway :P



Plus I vastly prefer watching a show once it's all done. I'm not a fan of getting into a show and having to wait years for another series.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 31, 2014, 10:31:04 AM
Kotow, while there have always been throwbacks, I think they have been more direct/explicit since Moffat took over. Completely appreciate that when RTD rebooted the show, he needed to make it current for a new audience and so couldn't go too overboard referencing the classic series, but personally I'm loving how the show is really strongly embracing its whole history now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 31, 2014, 01:05:03 PM
It' s ok guys i'm not gonna abandon the show just because the production standard wasn't fully fletched at S1, the production standard usually gets higher when the budget increase, i'm aware of that and will continue no matter what. I begin with S1 and work myself up, should be interesting given my complete lack of knowledge of anything Dr Who related.

Awesome! I personally started with S1 (though with episode 3, for some unfathomable reason) and it turned out fine, so don't worry. While there is plenty of iffy stuff in the RTD era, the high points are just as high as the later seasons.

Also, please report back with any reactions to episodes watched and what you thought of them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 31, 2014, 01:09:56 PM
Ok I finally got around to watching In The Forest of The Night ?

I didn't think it was *terrible*. I enjoyed it more than Robot Of Sherwood. But those kids could not act :P

I'm *definitely* skipping it this week and waiting for both next week. Hope it doesn't end on a cliff hanger.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 31, 2014, 01:13:16 PM

That's a nice idea in theory, but I know I couldn't possibly have the willpower to do it. I'm gonna be right here after seeing the first episode speculating away on the finale. :lol


Oh I can. I'm not a huge fan to begin with and i've gone a week before deciding to watch the latest episode so this is easy for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: MrBoom_shack-a-lack on October 31, 2014, 04:59:44 PM
It' s ok guys i'm not gonna abandon the show just because the production standard wasn't fully fletched at S1, the production standard usually gets higher when the budget increase, i'm aware of that and will continue no matter what. I begin with S1 and work myself up, should be interesting given my complete lack of knowledge of anything Dr Who related.

Awesome! I personally started with S1 (though with episode 3, for some unfathomable reason) and it turned out fine, so don't worry. While there is plenty of iffy stuff in the RTD era, the high points are just as high as the later seasons.

Also, please report back with any reactions to episodes watched and what you thought of them.
Will sure do!  :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 01, 2014, 02:50:01 AM
Since there will be some people waiting until next week for this weeks episode, how are we dealing with discussing today's episode?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 01, 2014, 03:03:02 AM
Go ahead and discuss. If people want to avoid spoilers, they should avoid this thread for the week, or be careful.

I think to help out a bit, we should put spoiler warnings at the start of all posts containing spoilers maybe?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: MrBoom_shack-a-lack on November 01, 2014, 03:36:33 AM
Naw for me it's cool I won't check the thread that much besides any current events probably won't make any sense for me during S1 anyway.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 01, 2014, 04:41:28 PM
... Well, that was pretty damn awesome.

I don't think we've ever had such a slow burner as a finale episode 1 before, but if worked perfectly. Missy was great, Seb was hilarious, that scene at the volcano (hello Mt. Doom!)... everything just came together to a perfect episode that was so much creepier than 95% of everything that Who has ever done.

Though I am, at the same time, quite disappointed by the fact that the BBC revealed that there would be Cybermen in this finale - that would have been such an amazing reveal that was cheapened because it was basically obvious the moment the Dark Water and its refractory properties were explained.

Still, on the whole, this was AMAZING. Easily my favourite of the season, and considering the season's strength, that's not something that I'm saying lightly.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on November 01, 2014, 05:27:02 PM
Yeah, that was pretty awesome. I agree, best episode so far. The whole thing with Seb reminded me of something Douglas Adams or Monty Python would do
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jaq on November 01, 2014, 06:53:42 PM
Holy fuck.  :omg:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 01, 2014, 08:02:57 PM
Though I am, at the same time, quite disappointed by the fact that the BBC revealed that there would be Cybermen in this finale - that would have been such an amazing reveal that was cheapened because it was basically obvious the moment the Dark Water and its refractory properties were explained.

Yeah, they revealed far too much in advance in the official trailers, so they ruined the big reveal, but it was still cool seeing all of the pieces come together, and it didn't hurt the episode one bit. Awesome episode. I can't wait for the conclusion.


SPOILERS:



I saw people saying from day guessing it was the Master, figuring that Missy was short for Mistress. It's interesting to finally have a timelord seemingly regenerate as a different gender. Very interesting concept with  reviving the dead. The Cybermen in the tanks reminded me of the Silence in The Wedding of River Song.

And any episode that starts off with Danny Pink being killed is fine by me. :lol It says a lot about their relationship that he couldn't figure a single thing to say to prove it was him. When he was saying "I love you", I figured he was going to recall her last words to him before he died, but nope.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on November 01, 2014, 10:10:24 PM
... Well, that was pretty damn awesome.

I don't think we've ever had such a slow burner as a finale episode 1 before, but if worked perfectly. Missy was great, Seb was hilarious, that scene at the volcano (hello Mt. Doom!)... everything just came together to a perfect episode that was so much creepier than 95% of everything that Who has ever done.

Though I am, at the same time, quite disappointed by the fact that the BBC revealed that there would be Cybermen in this finale - that would have been such an amazing reveal that was cheapened because it was basically obvious the moment the Dark Water and its refractory properties were explained.

Still, on the whole, this was AMAZING. Easily my favourite of the season, and considering the season's strength, that's not something that I'm saying lightly.

Completely agreed. Easily the best of the season so far. Hopefully Death in Heaven keeps up the game and results in an incredible two-parter finale!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 02, 2014, 01:07:14 AM
And any episode that starts off with Danny Pink being killed is fine by me. :lol It says a lot about their relationship that he couldn't figure a single thing to say to prove it was him. When he was saying "I love you", I figured he was going to recall her last words to him before he died, but nope.

I don't really understand your hate for Danny, but even so, don't you think that you're being a little hard on the guy? He just died, he's talking to his still-alive girlfriend, and she keeps insisting on him not being real. Don't you think that should cut him some slack? Plus, I think it's very possible that Clara is just afraid of Danny being a fake and getting attached to him again, to have that explained, and is thus being hyper-critical - keep in mind that there is a whole portion of the story ommitted, and we don't see the things that Danny says, so I don't understand why you're immediately jumping to the conclusion that shows him in the worst possible light.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 02, 2014, 01:51:39 AM
SPOILERS



I really do not like the cybermen, never have. But this still managed to be a great episode. The whole thing just had such a creepy vibe to it. I was also hoping for Missy not to be the Master, I think it would have been better to have someone new and fresh. It would have been cool to see another time-lord/lady survivor, whose history with the Doctor we haven't seen. That being said, the reveal was quite masterfully (puns-ohoy) executed.

Overall I really enjoyed this episode. Best of the season, despite the inclusion of something I have never been a fan of and something else I was hoping not to be. Well done.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 02, 2014, 02:09:17 AM
And any episode that starts off with Danny Pink being killed is fine by me. :lol It says a lot about their relationship that he couldn't figure a single thing to say to prove it was him. When he was saying "I love you", I figured he was going to recall her last words to him before he died, but nope.

I don't really understand your hate for Danny, but even so, don't you think that you're being a little hard on the guy? He just died, he's talking to his still-alive girlfriend, and she keeps insisting on him not being real. Don't you think that should cut him some slack? Plus, I think it's very possible that Clara is just afraid of Danny being a fake and getting attached to him again, to have that explained, and is thus being hyper-critical - keep in mind that there is a whole portion of the story ommitted, and we don't see the things that Danny says, so I don't understand why you're immediately jumping to the conclusion that shows him in the worst possible light.

Upon rewatching it, I realized that his final "I love you" was intentional so she wouldn't come after him and get herself killed, so I was being too hard on him there. Cheerfully withdrawn.
However, I didn't get the impression anything was really omitted from that conversation, so he was just being dense before that.

It seems they do make a habit of omitting things where he is concerned though. I don't buy the entire relationship at all because they skipped over most of it, so all we're left with is a boring, awkward wet blanket teacher who doesn't like The Doctor or adventure or any kind of fun. He's a worthless character with no redeeming qualities, and I'll be glad to never see him again after this finale.
And I hope we don't get some cliche scene where Danny's Cyberman encounters Clara and their love turns him good again and he saves the day by sacrificing himself or something along those lines. Blegh.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 02, 2014, 02:28:14 AM
Such a great episode!

SPOILERS

Though I am, at the same time, quite disappointed by the fact that the BBC revealed that there would be Cybermen in this finale - that would have been such an amazing reveal that was cheapened because it was basically obvious the moment the Dark Water and its refractory properties were explained.

Yeah, they revealed far too much in advance in the official trailers, so they ruined the big reveal, but it was still cool seeing all of the pieces come together, and it didn't hurt the episode one bit. Awesome episode. I can't wait for the conclusion.
Yeah but they had no choice really, because they filmed loads of scenes of the Cybermen at St Paul's Cathedral with loads of people watching. When they do public filming like that, they have no choice but to reveal the details they can't hide.

I agree it did soften the impact, but it was still really well done. In particular, I didn't twig certain details that I subsequently realised I should have done. The logo (small circle and big circle) looking like a Cyberman's eye was a great touch that I didn't spot at first, and the dark water hiding non-organic material and therefore disguising them as skeletons was brilliant.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 02, 2014, 02:35:22 AM
Such a great episode!

SPOILERS

Though I am, at the same time, quite disappointed by the fact that the BBC revealed that there would be Cybermen in this finale - that would have been such an amazing reveal that was cheapened because it was basically obvious the moment the Dark Water and its refractory properties were explained.

Yeah, they revealed far too much in advance in the official trailers, so they ruined the big reveal, but it was still cool seeing all of the pieces come together, and it didn't hurt the episode one bit. Awesome episode. I can't wait for the conclusion.
Yeah but they had no choice really, because they filmed loads of scenes of the Cybermen at St Paul's Cathedral with loads of people watching. When they do public filming like that, they have no choice but to reveal the details they can't hide.


That is true, it's just that the whole episode was paced to build to the Cyberman reveal at the very end, first with the subtle logo, then the water tanks draining. But the episode worked just as well knowing it in advance, so I didn't care one bit.

And I thought of something else. Clara didn't recognize Missy, so I'm not sure where that puts the whole woman in the shop idea. Missy did basically claim to have chosen Clara, but you'd think Clara would have recognized her if that was her. I hope that is an important part of next season's arc, if not revealed in this finale. It's obviously a thread they intend to deal with at some point.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 02, 2014, 02:44:46 AM
The logo (small circle and big circle) looking like a Cyberman's eye was a great touch that I didn't spot at first,

I didn't notice either, until those doors closed and we saw the two logos next to each other and that *duh duh duuuuuuh* music played. Okay, maybe it wasn't the *duhduhduuh*, but it might as well have been.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 02, 2014, 03:23:43 AM
The logo (small circle and big circle) looking like a Cyberman's eye was a great touch that I didn't spot at first,

I didn't notice either, until those doors closed and we saw the two logos next to each other and that *duh duh duuuuuuh* music played. Okay, maybe it wasn't the *duhduhduuh*, but it might as well have been.
:lol

And good point Blob, hadn't thought of that, but yeah still some points unaddressed.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on November 02, 2014, 11:29:26 PM
Sorry I haven't been around to post my thoughts on the episode, but MAN was it fantastic. Contender for Moffat's best finale if the second part follows up as well. The Master reveal was just wonderful, and Michelle Gomez brilliantly played the character-- the sinister dialogue, the humorous, yet sadistic subtleties... all just great. I think Moffat has done an amazing job this series and he is wrapping it all up quite nicely.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 02, 2014, 11:52:07 PM
In Deep Breath, Missy referred to The Doctor as her boyfriend, and said The Doctor would never be mean to her because he loves her so much.
Was Missy just being facetious, with the intention of throwing the viewer off the scent? I did see a few people think it was somehow River Song because of that, so that's probably the case.
Then again, Missy did give The Doctor a pretty long kiss. :lol Given that it's still The Master, that's a little creepy, even as a woman!

I assume from her comments that this is supposed to take place after the events of his final encounter with the 10th Doctor? Which means The Master somehow got out of the time lock on the time war. It might be tied into the events of The Time of the Doctor, escaping through the crack somehow, and the finale might reveal more about the current fate of Gallifrey.

I wasn't really going anywhere in particular with that train of thought. Just thinking out aloud.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Metro on November 03, 2014, 12:16:01 AM
Y'know, we've never seen River Song and The Master at the same place at the same time...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 03, 2014, 06:27:43 AM
OK, I saw the forest episode, and didn't care for it (not as bad as the Robin Hood episode, though).

Then I caught the latest episode, and it was fantastic.  I share Blob's disdain for Danny Pink, so when he started off dying, I was loving it.  I know that sounds awful, but it's true.

Can't wait for part two.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 03, 2014, 06:44:32 AM
So glad The Doctor's home planet is called Gallifrey and not something really obvious and alien sounding like Zargon :rollin.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 03, 2014, 08:53:22 AM
Yeah, 'Gallifrey' is pretty epic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 06, 2014, 11:01:25 PM
Pardon the self pimping, but I made a Doctor Who video that I think you guys would appreciate.
Lego Doctor Who - The Time of the Doctor (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FWP23X7JE4)

If you can help share the vid around other places on the interwebs, I'll give out free hugs or whatever.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 07, 2014, 12:04:29 AM
That's fantastic Blob. :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 07, 2014, 12:33:09 AM
Blob, I love you. That taking off the bow tie was fantastic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 07, 2014, 04:44:39 AM
Blob, I love you.

I know you do, but what did you think of the video? :zydar:
That's one of my favourite shots too. I like how that one turned out.

That's fantastic Blob. :D

Thanks ariich. :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 07, 2014, 05:04:51 AM
I give it 12 out of 11 ;)  :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 07, 2014, 05:09:43 AM
I see what you did there...... :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Zydar on November 07, 2014, 05:13:31 AM
That was great, Blob!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on November 07, 2014, 09:23:00 AM
Pardon the self pimping, but I made a Doctor Who video that I think you guys would appreciate.
Lego Doctor Who - The Time of the Doctor (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FWP23X7JE4)

If you can help share the vid around other places on the interwebs, I'll give out free hugs or whatever.

I give it a 12 ou-

I give it 12 out of 11 ;)  :tup

Oh goddamnit! :lol



But seriously, great work, Blob! :tup :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 07, 2014, 10:48:01 AM
Pardon the self pimping, but I made a Doctor Who video that I think you guys would appreciate.
Lego Doctor Who - The Time of the Doctor (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FWP23X7JE4)

If you can help share the vid around other places on the interwebs, I'll give out free hugs or whatever.

I give it a 12 ou-

I give it 12 out of 11 ;)  :tup

Oh goddamnit! :lol



Sorry :neverusethis: I actually changed it at the last second too. . .
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 07, 2014, 10:49:05 AM
So, are we still calling Capaldi the 12th Doctor even with the inclusion of The War Doctor ?

I must watch that episode really. Just for Tom Baker if nothing else...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Podaar on November 07, 2014, 10:59:31 AM
Wait a minute...did he just pull a chicken leg out of his ass?  :lol

Cool video, Blob!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on November 07, 2014, 02:57:51 PM
That ruled Blob! I'd love to see you do an self-written short episode with one of the Doctors and a one-off companion!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 07, 2014, 07:22:06 PM
So, are we still calling Capaldi the 12th Doctor even with the inclusion of The War Doctor ?

I must watch that episode really. Just for Tom Baker if nothing else...

And also because it's one of the very best episodes of Doctor Who. :)
But yes, Capaldi is still the 12th Doctor. The point of saying he wasn't called The Doctor was supposed to be to maintain the current numbering system (even though they credit him as The War Doctor and don't say what he otherwise referred to himself as during the Time War). So Capaldi is the 12th one to carry the name of Doctor, but he's the 13th incarnation.
You will see a ton of arguing about it online, but they have officially said that Eccelston is still the 9th Doctor, Tennant is still the 10th Doctor etc.

Wait a minute...did he just pull a chicken leg out of his ass?  :lol


:lol Well no, it wasn't out of his ASS, it was supposed to be from the kidney area, since the original video had him mentioning the kidneys.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 08, 2014, 05:08:03 AM
Pardon the self pimping, but I made a Doctor Who video that I think you guys would appreciate.
Lego Doctor Who - The Time of the Doctor (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FWP23X7JE4)

If you can help share the vid around other places on the interwebs, I'll give out free hugs or whatever.
lol

That was awesome, Blob!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: GentlemanofDread on November 08, 2014, 02:04:00 PM
That episode was very schizophrenic for me, and I'm not sure I liked it at all.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on November 08, 2014, 02:06:42 PM
^ You mean Death in Heaven? Because I thought that was absolutely fantastic!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 08, 2014, 04:10:13 PM
... I might have to revisit this one when I'm in a better mood, but it's left a bitter taste in my mouth like no other Moffat finale has ever done. Sure, there were some touching parts (that whole ending scene) but goddamn it, some of it was so cheesy. LOVE IS THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 08, 2014, 07:33:45 PM
Overall I thought it was an excellent finale.
I wasn't too big on Missy doing it all for the Doctor, because that made the ending a bit too easy, and I was hoping for more explanation on how Missy escaped from Gallifrey. I'm guessing she stole a new TARDIS and escaped from the bubble universe somehow, to set up the plan and such, but they didn't talk too much about that. I'm also assuming that Missy beamed out to her TARDIS at the end, rather than being obliterated. The blue effect looked more like her beam out to me.
And Danny saving the day by being the Cyberman with emotions was too predictable and obvious.

The ending with both Clara and The Doctor pretending everything had worked out well was sad.  :'(

The other ending with Santa Claus was........... hm. I'll decide that come the Christmas special, but it seems it will continue the tradition of hammy Christmas episodes. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on November 08, 2014, 08:19:36 PM
Yeah, Missy's still alive. No way Moffat would have the stones to kill off the Master. I will miss Osgood though. She would have made a fine companion. I wonder what Clara was really going to say to the Doctor? Overall, very satisfied with the finale. Season 8 is so far my second favorite season (4 is still the best them)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 08, 2014, 08:32:54 PM
Yeah, Missy's still alive. No way Moffat would have the stones to kill off the Master.

You can't kill off any Doctor Who villian, even if you tried. At any time in the future someone can just bring them back with a quick explanation.
I just watched the Doctor Who Extra for this episode, and they were joking that The Master would always get definitively killed, then come back the next time with the explanation "I escaped". :lol
Heck, in The Last of the Timelords, he died without regenerating, and then his body was burned, yet HE CAME BACK!

I'm pretty sure Missy wasn't killed, but instead teleported out, perhaps with an automatic failsafe for this very occurence, since she created these Cybermen. They used the same blue effect for her "death" as they did when she teleported off the plane. The Cyberman shots didn't cause that kind of damage, they made big flamey fireballs earlier in the episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on November 08, 2014, 08:47:01 PM
Yeah, Missy's still alive. No way Moffat would have the stones to kill off the Master.

You can't kill off any Doctor Who villian, even if you tried. At any time in the future someone can just bring them back with a quick explanation.
I just watched the Doctor Who Extra for this episode, and they were joking that The Master would always get definitively killed, then come back the next time with the explanation "I escaped". :lol
Heck, in The Last of the Timelords, he died without regenerating, and then his body was burned, yet HE CAME BACK!

I'm pretty sure Missy wasn't killed, but instead teleported out, perhaps with an automatic failsafe for this very occurence, since she created these Cybermen. They used the same blue effect for her "death" as they did when she teleported off the plane. The Cyberman shots didn't cause that kind of damage, they made big flamey fireballs earlier in the episode.

It gets better than that... in at least one instance, the Master's response was simply: "I'm indestructible, the whole universe knows this." :lol :lol :lol

But yeah, we're definitely seeing Missy again at some point. Easily the best Master since Delgado, possibly even the best Master ever. Michelle Gomez knocked it out of the ballpark and her chemistry with Peter Capaldi is sublime.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 09, 2014, 02:27:31 AM
I'm pretty sure Missy wasn't killed, but instead teleported out
I don't think that's even in question - the teleport was blue (which she had at the end) and the obliteration was orange. So, yeah she obviously got away.

Overall I thought the episode was fantastic. Missy was brilliantly mad and incredibly entertaining. And the Cybermen were the creepiest they've been for ages, probably since Patrick Troughton! That scene with Clara walking through the graveyard and then the Cybermen climbing out was brilliant.

The ending had some lovely stuff, but felt a little awkwardly unresolved. I imagine it'll be tied up in the Christmas special though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 09, 2014, 02:38:33 AM
The ending had some lovely stuff, but felt a little awkwardly unresolved. I imagine it'll be tied up in the Christmas special though.

There's also the rumour that Clara is leaving with the Christmas special, and I've also seen people point out clues that Clara may be pregnant with Danny's kid (Danny Pink apparently has descendants in Listen, and there are some hints in her opening phone conversation with Danny in Dark Water).
So it will be interesting to see how she fits into the Christmas episode.

My only problem with the Cybermen is that they already look too much like Iron Man, and now they even fly like him! But I thought it was a great story for the Cybermen.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Aefenwelg on November 09, 2014, 09:56:08 AM
Did anybody notice that the intro supported Clara's cold opening claim that she was the Doctor?

Jenna was billed before Capaldi. (It's always been Doctor first, anybody else second)

and

It showed her eyes instead of Capaldi's.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 09, 2014, 09:58:01 AM
Did anybody notice that the intro supported Clara's cold opening claim that she was the Doctor?

Jenna was billed before Capaldi. (It's always been Doctor first, anybody else second)

and

It showed her eyes instead of Capaldi's.

I sorta skim through the credits, so I didn't notice the names, but I did notice her eyes. :lol I thought that was a humorous little touch.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 09, 2014, 11:57:45 AM
:tup: Great performance by Michelle Gomez. Had me laughing out loud.

Not the most satisfactory ending but never mind.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 09, 2014, 12:39:03 PM
So I enjoyed it a lot more on the second time viewing. I dunno, maybe I just wasn't in the mood yesterday, who knows. It's still not my favourite finale, and the setup in Dark Water is still slightly better than Death in Heaven, but it is incredibly satisfying. This might now be my favourite nuWho season/series.

1. Listen
2. Mummy on the Orient Express
3. Dark Water/Death in Heave
4. Flatline
5. Kill the Moon
6. Deep Breath
7. Into the Dalek
8. Time Heist
9. The Caretaker
10. Robot of Sherwood
11. In the Forest of the Night
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 09, 2014, 07:06:49 PM
I'd probably rank them like this-

Listen
Flatline
Time Heist
Into the Dalek
Deep Breath
Mummy on the Orient Express
The Caretaker

Kill the Moon
Robot of Sherwood
In the Forest of the Night


I've omitted the two part finale, as I find it too hard to rank it against single episodes, and I'm not 100% on where I'd place it anyway. Maybe after I rewatch it I'll have a better idea. Overall this has been a strong season, and possibly my favourite so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on November 09, 2014, 07:13:51 PM
I'm going to have to watch the series over again before I do any sort of final rankings, though I reckon the two-part finale would be at the top of the list. On any account, this is easily my favorite series of the modern show to date.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: adameastment on November 09, 2014, 07:46:38 PM
So I enjoyed it a lot more on the second time viewing. I dunno, maybe I just wasn't in the mood yesterday, who knows. It's still not my favourite finale, and the setup in Dark Water is still slightly better than Death in Heaven, but it is incredibly satisfying. This might now be my favourite nuWho season/series.

1. Listen
2. Mummy on the Orient Express
3. Dark Water/Death in Heave
4. Flatline
5. Kill the Moon
6. Deep Breath
7. Into the Dalek
8. Time Heist
9. The Caretaker
10. Robot of Sherwood
11. In the Forest of the Night

I don't get why people rate Robot of Sherwood so low! I thought that was one of the best of the series, and that's coming from me - a guy who usually hates episodes set in the past. How come you don't rate it highly? :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on November 09, 2014, 09:05:56 PM
So I enjoyed it a lot more on the second time viewing. I dunno, maybe I just wasn't in the mood yesterday, who knows. It's still not my favourite finale, and the setup in Dark Water is still slightly better than Death in Heaven, but it is incredibly satisfying. This might now be my favourite nuWho season/series.

1. Listen
2. Mummy on the Orient Express
3. Dark Water/Death in Heave
4. Flatline
5. Kill the Moon
6. Deep Breath
7. Into the Dalek
8. Time Heist
9. The Caretaker
10. Robot of Sherwood
11. In the Forest of the Night

I don't get why people rate Robot of Sherwood so low! I thought that was one of the best of the series, and that's coming from me - a guy who usually hates episodes set in the past. How come you don't rate it highly? :)

For several reasons, personally. For starters, the story itself isn't just an average Doctor Who episode; it feels more like a parody of an average Doctor Who episode. It's a story idea that feels childish and something that practically anyone could have come up with. Also,as others will undoubtedly comment, the ending with the Golden Arrow was also downright ridiculous.

Most importantly though, the script itself (which I have read) is incredibly dull. The final episode actually surprised me in its ability to be entertaining because it was elevated by legitimately good acting from its cast and it was relatively well-directed. That being said, most any episode this series can lay claim to the same thing and also have the advantage of a good script too.

Not so with Robot of Sherwood. The key issue with that episode is that it was written quite weakly and despite the incredible aids that came in the form of Capaldi and Co.'s acting and the directing, it was still an ultimately weak story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: lonestar on November 09, 2014, 10:47:39 PM
Blob, any doubts of whether or not I ever wanted to sleep with you evaporated with that video. Excellent work my man!!!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on November 10, 2014, 04:33:11 AM
Blob, that was amazing. Well done sir!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on November 10, 2014, 03:21:02 PM
Blob, that was utterly fantastic. Hats off to you, sir.

I watched the whole two-part finale today. Loved it. Don't really know to say what else, though I hope Clara gets some great last moments in the Christmas Special if that really is her last episode. Michelle Gomez was a fantastic Master. Even though the ending was a bit open, I can wait till the Christmas Special. It's really cool that Nick Frost is playing Santa  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 10, 2014, 03:51:17 PM
Blob, that was utterly fantastic. Hats off to you, sir.

I watched the whole two-part finale today. Loved it. Don't really know to say what else, though I hope Clara gets some great last moments in the Christmas Special if that really is her last episode. Michelle Gomez was a fantastic Master. Even though the ending was a bit open, I can wait till the Christmas Special. It's really cool that Nick Frost is playing Santa  :lol

I couldnt place the voice. i thought it was Bill Bailey at first.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on November 10, 2014, 04:17:56 PM
I knew from Twitter that he was going to appear in the Christmas special, but I didn't know that he was going to do a cameo at the end of Death in Heaven. Still, when I heard his voice I almost immediately knew it was him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 10, 2014, 07:52:58 PM
I don't know who he is, I just know he sounded really weird and wrong for a Santa. :lol

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on November 11, 2014, 01:54:44 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Frost

He stars with Simon Pegg in the 'Three Flavours Cornetto' trilogy. Those films are really, really great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 11, 2014, 01:29:11 PM
Didn't like the finale that much, it was alright but nothing really grabbed me in it. Highlight being that annoying guy dying. For a while at least.

Generally, anything involving cybermen is shit so I'm not that surprised.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 11, 2014, 07:34:22 PM
I'm amazed at how negative the response has been for Death in Heaven on the rest of the internet, even by Moffat hater standards (I'm not saying anyone here who dislikes the episode is a hater).
I certainly thought there were flaws with the final, and it didn't quite meet my expectations, but I still thought it was a good end to the season, and Missy alone made that episode.

Also, check this out, posted from the Doctor Who FB page (bottom of the page)-
https://www.bbcamerica.com/anglophenia/2014/11/doctor-whos-day-roundup-scary-poppins/
:hat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jonny108 on November 11, 2014, 08:27:17 PM
Congrats Blob! Really cool!  I've really enjoyed this series, it's been one of the best since the show came back.  It feels like it's gone by so quick. I thought Dark Water/Death in Heaven has been one of the better finales since the show came back.  Really looking forward to Xmas.

Rankings

Series:
5
8
1
4
7
3
6
2

Episodes:
Listen
Dark Water/Death in Heaven
Flatline
Mummy on the Orient Express
Kill the Moon
Deep Breath
Time Heist
Into the Dalek
The Caretaker
In the Forest of the Night
Robot of Sherwood
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 12, 2014, 01:46:02 AM
I'm amazed at how negative the response has been for Death in Heaven on the rest of the internet, even by Moffat hater standards (I'm not saying anyone here who dislikes the episode is a hater).
I certainly thought there were flaws with the final, and it didn't quite meet my expectations, but I still thought it was a good end to the season, and Missy alone made that episode.
From the places I've seen, it hasn't been that negative, pretty mixed overall actually and more positive than the general response has been in quite a long time. Of course, Moffat haters will spew the same stuff over and over again whatever happens which skews things, but I don't know why anyone would take that seriously. :lol The BBC (fortunately) doesn't.

EDIT: Oh and congrats on the praise you got from the Anglophenia page, I often read their weekly DW updates so that's really cool to get on there so prominently! :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 12, 2014, 02:45:06 AM
ariich, I want to know what places you hang around. :lol
I'm glad this place is well balanced when it comes to Doctor Who discussion. Facebook and Youtube are AIDS when it comes to Doctor Who discussion. Everyone hates Clara, everyone hates Moffat, everyone hates the final etc. I've been plenty vocal about things I have disliked this season, but at the end of the day, I thought this was a really strong season, and I liked the slightly different direction they took this season, and hope it continues.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 12, 2014, 02:59:04 AM
Haven't posted here since before I saw the final episode. Which is because I'm just not sure what to think of it. There were some things I loved, defientely. But there were some things that just felt weird. There was absolutely nothing I hated, so in general this episode is absolutely a posetive one on the good/bad-scale. But like I said, there is stuff which keeps it from being a 'masterpiece'. It feels a lot of the conclusions felt rushed. As if Moffat had a lot of ideas for cool story set-ups, but no clear vision of how to close them in a satisfing way so he just scribbled them down in 10 minutes.

It's really hard to put into words what I mea, since I'm not exactly sure myself. But overall the finale was a good Doctor Who episode, and series 8 has been very strong. Though I do prefer more serialized story telling.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 12, 2014, 07:29:52 AM
I have thoroughly enjoyed this season, although I feel I would benefit from some repeat viewings (especially for the finale).

It doesn't match last season for me, but that had some whoppers.

I am very excited for Capaldi going forward as the Doctor.  Long may he reign.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on November 12, 2014, 11:47:49 PM
Finally saw the last two and have some mixed feelings. I loved Missy (and she's definitely not dead). I loved the idea of the dead rising as Cybermen... but I just thought the whole Danny-as-emo-cyberman thing was kind of lame, and the whole UNIT lady (can't remember her name) being alive thing was kind of cheap/cheesy. The ending was sad. Still processing, but those are my initial thoughts...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 13, 2014, 08:00:58 AM
So is Danny definitely dead?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 13, 2014, 08:04:27 AM
He is dead. I'm pretty sure he's not coming back. If they wanted to, they could technically find a way to do it, since he was able to send that kid back, but I think he was only supposed to be part of the season arc.
If Clara is leaving the show, maybe they'll figure a way to revive him, but I doubt they will.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 13, 2014, 08:34:05 AM
He is dead.
Good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on November 13, 2014, 07:04:39 PM
He is dead.
Good.
PRAISE YE  :hefdaddy
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 14, 2014, 06:42:00 AM
Blob, your video was posted by The Nerdist.  You are going big-time, buddy!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on November 14, 2014, 06:51:10 AM
One of the Doctor Who pages I'm subscribed to posted it as well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 14, 2014, 07:21:40 AM
Blob, your video was posted by The Nerdist.  You are going big-time, buddy!

Are they a thing? I saw it, along with a few other sites that posted it, but I don't know these sites.
The Doctor Who Facebook page posted it separately, which got me 100,000 views overnight. Downright kind of them! :hat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 14, 2014, 07:47:25 AM
Yeah, that's a thing.  It was started by Chris Hardwick.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 14, 2014, 07:48:42 AM
Is he supposed to be a thing? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 14, 2014, 08:34:31 AM
Is he supposed to be a thing? :lol
Well, HE thinks so.  He had his own show on BBCAmerica, and hosted their specials on the premiere of the new season of Doctor Who. 

In the geek world, I would say he is in the neighborhood of Wil Wheaton (who was on his Doctor Who special).  I don't think he has any international fame.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on November 14, 2014, 08:38:16 AM
How did the host of Singled Out go to becoming practically the authority on geekdom?  :lol

And yeah Blob, your video is getting a whole lot of attention
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 14, 2014, 08:46:59 AM
How did the host of Singled Out go to becoming practically the authority on geekdom?  :lol
He is lucky, smart, and is a hard worker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on November 14, 2014, 09:48:42 AM
Well, yeah. That was more me being rhetorical and silly. Guess I failed
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 14, 2014, 09:49:30 AM
My bad
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 14, 2014, 10:22:44 AM
Blob, your video was posted by The Nerdist.  You are going big-time, buddy!

Are they a thing? I saw it, along with a few other sites that posted it, but I don't know these sites.
The Doctor Who Facebook page posted it separately, which got me 100,000 views overnight. Downright kind of them! :hat

I wish some music channel would post my video . I'd love that kind of exposure ! :emo:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on November 14, 2014, 11:15:07 AM
My bad
It's all good  :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 21, 2014, 01:45:56 PM
Good article at Nerdist about series 8: https://www.nerdist.com/2014/11/doctor-who-series-8-what-was-it-all-about/
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 03, 2014, 04:19:49 AM
I recently started on the original series of Doctor Who, currently on The Screaming Jungle. I swear Susan does nothing but cry and scream. :lol

I'm quite enjoying the show so far, except for the two episodes they were just on the TARDIS doing nothing but going
crazy, and I skipped Marco Polo because I wasn't up for so many audio only episodes. The constant flubs by Hartnell just add to the cheap charm of it, and as I expected, the Daleks were awesome from the very start.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 03, 2014, 04:46:24 AM
I'm quite enjoying the show so far, except for the two episodes they were just on the TARDIS doing nothing but going crazy
SAY WHAT?

That serial is easily my favourite Hartnell story. It's really unusual and creepy.

EDIT: Also, keep us updated on how you're getting on with the classic seasons, I enjoyed them and am interested to know what you think, what your favourites are, etc.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 03, 2014, 05:02:38 AM
I don't know, it just felt like it meandering, and went nowhere like they didn't know where it was going, and there were too many random elements and wild leaps. The only thing I enjoyed about it was seeing some more of the TARDIS.

Everything else I've seen I've quite enjoyed though. The first episode was strong, and that whole first story was solid. The Daleks story was great, even if a little padded at times with how many episodes it took. I'm loving the keys of marinus so far. I like all of the elements in this one, the adventure element of the quest for the keys, the wristbands, and them being deceived by the brains in jars. Classic scifi.

What's most interesting is seeing everything develop. The Doctor is a much different character at this point, and less central to the stories as he is now, and everything that is now iconic and taken for granted is here for the first time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on December 03, 2014, 06:35:28 AM
I recently started on the original series of Doctor Who, currently on The Screaming Jungle. I swear Susan does nothing but cry and scream. :lol

I found that with the majority of classic female companions; they seem to just serve as the catalyst for getting the Doctor in troublesome situations.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 03, 2014, 03:48:00 PM
I recently started on the original series of Doctor Who, currently on The Screaming Jungle. I swear Susan does nothing but cry and scream. :lol

I found that with the majority of classic female companions; they seem to just serve as the catalyst for getting the Doctor in troublesome situations.
Some of them, definitely. Victoria Waterfield, gorgeous as she was, was useless and just screamed all the time. Others like Zoe Heriot and Sarah Jane Smith were awesome though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on December 03, 2014, 04:39:41 PM
The only Hartnell serial that I really like is The Time Meddler. I imagine that the cliffhanger to end the third episode of that one on must have been one of the best cliffhangers to ever experience when watching it without knowing what was to come.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: El JoNNo on December 04, 2014, 10:58:33 AM
I recently started on the original series of Doctor Who, currently on The Screaming Jungle. I swear Susan does nothing but cry and scream. :lol

I found that with the majority of classic female companions; they seem to just serve as the catalyst for getting the Doctor in troublesome situations.
Some of them, definitely. Victoria Waterfield, gorgeous as she was, was useless and just screamed all the time. Others like Zoe Heriot and Sarah Jane Smith were awesome though.

Sarah Janes character become useful but was terrible in some of the earlier stuff.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 06, 2014, 07:39:50 AM
I just finished The Aztecs. I'm not as much into the more straight up historical stories without the sciencey stuff, but I still quite enjoyed that story. Quite nice sets too.

The keys of marinus is currently my favourite, followed closely by The Daleks. Given that Terry Nation wrote both, maybe that will become a trend for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 06, 2014, 10:41:41 AM
Yeah for the most part I didn't usually find the pure historical stories all that exciting, but they stop after a few seasons.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 09, 2014, 09:39:18 PM
I just finished watching The Sensorites. Another very good story. I liked the Sensorites, they were an interesting and reasonable race, and it kept up a solid pace. There's a lot of mystery solving in these early episodes.
I think in reality if a race was that sensitive to darkness and noise, their lives would be absolute hell. :lol It's no wonder they use telepathy to communicate, but their speaking voices are not too far off debilitating pain.

I believe Susan gives the first description of Gallifrey here (still unnamed at this point), which was cool, because I recall the 10th Doctor giving an almost identical description later on. A nice little callback, witnessed in reverse.
There have been at least a couple of references so far to The Doctor having only one heart, so that idea obviously came later. The Doctor's backstory isn't much developed at this point, mostly being a means to include the TARDIS as a plot device. It's interesting seeing that progress over time.

I thought the conclusion for the second elder was rushed given that he was the main bad guy of the Sensorites, but overall this was a very enjoyable story.

Flub of the story - "I heard them over....... over.... over talking......."
I think you meant "I overheard them talking" there, pal. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 10, 2014, 02:20:42 AM
Yeah so much stuff gets added as the show goes on - Doctor Who lore as we have it now is informed by things introduced all throughout the years. Even the Doctor Who movie (the 8th Doctor's only appearance) introduced things that stuck around when the show was brought back. Fortunately some other things it tried to introduce were retconned (like the idea Doctor being half human!).

When the show started there was obviously no thoughts whatsoever regarding regeneration. That only came about because Hartnell was unwell but they wanted to keep the show going. I don't think it even became "regeneration" until maybe Tom Baker?

EDIT: And yeah the early years have quite a lot of flubbed lines. :lol That smooths out a lot after a couple of seasons. If you ever get to see any snippets or scenes from the original pilot version of the first episode, it's so much worse though - An Unearthly Child episode 1 is actually the refined version!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 10, 2014, 04:12:02 AM
I've only skimmed the 8th Doctor's movie. What did that introduce aside from the failed idea of being half human? (ugh American TV thinking people won't relate to a character unless they're enough like them)

I'm glad I watched An Adventure in Space and Time when it aired (before I'd even watched an episode of Doctor Who, incidentally). It gave a nice background to those early years, regarding the limited production values of the time, and the idea of "regeneration", so it's easy enough to look past that stuff. The stories and writing are good enough to make up for any such shortcomings. It's just an amusing little side thing for me.

And is it just me, or did the Doctor overreact a bit to Ian at the end of the Sensorites?
"At least they know where they're going"
"OH YEAH? WELL YOU CAN F*** RIGHT OFF"
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 10, 2014, 04:20:42 AM
I've only skimmed the 8th Doctor's movie. What did that introduce aside from the failed idea of being half human?
I can't remember exactly what now, but I remember noticing two or three things that hadn't ever happened/existed previously but which I was familiar with from the modern series.

Quote
And is it just me, or did the Doctor overreact a bit to Ian at the end of the Sensorites?
"At least they know where they're going"
"OH YEAH? WELL YOU CAN F*** RIGHT OFF"
The first Doctor was pretty damn grumpy sometimes. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 10, 2014, 04:29:07 AM
I like the grumpiness, but he was a bit short tempered on that one! I thought he must have been joking at first.

I'm not too excited for Reign of Terror so far, being a historical episode, and with having two of them animated. First episode didn't do much for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 12, 2014, 06:22:58 AM
I just finished Reign of Terror. Like other historical episodes, it was alright, but not one of my favourites. It largely seemed to consist of everyone getting arrested and then escaping and then repeating the process. :lol

Those two animated episodes were very cheaply done. Nasty hybrid 2D/3D facial animation, and a bunch of different animation styles that clashed horribly from shot to shot, and frantic confusing editing. So so many close ups. Still, better than having audio only.

The Doctor laying out the guard with the shovel to the back of the head was unexpected. But rather than serious concussion or death, it simply put him to sleep. And the first appearance of location shooting, with The Doctor walking across the countryside. I know there's some more location shooting coming up in The Dalek Invasion of Earth, a story I'm especially looking forward to. That will also be the first returning villian. History in the making!

But I'm getting ahead of myself. I'm just about to start Planet of Giants, which if it lives up to its name, sounds amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 12, 2014, 08:10:40 AM
Those two animated episodes were very cheaply done. Nasty hybrid 2D/3D facial animation, and a bunch of different animation styles that clashed horribly from shot to shot, and frantic confusing editing. So so many close ups. Still, better than having audio only.
Is that one of the official BBC animations? They are fairly cheap, the point wasn't to try and fully replicate the originals, just to give an idea of what is going on visually to accompany the sound. I've watched some episodes that are audio-only with accompanying still shots, and it just doesn't work, so having ANY kind of animation is a blessing.

Quote
The Doctor laying out the guard with the shovel to the back of the head was unexpected. But rather than serious concussion or death, it simply put him to sleep.
The Doctor has gone through different phases. He wasn't always the pacificst he is now. The third Doctor in particular was quite a fighter.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 12, 2014, 08:14:19 AM
Yeah, it was the official animation. I know that not every remade episode is the same animation company/style, and I prefer the more flat cartoony style of what I've seen for other recreations. I tried watching one of these episodes with the still images, but it's barely better than audio only. I'll still gladly take the animation over the alternatives, but the quality of it was a bit distracting too.

I just finished the first episode of the giant story. It was exactly what I was hoping for.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 12, 2014, 08:33:43 AM
Ah ok, I don't think I've seen that animation style so I must have missed that one! It might have been before they'd done the official animations that I was at that stage. Yeah the cartooney ones are decent, those are what I'm more used to.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 12, 2014, 08:35:16 AM
Well this was still cartoony, but they went for very detailed shading on the characters, and the close-ups were creepy, with a lot of facial movement. The Troughton ones look a little bit more simple Flash animated, which to me looks better because it keeps it simple.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 13, 2014, 07:43:46 AM
I just finished Planet of Giants. Not bad overall, pretty ambitious in terms of ideas and sets, but I was hoping for more interaction with the regular sized people. I understand that it would have been difficult with their budget and technology though.

They really couldn't sort out their scale. They said they were about an inch high, but most of the time they appeared to be double that, while other times they seemed half of that. I'm not convinced an old man and a teenage girl could have climbed up a vertical drain pipe for what would have been the equivalent of about 200ft, and I assume they got out the same way, but Barbara was pretty much unconscious by that point, so don't get me started on that. The first episode was my favourite of the 3.

I've just started The Dalek Invasion of Earth. Already this has had several location shots, making it feel like the biggest story yet, and nothing has even happened so far. I can't wait.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 16, 2014, 08:53:23 PM
I just finished The Dalek Invasion of Earth. Damn! The production values of the show have come a long way since the start of the show, and this episode was huge in scope. Bigger more elaborate sets, a lot of extras, a ton of location shooting, more effects, and much slicker editing with crossfading between shots and the audio/music not suddenly cutting between scenes. And a great story too!

The Doctor ditched Susan pretty easily. Hey, I'll just leave my 15 year old grand daughter on a ruined planet in the aftermath of a Dalek attack with some creeper she just met and fell in love with where I currently have no means of returning reliably. :lol What's the deal with her parents anyway?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 17, 2014, 02:48:35 AM
The Doctor ditched Susan pretty easily. Hey, I'll just leave my 15 year old grand daughter on a ruined planet in the aftermath of a Dalek attack with some creeper she just met and fell in love with where I currently have no means of returning reliably.
I dunno about that, I think that scene is really nicely done. Certainly other companions leave with considerably less fanfare (though admittedly they aren't his family)

Quote
:lol What's the deal with her parents anyway?
I'm not sure that's ever been addressed in the show.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 17, 2014, 03:04:35 AM
The scene itself was nicely done from an emotional perspective, I just felt he let her go too easily, and also I don't think they had enough time to establish Susan's relationship with that guy to the point where I felt it was worth her leaving The Doctor.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 17, 2014, 03:12:26 AM
Oh lordy, you're going to hate some future companion departures in that case. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 17, 2014, 04:38:03 AM
:lol Nah, it didn't bother me at all, I just thought it was worth mentioning. Not a big deal. I just mention whatever crosses my mind as I go through them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 17, 2014, 07:08:50 AM
:lol I know, I was just being silly. But seriously, some of the future departures are exactly the same (woman goes off with man she's only just met) but seem way more out of the blue.

At least with Susan it was the first departure - I think after a while they just ran out of ideas.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 17, 2014, 07:11:52 AM
I could more easily accept it for other companions, I think it was largely her age and relationship with The Doctor that made me bring it up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on December 17, 2014, 04:14:17 PM
Quote
:lol What's the deal with her parents anyway?
I'm not sure that's ever been addressed in the show.
It isn't. However, there is a very convoluted explanation in an extended novel featuring the Seventh Doctor called Lungbarrow. If you're interested, I can go into detail about that, but it's not canon anyway.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jonny108 on December 18, 2014, 06:52:28 PM
Really excited for the Christmas special.   :metal

The episode title for the Series 9 premiere has been revealed aswell, I'll put it in small The Magician's Apprentice
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 18, 2014, 11:38:58 PM
Really excited for the Christmas special.   :metal

The episode title for the Series 9 premiere has been revealed aswell, I'll put it in small The Magician's Apprentice


So how many of us are taking that to mean Clara isn't coming back?
I read something about her doing another half season, which I hope is not the case simply because this season's arc was so perfect for her, and it would end on a good note, rather than outstaying her welcome as Amy and Rory did. Plus I'd like to see a companion that is considered Capaldi's.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 19, 2014, 12:10:06 AM
I'd be very happy for Clara to stay on a bit longer as they have a really interesting dynamic going on at the moment. Title hints at a new companion, but (a) that could be Moffat's usual trickery, and (b) even if it is a new companion, it doesn't mean Clara is departing yet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 19, 2014, 12:17:09 AM
I'd be very happy for Clara to stay on a bit longer as they have a really interesting dynamic going on at the moment. Title hints at a new companion, but (a) that could be Moffat's usual trickery, and (b) even if it is a new companion, it doesn't mean Clara is departing yet.

Knowing Moffat, it could very likely be an intentional deflection.
I think Clara is a great companion, so if she stays I'm fine with that (assuming they continue to use her well), I just don't want her fizzling out like I feel Amy/Rory did, considering how great she's been this season. The end of the season was such a touching moment for their relationship, and there's still the suspicion that Clara is pregnant, so the timing just feels right for her to leave.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2014, 08:42:55 PM
Spoilers ahead, obviously.



I'm not sure what to make of that episode. The Christmas episodes are always corny, and this was one of the most corny, but at least Santa wasn't real, at least what they saw of him, and most of it was a dream anyway.
Of course I knew it was going to still suggest that Santa was real at the end, even though I have absolutely no idea what the whole tangerine(?) thing was about. What the hell does that have to do with Santa?

As soon as they woke up the first time, I knew it would still be a dream, along with each subsequent time, which made it easier to accept most of the silly parts of the episode. You'd think that submitting to the fairytale of Santa would have the opposite effect of saving them, so that was super corny, including having The Doctor flying the sleigh. The bit with old Clara at the end felt unnecessary and confusing. I was hoping not to see Danny again, but he wasn't too annoying, for him.

Overall, kind of meh I suppose.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 25, 2014, 09:21:28 PM
Spoilers ahead, obviously.

I liked it, not the greatest of specials but definitely among the better episodes with Capaldi. And I didn't mind the silliness, after some of the stuff they pulled off in the regular season, this was mild in comparison, so it didn't get on my nerves and I was able to enjoy it. I thought it was going to be the last time we see Clara, so I got scared a bit there in the end, that would have been a terrible way to send her off.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2014, 09:25:05 PM
I agree on the Clara bit. I thought that was possibly going to be her send-off, but Moffat very well may have written it with that belief in mind, knowing him. :lol

(I'm assuming that people are cautious enough to avoid this thread until they've seen the new episode, so I'm not too concerned about small text on spoilers)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 25, 2014, 09:30:44 PM
It seemed like this is part one of a two-episode arc, characters kept throwing how he was dressed like a magician and the next episode is called The Magician's Apprentice, so the nightmare may not be entirely over yet.

Moffat is like those facehuggers. You never really know if it's not a dream within a dream within a dream. It's part of the charm but also it has its role in some parts of me going "FU, Moffat!" every now and then. Mostly an endearing "FU" of course :).

Also, not sure if it was posted here but I saw this on another forum: https://i.imgur.com/Y0zr09p.jpg
Wow.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2014, 09:34:51 PM
I did notice the magician connection, however he also referred to himself as looking like a magician in Time Heist, so maybe it was just a coincidence. The S9 opener may not have been planned or written yet when this script was written and shot either.

I don't get the impression that there will be any story connection, but I think that magician either refers to The Doctor, or is supposed to make us think it refers to him, or maybe it will work in a dual nature for whatever character is in the season opener.

What's the 11th Doctor doing looking all ripped? Was that for Terminator Genisys, or is that for a different upcoming role?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 25, 2014, 09:39:38 PM
Yeah, we'll see. I just hope it's a satisfying and not an ending that would haunt me for a few days like with Donna (as great as the ending was, I can't handle another tragedy like that!).

As for Smith, you are correct. He's pulling a reverse Bale and buffing up for some role in a Terminator movie. Why do they even bother making these is beyond me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 26, 2014, 04:32:40 PM
While watching it, the opening scene was among the dumbest shit I've ever seen, and I had very little faith that anything in the rest of the episode could redeem it. But it actually did, for which I am very glad.

I thought it was an effective episode. A pretty cool concept with the dream crabs. Not without flaw, obviously, but good still.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 26, 2014, 07:36:33 PM
While watching it, the opening scene was among the dumbest shit I've ever seen, and I had very little faith that anything in the rest of the episode could redeem it. But it actually did, for which I am very glad.

I felt the same as I started watching it. By the point of the opening credits, I was thinking "well, this episode's pretty crap already", but it redeemed it by putting those scenes in context. I think I'd view a lot of it more favourably on a second viewing knowing how it plays out in advance, but like most Christmas episodes, it was still fairly average for me though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on December 27, 2014, 01:08:29 AM
I absolutely loved Last Christmas. Great concepts, kept me on the edge the entire time. I love the Dream Crabs, and would love to see them return alongside the Dream Lord. Shona was a great character, and I hope they revisit her-- it seemed like she was being set up for something, at least.

Great episode overall. Looking forward to The Magician's Apprentice.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on December 27, 2014, 09:58:11 AM
I thought it was a great episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 27, 2014, 02:15:16 PM
Yeah I'd say it was one of my favourite Christmas ones. I agree with Blob that they're usually pretty corny, but I don't care, that's what Christmas specials are all about.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on January 01, 2015, 01:09:19 PM
I've been having this increasing pain in my right temple. Is this real life?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lynxo on January 13, 2015, 02:14:05 PM
Well, now I'm all caught up again. But since we're discussing the Christmas episode, I'll just share my thoughts on that first:

Alien meets Inception meets corny Christmas? Only Moffat could have written something like that. And I loved it. The Dream Crabs were REALLY creepy and I absolutely loved the ending, it was really lovely.



Thoughts about the season in general: this was one of my favorite seasons! I love the new doctor and the way he always bluntly speaks his mind, to great comedic effect. I also love that there's a darker side to him. I can't image Matt Smith or David Tennant going into rage mode when not finding Galifrey (which was real sad btw  :'( ).

The episode Listen was one of the best things I've ever seen on television, period. I've never had so many thoughts and ideas about an episode before and judging by the discussions you all were having, I'm not alone.

Deep Breath and Into The Dalek were both great introductions to our new doctor. with the latter also providing an interesting look at our classic nemesis.

Flatline had a great concept and really funny execution. I was laughing so hard when the doctor reached out his hand from Clara's purse to point her in the right direction.

The two-parter finale really showcased why Doctor Who needs twoparters for at least the finale. Awesome setup, amazing twists (at least in the execution - which Doctor Who hardcore fan did not see the cybermen a mile away?) and great resolution! And also, I love that the Cybermen have been awesome for two seasons now. I wonder if they'll continue to use them? I think it would be interesting to raise the stakes with them - have them discover Galifrey before the Doctor do or something!

I don't know but this season felt a lot more...subtle and mature? Like, not all of the story threads was worlds ending and timey wimey things needing resolution. They were about relationsships, about finding out who you are. This Doctor, unlike the others, needed more than an episode to understand his new self - he needed a whole season. And it all came down to him proudly proclaiming he's an idiot. To me, that felt like the Doctor saying that he's still the Doctor - the madman in a box.

I'm so in love with this series right now that I can't decide if I'm happy for having watched such a great season or sad because there's nothing new to watch. Except the classic series I suppose.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 13, 2015, 02:27:32 PM
 :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 13, 2015, 06:40:21 PM
Nice to have you back on board, Lynxo! I pretty much agree with you on the overall season. This was a great one.

My only major complaint is that too many things happen to be on Earth in Clara's time. The Caretaker, Flatline, In The Forest of the Night, Dark Water / Death in Heaven, and Last Christmas. That's almost half the season. What is it about Clara and London that makes it such an alien magnet? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lynxo on January 14, 2015, 06:46:29 AM
Nice to have you back on board, Lynxo! I pretty much agree with you on the overall season. This was a great one.

Thanks! I actually started watching this show around the same time you did - when the 50th anniversary was all new. One of my best friends went to see it at the cinema and it seemed like such a fun show, I started watching it from the beginning. :)
However, I've been holding off from this season because I wanted to wait until the season was over so I could watch whenever I felt like it. Worked out fine, except I managed to read too much in this particular thread actually.  :lol But nothing major was spoiled.

My only major complaint is that too many things happen to be on Earth in Clara's time. The Caretaker, Flatline, In The Forest of the Night, Dark Water / Death in Heaven, and Last Christmas. That's almost half the season. What is it about Clara and London that makes it such an alien magnet? :lol
I agree to a certain excent. But I really wouldn't consider In The Forest Of The Night and Last Christmas as usual Earth-centered episodes. Both felt as outer wordly to me as the ones taking place on another planet entirely, at least to me. But yeah, in a sense I agree with you. It's always fun when the Doctor Who creators really explore the universe and their imagination.

I forgot to mention btw: the concept of the dead still having a conscious and being aware of their surroundings that they introduced for a short time before revealing it was a hoax was REALLY creepy. :| Just imagine cremating or burying someone who can still feel pain...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 14, 2015, 06:52:06 AM
It's not really about whether it feels other worldly (Last Christmas was a very alien dream setting), it's just the fact that coincidentally bad alien shit is happening in Clara's exact location at that exact point in time. It's beyond coincidence, and it bugged me. I still liked most of those episodes (except Forest of the Night, which can die in a fire).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lynxo on January 14, 2015, 06:57:19 AM
It's not really about whether it feels other worldly (Last Christmas was a very alien dream setting), it's just the fact that coincidentally bad alien shit is happening in Clara's exact location at that exact point in time. It's beyond coincidence, and it bugged me. I still liked most of those episodes (except Forest of the Night, which can die in a fire).
Ah, I get you. :) Still, couldn't the same be said about every Who episode ever? They just stumble upon trouble after trouble wherever they go.  :lol

And yeah, the Forest episode was not very impressive. I didn't mind it per se, it just reeeeeeeeeeeeally clashed with the doctor's personality and that season's overall feeling.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 14, 2015, 07:02:29 AM
It's not really about whether it feels other worldly (Last Christmas was a very alien dream setting), it's just the fact that coincidentally bad alien shit is happening in Clara's exact location at that exact point in time. It's beyond coincidence, and it bugged me. I still liked most of those episodes (except Forest of the Night, which can die in a fire).
Ah, I get you. :) Still, couldn't the same be said about every Who episode ever? They just stumble upon trouble after trouble wherever they go.  :lol


Oh absolutely, but I've accepted them randomly stumbling upon trouble in random times and places, it's just when it all happens in one minutely tiny area of space and time repeatedly, it goes beyond my ability to suspend disbelief.

And I agree Forest of the Night was very out of character. It was so clearly a kid's episode. The 12th Doctor wouldn't have been so nice to the kids and let them save the day. He wasn't put to much use in that episode overall, so his usual personality wasn't able to save it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on January 14, 2015, 07:17:43 AM
I watched the Christmas episode two days ago. It was absolutely epic and I loved it. I loved the references to both Alien and Inception. Overall, the season has been great and I'm really looking forward to seeing more of Capaldi as the Doctor!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 14, 2015, 07:34:49 AM
It's not really about whether it feels other worldly (Last Christmas was a very alien dream setting), it's just the fact that coincidentally bad alien shit is happening in Clara's exact location at that exact point in time. It's beyond coincidence, and it bugged me. I still liked most of those episodes (except Forest of the Night, which can die in a fire).
Ah, I get you. :) Still, couldn't the same be said about every Who episode ever? They just stumble upon trouble after trouble wherever they go.  :lol


Oh absolutely, but I've accepted them randomly stumbling upon trouble in random times and places, it's just when it all happens in one minutely tiny area of space and time repeatedly, it goes beyond my ability to suspend disbelief.
That's been an issue for DW for quite a while now, I know those sorts of complaints were made during RTD's time as well - too many Earth settings.

I think a feature of New Who is to try and make the companions more relateable by having them all come from the present day, and have a decent number of stories set wherever they come from. On the whole I think it works quite well, but it does require that little bit more suspension of disbelief that all these problems would keep occuring specifically in the UK on planet Earth. :lol

That said, the Third Doctor's first two or three seasons were entirely set on Earth in the UK, so it's not as bad as that. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 14, 2015, 07:38:15 AM
I had particular issue with the RTD era with bad shit happening on Earth. EVERY. SINGLE. CHRISTMAS! :lol Christmas episodes do not have a good reputation at all with me.

I need to get back to my watch through of classic Who. I got up to the rescue (I think that's what it's called) then forgot about it. Looooooong way to go yet!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 14, 2015, 07:57:12 AM
Haha yeah. It's worth sticking with, and it's interesting to see how the show developed over the years. The pace definitely picks up, though very gradually. I definitely found some of the early stories really dragged out unnecessarily, particularly some of Hartnell's. Even by Troughton's time they'd mostly got a little tighter.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 21, 2015, 04:47:19 PM
May as well watch the Christmas special. *downloading now* :hat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on January 22, 2015, 04:06:25 PM
Haha yeah. It's worth sticking with, and it's interesting to see how the show developed over the years. The pace definitely picks up, though very gradually. I definitely found some of the early stories really dragged out unnecessarily, particularly some of Hartnell's. Even by Troughton's time they'd mostly got a little tighter.

I have only watched the complete Troughton stories, but most of them are a lot better than Hartnell's stories. I might just prefer his Doctor. The War Games is definitely my favourite story from the black-and-white era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 23, 2015, 02:15:36 AM
The War Games is maybe a little overly long, but it is also rather excellent.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on January 24, 2015, 06:48:38 AM
Blob, have you reached The Time Meddler yet on your Classic Who perusal?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 24, 2015, 06:55:38 AM
Blob, have you reached The Time Meddler yet on your Classic Who perusal?

I've been really slow watching them lately, so I'm only on The Romans. I've seen a clip from The Time Meddler, and it looked pretty cool though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 04, 2015, 07:44:18 AM
Doctor Who Lego set is coming!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SblCKsE3F9c
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Bolsters on February 04, 2015, 07:49:51 AM
So that's the Lego HQ in that video? I'm disappointed that the whole thing doesn't look like it's made from Lego. :(
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 04, 2015, 07:58:36 AM
That's probably some off-site location. I'm sure it's really a giant Lego castle.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on March 30, 2015, 09:03:14 AM
So, there have been bits and pieces of news about series 9 in recent weeks, but the latest one intrigued me: Maisie Williams to guest star at some point! Moffat being typically tight-lipped about her role though!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/38990615-a32e-41b5-9765-137ecd727f86
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on March 30, 2015, 10:43:20 AM
Saw that this morning.  That is interesting.

SPOILER ALERT - she will play Arya Stark and the Doctor will restore her to Winterfell and give her a pet Dalek.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on March 30, 2015, 11:16:31 AM
Cool, I like her. She seems like a cool person. Haven't seen much of her acting besides GoT though, but I hear she's good in Cyberbully.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on March 30, 2015, 01:36:37 PM
SPOILER ALERT - she will play Arya Stark and the Doctor will restore her to Winterfell and give her a pet Dalek.
She plays Arya Stark in her current form in the show. Brutal. Merciless. She kills the Doctor. Painfully.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on March 30, 2015, 01:39:43 PM
And then she goes on a date with Clara.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on March 30, 2015, 02:12:26 PM
And Amy's there too, hopefully.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on March 30, 2015, 08:21:39 PM
Finally saw the Christmas special- wonderfully corny. When Santa rolls up on Rudolph like he's in a western, omg  :rollin
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on March 31, 2015, 04:20:53 PM
I thought it was pretty scary for a kids show.



What ?  :angry:






No I did NOT poo in my pants !!  :angry: :angry:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 10, 2015, 01:06:37 AM
S9 trailer. Why are we not discussing this yet?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB8fh4QUy-A
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on July 10, 2015, 01:35:01 AM
That didn't tell us much at all and I am still extremely excited.

Though nothing excites me as much as the extremely dope shades that the Doctor is donning.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 10, 2015, 01:43:24 AM
That didn't tell us much at all and I am still extremely excited.

Though nothing excites me as much as the extremely dope shades that the Doctor is donning.

Hey, the first trailer for S8 was made of footage that wasn't even in the season, so I'm alright with this. :lol

It doesn't give any much of anything, but what it does show, I like. The show looks better than ever, Capaldi is looking more comfortable as the Doc, and there are a lot of new enemies.

There's already a lot of speculation about Maisie Williams' characters being Susan or Jenny. People have a habit of throwing around any name whenever there's some new character, especially the female ones, so I'll just wait until we actually have something to base the speculation on besides the possible red herring of "it's you".
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 10, 2015, 02:09:48 AM
Whenever there's a new female character that appears to possibly be someone the Doctor already knows, there's always speculation that she's any of the previous female Time Lords (Time Ladies?). Or indeed, these days the male ones too, in the case of Missy.

So main options:
 - Susan
 - Jenny
 - River
 - The Rani (highly unlikely)

Anyway trailer looked awesome. Only watched it once and it was pretty fast paced, but it definitely looked exciting. And am I right in thinking we saw both Davos and Scaro?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 10, 2015, 02:14:24 AM
Whenever there's a new female character that appears to possibly be someone the Doctor already knows, there's always speculation that she's any of the previous female Time Lords (Time Ladies?). Or indeed, these days the male ones too, in the case of Missy.

So main options:
 - Susan
 - Jenny
 - River
 - The Rani (highly unlikely)

Everyone was speculating the Rani and River last season with Missy. I also recall speculation for Madame Kovarian and Tasha Lem being River Song, or maybe I got that muddled. Every female character is every other female character, apparently.
I think people figure that if you throw enough crap at the wall, something will eventually stick. :lol


Anyway trailer looked awesome. Only watched it once and it was pretty fast paced, but it definitely looked exciting. And am I right in thinking we saw both Davos and Scaro?

I think no to the former and yes to the latter.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 10, 2015, 02:42:53 AM
Anyway trailer looked awesome. Only watched it once and it was pretty fast paced, but it definitely looked exciting. And am I right in thinking we saw both Davos and Scaro?

I think no to the former and yes to the latter.
Hmm, will have to re-watch!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on July 10, 2015, 02:43:48 AM
Yeah, I didn't see Davros, but that city could have been a Dalek city, though Skaro (if it is indeed that) looked remarkable unburnt.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 10, 2015, 03:22:05 AM
Yeah, I didn't see Davros, but that city could have been a Dalek city, though Skaro (if it is indeed that) looked remarkable unburnt.

It could be a new Dalek planet established somewhere else, if it is related to the Daleks at all.
Either way, it looks bad-ass.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on July 10, 2015, 03:24:37 AM
Didn't watch the trailer, but I'm very excited for season 9!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 10, 2015, 03:39:58 AM
Yeah you're right - watched again and the bit that at first glance looked a bit like Davros was emphatically not. :lol

That planet definitely looks SO much like Skaro though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on July 10, 2015, 05:19:13 AM
Really enjoyed the trailer.  Can't wait for the new season to start!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on July 12, 2015, 05:38:31 PM
The planet is definitely Skaro, it just screams the 60's Dalek building designs.

In any case-- beautiful trailer. I think this has potential to be the best series of DW yet-- a  confident, comfortable Doctor, a comfortable companion, an amazing cast of reoccurring characters, the return to two parters, and the more cinematic quality the trailer showcased. I am really hyped.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 12, 2015, 11:02:11 PM
The planet is definitely Skaro, it just screams the 60's Dalek building designs.

In any case-- beautiful trailer. I think this has potential to be the best series of DW yet-- a  confident, comfortable Doctor, a comfortable companion, an amazing cast of reoccurring characters, the return to two parters, and the more cinematic quality the trailer showcased. I am really hyped.

I agree. Last season was a very strong start for Capaldi, and now that Capaldi/the 12th Doctor have settled into their role, I expect big things from this season. With more two parters, I expect less "filler" episodes (not that I have a problem with those), and some big stories. I'm also excited to see Missy return, and I hope they give a bit of backstory this time about how The Master escaped the Time War.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on August 12, 2015, 10:10:47 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0csVdLbDMO4

Another goosebump-inducing trailer.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 13, 2015, 12:03:51 AM
I've only quickly watched it once on my phone so far, but I think this one was even more exciting than the first one. Gonna have to go back and freeze frame it and then hate that I still have to wait over a month for S9 to start.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 13, 2015, 12:14:02 AM
I cannot wait to see Capaldi rock out with a guitar and sunglasses.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on August 13, 2015, 12:16:54 AM
I cannot wait to see Capaldi rock out with a guitar and sunglasses.

I wonder what he's playing? Is it just going to be some kind of weird alien noises he's generating, or something written by Murray Gold, or will it be a real song? Last season did have a Queen cover, and a reference to The Wall, so anything's a possibility.
I hope it's something fittingly awesome.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on August 13, 2015, 12:30:58 AM
I really can't wait for the new series the start. Since I'm living in Germany now and we don't have BBC on the TV (as opposed to the Netherlands, where we do) I'm going to start using Netflix basically just to watch Doctor Who  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on August 13, 2015, 11:32:51 AM
From the trailers they seem to be pushing the Doctor into even more darker areas. I wonder how that is going to turn out, if true. It seems to be a little bit too much or at least getting close.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on August 13, 2015, 11:37:21 AM
From the trailers they seem to be pushing the Doctor into even more darker areas. I wonder how that is going to turn out, if true. It seems to be a little bit too much or at least getting close.

I'm going to wager that there's still going to be plenty of light-hearted moments and stuff. The plan is probably to take 12 into a more Hinchcliff-inspired direction, which I think would work brilliantly for the character and the show. It's considered to be the golden era of Classic Who for good reason, after all. :metal
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 13, 2015, 12:19:33 PM
It would be a cool nugget if when Capaldi is playing guitar he is actually playing a song of the punk band that he was a member of in his youth.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on August 13, 2015, 12:37:16 PM
It would be a cool nugget if when Capaldi is playing guitar he is actually playing a song of the punk band that he was a member of in his youth.

That'd be cool, but he'd need to be accompanied by his old drummer Craig Ferguson for the full effect.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on August 13, 2015, 01:04:45 PM
Which would mess with time, space and matter in such a way that we'd get 2-3 episodes of Craig as the Doctor. Interviewing his enemies, past-selves and companions. Maybe as a web mini series xD
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on August 29, 2015, 06:33:48 AM
Got back into classic Who after taking a break for a while, just finished the Key To Time season, which I thought was a fairly solid season. Why did they cast a new Romana though? Did the first one get a new series?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on August 30, 2015, 07:20:31 AM
I have no idea, but I do think that The Key to Time is pretty damn cool overall, especially the first two stories are brilliant. I should watch it again.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on August 30, 2015, 10:03:46 AM
I read her Wiki page. I guess she felt her character was turning into the same old companion role that others were. She only took the role because they made her a Time Lord and therefore put her kind of in equal footing with the Doctor. Looks like her career didn't amount to that much after leaving the show
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 04, 2015, 06:55:58 PM
Currently watching Full Circle and I want to punch Adric in the throat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 05, 2015, 04:02:26 AM
If that's your reaction to Adric, then I very much look forward to your reaction of Earthshock.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 05, 2015, 12:32:13 PM
Ok, to be fair, I think that was a gut reaction on my part. I was fine with him by the end of that story, but his first few scenes really didn't do him any favors lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 05, 2015, 02:18:22 PM
Whenever I don't like a companion in modern Who, I just think of Adric and suddenly they aren't so bad.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 05, 2015, 09:22:46 PM
Clara (and technically Mickey) are the only two modern companions I've come close to disliking.

Oh, and I'm convinced that Maisie Williams is playing a new version of Romana. That tiger creature that's supposed to be in her episodes look an awful lot like the creature we last saw with Romana in Warriors Gate
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 06, 2015, 01:20:59 AM
Mickey I get, but what's wrong with Clara?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 06, 2015, 01:28:27 AM
I don't understand the rampant hate against Clara at all. She's mostly benign as far as companions go.
I've liked most of the companions I've seen so far (still not far into the original series). Donna was obnoxious and annoying at first, but I very quickly grew to like her in S4 once they established her dynamic with The Doctor.

Although they're not companions, the only major characters I can recall that I have truly deeply hated are Danny Pink (a personality-less drone hellbent on being as boring and personality-less as humanly possible and showboating with mindless army rhymes), and River Song (smug old cliche bitch who thinks she knows better than The Doctor). And just to make sure they don't break the tradition of Christmas episodes being terrible, they go and stick her in this year's Christmas special. Yay.
Mickey I was mixed on. Didn't like him much for the most part, but I didn't hate him, and he had his moments.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 06, 2015, 03:05:05 AM
The problem with River is that they keep her so one-dimensional. At first it's cool that she's that way but it quickly turns into a gimmick and they don't give her anything else to work with. Spoilers and looks and smiles that say "I know but I won't tell" is all there is to her.

As for Clara, while I still like her a lot, she never really lived up to the expectations/potential she had in the first few episodes she was in (even before we knew she was the new companion). On paper she seems to have all the right qualities to be amazing, but somehow falls short (unlike Pond).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 06, 2015, 03:06:00 AM
I liked River Song. I thought her whole weird backwards story was very interesting.

Amy is still my favorite though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 06, 2015, 08:43:20 AM
Anyway, finally finished the Fourth Doctor's run last night. I'm a little bit depressed now lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 06, 2015, 11:37:52 AM
Logopolis is so amazing in its atmosphere that I can forgive it for not making any sense in the slightest (I'm mainly talking The Watcher).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 07, 2015, 07:29:51 AM
I like River Song quite a bit, and I'm looking forward to a new appearance!  It will be interesting to see her work with Capaldi.

I like Clara, too.  Although I prefer Amy Pond.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 07, 2015, 08:52:24 AM
Karen Gillan  :heart
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 07, 2015, 09:30:20 AM
I love me some Amy Pond, my favorite companion
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 07, 2015, 09:32:58 AM
Amy Pond was a great companion, although by S7 I definitely felt she'd begun to over-stay her welcome. By that point Amy/Rory felt too constantly indecisive about traveling with The Doctor, and I was glad to see them go by The Angels Take Manhattan.
I suppose I'd say she's my favourite companion, although I've pretty much liked them all, so it's hard to say.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 07, 2015, 12:27:09 PM
I'm torn between Amy and Clara as my favourite companions, third place is definitely Sarah Jane Smith. She had an excellent chemistry both with Pertwee and with Tom Baker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 18, 2015, 02:14:21 AM
I heard the rumour yesterday, but now it's official. Clara is leaving the show.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/2a2689a8-5c52-46af-8e69-2fad42c46da3

While I like Clara as a companion, I'm glad she's leaving now. I don't want her to outstay her welcome like I felt with Amy/Rory by the end, and I am excited at the prospect of Capaldi getting a companion cast specifically for him (assuming he's staying on).
S8 would have been a good time for her to leave because she had the whole arc with Danny Pink, so I'm hoping they have a good departure in mind for her.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 18, 2015, 07:23:06 AM
Well, I like Clara quite a bit, so I'm glad she doesn't have the wretched Danny Pink as her final story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 18, 2015, 08:32:24 AM
Good point. :lol

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 19, 2015, 01:24:16 AM
I'm glad she's going. I liked her initially but it got old, especially because of Danny. Can't wait for tomorrow! My friend reserved a room at a local pub and we (the local Doctor Who meetup group) will be watching it there, followed by karaoke  :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 19, 2015, 02:52:46 AM
I saw the title of an article on IGN that gave me this info. I cannot for the life of me understand how this isn't considered a major spoiler. I mean, it's a main character leaving the show!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 19, 2015, 04:22:22 AM
I saw the title of an article on IGN that gave me this info. I cannot for the life of me understand how this isn't considered a major spoiler. I mean, it's a main character leaving the show!
It's an actor leaving one job for another job, which has already been announced. 

The manner of the character's leaving would be the spoiler.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Dimitrius on September 19, 2015, 08:15:17 PM
So I really, really liked this episode!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 19, 2015, 08:20:35 PM
If this episode didn't have Missy it would have been a total disaster. I don't know, I guess I'm just not feeling the "magic" of the show anymore
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 19, 2015, 11:10:50 PM
An amazing first episode! The episode had me excited from that first reveal of Davros. Missy was even better than last time, and I liked the classic Daleks and use of archival footage.

And the Doctor's party was awesome. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 20, 2015, 02:09:09 AM
Yeah, I thought it was an awesome episode. I keep loving Missy more and more!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 20, 2015, 02:25:10 AM
I just realized watching back that The Doctor actually plays part of Hey Mickey as Missy enters.
I can't figure out what he's playing as he's riding in on the tank. The riff sounds sorta familiar, but I can't place it (right after Eruption). And obviously he plays Pretty Woman when he spots Clara/Missy. Am I missing anything?

(And I'll just ignore that he's in drop D at the start, then is seemingly back in standard tuning when playing Pretty Woman, then magically has a wah pedal :blob: )
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 20, 2015, 02:55:36 AM
Yeah really cool episode. The reveals of Davros at the beginning and then of Skaro were great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 20, 2015, 02:57:21 AM
An amazing first episode! The episode had me excited from that first reveal of Davros.
Yeah seriously, that was brilliant and unexpected. That was one of my favourite series openers.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 20, 2015, 09:32:10 AM
Looking at this, seems like I don't really feel it because of too many ties to classic Who or something like that. And I'm so damn tired of the Daleks and anything to do with them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on September 20, 2015, 10:23:31 AM
Booo, the Daleks are awesome! And do you mean you think it has too many ties to classic Who for you to enjoy it? Because I am really not schooled in the old stuff but that did not stop me from loving it.

An amazing first episode! The episode had me excited from that first reveal of Davros.
Yeah seriously, that was brilliant and unexpected. That was one of my favourite series openers.

Agreed!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 20, 2015, 12:32:29 PM
The Doctor shredding Eruption while standing on a tank in the middle ages wearing sunglasses is an image that I never knew I wanted.

What? Oh yeah, great episode too. Loved the opening, that was superbly chilling - the hand mines, damn! - Missy was great and Davros, while hard to understand sometimes, was all around amazing. Loved it.

Though seriously, does ANYBODY think that Clara and Missy are dead? I mean, it's like they weren't even trying to hide their teleportation away, yet some online reviews I've seen treat it as the big mystery.

Looking forward to next week!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 20, 2015, 01:26:54 PM

Though seriously, does ANYBODY think that Clara and Missy are dead? I mean, it's like they weren't even trying to hide their teleportation away, yet some online reviews I've seen treat it as the big mystery.
I thought the same at the end of the last season. Everyone was going about "did Missy survive?!" and it was bleedin' obvious.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 20, 2015, 01:29:58 PM
Also, I really loved how this episode managed to perfectly hit the tone of Genesis of the Daleks, one of my (and presumably everyone else's) favourite Dalek stories ever. The beginning especially, but also that short clip of Tom Baker was perfectly placed and really elevated the episode.


Though seriously, does ANYBODY think that Clara and Missy are dead? I mean, it's like they weren't even trying to hide their teleportation away, yet some online reviews I've seen treat it as the big mystery.
I thought the same at the end of the last season. Everyone was going about "did Missy survive?!" and it was bleedin' obvious.

I loved how even the show didn't take that seriously. "Alive. Not dead. Big deal. Moving on." I'm paraphrasing, but you know what I mean. Michelle Gomez is amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 20, 2015, 02:02:59 PM
My favorite moment of the episode was probably just as the kid revealed who he was. I could really feel the sense of "oh shit, what the hell do you do now?", and could really see that question in Capaldi's eyes when he reacted to that. Also, to leave a little kid like that, even if it was Davros, was a dark thing to do by the Doctor, so that entire scene and the things it accomplished really worked for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 20, 2015, 10:54:07 PM

Though seriously, does ANYBODY think that Clara and Missy are dead? I mean, it's like they weren't even trying to hide their teleportation away, yet some online reviews I've seen treat it as the big mystery.
I thought the same at the end of the last season. Everyone was going about "did Missy survive?!" and it was bleedin' obvious.

It looked like Clara and Missy got legit ripped by the Dalek lasers, unlike Missy last season where she obviously teleported. I think they actually died, and The Doctor will have to change history to bring them back. He won't end up killing kid Davros, but he'll think of some clever alternative way to change the past and stick to his morals.

The Doctor shredding Eruption while standing on a tank in the middle ages wearing sunglasses is an image that I never knew I wanted.

God yes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Bolsters on September 20, 2015, 11:11:28 PM
Well it was implied that the hand mine things "created" Davros - I think it was The Doctor who at one point posited the question "who created Davros?" after it was mentioned that Davros created the Daleks, and Davros has the same eye on his forehead that the hands have on their palms. So The Doctor is probably there to EXTERMINATE the hands and save Davros from whatever it is they do to him.

Though, I feel this event should be a fixed point in time given how important to history it is.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 20, 2015, 11:41:59 PM
"Fixed point in time" is just a fancy way of saying "because reasons". :lol But I agree.
I don't see them making any change that removes either the Daleks or Davros from time. Davros will live in some form for any kind of future return.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 21, 2015, 03:08:57 AM
I thought he meant himself when he said "who created Davros?".
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on September 21, 2015, 12:17:05 PM
I thought he meant himself when he said "who created Davros?".

This is what I got out of it as well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on September 21, 2015, 01:02:49 PM
A real cracker of an episode!! Sunday can't come soon enough!  ;D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 21, 2015, 01:16:58 PM
Downloaded this from BBC iPlayer.

Gonna watch it soon.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on September 22, 2015, 09:00:53 AM
Finally caught up with it last night.

Wow, what an episode!  Missy, and the return of Davros, and the Doctor playing guitar in shades on a tank!

Best season opener I can remember.  Can't wait til next week!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 25, 2015, 01:40:44 PM
My three least favourite words in fiction :



" To Be Continued "
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 25, 2015, 01:42:45 PM
I just realized watching back that The Doctor actually plays part of Hey Mickey as Missy enters.
I can't figure out what he's playing as he's riding in on the tank. The riff sounds sorta familiar, but I can't place it (right after Eruption). And obviously he plays Pretty Woman when he spots Clara/Missy. Am I missing anything?

(And I'll just ignore that he's in drop D at the start, then is seemingly back in standard tuning when playing Pretty Woman, then magically has a wah pedal :blob: )

Ha i like how Capaldi was like " I'm blatantly not playing this " when it was the shredding part and he's basically flapping his hands all over the neck.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 25, 2015, 01:50:51 PM
Oh wait ;D


I waited so long to watch the first episode that I only have to wait one more day to see the conclusion :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on September 26, 2015, 02:02:23 AM
I haven't seen the episode yet, so I skipped some replies above.

Season 8 was hit or miss for me. Some good stuff, some....bad. But I am due for a rewatch, sometimes watching on Netflix can help improve the experience for me.

From what I remember, I didn't like season 8's finale. I hope season 9 is better.

Clara is about due to leave, she had a good run though I didn't care at all for the Danny Pink storyline.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 26, 2015, 02:59:11 PM
I just watched last week's episode and the one from today. I heard that it was a two-parter so I wanted to wait, I hate cliffhangers where I have to wait another week to see the rest. That was unbelievably good! Loved the story. Fantastic openers! If this is any indication of how good Series 9 will be... well, then I can't wait to see the rest.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 26, 2015, 03:03:44 PM
As I said above - I waited 6 days to watch the first episode for no reason other than motivation. Now i'm glad I did ! :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 26, 2015, 10:24:24 PM
A good conclusion to the opening episode. As soon as Clara got into the Dalek and couldn't say certain things, you knew that Missy would exploit it and knew there would be an encounter between the Clara Dalek and The Doctor. I wonder if Missy's idea at the end was only to escape, or whether the next time we see her, she'll have taken over the Daleks. I'm down with that.
And I wonder how much regeneration energy was taken from The Doctor to alter/revive that many Daleks? I guess we'll find out in another 50 years when it becomes an issue. :P
Are the glasses a permanent thing now? It reminds me of the 10th Doctor's 3D glasses in Doomsday. I think he still needs a sonic screwdriver though, and they could give him his own unique one now. But the glasses are working for him in a daggy but cool grandpa kind of way.
We knew The Doctor wouldn't kill Davros, but I can't believe I didn't think of killing the hands! That was a nice ending.

The preview for next week didn't look great. I don't like ghost-y stories even when they have some pseudo-sciencey explanation. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 27, 2015, 03:29:17 AM

We knew The Doctor wouldn't kill Davros, but I can't believe I didn't think of killing the hands! That was a nice ending.


Oh, really ? As soon as as I saw the preview for today's episode I assumed that's what was going to happen. :)

Some nice acting from whoever plays Davros in this episode.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 27, 2015, 08:26:13 AM
Very cool episode. I'd say these two episodes were better than anything series 8 had to offer.

I like Missy's weirdness, but it did get a bit much at times here though.

And since series 8 was more episodic, I'd also like to see an a bit more serialised season this year. I tend to like those the most. But they seem to be setting something up at least with the confession, so it all looks good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 27, 2015, 08:45:01 AM
I think the Doctor was playing his theme music on the guitar.

Anyway, great season premiere. One of the better Dalek centered stories of new Who (the two stories of series 1 are still my favorite)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 27, 2015, 08:49:11 AM
Very cool episode. I'd say these two episodes were better than anything series 8 had to offer.

I like Missy's weirdness, but it did get a bit much at times here though.

And since series 8 was more episodic, I'd also like to see an a bit more serialised season this year. I tend to like those the most. But they seem to be setting something up at least with the confession, so it all looks good.

Each to their own. I vastly prefer a different story every week. I cannot bear having to wait a week for a conclusion. I hate it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 27, 2015, 09:21:48 AM
Hopefully they are done with this for a while and we can get some actual fun DW episodes and stories now. 8 seasons of fan service is enough, time to bury the Daleks for a few years.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 27, 2015, 10:00:00 AM
Each to their own. I vastly prefer a different story every week. I cannot bear having to wait a week for a conclusion. I hate it.

A week is nothing. I'll gladly wait a week between the two-part stories.

Hopefully they are done with this for a while and we can get some actual fun DW episodes and stories now. 8 seasons of fan service is enough, time to bury the Daleks for a few years.

Don't they have to include the Daleks at least once a season? I think I heard that somewhere, or did I dream that?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 27, 2015, 10:30:21 AM
I see they're still doing the whole " either the Doctor or Clara or both have to be in a life or death predicament in every episode " shtick.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 27, 2015, 11:29:43 AM
Each to their own. I vastly prefer a different story every week. I cannot bear having to wait a week for a conclusion. I hate it.

A week is nothing. I'll gladly wait a week between the two-part stories.

Hopefully they are done with this for a while and we can get some actual fun DW episodes and stories now. 8 seasons of fan service is enough, time to bury the Daleks for a few years.

Don't they have to include the Daleks at least once a season? I think I heard that somewhere, or did I dream that?
I have no idea, but I've never liked Daleks or Cyberman, although they've had decent episodes with them in the past. I'll have to rewatch the first 5 seasons again, I was just glued to the screen when I was exposed to DW for the first time a few years ago and something from then is missing for me - would be interesting to see if I feel like that because it was my first time or was there actually something special about those seasons that is lacking now.

I feel like we haven't gone exploring much recently. The Doctor feels too much in control.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 27, 2015, 11:42:39 AM
I personally feel that the show has gotten better since those early years. Eccleston and Tennant had some great episodes, but I feel that Smith's run was more consistantly good. Capaldi is great as the Doctor, but I'm not a huge fan of series 8, so hoping that 9 will be able to improve his run and keep that consistant "goodness" up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on September 27, 2015, 12:11:53 PM
I agree, apart from your comments about series 8. I loved series 8. But yes, Eccleston was decent and had a few great episodes, Tennant was also really great but had a few weaker episodes and Smith was my favourite Doctor probably.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 27, 2015, 11:10:41 PM
I'm trying to get back to watching the original series. I was stuck on The Web Planet for about 6 months, just couldn't build up the motivation to watch it, but I've finally done it! I deserve a medal or something for getting through that crud. I couldn't even tell what was supposed to be happening half the time with the dudes in bug suits flailing around, awful camera work, and shit smeared on the lens to cover up the badness. :lol

I've skipped over The Crusade because two episodes are missing and have no animated versions (I'm a lightweight), so onto The Space Museum. I just finished the first episode of that, which I quite enjoyed.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on September 29, 2015, 12:09:49 AM
I find that the best Hartnell episodes come later in his time as Doctor. The Space Museum is pretty good, but my favourites are The Time Meddler and The War Machines.

In Modern-Who news, this weeks episode was great! I probably liked it a little more than The Magician's Apprentice, which is a rarity for two parters imo. The chat between the Doctor and Davros was the highlight, but Clara and Missy were a great double act.

Not sure how I feel about a prophecy concerning a Dalek/Time Lord hybrid, but eh.

Looking forward to next week's, it looks interesting and Toby Whithouse's episodes are generally really good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 29, 2015, 12:27:10 AM
I find that the best Hartnell episodes come later in his time as Doctor. The Space Museum is pretty good, but my favourites are The Time Meddler and The War Machines.

I just finished The Space Museum, and it was pretty good. I did feel it didn't quite live up to the craziness of the first episode, and the helping a race take their planet back from the invading aliens felt too similar this close to The Web Planet. This was much better though.

Looking forward to next week's, it looks interesting and Toby Whithouse's episodes are generally really good.

I just looked through the episodes he's written, and I'd say all of them are decent. None I'd call bad, but none I'd call great.
Looking at writers for this season, we have an episode by Jamie Mathieson, who wrote two great episodes last season, so that's good. Peter Harness is writing one, and he wrote one of the duds from last season, but I won't pass judgement based on one episode alone. Mark Gatiss has written one, with all of his episodes ranging from passable at best to complete shit at worst. There are also a couple of new names in the mix.

Given that it's all seemingly double episodes this season, it's a different dynamic, and I'm not in the habit of pre-judging episodes based on writers anyway.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on September 29, 2015, 01:15:53 AM
Dalek/Time Lord hybrid sounds interesting, but not nearly interesting enough to be the big seasonal story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 29, 2015, 04:39:37 AM
Maybe Mark Gatiss only brings his A game when writing for Sherlock .
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 29, 2015, 05:33:27 AM
They're completely different shows, so it's possible that he's much more suited to one genre than the other.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 29, 2015, 05:36:15 AM
Corey Taylor from Slipknot is the voice of " The Fisher King " in the next episode along with Peter "Darth Maul" Serafinowicz !
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 29, 2015, 09:15:17 AM
I just finished The Chase, continuing the run of great Dalek stories. Episode 4 (Journey into Terror) was a weak episode, being silly filler that made little sense, but the rest was a really good adventure. I figured the whole thing would be on that first planet, so it was a surprise once they escaped and visited several other planets too. Like the other Dalek stories, it had relatively big production values for the show, with the editing for the Dalek/Mechonoids battle being especially ambitious for the show at the time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 01, 2015, 09:35:29 AM
So I've watched a few more stories.
I saw The Time Meddler, which was an interesting one for having another (as of yet still unnamed race) Timelord with his own TARDIS. Nice idea, and decent execution, although a bit slow, and the obvious absence of Hartnell in one episode didn't help.
While I've tried checking out the audio-only episodes without proper video, I just couldn't sit through it, which unfortunately means a lot of skipping, which will be even more sad once I get to the second Doctor. :( It's also bad timing with companions seemingly coming and going every time I watch one. What the hell is a Dodo?

So I skipped right to The Ark after that, which I enjoyed. I knew the Monoids were going to turn as soon as I first saw them, although it played out differently and better than I expected, and the statue reveal was coo. Reminded me a bit of Planet of the Apes. I liked the idea of following up on this generational spaceship at a later time. Classic scifi. Also a great use of scale models and forced perspective. Very crafty effects.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on October 01, 2015, 09:40:09 AM
I watched my first ever episode of Dr. Who last night (S01E01 of 2006 reboot). What an awesome show.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 01, 2015, 09:41:16 AM
Boy, if you thought that episode was good, you're gonna love it all. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on October 01, 2015, 09:53:39 AM
If you can get past the first two seasons, which include a more than a few exceptionally high highs but some quite embarrassing lows as well, then you are definitely in for a big treat in a few days/weeks/month (depending on how long it will take you to go fully binge-mode)  :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 01, 2015, 10:27:45 AM
You may be the first one I know of who actually liked the first episode. I didn't, I sat through it and continued for a girl. And other people I've since introduced to the show have all been like "will it always be so... weird..." after the first episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 01, 2015, 10:31:39 AM
The first episode is pretty bad, and downright cheesy. I'd already watched and liked later episodes, otherwise that first episode wouldn't have compelled me to keep watching had I tried it at the very start.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 01, 2015, 06:25:52 PM

While I've tried checking out the audio-only episodes without proper video, I just couldn't sit through it, which unfortunately means a lot of skipping, which will be even more sad once I get to the second Doctor.



It really is a shame that most of the second doctor episodes are missing because he is my favorite. I actually watched all of the reconstructions and I will say that some of them are very hard to sit through. I do however recommend at least trying to watch the recons of both of troughtons dalek storys along with Fury from the deep.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 01, 2015, 07:42:55 PM
So there's some spin off being in the works in some school Is this the school from last season? Sounds pretty bad.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 01, 2015, 10:20:18 PM
So there's some spin off being in the works in some school Is this the school from last season? Sounds pretty bad.

When I first saw it, I thought it just a book or something. Sounds terrible. It does sound more like they're trying to start a new kids' show and mooch some brand recognition. I doubt it will have much to do with Doctor Who at all beyond perhaps a first episode. Maybe it will have that school girl that was in Kill The Moon? Blah.


It really is a shame that most of the second doctor episodes are missing because he is my favorite. I actually watched all of the reconstructions and I will say that some of them are very hard to sit through. I do however recommend at least trying to watch the recons of both of troughtons dalek storys along with Fury from the deep.

I'll try. I already skipped The Daleks' Master Plan, and I hate skipping Dalek stories! If I don't get to them now, I'll probably come back to them later once I'm done with all of the surviving episodes. What are the odds they'll ever recover these episodes? :(
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 01, 2015, 11:56:54 PM
Yeah they've had kids spin-offs before, like the Sarah Jane Adventures. Never did get round to watching that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 02, 2015, 12:00:40 AM
I have no interest in ever watching that one either, but the minor crossover they had was just fine luckily. I'll probably check out Torchwood at some point, but that kinda goes the opposite direction. :lol

And perhaps with an outlet for the more kiddy stuff, we won't have to suffer through anything like In The Forest Of The Night again for a while. :neverusethis:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 02, 2015, 08:07:59 AM

I'll try. I already skipped The Daleks' Master Plan, and I hate skipping Dalek stories! If I don't get to them now, I'll probably come back to them later once I'm done with all of the surviving episodes. What are the odds they'll ever recover these episodes? :(

Well there always is a chance. The christmas episode that was part of dalek master plan however is 100% gone forever. That one was not sent anywhere else to air and was likely wiped not too long after it aired in the UK. Its not a huge loss because it really had nothing to do with the story. All the other episodes there is a chance that they are in a werehouse in africa or something or somehow in the hands of a private collector.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 03, 2015, 11:46:07 AM
Corey Taylor from Slipknot is the voice of " The Fisher King " in the next episode along with Peter "Darth Maul" Serafinowicz !

Reposting this ahead of tonight's episode. Gonna be listening out for both.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 03, 2015, 04:05:04 PM
Ughhh. Two part episode. Bollocks. ::)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 03, 2015, 10:50:10 PM
Ughhh. Two part episode. Bollocks. ::)

The whole season is two part episodes. Nothing wrong with that.



I wasn't too excited going into this episode, but so far it's actually quite good, although somewhat predictable. As soon as I saw the deaf character, I knew they were going to lip read the ghosts, I knew that in the church they'd find the stasis pod, that the body at the end would be The Doctor. It was mostly a sign that the script was well written to play out the story though. Having the double episode means the pacing wasn't rushed either; my only concern was that it would be boring drawn out to two episodes, but the second part looks like it's going to be very different overall, with a change of scenery (and I love the timey-wimey stuff).

My only real nitpick is that if they've been there for three weeks knowing that the ghosts disappear during day mode, why didn't they keep it in day mode, or at least use process of elimination to see what about day mode keeps them away? It didn't seem to be a problem to override it to day mode even after the ghosts had messed with it.

Oh, and the sonic sunglasses are lame as shit. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 03, 2015, 11:36:26 PM
I love the sonic glasses, it totally fits Capaldi's character this season.

Anyway, great episode. Every episode this season has either been an 8, a 9, or a 10 thus far. Fantastic stuff from the DW team.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 03, 2015, 11:39:30 PM
I agree, nothing less than an 8 for me yet. At this point last season, we had Robot of Sherwood.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 04, 2015, 03:19:37 AM
Yeah, season 9 keeps delivering great stuff. Interesting episode, psyched for next week! And even though I too knew who the last ghost would be, that shot of ghost Doctor was one creepy image.

I don't mind the sonic glasses for now, but I wouldn't want them to be a permanent thing.

Oh, one negative about the episode though: Overly adventurous Clara is a bit weird. I mean, lives are at stake here, and having her be all like "this is so exciting!" takes away from that a bit. I know she got more serious towards the end, but it was a bit jarring in the beginning.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 04, 2015, 05:24:46 AM
I don't mind the sonic glasses for now, but I wouldn't want them to be a permanent thing.

Judging by the latest video with Moffat, it looks like they're sticking around for now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 04, 2015, 07:36:27 AM
Man, this series is so good so far!

I'm fine with the sunglasses, it's not like they get used very often and it's not really any different to the screwdriver.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 04, 2015, 08:51:39 AM
Glasses fine by me . Just so long as they don't become "Magic Deus Ex Machina Vessel".

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 04, 2015, 04:17:27 PM
Just watched the new episode. It was another great one! Didn't know the whole series is going to be two-parters though. Ah well, I guess I'll have to wait for next Saturday then. It can't come soon enough!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 04, 2015, 05:35:39 PM
I always love when doctor who does multi part episodes. It reminds me of the original serialized format which honestly I prefer. One thing I dont like about New who is that episodes sometimes feel rushed and the endings can be anti-climatic because of it. Like the Power of Three from season 7, The whole storyline about the blocks was very interesting and in the end the doctor just kinda quickly sonics his way out of it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 04, 2015, 09:54:40 PM
Yeah I would love to see The Power of Three redone proper, it had such an interesting and enthralling beginning to the story, plus the "Doctor trying to live a normal life" setting was quite hilarious. Unfortunate about the ending.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 04, 2015, 10:01:30 PM
Old Who marathon-

The War Machines - I loved the setup of this one, it was very Skynet, and seemed ahead of its time with the idea of networking all of these computers together. And the computer noises sounded like dial-up. I liked the tech solutions The Doctor came up with to beating the war machines. Dodo was ditched with no fanfare at all. I'm not complaining. :lol

The Tenth Planet - One of the most important ones yet, being both the last appearance of the 1st Doctor, and the first appearance of the Cybermen. The Cyberman voice was about the most obnoxiously painful thing I've ever heard, like nails on a chalkboard combined with the barks of a thousand dogs. The story itself was pretty good, but not very scientifically plausible. The lack of Doctor was obvious, and it would have been nice if the concept of regeneration was properly developed at this stage so they could have had The Doctor do something big as his final act, instead of just sleeping through the whole thing then changing at the end.
The most amusing thing is that the story was set 20 years into the future in 1986. Who could have imagined the show would actually still be running by that date? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 05, 2015, 03:36:40 AM
Watching the last episode - I wondered what would happen if the TARDIS has been flooded along with the base and they all left on a sub ?

Would the TARDIS home in on the Doctor ?

Has there ever been an episode where he's lost it ? There must be i'm sure.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 05, 2015, 06:51:47 AM
In Father's Day, The Doctor used the TARDIS key to get the TARDIS to rematerialize near him after it disappeared. In Time of the Doctor he used the key to get the TARDIS to materialize around him when he had to leave it on the spaceship.

In Cold War, the TARDIS de-materialized due to the flooding and relocated itself to the south pole (but apparently that was a special case because The Doctor had enabled the HADS).
In Voyage of the Damned, the TARDIS gets ejected into space when the space Titanic gets damaged, and it automatically landed on Earth.


I'm sure there are a ton of other instances of similar occurrences, but basically it does what the story calls for. I'd love to see a story where he was thoroughly screwed without his TARDIS or a key, and there wasn't an easy solution to fix it, although I'm sure they've probably done something like that in the 800 or so episodes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 05, 2015, 08:19:27 AM
Yeah I can't imagine being the doctor if he actually did permanently lose it. :|

Then he'd just be screwed unless a fellow time traveller helped him out.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: countoftuscany42 on October 05, 2015, 10:59:08 AM
Didn't know the whole series is going to be two-parters though.

it's not all two-parters, but 8 out of 12 episodes are two-parters
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 05, 2015, 12:19:08 PM
So...what do we think will be the explanation for the "ghosts" ?

And yes, obviously The Doctor isn't dead. My guess is that the "dead" people were copied somehow and then projected and The Doctor found a way to copy and project himself. . .



And finally - I really hope the entire series is this dark. i like it ! :tup. Less Robot Of Sherwood as Blob said !  :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 05, 2015, 12:58:43 PM
Didn't know the whole series is going to be two-parters though.

it's not all two-parters, but 8 out of 12 episodes are two-parters
As I understand it, even those that aren't strictly two-parters are connected. Like The Girl Who Died/The Woman Who Lived. Different writers but same director and clearly a connection.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 05, 2015, 11:44:17 PM
Yeah, some of the "two-parters" are only so in spirit, rather than storyline.

Also, the penultimate episode is going to have Capaldi acting alone. That is going to be phenomenal.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on October 06, 2015, 08:13:35 AM
Are you my mommy?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on October 07, 2015, 08:24:13 AM
So the Doctor kisses roses and turns into another doctor. The fuck?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 07, 2015, 08:29:15 AM
Did you not follow what was happening? He absorbed all of the time vortex energy that Rose had taken in before it killed her, killing him instead.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on October 07, 2015, 08:51:07 AM
I got that right up until a new Doctor appeared. How does that work?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 07, 2015, 08:57:48 AM
I got that right up until a new Doctor appeared. How does that work?

You mean how/why does the Doctor become a different person? He's an alien known as a Time Lord, who instead of dying, "regenerates" with a new body, with a slightly different persona, but retaining his past memories.
Time Lords can regenerate up to 12 times, for a total of 13 incarnations. You just saw the 9th Doctor regenerate into the 10th. A Time Lord can still die before using up all of their regenerations, if the process is interrupted or unable to start, so he's not invincible.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on October 07, 2015, 09:05:16 AM
Groovy. I'm going to miss #9.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 07, 2015, 09:11:06 AM
Sorry, I didn't even think of how confusing the randomly turning into another person thing is to a new viewer. :lol
I was luckily already aware of it before getting into the show just from hearing about it (plus I live scifi, so this kind of thing doesn't phase me).

David Tennant's first episode doesn't show that much of him, but he's universally loved, so you'll get over the 9th Doctor in no time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 07, 2015, 09:20:54 AM
Sorry, I didn't even think of how confusing the randomly turning into another person thing is to a new viewer. :lol
I'd say it's actually pretty well signposted in the episode. Nine only briefly explains it, but he does do so.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 07, 2015, 09:23:26 AM
Sorry, I didn't even think of how confusing the randomly turning into another person thing is to a new viewer. :lol
I'd say it's actually pretty well signposted in the episode. Nine only briefly explains it, but he does do so.

I knew it was mentioned somewhat, but it's been a while since I've seen it, so I couldn't remember how much was directly explained.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 07, 2015, 11:18:03 AM
I thought  they got rid of the whole #13 bodies thing so now he can regenerate forever ?

Because isn't Capaldi #13 if you count The War Doctor ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 07, 2015, 12:38:17 PM
He was given a new cycle (12 more regenerations) by the Time Lords beyond the crack at the end of The Time of the Doctor, right before regenerating into Capaldi.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 07, 2015, 01:45:37 PM
Neato !

Yeah they gad to address that at some point or Capaldi would have been the last one.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 07, 2015, 08:44:36 PM
Actually, Matt Smith was the last one, because not only did you have the War Doctor, but you had Tennant's aborted regeneration in Journey's End.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 08, 2015, 08:19:38 AM
Tennants doctor is actually my least favorite of the new show. It has nothing to do with the actor I think he did a great job with what he was given. My main issue is with RTD. RTD can be a great writer, Midnight is one of the best episodes of the new series. However when he's bad you get stuff like the end of time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 08, 2015, 09:11:58 AM
It's been a while since I saw it, but from what I can remember, I had no problems with The End of Time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 08, 2015, 09:17:08 AM
For the RTD era, I didn't have major problems with The End of Time. Last of the Timelords is far worse, with tweety bird Jesus Doctor.
I thought Tennant was a great Doctor despite not enjoying the RTD era that much in hindsight. No matter how bad the episode was, Tennant was always gold.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 08, 2015, 09:22:07 AM
I agree. Tennant was a great Doctor but I like Moffat's writing way more than RTD's. The Last of the Timelords was okay but I loved The End of Time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 08, 2015, 02:24:56 PM
Kinda late to the party, but I really liked Under the Lake. Great atmosphere and the ghosts just look fantastic. It was a little predictable, but it was impeccably constructed and paced.

Couple of nitpicks: the cards, the company guy being all like MONEY and then dying. The first didn't really fit with Capaldi imo - it might have, but it was too weird to work really well, especially the friend/family member/pet thing. The second is just so super clichéd that it would be nice to have it turn out difference for once, like it did on Voyage of the Damned.

Really looking forward to the second part in two days, it looks a lot less predictable, and while it's clear that the Doctor doesn't die, I'm very interested in seeing the events that happen before the flood, and maybe even have the Doctor play the hero in the past and the villain, as a ghost, in the present.

Chino: I liked the first episode too, but that was because I started with Episode 3, The Unquiet Dead and only went back to the first two after finishing Series 7, so my perspective was a little different, but I'm glad that the show has won you over. What were your favourite Ninth Doctor stories? And don't forget to keep us updated on your progress through the beauty that is Doctor Who!

Blob: The War Machines is pretty great and probably my favourite First Doctor story. Shame so much of Troughton's run is missing, but what is there is fantastic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 08, 2015, 03:31:49 PM
MY PREDICTION for Before The Flood...

Doctor goes back to the past and there's basically a holo generator which copies the dead people and projects them. He finds a way to copy himself and still live and projects himself...

That doesn't explain how holograms can hold objects though - but that can be explained easily in this type of show

" yadda yadda hard light blah de blah moving on "
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 08, 2015, 05:57:54 PM
That doesn't explain how holograms can hold objects though - but that can be explained easily in this type of show

" yadda yadda hard light blah de blah moving on "
:lol Red Dwarf reference?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 08, 2015, 10:55:55 PM
Blob: The War Machines is pretty great and probably my favourite First Doctor story. Shame so much of Troughton's run is missing, but what is there is fantastic.

The War Machines was definitely up there, although I think the Dalek stories would be my favourites from the first Doctor (not a very original answer), and The Keys of Marinus was a clear favourite of mine from the earliest episodes. The Chase would probably be a clear winner if not for that one dud episode in the middle.

I stuck it out for The Power of the Daleks, which was a great story. It's just a shame that Troughton's first story is entirely missing, so it's hard to get a complete first impression. I'm 3 episodes into The Moon Base, which is also a good one, and the animated episodes are the best quality of the ones I've seen so far. I really like the style of them.

The Cybermen are already a lot better here than in The Tenth Planet. The new voice is a bit hard to understand, but it sounds exactly like the early digital speech synthesizers that were yet to exist, and sounds so mechanical and creepy. The costumes look good too. The Cybermen are kind of weak jobbers at this point though. They're probably allergic to peanut butter, and I bet in the next story they get defeated by unplugging them while charging.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 09, 2015, 03:45:22 AM
I think Season 5 has much more complete or nearly-complete serials so you should be able to get into the Second Doctor a bit more at that point.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 09, 2015, 04:04:26 AM
Looks like there are 4 mostly complete stories, which is still not great, but much better than S4. It's kind of sad that after 9 episodes, I've only seen one full episode of video of Troughton.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 09, 2015, 08:46:30 AM
That doesn't explain how holograms can hold objects though - but that can be explained easily in this type of show

" yadda yadda hard light blah de blah moving on "
:lol Red Dwarf reference?

Yeah but it's as good as any. If i'm right - it will be a throwaway pseudoscience sounding line and then forgotten.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 09, 2015, 08:52:09 AM
The Doctor specifically said they're not holograms.
They're some kind of magnetic creature/projection, hence the fact they disappear during the day cycle when the electromagnetic doors are cycling, and are able to interact with metal objects. They gave several clues to their nature throughout the episode, so it's not throwaway; it appears to be closely related to the entire nature and purpose of the "ghosts".
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 09, 2015, 10:39:30 AM
:blob:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 10, 2015, 02:01:59 AM
I'm finally caught up, until tomorrow. I really liked the last two episodes. I fucking love Missy so much. I am so busy the next few weeks I'll probably have to wait a bit to see the next few episodes... so I'll be avoiding this thread again  :sadpanda:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: James Mypetgiress on October 10, 2015, 09:04:15 AM
I love Missy! Amazing character. I still don't like Peter Capaldi, though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 10:12:11 AM
I love Missy! Amazing character. I still don't like Peter Capaldi, though.

Missy is amazing and Capaldi is the best Dr of the modern "reboot" era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 10, 2015, 01:08:11 PM
I always have a tough time choosing a favorite of the new Doctors, because I think they've all been great and each done their Doctor really great in unique ways. An attempt at naming a favorite usually just leads to me talking about how good they all were.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 01:35:14 PM
Matt was my least fave. But I barely watched it back then.

The episodes I caught with Matt were really bad.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 10, 2015, 01:53:51 PM
If we judge them by the quality of the episodes themselves I'd probably say Eccleston is my least favorite, and Smith my favorite.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on October 10, 2015, 01:59:49 PM
I love Capaldi. I guess if I had to, I would probably rank them Tennant, Capaldi, Eccleston then Smith. Smith grew on me but I really did not like him at first.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 10, 2015, 02:11:29 PM
I love Smith, he's been my favourite Doctor since I saw his first episode. Capaldi is insanely good though, he's shaping up take the #1 spot for me.

That episode was another great one. Loved it!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 03:11:19 PM
I really think Capaldi will be remembered as one of the great Doctors along with Tom Baker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 03:28:40 PM
Just downloading from iPlayer now :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 10, 2015, 03:33:05 PM
Capaldi is fantastic. He has elements of almost every doctor. I also really liked Matt Smith because he modeled his performance after Patrick Troughton.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 03:38:23 PM
Capaldi is fantastic. He has elements of almost every doctor. I also really liked Matt Smith because he modeled his performance after Patrick Troughton.

Interesting. David Tennant was a bit Sylvester McCoy as well. Not just because they're both Scottish either ! :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 04:45:11 PM
Before The Flood...


Great episode . Lots of " Timey Wimey " shit be going down. :lol

I like paradoxes like that. 

I wasn't far off with my guess. The Doctor did copy himself and it was a hologram. And the reason the ghosts exists was explained in one line and then he immediately changed the subject :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 10, 2015, 05:32:27 PM
Oh dear. Next week looks like another Robot Of Sherwood type episode :(
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 10, 2015, 05:46:37 PM
I found this episode slightly weaker than the brilliant Under the Lake, but it was still a very satisfying two-parter, all in all. I liked the timey-wimey-ness of it all and the setting of the Russian village in Scotland was great, but I found the ghosts to be a lot more interesting than the Fisher King and while I understand why it was done, it was kind of a shame that they were sidelined a little two make more time for their boss, who was neither all that interesting (standard Who-fare villain, really, as far as motivations and the evil, sonorous voice go) nor as brilliantly creepy as the ghosts were.

In terms of the characters, the Doctor and Clara were pretty good, but the other characters didn't really feel all that much more fleshed out than in the previous episode, but that wasn't all that character-driven either, so I didn't expect this one to be. Bennett was the one exception, and his portrayal was ace. I could have done the without the love story, especially between Lunn and Cass (Bennett and O'Donnell was okay imo), but it was such a small part of the story that it didn't really hinder my enjoyment either.

Also superbly directed, which is something that I don't really notice unless it's really good or really bad, so that's a compliment.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 10, 2015, 10:09:58 PM
I agree with that, although it's hard to judge whether I consider it weaker, since it's the payoff for what was set up in the previous episode. If they're keeping the glasses, then I'm glad they're also keeping the guitar. :metal I like the dorky fun grandpa thing they've got going on.
I love the timey wimey stuff, and they acknowledged the predestination paradox, which they usually don't in Who.

Another great episode, making a strong season so far. I'm not at all excited for next week's episode, but I said the same thing about Under the Lake, so yeah. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 11, 2015, 12:25:16 AM
Ugh, so good again tonight. This could easily become my favorite season of NuWho if everything remains this good.

And for those not excited about next week-- it has Maisie Williams in it! It's going to be quite the romp.

Also, did anyone love the mention of the "Minister of War" that seems to be some sort of set up for a Big Bad? Toby Whithouse is a phenomenal writer, definitely a candidate to take Moffat's place when he eventually retires.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 11, 2015, 12:31:13 AM
I noticed the mention of the Master before that, didn't read too much into the minister of war though.
And I'm not into GoT, so Maisie Williams doesn't excite me, and neither does the setting. I'll just have to wait until next week and let the episode change my mind! :biggrin:

S8 is up there as one of my favourite seasons, and so far S9 is on track to be better.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 11, 2015, 02:53:02 AM
Season 8 didn't impress me much, but so far season 9 is one of the best!

Great episode once again. I didn't watch the "next week" bit though, but I'm always excited for next week.

Although, the episode did tell us how it was going to end in the first scene. And the mystery on who was in the suspended animation coffin was lost a bit, since I now knew from the very start that it was the Doctor. But still, very good episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 11, 2015, 08:26:25 AM
I get the paradox thingy ( BTTF fan ) - but I missed the bit about why the ghosts were summoning more ghosts if the fisher king had been dead all along ?

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 11, 2015, 08:42:49 AM
Maybe he set the process in motion before he died?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 11, 2015, 08:54:52 AM
I get the paradox thingy ( BTTF fan ) - but I missed the bit about why the ghosts were summoning more ghosts if the fisher king had been dead all along ?



The Fisher King was believed to be dead so he was taken for burial on Earth, but it turns out he was still alive (but weak). He creates the message that embeds itself into people's minds, then he kills some people. These dead "ghosts" are only programmed to transmit this message and kill anyone else who has seen the message, so that the signal becomes cumulatively stronger. Once the Fisher King was killed by the flood, the ghosts were still going about their business of killing endlessly, but had nobody to kill until the future when the spaceship with the message was opened up at the start of Under the Lake.
I think that covers it. Showing more of the Fisher King probably would have helped a bit with the story, and I think a lot of people wanted to see more of him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 11, 2015, 09:15:23 AM
I thought the Fisher King was a cool villain, but I'm not sure I'd want them to have shown more of him. They wisely kept him hidden for pretty long, which made him scarier. Showing him too much after he was eventually revealed would have taken away from that initial feeling a bit.

Really cool creature design though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 11, 2015, 11:00:08 AM
Took me a few minutes to recognise it was Paul Kaye ( aka Dennis Pennis ) as Prentis.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 11, 2015, 05:38:00 PM
So, I think I figured out the whole Maisie Williams thing (if this has already been mentioned, I apologize). She is a new character, and that part in the trailer is from her second episode. Well played Moffat, well played
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 11, 2015, 09:48:06 PM
So, I think I figured out the whole Maisie Williams thing (if this has already been mentioned, I apologize). She is a new character, and that part in the trailer is from her second episode. Well played Moffat, well played

That's what I've expected the whole time. Not sure if Moffat edited the trailer, but obviously they had to include Maisie Williams, and taken out of context they knew it would cause speculation to run wild. But who knows, maybe there is something to it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 17, 2015, 04:14:00 PM
Not a terrible episode.

I liked " Reverse the polarity of the neutron flow...I don't know what that means " :lol :clap:




Also - anyone care to explain the face epiphany ? I know Capaldi played a Roman or Caesar in a David Tennant episode.. How does that ep link to this one ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 17, 2015, 04:57:13 PM
It's basically about Pompeii, and there's an alien plot behind it (you should watch it, it's pretty damn good), and in the end, the Doctor has to decide to let the destruction of Pompeii happen as history knows it. But his companion Donna tells him to, if he can't save everyone, at least save someone, and he saves the Capaldi character whose name I have forgotten - making Capaldi's face his way of telling him to never lose sight of the individual people amid the big picture, and to always save everyone that he can.

Speaking of the episode, it felt a little rushed, but I guess that's just what happens after effectively having a one-parter after so many two-parters - even the best one-parters will feel a little rushed. It was probably my least favourite from the season for that reason, but it still had plenty of things to like and I would probably give it a 7/10 or something like that. The fake Odin-Mire subplot, especially, could have used a little more development, and the pacing felt a little off, but I have a feeling that it might improve after repeat watchings.

Rankings so far:

1. Under the Lake/Before the Flood
3. The Magician's Apprentice/The Witch's Familiar
5. The Girl Who Died
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 17, 2015, 05:03:08 PM
Still better than Robot Of Sherwood !

I want these two episodes over so we can get back to the feel of the first four episodes :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 17, 2015, 05:08:04 PM
While I did enjoy those two stories more than this one, I do think that an entire season of that feel would also not be something that I would be in favour of. I mean, they were pretty dark throughout, and while the darker stories tend to be my favourites, I do recognise that some more light-hearted stuff is necessary for a season to work as a whole.

And yes, miles better than Robot of Sherwood. Not that that's hard. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 17, 2015, 05:09:20 PM
I dunno. I'd love for Capaldi's Doctor to be really dark. Just not as dark as "Miracle Day" :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 17, 2015, 06:55:28 PM
Go back and fix Donna :(
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 17, 2015, 10:34:18 PM
Definitely the weakest of the season for me so far, but not a bad episode.

I just saw the 500 year diary the other day in The Power of the Daleks, so that was a nice reference with the 2000 year diary. I was happy to see the sonic glasses get crushed right away, so I'm hoping they don't return. :lol

The story was kinda average. It felt a bit rushed after The Doctor came up with the plan. I also don't like what they're doing with Clara this season. I'm sure this is all related to this being her final season and is leading to whatever they have planned for her sendoff, but given that there's a vocal subset of fans who seem to hate her, it's not a good direction.

I also felt that after the initial attention brought to his face in Deep Breathe, his revelation in this episode was a bit of a letdown. It was cool as a callback, but is that it? His face was just a reminder? Is that even something he needed to be reminded about when he regenerated?

The best part of the episode was turning Maisie Williams immortal, but from the trailer for next week, the payoff doesn't seem all that interesting.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 18, 2015, 01:02:37 AM
Loved the episode, not better than the first four, but still really good and proving that this season could potentially be the best yet.

Loved the last 20 minutes of the episode especially, the emotional drama was heightened very well.

And Blob, you can't tell anything from a trailer, I'm sure they payoff will be better than you expect...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 18, 2015, 01:24:05 AM
And Blob, you can't tell anything from a trailer, I'm sure they payoff will be better than you expect...

I'm sure it will be, I'm only judging the trailers (the one at the end of the episode, and one on Youtube). I thought Under the Lake would be boring based on the trailer, and thought that was a great episode.
The trailers actually showed very little in general, and basically nothing of how Maisie Williams' character is actually of importance. But in this newest episode, The Doctor had that strange reaction when he first saw her, plus the bit we saw in the original S9 trailer when he sees her, so they're probably intentionally holding back.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 18, 2015, 03:56:51 AM
This episode was super silly. I got some serious Monty Python vibes when "Odin" showed up in the clouds, which in this case, wasn't a good vibe. Didn't really dig this one, and thought it was a bit of a waste of Maisie Williams.

Although, the final scene, with the camera spinning around her with ages going by behind her was awesome. That blew me away. But not much else.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 18, 2015, 04:00:15 AM
Well it was expected after the first 4 episodes.

It'll probably go back to that. I hope anyway :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 18, 2015, 04:26:48 AM
Didn't really dig this one, and thought it was a bit of a waste of Maisie Williams.

I think of this episode as more of a set up for her character, so I'll reserve judgement on that one until the next episode where we get the payoff. But she was an important character to the episode, and the fact she's in GOT doesn't make her any more important than any other guest star for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 18, 2015, 04:37:38 AM
I also don't like what they're doing with Clara this season. I'm sure this is all related to this being her final season and is leading to whatever they have planned for her sendoff, but given that there's a vocal subset of fans who seem to hate her, it's not a good direction.
I genuinely don't know what this means - what direction are they taking her? And there's a vocal subsection of fans that hates literally everything, so Moffat and co have the right approach in just ignoring that and telling the stories they want to tell.

Quote
I also felt that after the initial attention brought to his face in Deep Breathe, his revelation in this episode was a bit of a letdown. It was cool as a callback, but is that it? His face was just a reminder? Is that even something he needed to be reminded about when he regenerated?
I didn't think it was a letdown at all, I thought the idea behind it was excellent and is something that the show touches on from time to time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 18, 2015, 07:37:17 AM
I also don't like what they're doing with Clara this season. I'm sure this is all related to this being her final season and is leading to whatever they have planned for her sendoff, but given that there's a vocal subset of fans who seem to hate her, it's not a good direction.
I genuinely don't know what this means - what direction are they taking her? And there's a vocal subsection of fans that hates literally everything, so Moffat and co have the right approach in just ignoring that and telling the stories they want to tell.

Her character is beginning to validate some of the bitching. She's becoming smug and acting like she's as clever and important as the Doctor, stepping in for the big speeches, and speaking in place of the Doctor. It's becoming a bit grating. I still like her, but it's starting to irk me.

After rewatching the two trailers for next week, I notice a couple of things. First of all, the sonic glasses appear to be fixed (damn). More importantly, they don't show anything of Clara at all from what I could see. I'm very curious as to why that is.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 18, 2015, 07:39:46 AM
Her character is beginning to validate some of the bitching. She's becoming smug and acting like she's as clever and important as the Doctor, stepping in for the big speeches, and speaking in place of the Doctor. It's becoming a bit grating. I still like her, but it's starting to irk me.

I must say I agree with this.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 18, 2015, 02:31:54 PM
They're setting Clara up as a pseudo-Doctor because something very bad is going to happen as a result of her become more calloused and Doctor-ish. I'm all for it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 18, 2015, 02:38:51 PM
They're setting Clara up as a pseudo-Doctor because something very bad is going to happen as a result of her become more calloused and Doctor-ish. I'm all for it.

Missy's Companion.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 18, 2015, 09:19:42 PM
They're setting Clara up as a pseudo-Doctor because something very bad is going to happen as a result of her become more calloused and Doctor-ish. I'm all for it.

I get that feeling, although I'm not happy about it. :lol But it definitely seems they're setting her up for a fall, and The Doctor is going to feel bad about it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 19, 2015, 08:20:30 AM
They're setting Clara up as a pseudo-Doctor because something very bad is going to happen as a result of her become more calloused and Doctor-ish. I'm all for it.

I get that feeling, although I'm not happy about it. :lol But it definitely seems they're setting her up for a fall, and The Doctor is going to feel bad about it.


Maybe we find out that The Doctor put one of those immortality thingies in Clara's bonce and now he's wondering if he did the right thing.

Or he injected it with some Time lord regeneration energy and Clara will be the next Doctor. . .

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 24, 2015, 01:04:36 PM
Just caught up on last week's episode. Definitely not as good as the first four, but if it turns out to be the weakest episode of the series (fingers crossed), Series 9 will be my favourite series so far. Looking forward to the next episode, only 15 mins left, yay!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 24, 2015, 01:08:32 PM
I don't have TV so i'm waiting for it on the iPlayer.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 24, 2015, 02:08:41 PM
You can watch it live using iPlayer, can't you?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 24, 2015, 02:43:21 PM
You can watch it live using iPlayer, can't you?

Not supposed to. you're meant to have a tv licence to watch live tv.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on October 24, 2015, 03:22:32 PM
Ah, I understand.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 24, 2015, 04:12:36 PM
Hang about.

Tonight's episode. The place the Doctor gets out of the TARDIS looks exactly the same place he gets

out at the start of the previous episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 24, 2015, 08:24:25 PM
I thought this was the best episode of this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 24, 2015, 11:33:41 PM
A bit better than last week's episode, but still nothing on the first four. While last week's episode had a very rushed pace at the end for the sake of Ashildr's character, this week's episode had a somewhat slow pace in the first half for the sake of Ashildr's character.

I thought the idea for Ashildr's character was really good, but for a two part episode, they just didn't do anywhere near enough with the idea. This double episode was why I was worried about a season that relied so heavily on two parters. Instead of getting one weaker episode, you get two in a row instead. It wasn't actually bad, but at no point was I invested in the episode, it just felt like it was going through the motions to finish her arc.

It was also weird for The Doctor to go on an adventure without Clara. Her absence was kind of random. I'd like to see Ashildr return at some point though so they can develop the idea better, since technically she could be in any time period after the initial encounter now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 25, 2015, 03:40:44 AM
Yeah, defintetly better than last week, although not as good as the first four.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 25, 2015, 05:19:57 AM
A bit better than last week's episode, but still nothing on the first four. While last week's episode had a very rushed pace at the end for the sake of Ashildr's character, this week's episode had a somewhat slow pace in the first half for the sake of Ashildr's character.

The hangman scene was extremely rushed. "Swift" didn't seem at all bothered about dying and his joy at being alive afterwards was unwarranted.

Then Ashildr went from not caring about anyone to suddenly caring about everyone and then just using her immortality device. So that's the end of that plot thread !

But hey - they can't all be as good as the first four.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 25, 2015, 05:38:40 AM
While I thought this was the least good 2-parter so far this season, there was still lots to enjoy and some great stuff. Some of the comments here are a bit strange.

"Swift" didn't seem at all bothered about dying
How so? He was joking precisely because he knew that as long as he kept the crowd laughing he remained alive. He was definitely bothered.

Quote
and his joy at being alive afterwards was unwarranted.
See above.

Quote
Then Ashildr went from not caring about anyone to suddenly caring about everyone
Well, yes, that was the whole point. The Doctor knew that she didn't really not care about anyone. It wasn't a sudden change, it was a sudden realisation.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 25, 2015, 06:02:19 AM
The story was little more than window-dressing and there were quite a few logical inconsistencies and an utterly replaceable Generic Alien Threat/InvasionTM, but I felt that none of that mattered, because Ashildr was at the heart of this episode and she was brilliant. The interaction between her and the Doctor was spot-on. Maisie Williams is a brilliant, brilliant actress.

Still my least favourite two-parter from the season, but that's mainly because the first two were so good - this season is shaping up amazingly and I look forward to what Moffat does with next weeks Zygon story. I really like the slower pacing that the two-parters bring to Season 9, and I hope that it will continue in the future, though some single-parters might be good idea too - actually, in terms of single-parters/two-parters, I found the first five seasons to be pretty much perfect.

1. Under the Lake/Before the Flood
2. The Magician's Apprentice/The Witch's Familiar
3. The Girl Who Died/The Woman Who Lived
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 25, 2015, 09:06:35 AM
]Well, yes, that was the whole point. The Doctor knew that she didn't really not care about anyone. It wasn't a sudden change, it was a sudden realisation.

Not the fact that it happened. Just the length of time it took to happen. Which I know is my usual gripe with these things. :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on October 25, 2015, 08:45:21 PM
People complaining about this episode feeling weak when we just had a season with "In the Forest of the Night" are kind of confusing me. I thought this was a great episode, a great character piece, too. It's nice when the threat/problem is second to the character development and interaction sometimes. I thought Maisie was brilliant, and setting her up like they have means there will be a definite return.

Also, yay for the Captain Jack shoutout. I would love him to return to the show.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 25, 2015, 08:57:15 PM
An episode can be weak without being "In The Forest of the Night" weak. That was the benchmark of bad!  :lol

If these last two episodes are as weak as the season gets, then it's still on track to be the strongest season of the modern series. I don't see people hating on these episodes, it's more that the first four episodes were so strong, so it's only a relative measure. :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 26, 2015, 02:02:32 AM
It's nice when the threat/problem is second to the character development and interaction sometimes.
Agreed, and usually I'm not all that interested in what the threat is in Doctor Who. Perfect example: Vincent and the Doctor. Absolutely rubbish monster, but superb episode, one of the very best.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 26, 2015, 02:14:34 AM
I'd say Love and Monsters is the example of a bad DW episode. Forest of the Night is Citizen Kane compared to that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2015, 02:22:10 AM
I'd say Love and Monsters is the example of a bad DW episode. Forest of the Night is Citizen Kane compared to that.

That's kinda splitting hairs imo. :lol They're both total crap.
There's just something about Doctor Who and kids that does not mix. Forest of the Night, Fear Her, Night Terrors, I'm sure there are more. Kids ruin everything. :getoffmylawn:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on October 26, 2015, 02:29:16 AM
I didn't actually hate Night Terrors, but it was definitely a weaker episode, even in Season 6, probably only better than The Curse of the Black Spot and maaaaaybe Let's Kill Hitler.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 26, 2015, 02:38:53 AM
I wouldn't even put it in the ballpark of those episodes. I liked both of those episodes, even though neither are among the better of the season. Night Terrors has nothing to redeem it. Annoying jerk kid, and a silly imagined doll house as the threat.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 26, 2015, 03:59:05 AM
I thought Night Terrors was very good, and enjoyed Love & Monsters just fine. Fear Her is fairly terrible though, and Forest of the Night isn't very good either.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on October 26, 2015, 04:02:36 AM
Had to look up which episode Night Terrors was, but yeah, I didn't mind that one either. Not that I can remember, at least.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 26, 2015, 07:10:18 PM
Not a huge audio drama fan (other than We're Alive) but I will certainly try to get my hands on this: https://www.vulture.com/2015/10/tennant-and-tate-returning-to-the-who-niverse.html
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 31, 2015, 11:07:35 PM
Decent episode this week. The Doctor didn't do a lot, but it looks like it will be much more reliant on him next week with everyone else taken out. I can't think of much else to say about it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 01, 2015, 01:50:48 AM
The soldiers agreeing to follow the aliens into the church was infuriating. They know the enemy are shapeshifting aliens, and the lead soldier gave in so easily. He tried two questions, one of which the alien didn't even bother to answer. Maybe because the Zygon knew just how completely stupid this guy was. Damn.

Clara makes a really good evil-face though. That whole twist was cool.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 01, 2015, 02:44:11 AM
Yeah, those soldiers knew in advance what was going to happen, and were actively being told it was a trap, so there's no way you'd go inside. Admittedly it would be very difficult to shoot an imposter who looks exactly like a loved one, but any other soldier could have taken the shot instead. Or there are any number of ways you could handle the situation without falling into a blatant trap.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 01, 2015, 02:50:54 AM
Yes, he could have asked the question about his birth again. The alien just ignored that one, and "I don't remember" just wouldn't work there. Or he could have shot it in the foot or something. I think for the sake of world security that would have been acceptable. Or if he didn't have the balls for that then like you said someone else could have done it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 01, 2015, 03:52:06 AM
I also forgot, there was another mention of a hybrid, with Osgood being a mix of Zygon and human. First there was Dalek / Timelord, then the human / Mire hybrid of Ashildr, now this one. I am curious what comes of that prophecy, perhaps it has something to do with Clara's departure?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 01, 2015, 05:13:26 AM
Noticed that too. Interesting to see what they have in store. Also, I'm guessing the Doctor's "confession" will come back into play at some point and it will all tie together.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 01, 2015, 08:48:37 AM
Another great episode. Season 9 is shaping up to be my favourite New Who - it might even top Season 5 if it continues like this.

Clara makes a great villain.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on November 04, 2015, 06:03:34 AM
I finished season 2 last night. I can't get over how amazing this show is. It's got some of the best writing I've ever seen. So many feels in that last episode. I'm going to miss Rose. I really liked her.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 04, 2015, 06:18:50 AM
If you think it's amazing at that point, your head is going to explode once you get to the good stuff like Day of the Doctor. :biggrin:

I've watched a few more episodes in my classic viewing.

The Evil of the Daleks was slow for the most part, but once it got to Skaro it was pretty cool. Farewell to the Daleks for now. The reconstructions for this story were the most elaborate so far, which made it a little easier to watch.

The Tomb of the Cybermen was the best Cyberman story so far, and introduced a lot of elements. The first appearance of the Cybermats, the first appearance of a Cyber Controller, and the ladders have been reused as generic Cyberman wall sections in more recent stories. That was neat. A good story overall too.

The Ice Warriors was ok. The Ice Warriors weren't too exciting with their whisper voices, but I love the 1960s futuristic look. So funky.

The Enemy of the World is pretty good so far. I'm not sure how I feel about Troughton playing a Mexican Dictator, but he does a good job of it, and the introduction of the underground group creating the natural disasters is a good element.

Jamie has been a pretty good companion so far, he's got some fire in him. Victoria doesn't do much, but she's damn cute, so she gets a pass.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 04, 2015, 08:22:04 AM
I really like the Enemy of the World, definitely one of my favourite classic stories. Tomb is also great.

And yeah, Jamie is awesome and Victoria is kinda rubbish but gorgeous. Pretty soon you'll meet Zoe (think she joins in the Wheel in Space) who is best of all worlds - cute AND awesome (which isn't to say that Jamie isn't cute of course :P ).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 04, 2015, 08:23:08 AM
I snigger everytime I hear Zygon because my bro and I have a running joke that all aliens in kids shows are either called, or come from the planet called Zargon :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 04, 2015, 08:31:40 AM
I really like the Enemy of the World, definitely one of my favourite classic stories. Tomb is also great.

And yeah, Jamie is awesome and Victoria is kinda rubbish but gorgeous. Pretty soon you'll meet Zoe (think she joins in the Wheel in Space) who is best of all worlds - cute AND awesome (which isn't to say that Jamie isn't cute of course :P ).

But is she cuter than Victoria? :biggrin:

I also forgot to mention I really like the second doctor now, just as much as the first, maybe even more. The moment that sealed the deal for me was in The Evil of the Daleks, the first time the Dalek wheels in. The look on Troughton's face and the way he reacted was just excellent. He always puts in a great performance.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 04, 2015, 10:36:37 AM
I love Troughton, he's definitely one of my favourites. Among the classic Doctors, he sits only behind Tom Baker for me.

But is she cuter than Victoria? :biggrin:
IMO, yes. Though that may be influenced by the fact that she's less useless. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on November 04, 2015, 11:06:55 AM
Jamie is my favorite companion. He and troughton work so well together. They also liked to improv a bit, and sneak inside jokes of their own into the show as much as they could.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 07, 2015, 05:26:05 PM
Capaldi's acting in the Osgood box scene. :metal


And next week looks nice & dark again a la Under The Lake.

And Reece Shearsmith !!! :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 07, 2015, 10:01:24 PM
I thought last week's episode was ok, but the payoff with this week's episode was amazing.
At first I was a little annoyed that Clara was so tough she could overcome the Zygon, but once the Zygon overcame her, I enjoyed the whole idea.
The Osgood box scene was the centerpiece of the whole episode, and tied it back into The Day of the Doctor wonderfully. I like that there wasn't much action in this episode, and it was all talking it out, without losing any steam.
While it initially seemed like a cheap way for Osgood to return, I thought the way it fitted into the episode was great too.

And The Doctor was in top form this episode. Capaldi continues to get better and better in the role.

I'm excited for the tail end of this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 08, 2015, 06:48:45 AM
Holy shit, The Doctor's monologue about the time war may be one of the best things this show has done. Perfect moment of Doctor Who.

Yeah, this episide was loads better than last week. The entire box scene was really well written and really intense.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 08, 2015, 05:38:31 PM
Yeah, that was an amazing amazing episode. Holy shit that monologue.

This has the story rocketing to the top of the season for me, and so far, the season has been superbly amazing. Not a single episode that I'd call weak.

1. The Zygon Invasion/The Zygon Inversion
2. Under the Lake/Before the Flood
3. The Magician's Apprentice/The Witch's Familiar
4. The Girl Who Died/The Woman Who Lived

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 08, 2015, 09:22:49 PM
It's hard to rank this season, but I think I'd go-

1. The Magician's Apprentice/The Witch's Familiar
2. Under the Lake/Before the Flood
3. The Zygon Invasion/The Zygon Inversion
4. The Girl Who Died/The Woman Who Lived

The first two area probably interchangeable. The Zygon Inversion alone is one of the best things they've done, but The Zygon Invasion was only "good". Even The Girl Who Died / The Woman Who Lived weren't bad, but they were average for me.
If that's as bad as it gets, this season will be the best of nuWho. The rest of the season looks like it could be amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 09, 2015, 02:25:35 AM
What are your thoughts on how two-parter heavy this season is? I personally love it, they've been using the extra time to develop more complex plotlines extremely well, and to superb effect.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 09, 2015, 02:34:51 AM
In the past I've been very mixed on Doctor Who's two parters, but this season I think they've largely done an excellent job. The two parts of each story have all had distinct differences that keep each episode interesting and unique, and as you've said they've used the extra time to develop the plots and characters better. They haven't felt drawn out, or crammed with confusing subplots, they've made use of the double episodes perfectly.

The only one that I've felt didn't entirely work was The Girl Who Died / The Woman Who Lived. It was a nice idea, but the first episode's plot was very rushed and secondary so they could set up the immortality plot, and then the next episode's plot also felt very secondary without a good payoff for that story imo. I am interested for her upcoming appearance though.

On that note, are the next two episodes at all related? They don't appear to be from the information I've seen, but maybe there will be some connection I don't know of, or that won't be known until we see it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 09, 2015, 03:20:42 AM
Doesn't sound like it. They're the only episodes this season given separate story numbers on Wikipedia, not that this particularly means anything but it's generally kept pretty up to date and accurate by geeky types. :P

And I'm definitely loving the two-parters, and have bemoaned the lack of them in the last few seasons. I do think the stories have better pacing a development than when everything is squeezed into single episodes. Not that single episodes can't be absolutely wonderful, as they are sometimes, but when every episode is like that, I just felt there wasn't enough in the way of strong stories.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 09, 2015, 03:32:25 AM
Yes. The fact that there was a lot that was crammed into one episode was a complaint of mine from the last series.

Nothing was dwelled on - something was introduced and resolved a scene later.

Now they have time to let things breathe.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 09, 2015, 07:13:25 AM
Very much digging the double episodes, those are often my favorites.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 09, 2015, 08:55:50 AM
As much as I hate " To Be Continued ".

I do prefer a longer story.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 09, 2015, 09:00:59 AM
I have no problem with "to be continued", I don't even mind it with a year between. A week is nothing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 09, 2015, 09:37:30 AM
I'm not a huge DW fan so I could probably leave watching part 1 of a 2 part episode a week and then watch both.

I did that with Under The Lake.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 09, 2015, 09:42:52 AM
Aren't you a fan of Classic Who, Kotow? Those used to have 4-6 parters, which meant LOADS of "to be continued"s. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 09, 2015, 09:49:43 AM
Aren't you a fan of Classic Who, Kotow? Those used to have 4-6 parters, which meant LOADS of "to be continued"s. :P

I was when I was about 9 :lol

Back then I didn't understand what regenerating was and watched every week in case Tom Baker came back. :p

I enjoyed Peter Davison though but like most people - was not a Colin Baker fan at all.

I remember liking Sylvester McCoy though.

Didn't really like the TV Movie.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 09, 2015, 12:38:47 PM
Speaking of long stories, one of my favourite Classic Who stories is the longest story that still exists in full - The War Games. Definitely some of Troughton's best.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 09, 2015, 12:40:37 PM
I wish the new series would do 4-6 parters, the more serialised it is the better.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 09, 2015, 12:41:04 PM
Tom Baker was definitely awesome, and Davison was good although not one of my favourites. I can see why people were less keen on Colin Baker - he was really offputting at first (which was very much the writing) though once they made him less confrontational I quite liked him. In the Big Finish audio dramas that I've listened to, he's really good.

McCoy was decent though probably one of my lesser favourites. Some of his stories were great though, I liked the darker tone.

McGann was excellent as the Doctor, but the movie was pretty bad. :lol Again in the audio dramas he is so so good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 14, 2015, 09:22:31 PM
I probably should have listened to the dude at the beginning when he said not to watch it. :P

Pretty average episode that will just blur together in my mind with the dozen other Doctor Who episodes just like it. Humans on some kind of space ship/station in the future, generic alien that doesn't really make sense, basic horror episode, except without seeing the actual horror and killing in this instance. I'm glad they didn't use up two episodes for this.
I mean, it wasn't bad, but it was extremely unremarkable.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 15, 2015, 02:52:36 AM
Yeah, not the best. Still fun enough though.

Something I don't get; is the danger over now? Won't there be a part two? It seemed like the danger was just getting started there at the end.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 15, 2015, 02:58:33 AM
As far as I can tell, next week's episode is completely unrelated. No "to be continued...", different writer, I think it's just meant to leave it open as part of the horror story thing, to make the little kiddies scared of sleep or popular 1950s music or something.

The trailer for next week's episode on Youtube is better, and actually shows Ashildr/Me. It's a new writer too, so that will be interesting. Hopefully it's good. Mark Gatiss should stop writing for Doctor Who, seriously.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 15, 2015, 11:09:00 AM
It had to come eventually - an episode that I didn't like. It tried to put all that "None of this makes any sense." into a plot point, but it didn't really answer any question as to what really happened, and just felt kind of lazy, like "Wow look, let's use lazy plot devices all around but by being all self-aware, that makes them better!" Um, no. If you're aware of your story not making any fucking sense, write a different story.

Rasmussen was brilliantly acted, though, and the Doctor was great as always. Still, all in all, this was clearly the weakest of the season.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 15, 2015, 11:38:05 AM
As far as I can tell, next week's episode is completely unrelated. No "to be continued...", different writer, I think it's just meant to leave it open as part of the horror story thing, to make the little kiddies scared of sleep or popular 1950s music or something.

That's pretty huge then. I mean, like, end of humanity huge. That's what was at stake right? And the Doctor failed. And is everything alright with Clara now? She was in the Morpheus chamber as well. I'd be surprised if this was indeed the last of all of this we heard.

I wouldn't say it's the weekest of the season, since I still think the goofyness of The Girl Who Died made it a worse episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 15, 2015, 11:49:43 AM
That's pretty huge then. I mean, like, end of humanity huge. That's what was at stake right? And the Doctor failed. And is everything alright with Clara now? She was in the Morpheus chamber as well. I'd be surprised if this was indeed the last of all of this we heard.
I believe a sequel is planned, but for a future season so presumably not Clara-related.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Aefenwelg on November 20, 2015, 10:40:32 AM
So I just got hugely spoiled by Facebook, but apparently

Capaldi confirmed tomorrow's episode is Clara's last
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 20, 2015, 10:43:29 AM
So I just got hugely spoiled by Facebook, but apparently

Capaldi confirmed tomorrow's episode is Clara's last

 :metal
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 21, 2015, 01:58:11 PM
Man, that was a really good episode. Looks like it's going to be an interesting run to the end of the season!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 21, 2015, 04:08:07 PM
SPOILER











I'm sure Moffatt can bring back Clara in the future if they both want to.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 21, 2015, 08:06:51 PM
Man, that was a really good episode. Looks like it's going to be an interesting run to the end of the season!

Yeah, this was a big transitional episode. It's a fitting end to this season's arc of Clara being reckless like The Doctor and being overconfident. Hopefully I don't have to see too much shit from the Clara haters celebrating her being gone.  :'(

Next week's episode looks good. Capaldi can definitely carry an episode on his own.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 22, 2015, 02:22:10 AM
It started off sort of silly, but the entire second half of the episode made up for it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 22, 2015, 02:48:39 AM
Man, that was a really good episode. Looks like it's going to be an interesting run to the end of the season!

Yeah, this was a big transitional episode. It's a fitting end to this season's arc of Clara being reckless like The Doctor and being overconfident. Hopefully I don't have to see too much shit from the Clara haters celebrating her being gone.  :'(
Definitely, and as is so often the case, the way things were going were part of the story arc. I never understand why people get really whiny about things like that (Clara becoming too cocky) before having the chance to see how it plays out.

Quote
Next week's episode looks good. Capaldi can definitely carry an episode on his own.
Hell yeah, I love unusual things like that so am very intrigued.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 22, 2015, 03:03:27 AM
Man, that was a really good episode. Looks like it's going to be an interesting run to the end of the season!

Yeah, this was a big transitional episode. It's a fitting end to this season's arc of Clara being reckless like The Doctor and being overconfident. Hopefully I don't have to see too much shit from the Clara haters celebrating her being gone.  :'(
Definitely, and as is so often the case, the way things were going were part of the story arc. I never understand why people get really whiny about things like that (Clara becoming too cocky) before having the chance to see how it plays out.


It was obvious from the start how it would play out, but it doesn't change that it was obnoxious to watch at times. I would rather them have not gone that route with her at all.


The style of the next episode looks to be what I was hoping for when I found out he'd be carrying it solo. I can't wait to see how he gets out of the predicament without the TARDIS, and deals with the death of Clara without anyone to keep him grounded. The name of the episode "Hell Bent" may give some indication of his state of mind coming out of that!
And it will be nice to see just Capaldi, because there have been times where I felt Clara has taken over and left The Doctor under-utilized.
Despite the circumstances, I'm hoping there's still some humour in next week's episode too, because Capaldi has been hilarious this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 22, 2015, 06:41:01 AM
I fucking loved that episode. What a fitting end to Clara's character arc, and the acting was sublime. A bit technobabble-y with the Quantum Shade, but it was really only a minor grievance. Everything worked together really well and even though a lot happened, it never felt rushed in any way.

And man, that final scene... so good.

Can't wait for next week! Ten minutes longer than usual, apparently, so that's going to be awesome (I hope). If the final two-parter is anywhere near as good as the rest of the season (minus maybe Sleep No More, but it seems we've got to have the obligatory Gatiss misstep every season :\ ), then Season 9 will stand high above any other season of the show for me.

1. The Zygon Invasion / The Zygon Inversion
2. Face the Raven
3. Under the Lake / Before the Flood
4. The Magician's Apprentice / The Witch's Familiar
5. The Girl Who Died / The Woman Who Lived




6. Sleep No More
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 22, 2015, 06:52:53 AM
#GatissNoMore
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 22, 2015, 07:32:37 AM
I'd have no problem with that. It's been a long time since I really enjoyed a Gatiss episode.

The Crimson Horror, okay. But going back beyond that... maybe The Unquiet Dead? He's better on Sherlock by a mile, his only real dud there is The Empty Hearse, and even that has tons of great moments, it just doesn't work as a whole for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 22, 2015, 09:11:43 AM
Thing is, while Gatiss episodes are never my favourites, I never dislike them either, and he always brings a certain horror influence that pretty much none of the other writers bring. One of the big selling points about Doctor Who for me is the variety, and that's also one of the reasons for its popularity (for all the stuff that most people here in the thread love, there will be other parts of the fanbase that hate it). So I want Gatiss to keep doing his thing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on November 25, 2015, 05:58:25 PM
Just realized I never posted my thoughts on Face the Raven.

It was pretty phenomenal overall, a very interesting build up and the final scenes were definitely dark and depressing, but I am excited to see where this goes. It's all pointing towards Gallifrey and the Time Lords-- the Time Lords have trapped the Doctor in a nightmare-ish universe before, so this isn't unprecedented. I think Capaldi has really made a case for best actor to play the Doctor this season, and the next two episodes will probably give that more credence.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 28, 2015, 04:47:11 PM
That was absolutely superb. This series has just been amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 28, 2015, 04:51:33 PM
Yes and it had good pacing for a single episode.

I kept checking the time and hoping they resolved it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 28, 2015, 04:57:32 PM
Just read on twitter that

POSSIBLE SPOILER

" The Hybrid is ME "  could refer to Ashildr.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Coolcat on November 28, 2015, 07:46:57 PM
When do we get a new doctor? (just wondering)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on November 28, 2015, 08:10:44 PM
Uhm, hopefully not soon, because Capaldi is amazing.

Easily the best episode of this season, maybe even the series alone. I am floored.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 28, 2015, 09:16:14 PM
Fucking fuck. That was amazing. I knew instantly the person pulling the lever was the Doctor, and figured out it was his confession dial once he figured out he could stop the monster by telling the truth. The whole setup was cool, and the concept with the TARDIS scenes was not only a great expositional device, but also added a lot more depth to the moments where he appears to just magically know the answer to everything. I loved it.

I have a few questions. First of all, if he'd been there 7000 years and there were that many skulls, shouldn't there have been no room left after 2 billion years? :lol Like, I was expecting him to dive and just land on a pile of skulls.
I also wonder, did he give the same confessions every loop, or was it somehow slightly different each time and he gave billions of years worth of confessions?

Also, spending billions of years chipping away at that wall was epic.

Next week's episode looks just as amazing. Bring on the Time Lords! I think Ashildr could be the hybrid. After all, humanity could be considered a warrior race.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 01:24:55 AM
Holy crap, this trailer for Hell Bent has me even more excited.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yak3ujqxDw


Spoilers from the trailer-

The barn from The Day of the Doctor / Listen makes another appearance, it looks like The Doctor escapes in a stock TARDIS, with the classic interior, and a Dalek appearance, and a weeping angel.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: wasteland on November 29, 2015, 01:43:12 AM
This was probably the best episode of Doctor Who (and consequently of any TV series) that I have ever seen. If there is anything fair in the way this sorry world spins, awards should rain on the heads of Peter Capaldi, Steven Moffat and Rachel Talaley.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 01:49:27 AM
This was probably the best episode of Doctor Who (and consequently of any TV series) that I have ever seen. If there is anything fair in the way this sorry world spins, awards should rain on the heads of Peter Capaldi, Steven Moffat and Rachel Talaley.

Anybody who sees this episode and thinks modern Who isn't as good as it used to be can eat my poo (and most likely is just a Moffat hater who didn't understand the episode properly).
It seems as if the general response to this episode is excellent though, as it should be.

If next week's episode lives up to the trailer, I think this will be the best season of modern Doctor Who yet. The only true stinker was Sleep No More.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 29, 2015, 02:54:45 AM
I have a few questions. First of all, if he'd been there 7000 years and there were that many skulls, shouldn't there have been no room left after 2 billion years? :lol Like, I was expecting him to dive and just land on a pile of skulls.
No, bone breaks down over time as well (just much slower than flesh), so after millions of years the oldest skulls would have desolved to nothing. Though after 2 billion years the water will have been largely bone matter. :lol

Just read on twitter that

POSSIBLE SPOILER

" The Hybrid is ME "  could refer to Ashildr.
Yeah I did think that might be the case; initial reaction was obviously that it was the Doctor, but that would require Moffat to resurrect the whole Paul McGann half-human thing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 03:22:21 AM
Why your hands ?

Why not kick it or use a shovel ?

 :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 29, 2015, 03:27:38 AM
Got to agree that this was one of the best episodes of Doctor Who ever. The moment I realized why he was punshing the wall was amazing.

Why your hands ?

Why not kick it or use a shovel ?

 :biggrin:

Because punshing your way through 20 feet of a wall harder than diamonds with your bare hands is just more badass ;)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 03:28:35 AM

Because punching your way through 20 feet of a wall harder than diamonds with your bare hands is just more badass ;)

And more stupid  :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 03:56:15 AM
I have a few questions. First of all, if he'd been there 7000 years and there were that many skulls, shouldn't there have been no room left after 2 billion years? :lol Like, I was expecting him to dive and just land on a pile of skulls.
No, bone breaks down over time as well (just much slower than flesh), so after millions of years the oldest skulls would have desolved to nothing. Though after 2 billion years the water will have been largely bone matter. :lol


The more you know! :lol

Why your hands ?

Why not kick it or use a shovel ?

 :biggrin:

I was wondering why he didn't try to use his ring to scratch at it. Probably more effective than punching it. But by the time he manages to get into room 12, he's basically trapped by the Veil, so he probably doesn't have the opportunity to use the shovel or any more advanced tools than what is on his person.

Plus as BlackInk said, badass factor. :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 03:59:44 AM
So now the Doctor is just an exact copy of himself.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 04:07:00 AM
So now the Doctor is just an exact copy of himself.

Yep (assuming the matter transporter was exactly as it appeared, and not some weird simulation as part of the confession dial. Who knows with the Time Lords.)

Given how much he's been through in time and space, with the constant dematerialization and transporting he's done, he was probably a copy thousands of times over long before this episode too. And then there's regeneration.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 29, 2015, 06:07:17 AM
Given how much he's been through in time and space, with the constant dematerialization and transporting he's done, he was probably a copy thousands of times over long before this episode too. And then there's regeneration.
Exactly, and I think his ongoing monalogue explained that well. Every time you "teleport", you're converted into a signal and that signal is used to create a perfect copy of you. So this was just a case of repeatedly using the same signal.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 08:56:53 AM
It was a pretty bleak concept. The positive is that each new Doctor didn't have the memory of 2 billion previous attempts.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 08:58:33 AM
The memory of 2 billion years of being tormented and killed? Yep, that would truly suck. :lol

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 08:59:57 AM
The memory of 2 billion years of being tormented and killed? Yep, that would truly suck. :lol

That's the thing that kept me from being utterly miserable after that episode. If each time he started over - he remembered.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 09:02:50 AM
Him remembering would take the fun out of having to figure it out each iteration, so after the first time he'd just sit by the door waiting to chip away at that wall. I liked seeing The Doctor figure it out the same on each loop, but each time realizing he's further and further into the future.
Imagine looking up at the stars, realizing 2 billion years have gone by, and realizing you've lived and died possibly a billion times trying to escape. That's bleak enough already.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 09:11:12 AM
Next week will probably end the series on a cliffhanger - can't wait for that ! :P

I just want to see him back in his TARDIS and off on more adventures  :biggrin:

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 29, 2015, 10:36:47 AM
Imagine looking up at the stars, realizing 2 billion years have gone by, and realizing you've lived and died possibly a billion times trying to escape. That's bleak enough already.

Got to be a hell of a lot more than 1 billion times though don't you think? He was there for 2 billion years, and each cycle felt like it might have covered a few days. So more like a few hundred billion tries.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 29, 2015, 10:46:22 AM
Oh man, that episode was superbly amazing. I don't think that I have enough good things to say about it! The design of the whole thing, the atmosphere, the monster, the music, the story, Peter Capaldi... A++ from me.

One minor niggle: why didn't the diamond wall reset (other than storytelling purposes?), was there any explanation for that?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 29, 2015, 10:48:34 AM
One minor niggle: why didn't the diamond wall reset (other than storytelling purposes?), was there any explanation for that?

Good point, I don't believe there was. Maybe because it was meant to be a way out all along? I don't know.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 11:09:50 AM
One minor niggle: why didn't the diamond wall reset (other than storytelling purposes?), was there any explanation for that?

Good point, I don't believe there was. Maybe because it was meant to be a way out all along? I don't know.


They probably never expected him to get out and thought an impenetrable wall would be enough.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 29, 2015, 01:05:59 PM
SPOILERS (seriously, don't click this link if you haven't seen Heaven Sent!): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_coTas61rs
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on November 29, 2015, 01:27:53 PM
I saw the joke coming from second one but it still cracked me up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on November 29, 2015, 01:44:44 PM
I saw the joke coming from second one but it still cracked me up.

From the second one what ? :neverusethis:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 29, 2015, 01:48:11 PM
Last 3 episodes have been very bad. Looking forward to the season break, maybe it will freshen things up for the next one. Makes me sad that they have Coleman and such a brilliant Capaldi, but neither had a story to reach their potential, especially with Clara.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 29, 2015, 02:00:27 PM
I don't think I have ever agreed with your opinion on Doctor Who (just an observation - as long as it's not bashing, I don't particularly care what other people think about things I like, I just found it curious. :P ).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 29, 2015, 02:34:16 PM
Also, just because I've done it after every episode: rankings!

1. Heaven Sent
2. The Zygon Invasion / The Zygon Inversion
3. Face the Raven
4. Under the Lake / Before the Flood
5. The Magician's Apprentice / The Witch's Familiar
6. The Girl Who Died / The Woman Who Lived
7. Sleep No More
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 29, 2015, 02:41:09 PM
I don't think I have ever agreed with your opinion on Doctor Who (just an observation - as long as it's not bashing, I don't particularly care what other people think about things I like, I just found it curious. :P ).
I get that a lot, on a variety of subjects. I'm used to it :). Not exactly sure why I don't like a large part of the show anymore, after that season break before the Ponds retired the show has been lacking something substantial and most of the stories haven't drawn me in like they used to and I can't quite put my finger on what's that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on November 29, 2015, 07:30:33 PM
Yo man if you didn't enjoy Heaven Sent then I think there's no hope for you liking the show. That was literally the best episode of Who yet, likely. The episodes weren't bad, you just didn't like them. They've gotten overwhelming positive reception, the whole season has.

Anyways, the diamond wall didn't reset because it was outside of the main castle -- just as the skulls in the water didn't reset. Plus who would have thought he'd ever break through anyways!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 29, 2015, 08:36:45 PM
Imagine looking up at the stars, realizing 2 billion years have gone by, and realizing you've lived and died possibly a billion times trying to escape. That's bleak enough already.

Got to be a hell of a lot more than 1 billion times though don't you think? He was there for 2 billion years, and each cycle felt like it might have covered a few days. So more like a few hundred billion tries.

I apparently don't know the difference between years and days. :lolpalm: I was figuring a couple of days each cycle, but forgot it was actually years. A big ball of wibbley wobbley timey wimey failure by me.

And seriously, anybody who didn't love that last episode doesn't even deserve to watch Doctor Who.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 30, 2015, 11:34:13 AM
Not sure if this "seriously" is serious, but if it is - this is one of the silliest things I've read this month.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on November 30, 2015, 01:34:00 PM
Guys, chill. Who cares if somebody likes something? I mean, I agree with you that Season 9 has been Doctor Who at the peak of its game, and I also agree that if abydos doesn't like it, then I doubt he's going to like future seasons all that much, but still, that's his thing. Why the hostility? As long there's no "dr who sux bring back rtd david tennent capaldi is a joke lol moffat", what the beef?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 30, 2015, 03:27:38 PM
I don't think there was any hostility - Blob's comment was slightly mean but I think it was in jest.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 30, 2015, 07:13:38 PM
I didn't mean seriously as in you seriously need to stop watching Doctor Who, I meant that if you're actually being serious about not liking the last episodes (which is honestly baffling to me if you're a Who fan), then it's probably not the show for you any more, because imo this is Doctor Who at its absolute best.
I didn't mean it to be mean spirited, I'm just very surprised anybody can not appreciate how great that episode was.

But I'm honoured that you rank the silliness of everything you read on a month by month basis, and then let me know where I rank! :)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 30, 2015, 11:28:53 PM
I just had a thought about the next episode, Hell Bent.
I don't know where this Gallifrey is in the timeline, but I wonder if it's possible we'll finally see the 12th Doctor's involvement with the events of The Day of the Doctor? It would be cool if the episode ends with The Doctor helping to stick Gallifrey in the pocket universe. I didn't see a lot in the trailer that indicated it was in the thick of the time war though, so maybe that's off base.
I also wonder if the hybrid has something to do with Missy, since we last saw her with some scheme with the Daleks. I would also have expected that in the trailer though, unless they're being really sneaky with it.

I'm sure both of those will be wrong. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on December 01, 2015, 07:50:29 AM
Also, just because I've done it after every episode: rankings!

1. Heaven Sent
2. The Zygon Invasion / The Zygon Inversion
3. Face the Raven
4. Under the Lake / Before the Flood
5. The Magician's Apprentice / The Witch's Familiar
6. The Girl Who Died / The Woman Who Lived
7. Sleep No More

I'd put Magician's Apprentice after Zygon and Face the Raven after The Girl Who Died arc
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 02, 2015, 10:07:37 AM
Peter Jackson is set to direct a future episode of Doctor Who!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 02, 2015, 10:08:29 AM
Peter Jackson is set to direct 3 future episodes of Doctor Who!

FTFY :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 05, 2015, 06:47:11 PM
Hell Bent  :tup :tup :tup

Great Ending.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 05, 2015, 06:47:55 PM

I also wonder if the hybrid has something to do with Missy

:tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 05, 2015, 07:36:10 PM

I also wonder if the hybrid has something to do with Missy

:tup

Not quite in the way I was expecting. :lol


I loved that episode, so many great details.
At first I thought the diner with Clara was just another framing device and thought it was unnecessary, but then the episode cleverly gave it context and it was such a sad ending. It was interesting that Clara's theme song got put "in universe" so to speak.

While I thought Clara had a good sendoff for her arc, bringing her back for this episode rounded it out even better by showing not only the bad influence The Doctor had on her, but the bad influence she had on him, with him killing (and having the white dude regenerate into a black chick was a nice choice).
The stock TARDIS was a nice throwback, and I believe Ashildr made a subtle nod to McGann's movie with her question implying he was part human.

The most interesting part was the twist on the Donna Noble ending, with The Doctor forgetting Clara rather than the other way around. It's almost even sadder, because we have to see him live with that, and they made it clear that he'd forgotten nothing else about his adventures. The feels when he saw the mural on the TARDIS, and then it flaked away when he dematerialized.  :'( I was wondering beforehand if the mural would disappear when he dematerialized, and that was before knowing how extra sad that moment would be.

While I instantly thought of The Impossible Astronaut at the start in the Nevada desert, I can't believe I didn't recognize the diner until the end when it did the reverse shot, not long before he realized he'd been there. Silly me.

I'm sure some people (especially Moffat haters) will bitch that Clara actually survived somehow, but I thought it was a fun ending to have Ashildr and Clara in their own TARDIS coincidentally stuck as a diner.

Totally not what I was expecting from that episode, but again a fantastic episode. The Christmas episode however, looks like ass. I hate Christmas episodes, and I hate River Song, so naturally any combination of the two is going to be awful. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 05, 2015, 07:42:15 PM
Peter Capaldi is an amazing actor and probably the best Doctor.

BY FAR the best Doctor of the reboot era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 05, 2015, 07:43:41 PM
I wouldn't say that. 10/11/12 have all been equally fantastic in their own ways. I'm not sure which would be my favourite, but Capaldi has moved up even further this season. I think I would have to call this the best season of the modern era, and Capaldi is much more comfortable in the role now.
And now he gets his own sonic screwdriver! I like it. And next season, he'll have his own companion, which is exciting.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on December 05, 2015, 11:54:37 PM
I have mixed feelings about the Clara thing, but overall I really enjoyed the finale. And yes, Heaven Sent, omg! Broke my heart a little. I've been avoiding this thread due to not being caught up, but finally watched the three episodes leading up to this one on Thursday. Gawd, Sleep No More was bad.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 06, 2015, 12:00:49 AM
Gawd, Sleep No More was bad.

Did ANYONE like that episode?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on December 06, 2015, 02:33:51 AM
Not that I know of!  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 06, 2015, 03:33:54 AM
I liked it just fine.

Apart from that, though, I agree with pretty much everything in your post Blob. I was going to post something similar last night but was too tired so just went to bed. I really loved the twist that it was the Doctor who forgot - really didn't see it coming and even they did the whole russian roulette thing I didn't think it would happen. Great twist.

Though Season 5 is still the best them.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on December 06, 2015, 03:36:12 AM
Gawd, Sleep No More was bad.

Did ANYONE like that episode?

Mark Gatiss, maybe?

Anyway, Hell Bent was superb. I had a lot of mixed feelings on my first watch, but I watched it again this morning and it really comes together very nicely. The way the Hybrid storyline was resolved was superb and while the whole Clara thing did feel weird, it really was a proper end to her arc.

I must say, I don't think I've ever enjoyed a Doctor/companion relationship as much as I have enjoyed Doctor/Clara in Season 9. It was a little wobbly in Season 8, but this season knocked it out of the park.

1. Heaven Sent/Hell Bent
2. The Zygon Invasion/The Zygon Inversion
3. Face the Raven
4. Under the Lake/Before the Flood
5. The Magician's Apprentice/The Witch's Familiar
6. The Girl Who Died/The Woman Who Lived





7. Sleep No More

Also, preliminary season ranking:

9
5
8
7
4
1
6
3
2

EDIT: As I thought, pretty much the entire internet says that this episode sucked because it brought Clara back and shows that nobody actually dies on the show.

Oh well, their loss. I liked it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 06, 2015, 04:15:50 AM
Loved the finale.

Gawd, Sleep No More was bad.

Did ANYONE like that episode?

I didn't really have a problem with it. Not even my least favorite of the season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 06, 2015, 04:23:55 AM
EDIT: As I thought, pretty much the entire internet says that this episode sucked because it brought Clara back and shows that nobody actually dies on the show.

Oh well, their loss. I liked it.

I'm sure some people (especially Moffat haters) will bitch that Clara actually survived somehow

Called it! So predictable.

It's a family show that's intended to be suitable for children. I don't expect them to do anything too brutal to the characters. The only companions of the modern era that really died were Amy and Rory, and even that was off screen by living out their lives together until they were old and died of natural causes.

Mark Gatiss, maybe?

I'm not even convinced of that. He probably forgot he had to submit a script that morning, so he just grabbed some random pages from old scripts, crossed out and changed the names, and had Mr Sandman stuck in his head after it woke him up with his alarm so scribbled some drawings on a post-it and stuck it on the front.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 06, 2015, 08:26:52 AM
So....

Clara isn't actually alive OR dead at the moment...Which means she could crop up again in the future...

Is she going back to Gallifrey to be put back in the trap street or will she go off on her own with Ashildr for a while first ?



Also...Diner at the End of the Universe ?  :P :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 06, 2015, 09:32:32 AM
So....

Clara isn't actually alive OR dead at the moment...Which means she could crop up again in the future...

Is she going back to Gallifrey to be put back in the trap street or will she go off on her own with Ashildr for a while first ?

Pretty sure they were going on their own adventures first, taking the "long way around".
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on December 06, 2015, 01:22:29 PM
EDIT: As I thought, pretty much the entire internet says that this episode sucked because it brought Clara back and shows that nobody actually dies on the show.

Oh well, their loss. I liked it.

I'm sure some people (especially Moffat haters) will bitch that Clara actually survived somehow

Called it! So predictable.

It's a family show that's intended to be suitable for children. I don't expect them to do anything too brutal to the characters. The only companions of the modern era that really died were Amy and Rory, and even that was off screen by living out their lives together until they were old and died of natural causes.

Well, to be fair, they've been quite brutal to characters in quite a few episodes - Heaven Sent comes to mind. And I would have a problem with it if the entire reason for Clara's survival was that they thought that a death would be too brutal. But that wasn't the reasoning behind it, and the reasoning made sense within the scope of both who the Doctor and Clara are, so whatever.

Also I will concede that it was a step down from Heaven Sent, but that doesn't really have to mean much, because Heaven Sent is probably Top 5 of all time for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 06, 2015, 01:28:32 PM
I love endings like Hell Bent.

It was like a Christopher Nolan ending. Tied up all the loose ends and showed you everything you wanted to see.

If it was an episode of Star Trek Voyager - the diner would have dematerialised - the blue TARDIS would have been there and it would have cut to black.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on December 06, 2015, 02:33:59 PM
Caught up on the last three episodes this weekend. Loved all of them. I thought they were really original. Fantastic ending for the season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Heretic on December 06, 2015, 05:51:12 PM
Yep, phenomenal ending for the best series yet, really. So proud of the entire DW team and the support from the fanbase as well.

Series rankings:

9
5
4
7 (including DOTD and TOTD)
8
1
3
2
6

Hasn't been a series I haven't loved, though, just loved some more than others on the whole.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 06, 2015, 06:58:33 PM
I don't know how I'd rank them all, but I think 9 would rank highest, followed maybe by 8, followed by the Matt Smith seasons.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on December 06, 2015, 11:54:50 PM
If it weren't for the entire Slitheen arc, then Season 1 would be much higher for me than it is, and it might even top Season 4. Eccleston is a great Doctor.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on December 07, 2015, 06:52:46 AM
I still think Tennant is my favorite of the reboot era, but Capaldi is definitely slowly catching up to Matt Smith for second place. This was a fantastic season, so much better than last year. Season ranking so far:

4
5
9
1
3
8
7
6
2
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2015, 08:39:06 PM
Well that was a better episode than I expected. As I've said, I don't like Christmas episodes, and I don't like River Song, but it wasn't very Christmas-y aside from being snowy and technically being Christmas at the end (I don't know why this planet would have Christmas, but hey), and even River Song wasn't annoying by the end of the episode.

I thought this was going to be an early River Song in her timeline, since their timelines are mostly opposite to each other, but I was glad it ended up being the end of her timeline for various reasons. This episode was actually a very nice sendoff for her character (good riddance :P), and I enjoyed the closure of seeing it come full circle back to Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead too, especially once he handed her the gift you knew would be the Sonic screwdriver.

Given my dislike of River Song, it showed how good the writing has been this season that I enjoyed it as much as I did. The first 2/3 of the episode were ok, but the last 1/3 once she gave her speech about The Doctor and realized he was The Doctor, was excellent. Capaldi and Kingston had more believable chemistry than the 11th did.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on December 25, 2015, 11:51:25 PM
Oh gawd, that speech :'(
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 26, 2015, 06:34:09 AM
Yeah this was a really emotional episode, at least the end, or last third as Blob said. The rest was a lot of fun, I laughed out loud at several moments.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bout to crash on December 26, 2015, 11:25:20 AM
True that. If I hadn't been watching with friends I probably would have been crying my eyes out in addition to the laughing out loud.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 26, 2015, 06:51:29 PM
Yeah the emotional stuff at the end was really nicely done, and I'm really glad Moffat went and brought River's story full circle as that definitely felt missing!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 26, 2015, 09:59:59 PM
Yeah the emotional stuff at the end was really nicely done, and I'm really glad Moffat went and brought River's story full circle as that definitely felt missing!

The sonic screwdriver thing from Silence in the Library is one of those hanging threads I've been waiting for them to deal with for a while, because it seemed like it was going to come from the 10th Doctor but never did.

I'm still waiting for them to show how the 12th Doctor ended up at the Time War for the events of Day of the Doctor (no sir, all 13!).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on December 27, 2015, 03:02:50 AM
That one I'm not sure they'll do, though you never know with Moffat. It wouldn't be so much of a hanging thread though, as they didn't show how any of 1-8 or 9 got there either.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 27, 2015, 03:23:03 AM
That one I'm not sure they'll do, though you never know with Moffat. It wouldn't be so much of a hanging thread though, as they didn't show how any of 1-8 or 9 got there either.

The difference is the 12th Doctor is the current Doctor, so I think it's an important event to show how he got involved and when it occurred for him. Even though we don't see every single thing The Doctor does, I feel that's a significant event to skip over, and showing how he ended up there would basically explain how the previous Doctors got there anyway, without needing to show them too. Some kind of mass message or beacon etc.
None of the earlier Doctors had the events of that episode happen in their original timeline/run; it only happened after the timey wimey stuff, so obviously I don't expect to see them. Those Doctors are decades in the past. The 12th Doctor is the only Doctor from after that point in the Doctor's life to be involved, and he's the current Doctor, and they set up those events before Capaldi even started. That's a hugely important difference. They set it up beforehand, so I do consider it a hanging thread.
I'm kind of expecting it to be part of Capaldi's final episode in the same way that The Time of the Doctor dealt with the 11th Doctor's loose ends.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on December 29, 2015, 03:12:45 PM
I was positively surprised by the Christmas special (which I only just got around to watching for some reason), but it would probably still rank among the bottom of the season for me, but that's mainly due to how astoundingly good the season has been.

The final third of the episode was amazing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 29, 2015, 04:23:29 PM
It was a really nice special, not sure how to rank it compared to others and i don't really feel like it. Ending the year on a high-note, as opposed to what the season was (for me) was a pleasant surprise.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 29, 2015, 05:54:59 PM
I was positively surprised by the Christmas special (which I only just got around to watching for some reason), but it would probably still rank among the bottom of the season for me, but that's mainly due to how astoundingly good the season has been.

The final third of the episode was amazing.

Christmas episodes always rank among the bottom of the season for me. :lol
That's not necessarily a bad thing this season though, given how consistently great it was overall.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on January 02, 2016, 03:33:40 PM
Really? You don't like ANY of the Christmas specials? I think the only one I ever disliked was the Widow and Wardrobe one, and maybe The Next Doctor, but all the other ones are great
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 02, 2016, 08:39:46 PM
I enjoyed probably the majority of them, but generally I find them all to be of much lower quality than the season average, and in the Moffat era they're often too sappy kiddy Christmas.

The Christmas Invasion was alright aside from being too light on the new doc. The Runaway Bride had its moments but was silly and not very good on the whole. Voyage of the Damned was alright but silly (a common theme with the RTD era). The Next Doctor I liked. The End of Time was solid. A Christmas Carol was a good episode I suppose, but was obviously very Christmas-y. The Doctor, The Widow and the Wardrobe was too shmaltzy Christmas and not very good. The Snowmen wasn't bad but forgettable aside from Clara. The Time of the Doctor is great, and still easily the best of the bunch. Last Christmas was an ok episode, but Santa put it a bit over the top.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 04, 2016, 08:59:47 AM
Just about done with Season 4. I left off on the Christmas episode with the doctor with the hot air balloon. Just found out Netflix loses its license in February. I have to kick it into high gear.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 11, 2016, 06:02:51 AM
I'm 6 episodes into season 5, and I'm not really digging the new doctor or Emilia  :-\
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 11, 2016, 06:05:08 AM
Is that Matt Smith ?

I was never a big fan of him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 11, 2016, 06:14:32 AM
S5 is such a huge step up in every way from the earlier seasons. I love Tennant, but Matt Smith is my favourite (although Capaldi is well on his way there).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 11, 2016, 06:15:44 AM
I actually don't like the fact that they've started tying the entire story together. I liked it a lot more when every episode was just a random adventure.

I miss Donna and Wilfred.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 11, 2016, 06:18:58 AM
I actually don't like the fact that they've started tying the entire story together.

Why? It doesn't stop them from having random adventures, but it gives you an epic payoff at the end of the season. The earlier seasons had similar loose arcs across the season too.
Since the 9th Doctor only lasted one season (and was awful), this is possibly the first time you've had to really go through previous Doctor withdrawal. The cycle is the same every time. You miss the old Doctor at first, then end up loving the new one. Get used to it. :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 11, 2016, 06:25:06 AM
I actually don't like the fact that they've started tying the entire story together.

Why? It doesn't stop them from having random adventures, but it gives you an epic payoff at the end of the season. The earlier seasons had similar loose arcs across the season too.
Since the 9th Doctor only lasted one season (and was awful), this is possibly the first time you've had to really go through previous Doctor withdrawal. The cycle is the same every time. You miss the old Doctor at first, then end up loving the new one. Get used to it. :biggrin:

It makes it more critical for me to pay attention  :lol If I fell asleep for a few minutes in an earlier episode, no big deal. If I do that now, it's easy to miss something major. I actually really liked the 9th doctor. I wish he stuck around longer. I will say though, that last Dahlek episode with Churchill was awesome. They next generation daleks, the blue, red, yellow, white, etc.. looked sooo badass.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 11, 2016, 06:32:01 AM
Was that post serious? :lol
Don't get too used to those nasty colorful plastic toy Daleks, because they ditch them very quickly after the unanimously negative fan reaction. They appear maybe once or twice more in S5, then I don't think they appear again.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 11, 2016, 06:35:34 AM
Was that post serious? :lol
Don't get too used to those nasty colorful plastic toy Daleks, because they ditch them very quickly after the unanimously negative fan reaction. They appear maybe once or twice more in S5, then I don't think they appear again.

Not in the least. I legitimately really liked the 9th doctor (never saw any of the doctors before that).

As for the daleks, why didn't people like them? We saw several variations throughout the season. Why were those particular ones hated? I thought they looked really great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 11, 2016, 06:44:27 AM
Was that post serious? :lol
Don't get too used to those nasty colorful plastic toy Daleks, because they ditch them very quickly after the unanimously negative fan reaction. They appear maybe once or twice more in S5, then I don't think they appear again.

Not in the least. I legitimately really liked the 9th doctor (never saw any of the doctors before that).

As for the daleks, why didn't people like them? We saw several variations throughout the season. Why were those particular ones hated? I thought they looked really great.

The proportions are horrible, they're monstrously huge, and look like cheap tacky kid's toys rather than a threatening metallic cyborg death robot. They were iDaleks. The original Dalek design is so iconic, they shouldn't have tried to mess with it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 11, 2016, 06:45:51 AM
Was that post serious? :lol
Don't get too used to those nasty colorful plastic toy Daleks, because they ditch them very quickly after the unanimously negative fan reaction. They appear maybe once or twice more in S5, then I don't think they appear again.

Not in the least. I legitimately really liked the 9th doctor (never saw any of the doctors before that).

As for the daleks, why didn't people like them? We saw several variations throughout the season. Why were those particular ones hated? I thought they looked really great.

The proportions are horrible, they're monstrously huge, and look like cheap tacky kid's toys rather than a threatening metallic cyborg death robot. They were iDaleks. The original Dalek design is so iconic, they shouldn't have tried to mess with it.

Ahh. I gotcha. Maybe because I've watched the series so quickly, I didn't have time to fall in love with the older/original designs.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 11, 2016, 06:53:24 AM
I dunno, I started with the new series and got up to that point much quicker than you, and still hated the newer ones. Such an uninspired and unbalanced modern re-imagining.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 11, 2016, 08:23:46 AM
I'm 6 episodes into season 5, and I'm not really digging the new doctor or Emilia  :-\
I actually don't like the fact that they've started tying the entire story together. I liked it a lot more when every episode was just a random adventure.
What is this I don't even.

Each to their own I guess. Though I would say that there's nothing wrong with the series 5 Daleks, but you should start getting used to the world of Doctor Who fandom, where people react more strongly to things than is really warranted. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 11, 2016, 07:16:23 PM
Each to their own I guess. Though I would say that there's nothing wrong with the series 5 Daleks, but you should start getting used to the world of Doctor Who fandom, where people react more strongly to things than is really warranted. :lol

Doesn't this go for any fandom? Keep in mind what site you're on here. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 11, 2016, 11:58:07 PM
Fair point, though some things are worse than others in that regard. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 12, 2016, 12:00:53 AM
True. And I could certainly do without the subset of Doctor Who fans who overreacts to everything Moffat does. :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 14, 2016, 07:14:29 AM
FINALLY caught up on this season.  I have been avoiding this thread since I was so far behind.

What an excellent, excellent season.  Probably my favorite season ever, beating out my previous favorit # 7.  Capaldi is awesome, and that double shot of Heaven Sent/Hell Bent to end the season was glorious, majestic, and crushing.  Also, the Christmas special was a fantastic denouement for the season as well as for River Song.

Just great, great stuff.

So, I guess Clara is now Schrodinger's Cat?

Will we see Me again?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 14, 2016, 08:44:38 AM
Hell Bent made a big impression on me. I'm pretty claustrophobic as it is.

And I know he didn't remember the previous 4.5bn years ( was there a line in there that said he did remember? Surely that's not possible since each "new" Doctor was brand new and died

restarting the cycle so memories weren't transferred )
... but still. Nightmarish.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 14, 2016, 08:17:14 PM
Hell Bent made a big impression on me. I'm pretty claustrophobic as it is.

And I know he didn't remember the previous 4.5bn years ( was there a line in there that said he did remember? Surely that's not possible since each "new" Doctor was brand new and died

restarting the cycle so memories weren't transferred )
... but still. Nightmarish.

He didn't remember anything, but by the end of each loop, he was aware of roughly how long he'd spent in there. Actually remembering 4.5bn years of memories of that would be even more horrible. And I'm glad they didn't try to do that, because I wouldn't believe he could have cared or remember about Clara for that long at that intensity.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 15, 2016, 09:35:51 AM
There was a line he said towards the end of the episode " I remember each time ".

I wonder what that meant.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on January 15, 2016, 09:38:10 AM
I don't even remember that. I also don't think it would even be possible for him to remember all those times. So he probably meant something else.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 15, 2016, 09:48:46 AM
There was a line he said towards the end of the episode " I remember each time ".

I wonder what that meant.

I took a look at the script to find the section, and I believe he's referring to remembering every time he loses a companion, because he's having trouble dealing with the loss of Clara and wants to give up entirely, and thinks it's futile to carry on when nothing he does will bring her back. He's overcome with grief.


THE DOCTOR
I can’t keep doing this. I can’t
always do this, it’s not fair! Just
this once, can’t I give in? Can’t I
lose??


He spins round on Clara -
- still standing with her back to him. But chalked on the
blackboard in front of her, a single word:
No!

The Doctor, staring hopelessly at that word.

THE DOCTOR (cont’d)
But I can remember, Clara. You
don’t understand, I can remember it
all. Every time!

Just the word No!

THE DOCTOR (cont’d)
And you’re still gone. Whatever I
do, you still won’t be here.

The Doctor sags. Like that admission ripped the heart out of
him.

And then, impossibly - her voice.
CLARA
Doctor.

He startles, looks at her. What?

And magically, impossibly -
- she turns to face him. Clara Oswald, fixing him in the eye.

CLARA (cont’d)
Stop it. Just stop.

He stares at her.

CLARA (cont’d)
You’re not the only person who ever
lost someone. It’s the story of
everybody. Get over it. Beat it.
Break free.
She steps towards him, puts a hand to his face.

CLARA (cont’d)
Doctor, it’s time. Get up off your
arse ... and win!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 15, 2016, 09:49:38 AM
Yeah it was very obvious that he didn't remember them, but that once he reached the end of each incarnation, he'd worked it out.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 15, 2016, 06:24:44 PM
I like how when we join him - he's already many many cycles in as the water is already full of skulls.


Who knows how far he'd punched back the wall the first time we see it ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 15, 2016, 08:12:02 PM
I like how when we join him - he's already many many cycles in as the water is already full of skulls.


Who knows how far he'd punched back the wall the first time we see it ?

It took him roughly 4 and a half billion years to get through 20ft of wall. The first cycle we saw was approximately 7,000 years into his stay according to The Doctor's calculations.
With those numbers, I believe he had already worn through about 0.0095mm on the first loop we saw. :blob:

If we'd seen him on the first loop, we wouldn't have seen the writing in the sand or the intro with the person pulling the lever, and the whole setup wouldn't have been as cool and mysterious.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 16, 2016, 03:34:43 AM
It took him roughly 4 and a half billion years to get through 20ft of wall. The first cycle we saw was approximately 7,000 years into his stay according to The Doctor's calculations.
With those numbers, I believe he had already worn through about 0.0095mm on the first loop we saw. :blob:
:lol Nice.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 19, 2016, 03:43:24 AM
It's been a while since I've updated on my classic Who viewing.

The Web of Fear - Solid story. I actually skipped overly The Abominable Snowmen because it was mostly missing and didn't seem that interesting, so I was lacking a bit of backstory, but nothing that hindered the story. I liked that The Doctor used some technical knowledge to solve the problem and command the Yeti.

Fury From The Deep - I almost skipped it because it's a missing story, but wanted to check it out solely because it was the first appearance of the sonic screwdriver. Another decent story. Pretty typical vaguely futuristic base overcome by a monster. It seems like there were some great visual moments in this one that are unfortunately lost. At least Victoria's departure had a little bit of buildup throughout the story, which makes it one of the better and less sudden early companion exits.

The Wheel in Space - One of the better Cyberman stories so far. The early part of the story on the spaceship before getting to the base was built up well, and I liked that they were suspicious of The Doctor and Jamie for appearing out of nowhere. The misc robot was pretty cool too. There were some good meaningful deaths in this story, which you get a lot in these older episodes.
Zoe was super duper annoying in this first appearance. DUR DUR LOGIC DUR DUR CALCULATIONS. I get the feeling they were trying to cash in on Spock's success with her character.

The Dominators - I quite liked this one. Zoe is already much better here. Pretty classic scifi setup with the radiated planet, and an invading alien force. The Dominators were a decent enemy, and I liked the funky robots aside from the fact you couldn't understand a single thing they were saying. It took me a while to even realize they were supposed to be saying words and not just making random robot noises. But they killed some people and blew shit up with some pretty impressive explosions.
This was a good one for The Doctor too, between playing dumb to the Dominators, and coming up with the plan to defeat them at the end. The ending was noticeably rushed due to being cut an episode, but that final explosion was cool. Strange use of the sonic screwdriver.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 19, 2016, 08:43:58 AM
Zoe was super duper annoying in this first appearance. DUR DUR LOGIC DUR DUR CALCULATIONS. I get the feeling they were trying to cash in on Spock's success with her character.
SHUT UP DON'T DARE DIS ZOE

Quote
The Dominators - I quite liked this one. Zoe is already much better here.
Ok I'll let you off.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 19, 2016, 08:47:26 AM
Zoe was super duper annoying in this first appearance. DUR DUR LOGIC DUR DUR CALCULATIONS. I get the feeling they were trying to cash in on Spock's success with her character.
SHUT UP DON'T DARE DIS ZOE

Quote
The Dominators - I quite liked this one. Zoe is already much better here.
Ok I'll let you off.

:lol Yeah, it was only her first story she really grated on me, because they really pushed the logic thing. I'm fine with her now that she's settled into the normal companion role.
I'm half way through The Mind Robber at the moment. Enjoying it a lot more than I expected to from the description.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Chino on January 19, 2016, 09:11:16 AM
Literally minutes after I said "you know, I like that they're keeping Rory around. It's cool that the Doctor is travelling with a couple this time around", Rory goes and gets eaten by time and erased from all of existence.

The dual dream episode with the chirping birds was awesome.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 19, 2016, 09:13:29 AM
Literally minutes after I said "you know, I like that they're keeping Rory around. It's cool that the Doctor is travelling with a couple this time around", Rory goes and gets eaten by time and erased from all of existence.

The dual dream episode with the chirping birds was awesome.

Ah yes, that would be Amy's Choice. That's a great episode, with bonus points for Rory's mullet!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 19, 2016, 09:42:45 AM
:lol Yeah, it was only her first story she really grated on me, because they really pushed the logic thing. I'm fine with her now that she's settled into the normal companion role.
:lol Yeah, I think they wanted to make it clear that she wasn't a Victoria-style "runs around looking cute but being useless" companion. She is awesome though, definitely one of my favourites ever.

Quote
I'm half way through The Mind Robber at the moment. Enjoying it a lot more than I expected to from the description.
That's a pretty fun story. :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 19, 2016, 09:46:57 AM
Quote
I'm half way through The Mind Robber at the moment. Enjoying it a lot more than I expected to from the description.
That's a pretty fun story. :tup

Yeah, I like having something different, and it's wacky. The way they worked in Jamie's absence was hilarious to me, just turning into some random dude. That other guy did a bang on job too!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on January 19, 2016, 11:31:04 AM
Finally watched the Christmas special. It was really good, I loved the fact that River didn't recognize the Doctor until near the end. The tying up of River Song's story line was very good as well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on January 20, 2016, 09:38:34 AM
So, no stirrings yet on the new companion? Are they keeping it under wraps, you think?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 20, 2016, 10:44:39 AM
(https://img00.deviantart.net/9e04/i/2013/277/4/0/perrobotillo__robo_puppy___futurama__by_dragonfly929-d6p6gw0.jpg)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 20, 2016, 03:18:09 PM
So, no stirrings yet on the new companion? Are they keeping it under wraps, you think?

What's the usual schedule on these things? This is actually the first new companion since I've been a fan, which is kind of exciting. I don't know how far in advance they finalize casting on something so big.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 21, 2016, 10:35:43 PM
I just finished off The Invasion, which was great. The Cyberman stories have definitely improved. Vaughn was an almost Bond-esque bad guy, a smart man in a battle of wits against both the Cyberman and the Doctor, which made for an interesting story. He also had that droopy eye thing going on which unintentionally added to it.
It was a good slow buildup to the Cybermen, so they weren't overused, and took a bit more to destroy than nail polish remover / slight radiation / the stink eye. They scope of the story was bigger than they could fully show, but they did a good job of it. It was still packed with action, with the grenades and rocket launchers and space missiles.
The shot of the Cyberman near St Paul's cathedral made me smirk now recognizing the homage in Dark Water / Death in Heaven, and finally seeing the backstory to Kate Lethbridge Stewart with the Cyberman head.
The animated episodes were ok. The faces looked really wonky, but still overall much better than the alternative of nothing, so it's still appreciated.

The attitude towards the girls was very '60s. Hey Zoe, do you want to do Doctor Who stuff? Nah, imma stay here and play dress ups.
Then when they finally made use of the photographer girl, they mostly dismissed her photos. At least Zoe got in some clever moments with the computer and the missile calculations at the end, but then I cringed a bit when the other guy said something like "can we keep her around? she's better looking than the computer". Never mind that she just saved the planet from an alien robot invasion with only half a minute to work with, she's pretty. :lol


Next up, The Croutons Krotons. More robots. Most excellent. :hat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 21, 2016, 11:56:19 PM
They scope of the story was bigger than they could fully show
This basically sums up classic Who. It gets made fun of a lot for it, but I think focussing on the writing and acting and not worrying too much about production values reveals a lot to enjoy and makes it kind of endearing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 22, 2016, 12:31:31 AM
They scope of the story was bigger than they could fully show
This basically sums up classic Who. It gets made fun of a lot for it, but I think focussing on the writing and acting and not worrying too much about production values reveals a lot to enjoy and makes it kind of endearing.

Absolutely! I don't mean it as a criticism at all, I'm actually continually impressed by how ambitious they are, and the production values here have come a long way since the early episodes. They don't let the limitations of budget limit the stories they tell, they just have to tell the story differently.
The writing and acting has also impressed me since day 1. Troughton nails it in any situation, and I enjoy the classic scifi writing that focuses on story buildup and character development, for the big payoff at the end of a multi-part story.

I admit I had a little laugh every time an actor flubbed a line in those early episodes, but it didn't make me enjoy it any less, I did find it endearing. It was a reminder that these people were doing a lot with very little.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 22, 2016, 02:10:45 AM
Indeed.

And yeah Troughton is excellent, one of my favourites!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 22, 2016, 03:24:36 AM
It took me a while to get into Troughton just because there were so many missing episodes before I even got to SEE him. I think it wasn't until Evil of the Daleks that I was finally sold on him, but now I like him more than the first Doctor.

But as much as I love him, I'm also kind of excited to be getting close to a new Doctor, and moving up to colour, and finally seeing the Time Lords.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 22, 2016, 03:29:53 PM
Woah: https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/doctor-who/news/a780998/doctor-who-showrunner-steven-moffat-is-leaving-after-series-10-and-it-wont-air-until-2017/
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 22, 2016, 03:31:14 PM
Woah.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on January 22, 2016, 03:36:57 PM
:(

Didn't Chibnall write some episodes already? I think he wrote 42, which was good, and something else that was pretty bad.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 22, 2016, 03:37:43 PM
Bit more detailed article here: https://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016-01-22/doctor-who-showrunner-steven-moffat-quits-to-be-replaced-by-broadchurch-creator-chris-chibnall

Chibnall could be a great choice. His Doctor Who episodes have been good, if not particularly amazing, but he's shown with things like Broadchurch what he can do. Definite potential!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 22, 2016, 03:41:13 PM
:(

Didn't Chibnall write some episodes already? I think he wrote 42, which was good, and something else that was pretty bad.
None of his episodes have been bad at all, IMO they've all be solid, but they also haven't been among the best (42 probably being the strongest). But it's a little different being a guest writer as to some extent you're asked to do something, and need to fit it in with the character and story arcs being determined by someone else. It's quite different being a showrunner.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on January 22, 2016, 03:44:45 PM
True. I haven't seen Broadchurch so his DW work was the only thing that I could really say something about.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Onno on January 22, 2016, 03:47:29 PM
Wow. Well, I guess Moffat would want to leave some time. Chibnall might be a great replacement though - Broadchurch is amazing!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 22, 2016, 05:38:11 PM
ONLY ONE EPISODE IN 2016? Shit, it's gonna be a tough year.

Chibnall has never been on my radar, but looking at the episodes he's written, none of them are bad. The only one I consider great is The Power of Three though. Moffat's episodes in the RTD era were already clear standouts, and I don't feel there's any one clear standout in the Moffat era aside from Moffat himself, so there's nobody who I really feel should have gotten it over Chibnall. So for now, I don't feel strongly one way or another about this. At least it's not Gatiss, amirite? :lol

I don't even want to read the comments about this on the web with everyone celebrating the best writer/showrunner of Doctor Who leaving.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 23, 2016, 02:52:33 AM
Moffat's episodes in the RTD era were already clear standouts, and I don't feel there's any one clear standout in the Moffat era aside from Moffat himself
For me there are definitely non-Moffat standouts in the Moffat era, particularly the following:

Amy's Choice (Simon Nye)
Vincent and the Doctor (Richard Curtis)
The Doctor's Wife (Neil Gaiman)
The Girl Who Waited (Tom MacRae)
Hide (Neil Cross)
Kill the Moon (Peter Harness)
The Zygon Invasion/Inversion (Peter Harness)

Some of those have been inconsistent (Cross), and others are far too big/busy doing other things to be able to showrun Who (Gaiman, Curtis). Peter Harness stands out to me as the other main candidate. Potential for the future I suppose! But Chibnall I guess meets the criteria of being a huge Doctor Who fan.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 23, 2016, 03:21:12 AM
Sorry for the ambiguity, I meant no clear standout writer as Moffat was in the RTD era. I didn't mean there weren't standout episodes! Every one of Moffat's RTD era episodes was a clear standout, no duds.

Although imo Hide was pretty bad, and Kill The Moon was awful. The Zygon Invasion was solid, with the second episode with a cowriting credit by Moffat being the far better of the two. The basic idea of setting up the Zygon invasion with the two Osgoods was Moffat's idea, and I suspect the payoff with that amazing speech had his input too.
The Girl Who Waited, Amy's Choice and Vincent and the Doctor are fantastic though. :tup

If I were to choose the non Moffat standouts of the Moffat era (excluding those listed), I'd say The Power of Three (yay, Chibnall!), maybe Time Heist, Flatline, and perhaps Under The Lake / Before The Flood (S9 is so good overall)

Still, Moffat's episodes have a certain magic to them for me. His writing style really matched up with what I like from the show, and his hit rate is incredible. Moffat had a distinctive style, so I look forward to seeing how Chibnall's input changes the direction of the Doctor Who. Chibnall's only written one dud for the show (42), with the rest all being at least good, so he doesn't appear to be a bad choice.
And will Capaldi stick around after S10, or will it be a fresh start as it was with S5?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 23, 2016, 07:21:22 AM
I just finished the Krotons, which was another great story. This has been a strong season so far, probably because of the abundance of robots, which I love. :lol

This one was a classic scifi setup, it reminded me of Star Trek TOS, like The Apple. It also felt like they could have made the same episode now and have it work just as well. It was a short and sweet story that came together quite nicely.

Some quick points-
Those Kroton accents. :lol
I love bumbling 2nd Doctor, whether it was for real like when he took the teaching test, or whether he's just playing dumb to stall for time like at the end (also used to amazing effect in The Dominators)
The Doctor getting the uneducated Gonds to crank out a shitload of sulphuric acid unsupervised. :lol So much coughing and exploding.
Zoe's outfit. Dayum gurl!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 23, 2016, 09:09:17 AM
Zoe has some great outfits. :eyebrows:

Can't remember The Krotons all that well, but glad you dug it! And yeah, I also love the way the second Doctor plays up his bumblingness to fool people.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 24, 2016, 12:15:27 AM
I'm surprised you don't remember it for the outfit alone. :lol

(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MCGgbFX-Gf0/VNQGJ0SuiuI/AAAAAAAAPYE/2yizoX0CJM0/s1600/KrotonsDoctorWho2.jpg)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 24, 2016, 02:42:28 AM
Oh yes. :lol

The outfit I remember most was, I think, in the Mind Robber.

(https://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r243/ariich/random/mindrob3_zpsjfbioipn.jpg)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 24, 2016, 02:53:00 AM
:lol That shot certainly didn't hurt (especially as it was repeated again in the recap)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 24, 2016, 02:24:11 PM
I was really surprised about the Moffat news.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 26, 2016, 01:42:40 AM
I just finished The Seeds of Death. I really liked the setup for this, with the introduction of the T-mat (which I suspect was influenced by Trek), and more interestingly, the idea of man not travelling beyond the moon despite the progression of technology, which has proven to be surprisingly correct for a story that actually predates man landing on the moon. It also reminded me of the much more recent episode, Kill The Moon. I'm not sure whether it was an intentional nod, or whether it was just coincidence due to The Seeds of Death correctly guessing the near future. There was also a character named Osgood, which again I wondered whether it was intentional or just coincidence.

I don't know how this world functions when it so quickly went to crap without the T-mat system, and there was no contingency plan. I also hope each city had more than just the one little T-mat booth! They may have explained that in the first episode and I forgot.

I actually lost a bit of interest once I saw it was the Ice Warriors, as I didn't think much of their previous encounter. The Ice Warriors are even weaker and dumber than the Cybermen. Lucky the moon base so readily had a valve that went up that high in temperature. Seems kinda dangerous to me. :lol

The deadly fungus that is killed by water.... Why was this not the first thing a cleanup crew tried? What were those guys even doing? Seriously, a mysterious foam appears, the first thing you'd try to clean it away with is water! Even with the flood level waters needed to kill it all off, they'd have noticed an effect as The Doctor did. I would have also thought that being in the vicinity of the fungus would have had more effect on people than it did since it eats up oxygen.

And how dumb do the Ice Warriors have to be to accidentally fly into the sun without noticing at some point? Even on automatic, you'd surely notice at some point.

Anyway, still an enjoyable episode. I'm really excited for The War Games!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 26, 2016, 03:06:21 AM
That's the problem with the Ice Warriors - great idea, pretty bad execution. :lol Gatiss (I think?) did a decent job modernising them for Cold War, but in the classic series they're just kind of annoying.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 26, 2016, 05:13:34 AM
Cold War certainly isn't one of my favourites, but they did a good job with the Ice Warrior in that one. I believe that episode also brought back the HADS as first seen in The Krotons that I just saw.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 28, 2016, 12:29:23 AM
I just finished The War Games, which means farewell to Patrick Troughton, and farewell to black and white. Troughton's final season was a strong sendoff, as was his final story. Usually I don't like war time settings, but once it introduced the communication monitor and the mind control glasses, I was totally on board with it.

At times I found it a bit confusing differentiating the different alien races, because neither of them had their home planets named (it was merely "your home planet"), and the glasses guys didn't even have their race named. I liked finally having some backstory for The Doctor. I smiled when they finally mentioned the Time Lords by name, and gave details on The Doctor stealing a TARDIS and breaking the Time Lords' rules about interference. Patrick Troughton did a great job of portraying his fear of the Time Lords, and I liked his attempted escape sequence (full of instantly recognizable stock footage of the TARDIS from previous episodes). It was curious that they still didn't make an attempt to name his home planet.

I'm not sure if this is also the first appearance of a stock TARDIS? I liked the way they looked here, although I prefer the more modern portrayal of a cylinder as the smaller size and simpler door are a much better fit.

The little box The Doctor uses to contact the Time Lords appears to be what inspired the idea in The Doctor's Wife in series 6 of the modern show, so that was a cool nugget (obviously I'm finding out about these nuggets in reverse here :lol )

The Doctor says Time Lords can live forever barring accidents. Regeneration still wasn't a full formed concept here, so that's not surprising to hear, but still interesting.

The sendoff for the companions was a bit sad, having their memories wiped and all, but I liked the way they did it.

The whole story was overall great. I liked the idea of the different war areas and the resistance, and how it all played out. The War Chief also had sick sideburns, so bonus points on that one.

Now onto the third Doctor!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 29, 2016, 12:42:01 AM
Spearhead from Space-
The first episode of this was excellent, and the whole story was pretty good too. This really felt like a fresh start in every way. New Doctor, first in colour, no existing companions, and they've finally established the different physiology of the Doctor with his two hearts.
The production values were very good, as this one was entirely shot on film. I expect later ones won't look as good. The only downside is the sound quality noticeably dropped, as the tape cameras always picked up dialogue and noise much better than the film setups, and this crew obviously wasn't used to it.
The first appearance of the Autons was ok. The moment when they started their attack from the shop windows was a great moment of destruction, but otherwise was a bit mixed.

The new chick (companion?) is alright. Did she not notice the cable was unplugged from that device or did she actually have to fix something inside the machine too? I couldn't tell.

I'm currently indifferent on the 3rd Doctor. That's to be expected from the first story. Most Doctors take some time to grow on me. I like him enough, but he has a long way to go before he's close to the first two Doctors yet, and he hasn't showed a lot of range yet. I hope his Earth exile doesn't get too boring or stale.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 29, 2016, 02:52:41 AM
At least you have Tom Baker next ! ;)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 29, 2016, 03:05:47 AM
I'm very much looking forward to that! Still a long way off though. What's the general opinion on the 3rd Doctor anyway?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on January 29, 2016, 03:24:56 AM
Pertwee is good. Not as good as Troughton or Baker, but he's a good Doctor. But his Earth exile does grew stale a little, I find his first season to be his best, at least until he leaves Earth again.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 29, 2016, 03:29:48 AM
That's about what I expected. I do like Pertwee so far, but I loved Troughton, and Tom Baker is about unanimously considered the best Doctor (at least of the original series). That's a tough spot to be in.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on January 29, 2016, 10:16:12 AM
Also, I rewatched War Games yesterday and today and it's probably Top 10 of the entire Classic Era for me, I love that story so much, especially how much time it takes to build up properly and reveal its mysteries.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 29, 2016, 10:26:38 AM
I gave my thoughts on that one just a few posts up. Definitely a great one. :tup
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on January 30, 2016, 08:55:54 PM
Tom Baker is awesome but Troughton is my favorite.


Also The War Games has my favorite depiction of the Time Lords. They are much more ruthless and uncaring here than they are in the rest of the series.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 07, 2016, 10:21:52 PM
The Silurians-
Having only seen the new series take on the Silurians so far, it was interesting to go back and see their original story. Hungry Earth / Cold Blood clearly took a lot of inspiration from this story, almost a reboot/remake in some ways. The Silurians looked ridiculous here with their loose masks with obvious seams, and I laughed every time they used the lights and waved their heads around randomly. I don't recall them bringing that aspect back luckily.
The story itself was pretty average. Nothing particularly great or memorable in it, but it was ok. Lethbridge Stewart bombing the crap out of them at the end was unexpected, and I hope the Doctor brings that back up at some point.


The Ambassadors of Death-

I liked the setup for this story, but then it was overly drawn out for the most part with a lot of back and forth, and I felt it wasn't using the potential of the radiation angle. The last two episodes brought it together though, and gave it a different and fresher spin than what I was expecting, and made for a great conclusion to an otherwise average story. It was a shame that for a story of this length, the conclusion felt so rushed. I wanted more payoff after all that had happened. Some great ideas, but very unevenly paced.

I'm already getting a bit bored of the formula of these Earth episodes, and the lack of TARDIS. I don't feel like the situation has allowed Liz to bond that well with The Doctor so far, and Pertwee's laid back style isn't doing it for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on February 08, 2016, 01:31:21 AM
Hmmmmm.

I agree on The Ambassadors of Death, but I really like The Silurians. Anyway, I think that you'll really like Inferno, it's different from pretty much everything that Doctor Who has done before and/or since.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 08, 2016, 01:48:56 AM
I liked The Silurians too overall, I just didn't think it was a standout story compared to others, and it had some silliness. There were lots of the elements I like from scifi/Doctor Who, but there wasn't any moment where I really loved it, hence it was middle of the road for me. But that's not a bad road to be in the middle of.

I've only just started part 3 of Inferno, where The Doctor has just disappeared with the console after trying again to make it work. Things just got interesting. :hat
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on February 08, 2016, 02:22:32 AM
The Silurians was ok, but I agree it wasn't that exciting.

Inferno is great though, one of my favourites.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 10, 2016, 11:51:06 PM
Just finished Inferno.

I'd say this was definitely my favourite Pertwee story so far. When he first started looking around after using the TARDIS console, I thought he'd maybe travelled to the future and would see what was to come, then would go back and change it. But then BAM, parallel universe story!

Again I got a strong feeling Star Trek TOS may have had an influence here. The parallel universe full of evil counterparts, facial scars, and inverted facial hair just screamed "Mirror, Mirror", which would have been recent in people's minds. That's not a bad thing, scifi has had so many different takes on these classic ideas, and so many scifi shows have been inspired by original Trek in particular. The eye patch was a nice touch of cheese. :lol

Doctor Who has had some parallel universes episodes in the modern series, but it's been kept as a fairly difficult and rare occurrence, so this one was a pleasant surprise. I'm not sure if it's something they do again in the classic series.

Overall a really good story. I love the messing around with tech, so I was happy to finally see the TARDIS console make an appearance, and be a pivotal part of the story. It had elements of a typical Doctor Who plot, with the advanced sciencey operation, led by some a-hole leader who won't listen to reason (Fury from the Deep, anyone?), but then added the new element of the parallel universe to get around some of the limitations of being Earth bound and add some twists.
My only problem with the story was those awful and unnecessary generic werewolf monsters. What the hell was that about? Beyond their initial discovery of the goo, they didn't really deal much with the fact that there was green goo inside the earth that seemed to infect people with contagious werewolf syndrome, and it was unnecessary since it already had the danger element of DESTROYING THE ENTIRE PLANET! :lol The monsters weren't really brought up much again in terms of plot either. It was just oh shit, monsters being monstery. They didn't care much about where they came from or what they were or how stopping the drilling would also stop the monsters, because you know, Earth being destroyed and all. The story had monsters for the sake of it, they weren't the story.

I'm looking forward to starting the next season. :)

edit: Ok, I'm two minutes into the next episode and my excitement level has already ramped up to peeing my pants.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on February 11, 2016, 12:18:49 PM
There are some really good story in the upcoming season that I think you'll dig a lot, but the first one isn't necessarily my favourite.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 11, 2016, 10:45:07 PM
An average to decent story overall, but I enjoyed it simply for being the first appearance of The Master, plus a few other Time Lord tidbits. The ending felt very rushed. The Master can't have given any thought at all to his plan if he was swayed that easily by a comment from The Doctor. I really don't know how his plan was supposed to make sense at all. But I was happy with the introduction of another Time Lord character.

As for the Autons, I felt the tech side of the story made more sense here, but ultimately they were much better used in Spearhead From Space. There was a lot of silliness, like the ugly little doll, the carny looking guys with the big plastic heads, the plastic face hugger, the telephone cord. And why did they sound like Daleks? :lol Spearhead From Space made them scary, this made them funny.
I noticed in Inferno they'd started playing with some blue screen effects (outside of The Doctor's lab hangar thing), but in this story they were abusing it like Kirk Hammett abuses a wah pedal. They used it for a lot of backgrounds through doors even when the camera was moving, and used it for backgrounds of labs and such. The worst was using it for one shot in a kitchen! Is it that hard to find a damn kitchen to shoot in? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on February 13, 2016, 10:20:36 AM
What did you think about Jo? It took me a while to warm up to her. She seemed so ditzy when compared to Liz
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on February 13, 2016, 02:42:31 PM
Jo has some great moments, but she's one of my least favourite companions all in all. I really like her in Carnival of Monsters and The Curse of Peladon though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 13, 2016, 08:19:31 PM
What did you think about Jo? It took me a while to warm up to her. She seemed so ditzy when compared to Liz

She bugged me at first, but I think I'll eventually warm to indifference. :lol
I don't know if it's the lack of travelling to other planets, but I don't find the companions/assistants for the 3rd Doctor to be all that interesting yet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on February 14, 2016, 02:17:15 AM
Liz was great, smart and a little sarcastic.

Jo was cute, but yeah a bit useless.

Sarah Jane is, of course, awesome.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on February 14, 2016, 05:25:03 PM
Speaking of Sarah Jane and the 3rd Doctor, I'm really looking forward to your reaction to Invasion of the Dinosaurs. It's one of my favourite Classic Who stories ever but I very rarely see it mentioned by anyone. :\
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on February 14, 2016, 06:38:26 PM
Speaking of Sarah Jane and the 3rd Doctor, I'm really looking forward to your reaction to Invasion of the Dinosaurs. It's one of my favourite Classic Who stories ever but I very rarely see it mentioned by anyone. :\

The story itself I remember enjoying. Shame about the actual dinosaurs though.  :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on February 15, 2016, 02:30:32 AM
Speaking of Sarah Jane and the 3rd Doctor, I'm really looking forward to your reaction to Invasion of the Dinosaurs. It's one of my favourite Classic Who stories ever but I very rarely see it mentioned by anyone. :\

The story itself I remember enjoying. Shame about the actual dinosaurs though.  :lol

They weren't perfect, true, but that kinda comes with the territory of being made in the 70's. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on February 15, 2016, 04:20:36 AM
Speaking of Sarah Jane and the 3rd Doctor, I'm really looking forward to your reaction to Invasion of the Dinosaurs. It's one of my favourite Classic Who stories ever but I very rarely see it mentioned by anyone. :\

The story itself I remember enjoying. Shame about the actual dinosaurs though.  :lol

They weren't perfect, true, but that kinda comes with the territory of being made in the 70's on a show with a limited budget. :P
Fixed.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 16, 2016, 12:51:30 AM
I can overlook cheap production values if the story is good. Many of those early Doctor Who episodes were amazing despite all of their limitations.

I just finished The Mind of Evil. Having another Time Lord stuck on Earth made for a fresh addition to The Doctor being exiled, but I thought this was another average story overall. The Master's plan wasn't well thought out again and didn't make a whole lot of sense, and the monster had a few inconsistencies in how it was applied. It had some nice ideas in there though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on February 16, 2016, 03:02:23 AM
plan wasn't well thought out ... didn't make a whole lot of sense ... a few inconsistencies in how it was applied ... some nice ideas in there though.
This sums up my feeling towards quite a lot of the Pertwee era. :lol I also think that his Doctor isn't nearly as engaging as Troughton or T. Baker - if he had been, it might have been easier to overlook some of the other issues. With the Fourth Doctor, even in the weakest stories, he was written and acted in a such a way that made him hugely enjoyable to watch, even when the story made no sense.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on February 17, 2016, 12:47:26 AM
Yep yep.

Also many Pertwee stories have the unfortunate habits of drawing out a premise that's decent at best across six episodes, which really lowers my appreciation for some of the stories. The worst offenders there, I find is the semi-interconnected story Frontier in Space/Planet of the Daleks, which spans 12 fucking episodes.

That said, there are some real gems in there, like Inferno, The Curse of Peladon, Carnival of Monsters (this is probably Top 5 of Classic Who for me, I love this one) and Invasion of the Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 22, 2016, 11:12:12 PM
The Claws of Axos-

Again a lot of nice ideas, with the execution being a little lacking overall. The fourth episode was by far the best, with the first time I believe we've seen the interior of the TARDIS since the 2nd Doctor, and some cool scifi stuff with The Master and The Doctor using the TARDIS during the latter half of part 4.
The Axons had an interesting look with the bug eyes, didn't like the poop monster form though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on April 10, 2016, 04:15:19 AM
So, after a short Doctor Who rewatch-athon, I have come to the conclusion that Heaven Sent is my favourite Doctor Who episode of all time. It's just perfect on every level.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 10, 2016, 04:28:46 AM
Yeah, that episode is something special. I don't know if it's my favourite episode because there are other episodes I love just as much, but at worst it's top 2 or 3. The story, the directing, the pacing, the music, the whole episode oozes quality.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on April 10, 2016, 04:56:50 AM
Speaking of DW, how is your Classic Series watchthrough going Blob?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 10, 2016, 05:03:31 AM
I stalled again a little while ago most of the way through Colony in Space. Nothing wrong with the story itself, it was an improvement having him leave Earth, I think was just getting a bit burned out on that era for now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on April 10, 2016, 08:26:06 AM
Oh, I definitely understand burn-out on Pertwee stories, but you should definitely keep on it, there's some of the best stuff of the classic series still to come.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 11, 2016, 11:15:57 AM
I'll definitely be getting back to it some time, I just needed a break. There's so much I'm excited to see coming up though, including many of the 3rd Doctor's stories, and of course I have the entire run of Tom Baker to look forward to!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on April 11, 2016, 01:50:53 PM
I think Season 9 is a pretty big rut, so you'll have to trudge through that (though it does have The Curse of Peladon, which I like a fair bit), but after that things pick up quite a bit. Season 10 has what is probably my favourite Classic Who - or certainly Top 5 - story with Carnival of Monsters.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 12, 2016, 03:11:34 PM
I'll definitely be getting back to it some time, I just needed a break. There's so much I'm excited to see coming up though, including many of the 3rd Doctor's stories, and of course I have the entire run of Tom Baker to look forward to!

And the entire run of Colin Baker to "look forward" to !!

Peter Davison is a good Doctor too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 12, 2016, 11:23:40 PM
Peter Davison is a good Doctor too.

Sorry Kotow, I don't watch Doctor Too, I watch Doctor Who. :neverusethis:
I don't have an opinion one way or another on most of the later Doctors yet, although wearing celery and something to do with cricket turns me off him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 13, 2016, 03:30:45 PM
When I was tiny - Davison was my 2nd favourite Doctor after Tom Baker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on April 14, 2016, 11:15:45 AM
Not sure how controversial this is, but I actually prefer Colin Baker to Peter Davison, even though Davison's stories were a lot better for the most part - I just find his pretty campy acting style to be a lot of fun, and Davison was always too much of a wet blanket for me, though he's great in The Caves of Androzani, for instance.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 14, 2016, 04:18:03 PM
(https://www.crackerboxpalace.com/warriorsgate/warriorsgate13.jpg)
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Scorpion on April 14, 2016, 04:18:52 PM
Oh yeah, also a reason why the first Davison season is basically worthless.

Seriously, fuck Adric. Worst companion by a lightyear.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 14, 2016, 04:29:02 PM
:o look at his little face.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 21, 2016, 10:38:07 AM
The new companion is being announced on Saturday. I'm hoping for a black midget, just to mix things up a little.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 21, 2016, 10:41:44 AM
It's bound to be female isn't it ?

You have to make sure everyone knows The Doctor has " a case of the not-gays " as they say on RLM.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 23, 2016, 11:17:25 AM
Pearl Mackie as Bill

Seems to be a girl from the 80s? Looks like a Donna type personality, slightly annoying from the short clip posted, but I expect the character to come on a bit strong at first. I didn't like Donna at first either, but she ended up being great. I was hoping for something a bit more different, but I'm fine with this. Sucks to have to wait so long to see some new episodes.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 23, 2016, 11:36:47 AM
I'm not familiar.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 23, 2016, 11:37:46 AM
Neither am I. Here's the teaser clip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbMmsShghT4
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 23, 2016, 11:56:46 AM
Daleks again ?!

I know they're a famous DW villain / species but it would be like having Khan keep cropping up in Star Trek.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 23, 2016, 12:03:55 PM
Yeah. I do love the Daleks, but there are so many other ideas to explore too.
I've heard repeatedly that the BBC need to use the Daleks every year by contractual obligation or something to do with the rights to the Daleks, but I don't know if that's just internet rumour.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 23, 2016, 12:05:47 PM
Who else would have the rights ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 23, 2016, 12:06:05 PM
Invent a new type of Dalek called Kaled.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 23, 2016, 12:12:16 PM
Who else would have the rights ?

Terry Nation owned the rights to the Daleks, as he wrote their first stories and created them (seems things worked differently back then), and I guess his estate owns the rights now? Every episode featuring the Daleks still includes a mention of him in the end credits. Terry nation wanted to take the Daleks elsewhere back in the day, which is why they were killed off in Evil of the Daleks and didn't appear again for several years. I don't know what the deal has been since.

Invent a new type of Dalek called Kaled.

Kaleds are already a thing. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on April 23, 2016, 12:28:22 PM
In DW or in general ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 23, 2016, 12:29:40 PM
In Doctor Who. They're Dalek related.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on April 23, 2016, 03:41:44 PM
Yeah. I do love the Daleks, but there are so many other ideas to explore too.
I've heard repeatedly that the BBC need to use the Daleks every year by contractual obligation or something to do with the rights to the Daleks, but I don't know if that's just internet rumour.
I'm pretty sure that's just made up nonsense.

And the Kaleds were the human-like people of Skaro (well, one of the two races) who Davros experimented on and turned into Daleks.

EDIT: Though you won't have explored that much in your run through the classic seasons yet, Blob.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 23, 2016, 11:12:03 PM
Yeah. I do love the Daleks, but there are so many other ideas to explore too.
I've heard repeatedly that the BBC need to use the Daleks every year by contractual obligation or something to do with the rights to the Daleks, but I don't know if that's just internet rumour.
I'm pretty sure that's just made up nonsense.

Or you suggesting the internet is lying? Surely you jest! :lol

I was thinking I'd seen Kaleds, but I was getting mixed up with the Thals. I recognized the name instantly though. I really gotta get back to my classic Who viewing and power through to Tome Baker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2016, 12:07:59 AM
I didn't want to make a new thread for it, but has anyone checked out Class yet, the new spin-off series? I watched the first two episodes, and it's not bad.
I was under the impression it was going to be a more kid oriented show, like what I assume the Sarah Jane Adventures was, but it's actually more adult than Doctor Who, with a decent amount of blood, and dealing with more mature topics that Doctor Who, with a bit of language. I like the diversity, but at the start of the first episode I thought it laid it on too thick with the pandering. Didn't have any problems after that though.
The premise for why Coal Hill is getting a whole bunch of aliens works well enough for the purpose of the show, and they deal with the fact they're just a bunch of kids who have no clue what they're doing. The quality of the show is on par with Doctor Who, but this is more focused on the people than the monsters. The Doctor's cameo in the first episode was limited, used only to establish the premise rather than get in the way or overshadow the main cast.
In the absence of Doctor Who, I'll probably continue watching it for now. It has potential.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 23, 2016, 09:26:28 AM
I guess that's to replace Torchwood since it looks like that probably won't come back any time soon.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 23, 2016, 02:50:59 PM
Isn't this great? Us talking about something other than what the white people are doing?

Those annoying white people... Ugh.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 23, 2016, 02:51:40 PM
Speaking of white people ?

You know who fucking sucks ?

Fuckin Davros.

Davros can eat a dick.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 24, 2016, 07:37:04 AM
Didn't know this was out yet.  I will try to catch it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 26, 2016, 06:59:15 AM
Since it's return (the dreadful Nu_who moniker) the 4 actors who have taken the role have in my opinion all been stellar Doctors, a lot more consistent than the casting of the title character in the older version of the show.   I'd probably give Matt Smith the edge - he got the old weary alien side perfectly, also 11 plus Amy/Rory was the best group so far.   Eccleston and Capaldi I have about at the same level, Eccleston quit to soon he was just starting to find his groove (His acting in Dalek is about as good as it gets).   Capaldi I thought was great in his first series, but they'll toned him down since and i'm not sure that suits him so well.   Tennant comes in last for me, great actor, but his version was to Human for me (that's down to the writting not the actor).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 26, 2016, 07:02:09 AM
Double post
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 26, 2016, 05:02:44 PM
I hated Matt Smith and LOVED Capaldi. i think he's up there with the best Doctor's ever.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 27, 2016, 02:11:17 AM
I hated Matt Smith and LOVED Capaldi. i think he's up there with the best Doctor's ever.

I genuinely believe all four of the new doctors are up there with the best, in fact all 4 would be in my top 6 (Davidson and Pertwee would be the other two).   Capaldi is great I loved his first series when he had an edge and menace, but in the second series they decided to lighten him up and make him more wacky (Glasses, Guitar etc...) and that didn't suit him so much.   You really hate Matt Smith?   The whispered " daft old man, who stole a magic box and ran away" speech to a sleeping Amy in 'The Big Bang' is about for perfect Doctor moment for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2016, 02:20:39 AM
I love 10, 11 and 12, but I've never much liked 9. They tried to make him rough and edgy, but he always had that stupid goofy grin even when he was supposed to be angry. I love the rest about equally though.
I think Capaldi's Doctor has gotten even better in S9. I did like the darker side in S8, but he more so natural as the quirky uncle/grandpa thing now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 27, 2016, 02:51:31 AM
I love 10, 11 and 12, but I've never much liked 9. They tried to make him rough and edgy, but he always had that stupid goofy grin even when he was supposed to be angry. I love the rest about equally though.
I think Capaldi's Doctor has gotten even better in S9. I did like the darker side in S8, but he more so natural as the quirky uncle/grandpa thing now.

9 Needed another series.  That first serie was all over the place in tone - the stuff Russel T Davis was writing back then was camp as Hell, the guest writers saved the serie with stuff like Dalek and The Gasmask Kid double.  The defining 9 moment for me was in 'Dalek' when he walks into the locked room.  First there is the cocky swagger, then the absolute fear as he realises he's locked in with a Dalek, then the elation that the Dalek is harmless, then the anger at it.   A taster of how good 9 could have been if he'd hung around once the show found it's feet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 27, 2016, 06:54:54 AM
I love 10, 11 and 12, but I've never much liked 9. They tried to make him rough and edgy, but he always had that stupid goofy grin even when he was supposed to be angry. I love the rest about equally though.
I think Capaldi's Doctor has gotten even better in S9. I did like the darker side in S8, but he more so natural as the quirky uncle/grandpa thing now.
This exactly.  I just never bought 9. 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 27, 2016, 07:33:29 AM
I'm so lost when people call Doctors by their number rather than the actor :p

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2016, 07:35:01 AM
What kind of Doctor Who fan doesn't know the numbers?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 27, 2016, 08:48:16 AM
What kind of Doctor Who fan doesn't know the numbers?

To be fair the numbers thing is kind off screwy since the whole War Doctor stuff!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2016, 08:50:51 AM
What kind of Doctor Who fan doesn't know the numbers?

To be fair the numbers thing is kind off screwy since the whole War Doctor stuff!

Not really. It was made very clear that the War Doctor doesn't affect the numbering on the technicality of not referring to himself as The Doctor (although I don't know what exactly he did refer to himself as. Maybe The Executioner, or The Doombringer, or the Destructionator, or Stormageddon Dark Lord of All)
I would have liked to see 8 instead of the War Doctor though, finally get some good screen time, instead of just the regeneration in Night of the Doctor. Not that I had a problem with John Hurt as the War Doctor, but it would have been nice for 8 to get a big ending.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 27, 2016, 09:01:21 AM
The War Doctor called himself Pepe.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 27, 2016, 09:05:24 AM
:lol And the Daleks and the Time Lords and the entire universe came to fear the name........ Pepe.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on October 27, 2016, 09:46:37 AM
What kind of Doctor Who fan doesn't know the numbers?

One who's only a casual observer.

The only series I've seen in full are Capaldi's.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 27, 2016, 10:01:24 AM
:lol And the Daleks and the Time Lords and the entire universe came to fear the name........ Pepe.
https://imgur.com/a/EwKKc :D
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 27, 2016, 10:18:08 AM
What kind of Doctor Who fan doesn't know the numbers?

To be fair the numbers thing is kind off screwy since the whole War Doctor stuff!

Not really. It was made very clear that the War Doctor doesn't affect the numbering on the technicality of not referring to himself as The Doctor (although I don't know what exactly he did refer to himself as. Maybe The Executioner, or The Doombringer, or the Destructionator, or Stormageddon Dark Lord of All)
I would have liked to see 8 instead of the War Doctor though, finally get some good screen time, instead of just the regeneration in Night of the Doctor. Not that I had a problem with John Hurt as the War Doctor, but it would have been nice for 8 to get a big ending.
Agreed. Although the DW movie had some pretty big flaws, I liked the Doctor and I've really liked what I've heard of his Big Finish audio dramas. And then I loved the Night of the Doctor, so it's a huge shame that they didn't make more of that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 28, 2016, 11:08:32 AM
:lol And the Daleks and the Time Lords and the entire universe came to fear the name........ Pepe.
https://imgur.com/a/EwKKc :D
:lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 04, 2016, 01:31:32 AM
Class just finished its first season, and it looks like they're setting up the return of a well known Doctor Who villian for the second season, but I won't spoil it in case anyone is planning to watch it. The first season was not bad, although the characters were a bit annoying. Quill was easily the standout character. The second last episode with her as the focus was the best of the bunch.

I have pretty low expectations from the Christmas episode of Doctor Who, it looks silly. Many of the details for S10 don't look promising either, but after such a strong S9, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I hope Moffat can go out with a bang.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bundy on December 06, 2016, 02:29:34 AM
Anyone else planning on getting The Power of the Daleks when it's released. Animated version of the first Troughton story using the original audio. I'm really looking forward to this.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 26, 2016, 01:23:58 AM
Anyone else planning on getting The Power of the Daleks when it's released. Animated version of the first Troughton story using the original audio. I'm really looking forward to this.

I just got it for Christmas, haven't watched it yet. It was about a year ago I saw it for the first time (the reconstructions obviously), and I quite enjoyed the story, but found it hard to get into Troughton as the Doctor due to the tediousness of having no video. I expect I'll enjoy it even more now.


The Christmas episode was not bad, and some good light fun. It had little to do with Christmas, which was a plus. Overall I'm not a fan of the Christmas episodes of Who. I'm also really not a fan of superhero/comic book stuff, and aside from the magical thought gem idea, I overall thought the concept was handled really well, and parodied a lot of the sillier elements of comic books in a fun way. Having The Doctor appear at multiple points in Grant's life reminded me a bit of Doctor Who's A Christmas Carol episode. Was the machine he was building at the beginning a reference to The Angels Take Manhattan? Nice reference if it was.

While I don't dislike Nardole, I barely remember his role in last year's episode, and found him quite pointless in this one too. I know he appears in S10, so hopefully he's utilized better there. The little teaser for S10 looked good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 26, 2016, 09:35:08 AM
I don't know how "good" I'd say the christmas special was if I'd be like analytic about it, but I don't really want to because the episode was a lot of fun. The christmas episodes are always pretty silly, and this was no exception, but I found myself laughing at a surprising amount of stuff in there, so thumbs up for having fun.

Didn't watch the s10 teaser but I'm excited for the new season!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on December 26, 2016, 09:54:58 AM
I saw the new Doctor Who Series trailer and oh man that new companion looks so annoying already.


Like jumping the shark Scrappy Doo annoying.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Skeever on December 27, 2016, 09:55:57 AM
Weird special. Overall, I liked it, but I was getting ready for disappointment when they were showing the guys with their heads split open. ClairvoyantCat and I were talking about the show earlier when he mentioned not liking it because "I came for campy sci-fi, and I got bad horror."

Didn't  make much of the comment at the time, but as I think about it, it's started to stick. As a longer term fan, I feel like Moffatt still gives you a mixed bag of genres, but now that I think about it it's no surprise a less seasoned viewer would get the impression that it leans heavily in the direction of "bad horror", even moreso than "camp sci-fi". Seems to be a problem unique to Moffat, too. Don't get me wrong - I've loved a lot of what Moffat has done for the show, but the Christmas special was just the reminder I needed as to why the show needs fresh vision behind it. Not sure it's going to improve with the guy who did Broadchurch behind the helm, but we'll see.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 27, 2016, 10:11:32 AM
It's not something unique to Moffat at all. The RTD era leaned more towards the bad horror stuff imo, and especially the campy stuff that gives the genre a bad reputation of being silly monsters. When Moffat does horror, he does it in a way that doesn't just feel like a B movie. Then there's the crap like Sleep No More, which we can blame on other writers like Gatiss rather than Moffat. They can't all be winners! :lol

This episode really didn't treat the bad guys as the focus, so I didn't consider it a horror episode even for Who. The bad guys were mostly there as a vehicle for the main superhero plot. They actually reminded me a lot of Parasyte, which I forgot to mention earlier.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bundy on December 27, 2016, 04:12:31 PM
DW has always had an element of horror. The show came under a lot of criticism from self appointed upholders of "Christian values" (Mary Whitehouse and co.) during the Philip Hinchcliff/Robert Holmes years, for it's 'inappropriate' content. Stories such as The Ark in Space, Pyramids of  Mars, The Deadly Assassin, The Brain of Morbius and the Seeds of Doom all have many of the elements of traditional horror movies and meld sci-fi with horror as many Hollywood movies such as Alien, The Thing and Frankenstein have done over the years. While I'm a big fan of the Hinchcliff stuff, like previous posters, the horror elements in recent series don't do much for me at all.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on December 29, 2016, 08:58:17 AM
Finally got to see the Christmas special.  I thought it was fun and harmless, and was a good vehicle for Capaldi to portray his version of the Doctor.  I also liked that it addressed the last night (24 years) of River Song.  However, I don't like that they used Matt Lucas as Nardole to do it.  I find the actor unnerving in every role I've seen him in, and he has never once played a character that is likable, including in Doctor Who.  Hopefully he won't continue into the new season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 29, 2016, 09:17:08 AM
Finally got to see the Christmas special.  I thought it was fun and harmless, and was a good vehicle for Capaldi to portray his version of the Doctor.  I also liked that it addressed the last night (24 years) of River Song.  However, I don't like that they used Matt Lucas as Nardole to do it.  I find the actor unnerving in every role I've seen him in, and he has never once played a character that is likable, including in Doctor Who.  Hopefully he won't continue into the new season.

I know he starts off in S10, and is in several episodes if not all of them (not sure). I at least hope they take some time to develop him a bit, and have a good dynamic with the new companion if he sticks around that long.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on December 29, 2016, 09:33:19 AM
Oh well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 29, 2016, 11:49:28 AM
I liked the fat guy. He looked adorable. I didn't get why they brought River Song into this, I thought this was about losing Clara. The episode felt pointless, though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: countoftuscany42 on December 29, 2016, 12:15:34 PM
Well since he doesn't remember Clara it wouldn't really be about that..
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 29, 2016, 12:39:10 PM
I'm drawing a complete blank on the last season, other than that I didn't really like it. Can it be summed up in a sentence?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on December 29, 2016, 01:18:57 PM
I liked the fat guy. He looked adorable. I didn't get why they brought River Song into this, I thought this was about losing Clara. The episode felt pointless, though.
It wasn't about Clara at all, it was about the death of River Song in the aftermath of "The Husbands of River Song", last year's Christmas special, which was the last episode of Doctor Who that aired.

It ended at the start of the last night of River's life.  But they were on Darillium, where night lasts for 24 years.  Hence, the 24 years that the Doctor has been gone in this new episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 29, 2016, 01:21:28 PM
Damn, I completely forgot about that as if it never happened. Might have to check myself just in case, total Who amnesia :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 29, 2016, 01:27:35 PM
I actually thought it was about Clara too until they said River's name, then it all came back to me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 29, 2016, 08:30:18 PM
This is what happens when you have an entire year between episodes. It took time for it to register with me that it was about River Song, especially as I try to block River Song out of my mind. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 04, 2017, 09:33:34 AM
This is what happens when you have an entire year between episodes. It took time for it to register with me that it was about River Song, especially as I try to block River Song out of my mind. :lol
I had just rewatched the last episode recently, so it was fresh in my mind.  I thought about it as soon as it said "24 years later..." or whatever.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on January 18, 2017, 01:08:35 AM
Apparently Moffat has said that Nardole will be in every season 10 episode. I didn't really mind him, but I think every episode is pushing it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 18, 2017, 06:36:24 AM
Yeah, they're going to have to do a lot of work to make him work as a companion. I also don't know how the dynamic will work with Bill. We'll just have to wait and see.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Metro on January 30, 2017, 06:40:23 PM
Capaldi is leaving Doctor Who
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-38805151?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 30, 2017, 08:25:29 PM
Third Doctor in a row to do 3 seasons in 4 years. I'll miss Capaldi a lot, but I'm also glad that Capaldi will finish his run with Moffat, and the next guy will have a fresh start, as was the case with Moffat/Smith. I hope S10 is as strong as S8/9 and that Capaldi gets a solid conclusion.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 31, 2017, 09:32:57 AM
Third Doctor in a row to do 3 seasons in 4 years. I'll miss Capaldi a lot, but I'm also glad that Capaldi will finish his run with Moffat, and the next guy will have a fresh start, as was the case with Moffat/Smith. I hope S10 is as strong as S8/9 and that Capaldi gets a solid conclusion.
Same here.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 31, 2017, 09:34:56 AM
Thats the way to do it .

Get in - be the best Doctor since Tom Baker - Get out.

Say " follow that "

Good luck to whoever replaces him :lol

I imagine they might go young again.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on January 31, 2017, 09:50:20 AM
Third Doctor in a row to do 3 seasons in 4 years. I'll miss Capaldi a lot, but I'm also glad that Capaldi will finish his run with Moffat, and the next guy will have a fresh start, as was the case with Moffat/Smith. I hope S10 is as strong as S8/9 and that Capaldi gets a solid conclusion.

Agreed!

I do hope that they don't cast a Matt Smith clone after him, just to win back some audiences.

I loved Capaldi's darker take on the doctor!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 31, 2017, 09:58:48 AM
I actually read that they want to return to the Tennant type of thing (to get the young girls back).

I don't really care what direction they choose, as long as the Doctor and companion are both well cast and have a good dynamic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on January 31, 2017, 11:20:48 AM
I said that I don't like new Sherlock for going dark but IMO Doctor Who is at it's best when it's dark.

It's the shitty forest of kids episodes and cities on backs of whales episodes that are usually the crap ones.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on February 16, 2017, 07:13:19 AM
What does everyone think about the rumour that Tilda Swinton could be the new Doctor ?

I think she'd be perfect for it myself.

I mean - If they do go female.

I assume The Doctor can regenerate into anyone as long as they are Gallifreyan ? They do have female Gallifreyans I assume ?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on February 16, 2017, 07:24:54 AM
The Master already regenerated into a woman, and the idea that regenerating time lords can change gender has been mentioned a few times on the show in recent years. So they definitely CAN do it. The question is whether they will.

Personally, I don't think it's necessary. If they have an actress who they think is perfect for the role then they should definitely go for it, but I don't think they should force it. In a way, given they only just made the Master female, they might actually be better off waiting for one more regeneration.

I'd actually be more interested in them casting a non-Caucasian actor this time around. There's definitely no reason at all to not do that.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 16, 2017, 07:29:48 AM
No.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on February 16, 2017, 08:15:37 AM
Idris Elba for everything !
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on February 16, 2017, 08:19:31 AM
:lol :getoffmylawn:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on February 16, 2017, 08:47:03 AM
When Matt Smith took over I'd have liked James Callis.  When Peter took over I'd have liked James Callis.  Both Matt and Peter were/are great Doctors, but now it's new actor time I still want James Callis (who hasn't really done much after BSG).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on February 16, 2017, 09:46:47 AM
Graham Norton :biggrin:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on February 17, 2017, 02:27:13 AM
Graham Norton :biggrin:

Kris Marshall seems to be the bookies fav.  He's just been written out of Death in Paradise, a show my misses watches and so I watch it too sometimes - so he's available.  I'm not against him taking the role - he's got a certain quirkiness and could do the humour if needed, but personally I think he'd be a rather safe choice and end up being a bit like Peter Davidson's take on the Doctor.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on February 17, 2017, 02:29:22 AM
He left Death In Paradise because the work was too much for him.

I doubt he'd taken on Dr. Who.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on March 17, 2017, 02:56:25 AM
New Trailer...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU0_PNeRqPY

Not sure I like the look of Bill.  Rumours of Cybermen being the big bad this time.

All starts on April the 15th.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on March 17, 2017, 10:57:58 AM
Great.. Cybermen.. Again. My least favorite reccuring DW villains.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bundy on March 18, 2017, 06:14:49 AM
I would love to see Alan Davies (Johnathon Creek, QI) be the next Dr.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 06, 2017, 09:56:54 AM
John Simm will return this season as The Master. Looks like it will be in the same episode as Michelle Gomez, so I don't think it will be replacing her (I hope not, because she's amazing). Maybe we'll find out how Simms escaped the Time War and regenerated (or whatever) into Missy. I would like to see that a lot. They've done multi-Doctor stories before, but have they ever done a multi-Master one before? I haven't seen enough of the classic series.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/9ecdaaa1-10e1-45a7-a266-bdd7a1adcdf2
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 16, 2017, 12:18:28 AM
First episode was pretty good. Felt like more of an introduction to Bill as the new companion than feeling like a big Doctor Who story though. That's not a bad thing, but with how long it's been since the last full season, I'm itching for more Capaldi too.
I was worried Bill was going to be annoying at first like Donna was to me, but so far she's ok. And Nardole was kept to a minimum, which I hope continues.

That preview for the rest of the season has me too excited.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bundy on April 16, 2017, 06:06:25 AM
They've done multi-Doctor stories before, but have they ever done a multi-Master one before? I haven't seen enough of the classic series.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/9ecdaaa1-10e1-45a7-a266-bdd7a1adcdf2

No.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on April 16, 2017, 07:58:43 AM
Why is BBC America showing a canceled series? Is it just something to fill the time slot until they get something new or are they hoping to revive it for the American audience
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 16, 2017, 08:01:12 AM
Why is BBC America showing a canceled series? Is it just something to fill the time slot until they get something new or are they hoping to revive it for the American audience

What are you talking about?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on April 16, 2017, 09:01:32 AM
I thought Class was cancelled, but I guess they're airing it on America to try to get a more worldwide audience interested 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 16, 2017, 09:13:27 AM
Sorry, I wasn't familiar with BBC America's schedule. :)
It seems Moffat recently said it's not decided yet, so maybe they're hoping for greater interest internationally, but if that's the case, I don't like their chances. It actually wasn't too bad a show overall, and I wouldn't mind seeing another season. If not, I'm not particularly bummed about it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on April 16, 2017, 02:47:20 PM
The episode was a bit weird, but ultimately fun and a perfectly fine DW episode. Like Blob said, it felt mostly like an introduction to Bill, and in that regard I think it did pretty good. I like her, she seems like a fun character.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on April 16, 2017, 04:33:56 PM
It exceeded my expectations, which admittedly were low but I enjoyed it quite a bit, even though it felt a little bit too familiar or predictive.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Skeever on April 16, 2017, 07:46:19 PM
Came for fun, lighthearted, campy sci-fi. Got really bad PG horror. Oh well, at least Moffat is gone soon.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on April 18, 2017, 01:18:52 AM
I really enjoyed it.  I wasn't expecting much based on the trailers, but I instantly took a liking to Bill.

I have this theory, why would they ruin the surprise of John Simm back as the master in the trailer?  Unless it's a red herring.....How about instead of John Simm coming back as the master, he is in fact the next Doctor.  (P C has already confirmed he's shot his regeneration scene, so It will be part of this series rather than the Chrimbo special).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 18, 2017, 01:25:06 AM
I don't think there's any trick, Doctor Who is usually quite up front about revealing these things themselves, unless there's a specific reason to keep the surprise. Apparently he's appearing as The Master in the same episode as Missy, so I think we're just going to get a cool multi Master story, that may act as closure for Simm to regenerate into Missy, since that was never explained.

Whoa, now that I think about it, Simm's Master was stuck at the end of the time war. Capaldi's first on screen appearance was technically in Day of the Doctor helping the other Doctors end the time war. Maybe we're finally going to see how Capaldi got involved in Day of the Doctor (which I've been waiting for since day 1), and see how Simm escaped the time war and became Missy. Kill two birds with one stone in a big send off for Capaldi. The brief shot of Simm in the trailer definitely appears to be the time war, so it makes sense. The last we saw of Missy, she was aligned with the Daleks. She could also be involved in the time war.

Also, I don't know if a new Doctor has even been cast yet, but I get the feeling we won't see Capaldi's full regeneration until the Christmas special. I think the 12th episode will end with the regeneration process just starting.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on April 18, 2017, 01:51:59 AM
I don't think there's any trick, Doctor Who is usually quite up front about revealing these things themselves, unless there's a specific reason to keep the surprise. Apparently he's appearing as The Master in the same episode as Missy, so I think we're just going to get a cool multi Master story, that may act as closure for Simm to regenerate into Missy, since that was never explained.

Whoa, now that I think about it, Simm's Master was stuck at the end of the time war. Capaldi's first on screen appearance was technically in Day of the Doctor helping the other Doctors end the time war. Maybe we're finally going to see how Capaldi got involved in Day of the Doctor (which I've been waiting for since day 1), and see how Simm escaped the time war and became Missy. Kill two birds with one stone in a big send off for Capaldi. The brief shot of Simm in the trailer definitely appears to be the time war, so it makes sense. The last we saw of Missy, she was aligned with the Daleks. She could also be involved in the time war.

Also, I don't know if a new Doctor has even been cast yet, but I get the feeling we won't see Capaldi's full regeneration until the Christmas special. I think the 12th episode will end with the regeneration process just starting.

There were a lot of papers in the UK this weekend saying Kris Marshall is the new Doctor and has already shot the regeneration scene.  I'd be OK with Kris, I think he'd be maybe a tad safe option - but he could play a more earnest Doctor like Peter Davidson quite well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 18, 2017, 01:57:36 AM
I don't put any stock in that at this point. Kris Marshall has been one of the rumoured names since the start, so it obviously wouldn't surprise me one bit, but I'm not taking it as anything more than rumour until anything is confirmed either.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on April 18, 2017, 02:22:47 AM
I don't put any stock in that at this point. Kris Marshall has been one of the rumoured names since the start, so it obviously wouldn't surprise me one bit, but I'm not taking it as anything more than rumour until anything is confirmed either.

Yeah I agree.  There is always tons of rumours regarding a new Doctor, I remember with horror the time it was going to be Russel Brand (turned out to be Matt Smith, thank God).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on April 18, 2017, 02:25:31 AM
I don't think there's any trick, Doctor Who is usually quite up front about revealing these things themselves, unless there's a specific reason to keep the surprise. Apparently he's appearing as The Master in the same episode as Missy, so I think we're just going to get a cool multi Master story, that may act as closure for Simm to regenerate into Missy, since that was never explained.

Whoa, now that I think about it, Simm's Master was stuck at the end of the time war. Capaldi's first on screen appearance was technically in Day of the Doctor helping the other Doctors end the time war. Maybe we're finally going to see how Capaldi got involved in Day of the Doctor (which I've been waiting for since day 1), and see how Simm escaped the time war and became Missy. Kill two birds with one stone in a big send off for Capaldi. The brief shot of Simm in the trailer definitely appears to be the time war, so it makes sense. The last we saw of Missy, she was aligned with the Daleks. She could also be involved in the time war.

Also, I don't know if a new Doctor has even been cast yet, but I get the feeling we won't see Capaldi's full regeneration until the Christmas special. I think the 12th episode will end with the regeneration process just starting.
My timey-wimey theory (which I'm sure others have suggested but I haven't seen it) is that it's Missy who kills the Master in order for him to regenerate into Missy. There would be something so perfectly Moffat about that. :lol

Anyway very strong season opener, I like Bill a lot so far! And it nicely set up some story arc stuff with the vault without going too overboard on it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 18, 2017, 02:34:41 AM
Anyway very strong season opener, I like Bill a lot so far! And it nicely set up some story arc stuff with the vault without going too overboard on it.

Yeah, they only just touched on that, and it was enough for now. They'll probably easily be able to add bits and pieces to that over the season given the proximity to Bill on Earth.
I also had a silly theory, curious if there would be any more to the spaceship that left behind that puddle in the episode. It's probably just self contained and was trivial to the story, but I couldn't help but wonder if there was any connection to the Waters of Mars and the Ice Warriors? The voice from the puddle sounded Ice Warrior-y to me, and we know they appear this season. I'm probably way overthinking that to find a connection though. :lol

I wouldn't be surprised if Missy kills the Master. If The Master was killed by Missy, she should already know that's how it happened, and it would be fulfilling causality. And I can't imagine a personality such as the Master/Missy wanting to share their power, even with himself/herself.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on April 18, 2017, 02:43:19 AM
The voice from the puddle sounded Ice Warrior-y to me
I dunno, not enough of a horrible lisp.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 18, 2017, 02:47:16 AM
I don't think the voice was quite as lispy in Cold War either, was it? I don't know, it's not one I really rewatch. Anyway, it was just a thought. It was probably nothing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 22, 2017, 11:38:46 PM
Great episode, and Bill was even better in this one. I thought her character would be annoying with all of the constant questions, but I find her awareness amusing, and I'm relieved Nardole is only being used as much as necessary for the story arc. The Doctor and Bill carried 2/3 of the episode on their own with no problem. The resolution of the episode was a bit light for me, but not a huge deal. The museum they used for the location was beautiful. The whole episode looked amazing.
Does the ending indicate a temporary return to random traveling in the TARDISas part of the arc or just a one off?

And I just realized this episode was written by the same guy who wrote In The Forest Of The Night. At least he was able to slightly redeem himself for that atrocity. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on April 23, 2017, 02:51:50 PM
"Is there food sexism in the future, too?" I hate how I so easily notice shit like that nowadays.
It was an enjoyable episode again although I could have used a few more characters in the mix. Also, wasn't quite sold on her character's reaction when watching through that history book.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Skeever on April 23, 2017, 03:29:31 PM
That episode was MUCH BETTER than the first, thankfully.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: bundy on April 24, 2017, 05:44:57 AM
. The museum they used for the location was beautiful. The whole episode looked amazing.


This. Visually, it was a stunning episode. Apart from that it didn't do much for me. Didn't dislike it, just left me feeling pretty ambivilent. Unlike most fans, I'm also finding Bill very annoying and can't warm to the character at all.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 24, 2017, 05:46:27 AM
I really thought I was going to find her annoying, at least this early on, but luckily I'm finding she adds a fun element of awareness to the mix. I can understand how her approach isn't to everyone's taste though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on April 24, 2017, 06:33:33 AM
Yeah I'm liking Bill a lot. Another good episode!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on April 24, 2017, 06:50:31 AM
So, the Doctor doesn't remember Clara at all or what? I'm not remembering a lot from the past seasons anymore since I didn't enjoy them as much but is him being "Stuck" on Earth a reference to something I should remember?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on April 24, 2017, 02:18:54 PM
It'll probably be addressed midway through the season. Sounds like something happened between Doctor Mysterio and The Pilot
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on April 25, 2017, 02:25:55 AM
Wasn't so keen on episode 2.  It was OK but the pacing felt off, took a long time to get going then ended with a quick way to easy resolution.  The interaction between the Doctor and Bill saved the episode for me.  If only Capaldi had got Bill for his first two series instead of the smug Clara his era could have been epic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on April 25, 2017, 03:46:16 AM
took a long time to get going then ended with a quick way to easy resolution.
That can be said about lots of episodes in the last few seasons I think, which to me is part of why I've enjoyed it less.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 29, 2017, 11:14:10 PM
Another solid enjoyable episode. I'm glad they didn't ignore the race issue, and I liked the Jesus quip. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on April 30, 2017, 01:22:59 AM
Could have gone without the "whitewash" comment but no big deal, the thing that kind of got on my nerves was how fast Bill would go and try to judge the Doctor about not being upset and that he's lost count of how many people he's seen dying. While I understand how one might think this is cold to do, to go on the offensive at him like that, especially when they are not that close yet looked quite obnoxious.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on April 30, 2017, 02:15:47 AM
I think the purpose of that was to contrast their characters and show how he needs that human balance for perspective. And from The Pilot, I also got the impression they got to know each other as teacher/student over a decent amount of time, with Christmas and everything.
There were moments when I felt the Doctor acted a little out of character, but overall I felt this was a good episode for The Doctor and Bill.

It's a shame there weren't four knocks on the door at the end, amirite? :neverusethis:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on April 30, 2017, 01:56:13 PM
Probably my favorite episode from this season so far. The Doctor was very funny here, and in a pretty natural way too.

It's a shame there weren't four knocks on the door at the end, amirite? :neverusethis:

My first thought when it happened too. Wasn't really paying attention just when that happened so I had to go back to see how many there were that first time.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 07, 2017, 03:43:33 AM
This episode was enjoyable, although the story doesn't hold up with any thought. Probably my least favourite episode of the season so far, but still not bad.
This season has been quite low key so far and focused a lot on Bill, with only the mystery of the vault to really drive it forward. The Doctor has felt kind of secondary for most of the season imo. I have a feeling the back end of the season is going to be very loaded, and I can't wait for the stuff with the Cybermen and the Master/Missy and likely Time War.

Back to the vault, what do you think is going on there? The Master/Missy somehow?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on May 07, 2017, 07:51:46 AM
I liked the episode until suddenly everyone who "died" were back and everyone was fine. That sort of undermined the whole thing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 07, 2017, 07:57:24 AM
They killed a kid last week, so I'll call it even. :lol And they killed several people at the start of Smile.
But yeah, I sorta felt the same way. It didn't bother me too much though, as they do that more often than not in Doctor Who. They like to keep it family friendly or whatever.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on May 07, 2017, 02:04:07 PM
I'm gonna have to wait til this series is on Netflix. Every other season since Chris Ecclestone is so ...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on May 07, 2017, 02:13:05 PM
They killed a kid last week, so I'll call it even. :lol

That's true, I forgot about that. That was pretty dark.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: countoftuscany42 on May 08, 2017, 12:45:53 AM
I'm gonna have to wait til this series is on Netflix. Every other season since Chris Ecclestone is so ...
nope, they haven't been in over a year. They are on amazon prime though, I believe all nine season
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 13, 2017, 11:45:23 PM
Decent episode, although it's about the millionth space station horror space suits killing people episode they've done. Not particularly original, and the science was hinky, but still one of the better episodes of that kind.
This season really feels like Capaldi is taking it easy though. I'm hoping he goes out with a bang, because the end of this season is shaping up to be huge.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on May 14, 2017, 08:16:37 AM
I liked the episode. It was a perfectly fine DW episode, which I suppose has been a bit of the "problem" with this season. There haven't been any real highs yet, it's all just kinda been there. Not bad but sort of fine. I'm hoping there's some great stuff to come.

I liked the Doctor still being blind though. I always like it when damage to character is either lasting or permanent, so that it feels like there are some consequences to all the crazy things they go through.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 14, 2017, 08:27:30 AM
I hope he's not blind for too long, because as it is he's felt under-utilized this season, but that may play into part of his regeneration plot, which could actually be very interesting, since we know that occurs before the Christmas episode.
I agree there haven't been any major highs, or lows. These are all decent episodes, but that's all we've had this season so far.

I believe/hope that the tail end of this season is going to be epic as fuck though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on May 15, 2017, 01:18:52 AM
I actually really liked this recent episode.  It was well thought out - the capitalism theme was a solid idea and utilised well with an actual clever conclusion, where the Doctor had to think.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on May 15, 2017, 01:32:06 AM
Capitalism as the root of all evil is trendy these days.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on May 20, 2017, 08:55:16 PM
Interesting story arc for the rest (?) of the season, but yes, the Doctor being blind is kind of dumb
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 21, 2017, 01:03:32 AM
That episode was not what I expected, and I'm glad they didn't give away too much. Best episode of the season easily, and a cool matrix-y concept to set up the next one. And what's in the vault is the least surprising option, but I liked the flashbacks to set that up.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 28, 2017, 12:42:39 AM
I didn't realize this would carry over into a 3rd episode, but I like that. From the preview for next week, it looks like this is the location we saw The Doctor start his regeneration from, which would fit with seeing him being shot in the preview. But he still has the rest of the season, so I wonder if we'll see something like the 10th Doctor, but shown over multiple episodes. That could be cool.
And something interesting I just noticed. In the preview where he gets shot, he's wearing the same tattered outfit he was wearing in the flashbacks last week to when he made his oath to watch over Missy. Maybe something timey wimey going on as well?

I'm so excited for the rest of this season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on May 28, 2017, 06:51:28 PM
Very similar to the third season finale when the Master took over. I'm thinking this arc could extend to the rest of the season
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on May 29, 2017, 02:34:30 AM
This is a really weak arc to have a 3 parter on and if that extends to the end it would be really disappointing. This whole season lacks the feel of an actor's last doctor season, it's not epic or foreboding and it just looks like this whole buildup will be for nothing - a quick and rushed resolution as most episodes so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 29, 2017, 02:37:44 AM
I think this next episode will be the end of the monks arc, but possibly the start of a regeneration arc. I believe the episode after this one is featuring the ice warriors, and the final two parter will likely be set in the time war with John Simm's master, and the classic Cyberman are also in there somewhere. It's definitely building to a big end of season send-off for Capaldi.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on May 29, 2017, 03:48:48 AM
Did they explain why his eyesight isn't returning? This should have been taken care of by the regeneration or did I miss something in that episode? The monks just being able to return his vision like that felt cheap.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 29, 2017, 03:58:52 AM
There's not really anything to explain. Whatever that healing device was that he thought would fix his eyesight didn't work. I thought having the monks do it was very cheap too, and I think they could have found a better option there. I didn't want them to milk it all the way to his regeneration, but they could have made an episode out of it with him getting new eyes or whatever. I still don't get why his sonic glasses couldn't manage to fully replace his sight. Even current Earth technology could probably do better, so surely a time lord with access to all of space and time could have easily found a solution before the next episode. Go to the back alleys of the planet Mexicon 12 and buy some space hobo's eyeballs or something.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on May 30, 2017, 01:58:45 AM
The first two episodes of the Monk trilogy have been fine, but a little disjointed so far.  I'm not really seeing the need for the Monks 'simulation' earth, hopefully we will get a good payoff next week.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 30, 2017, 02:11:52 AM
The first two episodes of the Monk trilogy have been fine, but a little disjointed so far.  I'm not really seeing the need for the Monks 'simulation' earth, hopefully we will get a good payoff next week.

The simulation was so that they knew the best time and location on Earth to conquer it by consent (which for a yet unknown reason is apparently something they needed), and presumably also so they know the best strategy to rule the planet. I'm sure we'll find out more about all of that in the next episode now that they're ruling Earth.
It was a little coincidental that the simulation date that The Doctor discovered the Monks and their plan happened to align with the real world time of the end of the world though, and I'm sure it wasn't necessary for them to do it that way, but nonetheless I thought it made for really good standalone plots for the individual episodes.

I also liked that the factor that they didn't account for that allowed The Doctor to save the planet (ignoring Bill's fuckup to save The Doctor) was their own presence. Their simulations accounted for The Doctor and they still calculated they'd conquer the planet, but The Doctor was only able to track down the source of the plague because the Monks were there on Earth monitoring it in reality. Or maybe their simulation did factor in all of that, since their plan did succeed.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on May 30, 2017, 02:28:39 AM
The first two episodes of the Monk trilogy have been fine, but a little disjointed so far.  I'm not really seeing the need for the Monks 'simulation' earth, hopefully we will get a good payoff next week.

The simulation was so that they knew the best time and location on Earth to conquer it by consent (which for a yet unknown reason is apparently something they needed), and presumably also so they know the best strategy to rule the planet. I'm sure we'll find out more about all of that in the next episode now that they're ruling Earth.
It was a little coincidental that the simulation date that The Doctor discovered the Monks and their plan happened to align with the real world time of the end of the world though, and I'm sure it wasn't necessary for them to do it that way, but nonetheless I thought it made for really good standalone plots for the individual episodes.

I also liked that the factor that they didn't account for that allowed The Doctor to save the planet (ignoring Bill's fuckup to save The Doctor) was their own presence. Their simulations accounted for The Doctor and they still calculated they'd conquer the planet, but The Doctor was only able to track down the source of the plague because the Monks were there on Earth monitoring it in reality. Or maybe their simulation did factor in all of that, since their plan did succeed.
Agree with all of this, I loved the whole simulation episode, and it set up the second one perfectly. These slightly longer story arcs (2-3 episodes, or longer) are where I think DW is normally at its best, barring the occasional standout standalone episode (like Blink or Listen).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on May 30, 2017, 02:34:49 AM
The first two episodes of the Monk trilogy have been fine, but a little disjointed so far.  I'm not really seeing the need for the Monks 'simulation' earth, hopefully we will get a good payoff next week.

The simulation was so that they knew the best time and location on Earth to conquer it by consent (which for a yet unknown reason is apparently something they needed), and presumably also so they know the best strategy to rule the planet. I'm sure we'll find out more about all of that in the next episode now that they're ruling Earth.
It was a little coincidental that the simulation date that The Doctor discovered the Monks and their plan happened to align with the real world time of the end of the world though, and I'm sure it wasn't necessary for them to do it that way, but nonetheless I thought it made for really good standalone plots for the individual episodes.

I also liked that the factor that they didn't account for that allowed The Doctor to save the planet (ignoring Bill's fuckup to save The Doctor) was their own presence. Their simulations accounted for The Doctor and they still calculated they'd conquer the planet, but The Doctor was only able to track down the source of the plague because the Monks were there on Earth monitoring it in reality. Or maybe their simulation did factor in all of that, since their plan did succeed.

I presume Missy will be the key factor to victory in the third episode as the Monks wouldn't have been able to factor her in to the simulation as they wouldn't have known she was in the vault.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 30, 2017, 02:43:33 AM
The first two episodes of the Monk trilogy have been fine, but a little disjointed so far.  I'm not really seeing the need for the Monks 'simulation' earth, hopefully we will get a good payoff next week.

The simulation was so that they knew the best time and location on Earth to conquer it by consent (which for a yet unknown reason is apparently something they needed), and presumably also so they know the best strategy to rule the planet. I'm sure we'll find out more about all of that in the next episode now that they're ruling Earth.
It was a little coincidental that the simulation date that The Doctor discovered the Monks and their plan happened to align with the real world time of the end of the world though, and I'm sure it wasn't necessary for them to do it that way, but nonetheless I thought it made for really good standalone plots for the individual episodes.

I also liked that the factor that they didn't account for that allowed The Doctor to save the planet (ignoring Bill's fuckup to save The Doctor) was their own presence. Their simulations accounted for The Doctor and they still calculated they'd conquer the planet, but The Doctor was only able to track down the source of the plague because the Monks were there on Earth monitoring it in reality. Or maybe their simulation did factor in all of that, since their plan did succeed.
Agree with all of this, I loved the whole simulation episode, and it set up the second one perfectly. These slightly longer story arcs (2-3 episodes, or longer) are where I think DW is normally at its best, barring the occasional standout standalone episode (like Blink or Listen).

I think S9 in particular did a great job with the double episodes, and is a very strong season because of it. There are just as many equally amazing standalone episodes too though imo, especially the Moffat stuff like the ones you've mentioned.

Also, I'm only just realizing that the combination of the original Mondasian Cyberman, John Simm's Master, finishing 12's arc from TDOTD, and the rumoured character who might appear, all add up to one potentially incredibly epic finale. :| It could all fit together so well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on June 02, 2017, 02:44:19 AM
Sadly the early review for the Monk 3rd part all say it's a bit of a letdown - oddly it's not written by Moffat either.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 02, 2017, 02:58:03 AM
That would be a shame if true, but we'll see. Toby Whithouse has written mostly decent episodes in the past, although the only one I'd call great was Under the Lake/Before the Flood last series. And after that is a Mark Gatiss episode, so we need something good before his stinker. :lol

I'm hoping Moffat saved up and blew his wad in the two part finale.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 04, 2017, 12:44:42 AM
I thought that was a pretty good episode. I'm a little disappointed in the fake-out regneration, and the ending was a little rushed, and I really dislike the current trend of "humans forget everything" they've been doing in the Capaldi era, but overall I enjoyed it, and I liked the commentary of the episode. It felt very relevant. Given their fake news remark, that's probably no accident. :P

edit: Actually, you know what really bothered me about the fakeout regeneration? It was completely pointless. Bill has no fucking clue what regeneration is yet, other than hearing one brief passing mention of its name. That was not necessary to convince her of anything, all it should have done was confuse her. That was pure trailer-bait for the audience. The best thing he could have done for her sake is pretend to bleed out in a clump on the ground. How much regeneration energy did he just waste? Between this, and The Witch's Familiar when he had some siphoned off on new Skaro, he must be down a regeneration now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on June 05, 2017, 12:01:15 AM
I also enjoyed the episode overall, but I too noticed the issues Blob mentioned. I also thought how Bill fixed it all in the machine thing was a bit cheesy, but I could still appreciate the point.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 05, 2017, 12:21:43 AM
Yeah, that kind of corny sentimentality is a common theme for many endings. You have to just accept it with Doctor Who. :lol

This is what happens when you don't just shoot shit.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 11, 2017, 12:08:35 AM
Whoa, was that a callback to The Curse of Peladon at the end there? The voice sounded instantly familiar, but I was almost thinking Zarbi at first. :lol Although, that particular story was actually set in Earth's future, not the past, but I guess it could be a different character of the same race.

Decent episode, despite the silliness of the premise. I've never been much of a fan of the ice warriors, but this was ok.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on June 11, 2017, 10:01:43 AM
No, I think it was supposed to be who you thought it was
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 11, 2017, 10:10:32 AM
I guess that species live a long time. Every alien species lives a long time. :lol

And I just saw a video that confirmed they got the original actress to do the voice, which I guess is confirmation enough it's the same character. It sounded dead on, but I assumed the original voice actor would be dead after all this time. That's a nice little nod! It's one of those references that isn't essential to know, but makes it more rewarding to be catching up on the original series.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on June 11, 2017, 03:28:19 PM
So, from what I have heard, Russell Davies reported they picked the next Doctor. I wonder if they're going to go for an unknown this time around?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 11, 2017, 11:58:03 PM
The current rumour is Kris Marshall, but I don't know how reliable that is.

I'm sure whoever they go with will be unknown to me, since I don't watch many British shows outside of Doctor Who.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on June 12, 2017, 06:14:11 AM
Kris would be a safe choice.  He's been on TV in the UK for well over a decade and had a couple of big roles in popular shows (albeit slightly bland shows).  I think he'd be best suited to a more earnest Doctor, like Peter Davidson.  If they tried to make him another wacky, over confident Doctor i'm not sure that'd work for him.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on June 12, 2017, 09:30:36 AM
Kris Marshall was the main rumour last time, and possibly the time before as well. I remain sceptical.

And yeah that was a good episode, especially for an Ice Warriors one. I really liked the main story and thought it played out very nicely. I wasn't so keen on Nardole getting all panicky and accidentally sending the Tardis back home, as that seemed a bit out of character and really just as an excuse to get him to ask Missy for help. But otherwise, strong episode.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 12, 2017, 09:56:04 AM
Kris Marshall was the main rumour last time, and possibly the time before as well.

I did not know that! (Capaldi had already been announced by the time I became a fan) I have no opinion one way or another on him, I just hope I end up liking their choice, whoever it is.

I didn't get why the TARDIS randomly decided to dematerialize the second Nardole got in anyway, it seemed like a pretty weak contrivance for the story to both get Nardole out of the way and also get Missy out of the vault. But whatever. If that's my biggest gripe with a Gatiss episode, I'll take it as a win. :neverusethis:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on June 13, 2017, 01:48:33 PM
God damn, this was an awful episode. They should get Dylan Moran to play hims..I mean the Doctor next.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 18, 2017, 03:17:47 AM
Well, that's a whole season of solidly good but not great episodes so far. This two part finale better be absolutely amazing to do justice to Capaldi's final season, because S8 and S9 were both stronger seasons overall.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on June 18, 2017, 04:18:52 AM
I still think this season is slightly above 8, but it ain't got shit on 9.

Latest episode started off pretty shaky, but got a bit better towards the end.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 18, 2017, 04:41:57 AM
I still think this season is slightly above 8, but it ain't got shit on 9.

8 had some major stinkers, but it also had some of my favourite regular episodes, like Listen, Flatline and Time Heist, and imo got off to a stronger start.
This season is more consistent, and it does beat S8 in ways, but S8's high points make up for that for me. I agree there's not a huge margin between them, but it feels like a bit of a letdown for the sendoff of both Capaldi and Moffat.
And I agree S9 slays them. Possibly the best season of the modern series.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on June 19, 2017, 04:27:31 AM
I still think this season is slightly above 8, but it ain't got shit on 9.

8 had some major stinkers, but it also had some of my favourite regular episodes, like Listen, Flatline and Time Heist, and imo got off to a stronger start.
This season is more consistent, and it does beat S8 in ways, but S8's high points make up for that for me. I agree there's not a huge margin between them, but it feels like a bit of a letdown for the sendoff of both Capaldi and Moffat.
And I agree S9 slays them. Possibly the best season of the modern series.

Mummy on the Orient Express was IMO the best of that series, and maybe Capaldi's best episode (toss up with Heaven Sent).

This series was going along OK - no real classic episodes (Oxygen comes closest)  most were around average.  However starting with the 3rd (and conclusive) part of the Monk trilogy we've had 3 fairly disappointing episodes.  I'd say (very much depending on how good the finale is) that currently this series is running lower than the two previous Capaldi series and about on par with Series 7 (Smith's final series) - which I currently rank as the weakest of Moffat's reign.

My own personal choice would be Series 5 for the best of the modern run.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 19, 2017, 05:02:19 AM
I thought Mummy On The Orient Express was great, although I preferred the aforementioned eps more, and I don't rank it as highly.
S7 was very patchy, but damn, the end of that season made up for all of it. S5 was probably my favourite season until S9, and S8 is very close too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on June 20, 2017, 04:42:31 AM
I thought Mummy On The Orient Express was great, although I preferred the aforementioned eps more, and I don't rank it as highly.
S7 was very patchy, but damn, the end of that season made up for all of it. S5 was probably my favourite season until S9, and S8 is very close too.

It's possible in terms of stories series 8 & 9 are the strongest - however the dynamic of Matt's Doctor, Amy & Rory (the best Doctor /Companions combo since the show returned by miles) makes series 5 & 6 more fun and enjoyable for me.   I wasn't the biggest fan of Clara (prefer Bill).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 20, 2017, 04:49:57 AM
I'm apparently one of the few who liked Clara, but I agree that the Doctor/Companion dynamic is important, and 11 + Amy/Rory was a classic combo. In general I like most Doctors and companions, so I was thinking more specifically about the stories and arcs.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on June 20, 2017, 09:41:55 AM
I loved Clara but they gave her shit to work with for the most part. She would have been much better as a recurring character instead.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on June 21, 2017, 12:31:23 AM
I really like Clara too. There were a few moments where they attempted to make her too much like the Doctor, which could get a little annoying, but overall I liked her.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on June 22, 2017, 01:35:15 AM
I generally regard her as the weakest companion of the new series for numerous facts like she followed the brilliant Amy/Rory, or that after her 'Impossible Girl' storyline ended they had nothing much to do with her (2 whole seasons), the dreary Danny Pink stuff, her general smug demeanor and the way the stories tended to make her overshadow Capaldi's Doctor early on.   
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 24, 2017, 01:45:24 PM
I was so excited that I stayed up to watch the new episode right away, so now it's almost 6am here. :lol

Jebus, what a buildup. It's a shame that we knew who/what was in this season before it even began, because the end of this episode was a bunch of awesome reveals, with the Mondasian Cybermen, and The Master, and Bill. I totally didn't place him at all until he started talking to Missy at the end. He was obviously wearing prosthetics, but I figured that was just to look deformed/sick like the rest of them, didn't even consider it was John Simm under there.

Looks like next week includes both the RTD and Moffat style Cybermen, so I don't know how that fits into the story if this is supposed to be their origin. The regeneration tease is also most interesting. The trailer for next week shows his regeneration differently to this episode. Does he hold it off like 10 did? I assume the next episode will end with the same clip this one started with and be a big ol' Doc tease? I figure we're not seeing a new Doctor next week.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on June 24, 2017, 06:33:48 PM
Christmas special we get the new Doctor. I'm wondering if it'll start with the Doctor regenerating (kind of like with the movie) and the rest of the special will be the new Doctor's first adventure?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 25, 2017, 12:13:51 AM
Even though they made it look like Capaldi is regenerating at the end of this episode, I can't see it being the case. It's Capaldi's last episode, it's Moffat's last episode, and I can't see Moffat writing anything too substantial for the next Doctor with a new showrunner taking over, or having Chibnall get too involved before having the prep time for a new season.
I have no idea how this will all play out though, or how connected the Christmas episode will be to the events of the next episode. I can't help but feel they're holding back a lot from the trailer for the finale, because I can't make sense of it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on June 25, 2017, 02:24:58 AM
I really liked this week's episode. Fun idea with the time relativity, and the build-up to the cybermen was indeed great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on June 25, 2017, 03:16:46 PM
The Cybermen buildup was awesome, but oh man it would have been incredible if they hadn't been trailing Cybermen and the Master for weeks. Guess it's just too hard to keep these things properly under wraps these days.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 26, 2017, 03:41:28 AM
It would be cool if they tried though. Obviously there's stuff that would be difficult to keep secret, especially if they're shooting on location, but they probably could have kept The Master secret. Even if there are rumours about, the average viewer would still get a surprise out of it.
At the very least, it would have been nice if they didn't spoil the surprise of The Master at the very start of the season!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on June 26, 2017, 04:54:42 AM
I suspect Mr Moffat is up to something rather big, the reveal of John Sim and the Cybermen in the early trailers suggests to me that there is something bigger going to happen next week. 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on June 26, 2017, 08:58:21 AM
I just thought it was a bit lazy going back to the Cybermen again, like almost a repeat from 2 seasons ago, except with Danny being replaced by Bill. Would have kind of liked instead to know what Missy was planning with the Daleks
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 26, 2017, 09:10:31 AM
I just thought it was a bit lazy going back to the Cybermen again, like almost a repeat from 2 seasons ago, except with Danny being replaced by Bill. Would have kind of liked instead to know what Missy was planning with the Daleks

I also considered that parallel, and building up to reveal the Cybermen at the end of the first part, although it is otherwise a very different story so far, and expect it will be even more so next episode.
I suspect Moffat did this story as a sendoff for Capaldi, because I recall a while ago when Capaldi was asked which past monster he'd like to go up against, he said the Mondasian Cybermen.

Also, I think this is the creepiest the Cybermen have ever been portrayed. I thought that was done very well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on June 26, 2017, 10:47:54 AM
I've always disliked the cybermen. I think they're pretty crap villains. But they did it well this time so I'll go with it for now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on June 26, 2017, 11:14:45 AM
I'm never been much of a fan of the Cybermen either. There have been some decent stories, and a lot of mediocre ones, and not a whole lot of truly great episodes. And especially at the start, they were often defeated in the most benign ways. They rarely felt like a truly formidable villian, at least in the ones I've seen.
This might actually be my favourite Cyberman episode so far, because of how they built up the creepy humanity aspect. I hope the second part lives up to the first.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 01, 2017, 08:32:26 PM
Oh man, bring on the Christmas special right now. That was one emotional ride
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 01, 2017, 11:10:07 PM
Good episode, but I preferred the last episode. Maybe it's just a thing with Capaldi Cyberman season two part finales having stronger first parts.

That's both Capaldi companions who sorta died then got brought back by magic and ran off with an invincible girl to explore space. :lol

I like how we have the first multi Master story, and of course they both kill each other. Does this mean they're both done with the part though? I would have liked to see the Master regenerate.

I can't wait for the Christmas episode! That is what I wanted to see! So it looks like this will tie in to The Tenth Planet, when the 1st Doctor was absent and "resting", hence no companion. Maybe they'll both swing by the Time War while they're at it...
That should be an interesting dynamic, one who is just about to regenerate for the first time, and one who's about to go through it again.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on July 02, 2017, 01:28:45 PM
Don't really know what to say. I liked the episode, but while it had moments that were excellent, as a whole it felt more "fine" than "great", just like the entire season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 02, 2017, 11:29:43 PM
Even though I thought the story was sort of average, I felt it had enough of those moments to put the episode somewhere between good and great, although I would have hoped for more from a story with 2 Masters, 2 Doctors, 3 different generations of Cybermen, and most of those characters being killed in some form.
Overall it has been a bit of a disappointing run for Capaldi's final season. Don't get me wrong, it's been consistent throughout, and even though it's had no major low's imo, it hasn't the big highs either. It hasn't been a bad season, but Capaldi's first two seasons were so damn good that this was a bit of a letdown by comparison.

Hopefully the Christmas episode is a stronger swan song for Capaldi/Moffat.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 03, 2017, 12:05:14 PM
So, Jenna's appearing in the Christmas special. I guess they're going to do a repeat of what Karen did for Matt's regen
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 03, 2017, 12:09:06 PM
So, Jenna's appearing in the Christmas special. I guess they're going to do a repeat of what Karen did for Matt's regen

That would be strange given that 12 doesn't remember her, although I guess he could remember again as part of his regeneration? There's also the fact she's also still flying around in her own TARDIS, so there are possibilities there, however coincidental as that might be.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 05, 2017, 06:00:37 AM
Dailymotion used to be the place to watch classic Doctor Who, but I don't know if the copyright police got on them. For instance, I can't find Earthshock and with Time-Flight, the dude only uploaded the first three episodes. I mean, COME ON!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 05, 2017, 06:05:28 AM
I just recently encountered the same problem getting back into classic Doctor Who. It's very hit and miss for what people have uploaded, and that site's search is the worst of anything I've used (I always use Google to search the site instead). One guy had pretty much everything else from the season I'm on, except for the story I'm currently up to. Now I've had to resort to much shadier sites, which sucks.

Currently half way through Planet of the Daleks btw.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 11, 2017, 02:33:08 PM
Something that's been bothering me with the last episode. Why can't Missy try to regenerate? Like, what would happen? It's been my understanding that Time Lords can take a whole lot of damage. I assume all of them are created equally and the Doctor isn't more special
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 11, 2017, 11:43:45 PM
Something that's been bothering me with the last episode. Why can't Missy try to regenerate? Like, what would happen? It's been my understanding that Time Lords can take a whole lot of damage. I assume all of them are created equally and the Doctor isn't more special

Although Time Lords can regenerate, they're not invincible, and certain types of injuries can stop the regeneration process from being able to occur. It also happened to the 11th Doctor in "Let's Kill Hitler", where River Song poisoned The Doctor with something that would stop him from regenerating (and was only saved by her using her own regeneration energy on him). Whatever The Master hit Missy with apparently did the same thing. Kind of like Time Lord erectile dysfunction I guess.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 14, 2017, 11:09:27 AM
New Doctor being announced after the Wimbledon's Men's Final on Sunday the 16th July!


Can someone translate that into a real time for me? I don't speak sportball.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 14, 2017, 03:04:33 PM
I think 12 AM your time is when the men's final start and it will last a few hours. It's 4pm EET.
Google "mens wimbledon finals when' and it should do it for you.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 14, 2017, 11:21:26 PM
Thanks. Even if it's a long match, I should still be up for that. I don't want to miss the live news. :caffeine:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on July 15, 2017, 12:53:08 AM
So Roger Federer is the next Doctor, didn't see that coming.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 15, 2017, 01:05:54 AM
Only if he wins. If he can't win a tennis tournament, how can we expect him to win against the Daleks?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 15, 2017, 01:35:29 AM
No dalek is a match for his sonic racket!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 16, 2017, 05:07:18 AM
I'm excited to find out who the new Doctor is, even though chances are high I won't be too familiar with them yet. This is the first new Doctor reveal since I've been a fan.

Anyone have a preference out of the likely contenders? Although I have no bias for/against a female Doctor, I think I prefer the female options over the male ones. My preferred male Doctors are more distant odds.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 16, 2017, 05:44:49 AM
I don't even have an idea of who the rumoured candidates were.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 16, 2017, 07:59:12 AM
I don't even have an idea of who the rumoured candidates were.
https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/cult/feature/g24518/everyone-rumoured-to-play-new-doctor-who/ :P

I don't have any strong views. Though while I don't really care about race and gender myself - a good actor/character is good regardless - I will be a bit disappointed if they cast yet another white man. Especially considering there is now solid precendent that time lords can change gender and skin colour when they regenerate.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 16, 2017, 08:10:35 AM
Why would that be a disappointment? It's not like it brings anything to the table.
Would not mind Natalie Dormer in the slightest.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 16, 2017, 09:29:19 AM
Interesting and

SPOILER


















not overly surprising given Chibnall as showrunner!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 16, 2017, 09:30:52 AM
I'm actually really happy with this choice! Definitely my top choice of the female options.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Mister Gold on July 16, 2017, 09:35:41 AM
Very excited about the new Doctor! Whittaker's gonna rock it! :metal
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 16, 2017, 09:37:35 AM
I've seen Broadchurch but I have no memory of Whittaker. It's gonna be interesting for sure.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 16, 2017, 09:43:41 AM
She's an excellent actress. Haven't seen her in any Doctor-esque roles before but doesn't mean she hasn't been in any or that she can't do them.

Should definitely be interesting!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 16, 2017, 09:48:15 AM
I'm definitely willing to give her a try. I hope the regeneration change is going to be hillarious, like oh, what are these?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 16, 2017, 09:54:13 AM
Can't wait to see what kind of outfit they go with too. This is important stuff! I liked that the promo used 12's jacket and hoody to hide the identity. Nice reveal. That should make for an interesting regeneration sequence.

Also, pretty sure someone messed up the TARDIS in the promo. Looks like they used Tennant's box, with the thinner columns, no white edging on the windows, no St John's logo, duller blue etc.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 16, 2017, 10:03:19 AM
I just hate how Chinball kept saying he was aiming to keep the Doctor male, unless this was a last minute kind of thing. How long ago was she cast?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on July 16, 2017, 11:22:51 AM
This is a huge gamble, but a gamble that could potentially pay off!

I'm indifferent about this choice, i'll be judging her based on her first episode.

I'm wondering how well this will go over with the diehard fans? Pretty sure that a lot of people will not be happy about this.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 16, 2017, 11:32:59 AM
"Diehard" fans find something to bitch about regardless, whether it's The Doctor, the showrunner, etc. But they've been laying the groundwork for this for a few years now, and the end of this season hinted in this direction, so it's not unexpected or out of nowhere.
If people don't like the casting choice based on her acting in other roles, that's fine though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 16, 2017, 01:43:18 PM
I just hate how Chinball kept saying he was aiming to keep the Doctor male, unless this was a last minute kind of thing. How long ago was she cast?
First rule of being Dr Who showrunner: lie about everything.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 16, 2017, 11:34:02 PM
It might not have been a lie. I recall that statement being made a while ago, so a lot could have happened in the meantime.
Even if his original intention was to have a male Doctor, they would have auditioned females either way, and he may have changed his mind. Or maybe the BBC pushed in that direction. Fans were probably also very vocal after that statement was made. There are many possible factors.

I suspect the people higher up have been planning this for a while. Personally I don't think this was a last minute decision or token casting, because the entire Capaldi era has been setting this up, and I'm actually glad they waited until now to ease into it in-universe, rather than have it come out of nowhere. I'm very wary of gender swap casting, but I think they've done this right, and now they're more free in future to cast whoever is best for the part.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 16, 2017, 11:46:37 PM
They've been setting it up since before Capaldi. First mention I can remember was in The Doctor's Wife (2011) which I think was the first time it was revealed that time lords can change gender when they regenerate.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 17, 2017, 12:02:40 AM
Even better. I don't recall that reference, so I'll be sure to take notice when I get to it in my rewatch.
Still, I don't feel the show was quite ready for it when they cast Capaldi. This time, it almost felt inevitable. We've had Michelle Gomez's fantastic portrayal of Missy over the past 3 series, we saw a white male regenerate into a black female in Hell Bent, and The Doctor's conversation with Bill in World Enough and Time felt like it was bringing it all together ready for this to eventuate. I don't know if this was their plan all along, or whether it just came together that way this time, but I think they've done a good job setting it up, and I'm confident in their casting choice.
So I'm definitely excited and interested to see what S11 brings.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 17, 2017, 12:37:30 AM
I can already see the accusations of sexism if the show isn't good and criticized by a lot of people (like GB). I hate the politicization of everything these days so much.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on July 17, 2017, 01:20:24 AM
Yeah. The more i think about, the more it makes sense for them to do this change now. With the new showrunner and everything.

This has been in the works for years. It's not like they came up with it yesterday.

Honestly this could be a great way to bring new life into the show, Capaldi's last season was pretty average unfortunately.

This is a cool choice IMO. But judging by the reaction on the interwebs, this will be a very divisive choice.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on July 17, 2017, 02:32:07 AM
I'm much more concerned with how they write the character because of the gender, rather than the gender itself. Doctor Who since it's return (and sometimes in the old show) has the habit of making the female characters the more strong, sensible ones, more streetwise - often the morale compass. The males (and certainly including the Doctors) are often socially inept, aloof, geeky and childish. If this continues we will have a perfect female Doctor and a comedy sidekick male.

To make Jodie work as the Doctor they have to be willing to give her flaws.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 17, 2017, 04:03:14 AM
Even better. I don't recall that reference, so I'll be sure to take notice when I get to it in my rewatch.
Still, I don't feel the show was quite ready for it when they cast Capaldi. This time, it almost felt inevitable. We've had Michelle Gomez's fantastic portrayal of Missy over the past 3 series, we saw a white male regenerate into a black female in Hell Bent, and The Doctor's conversation with Bill in World Enough and Time felt like it was bringing it all together ready for this to eventuate. I don't know if this was their plan all along, or whether it just came together that way this time, but I think they've done a good job setting it up, and I'm confident in their casting choice.
So I'm definitely excited and interested to see what S11 brings.
The reference in the Doctor's Wife was when he talked about the Corsair (when they found the memory cubes or whatever they were called) and he mentioned that at least a couple of the Corsair's incarnations had been female.

We've also seen that time lords can change skin colour since that same season, when River Song regenerated.


I'm much more concerned with how they write the character because of the gender, rather than the gender itself. Doctor Who since it's return (and sometimes in the old show) has the habit of making the female characters the more strong, sensible ones, more streetwise - often the morale compass. The males (and certainly including the Doctors) are often socially inept, aloof, geeky and childish. If this continues we will have a perfect female Doctor and a comedy sidekick male.

To make Jodie work as the Doctor they have to be willing to give her flaws.
For me that dynamic has never been a female/male thing but a human/2000-year-old-alien thing. There's definitely scope to do something a bit different with the show and give it an exciting refresh now, but I don't see them making the Doctor any less alien and the companions any less human (whether they're male or female).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 17, 2017, 04:19:48 AM
Another good point with River Song.

I don't see the Doctor changing more than usual, but I anticipate some new and fresh reactions from other characters, especially enemies of The Doctor, or civilizations that won't listen to a female. Same character, new dynamic. They won't mess with the essence of the character, especially trying to convince audiences for the first time that a female is The Doctor. As usual, it will probably take a few episodes before the character is fully formed, and we've got a new showrunner on top of that, so I'm not going to be too critical right out of the gate. I wasn't sold on Capaldi right away either, but now he's one of my favs. Such is the Doctor Who cycle.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 17, 2017, 04:48:53 AM
As usual, it will probably take a few episodes before the character is fully formed, and we've got a new showrunner on top of that, so I'm not going to be too critical right out of the gate.
Absolutely. If only Twitter was similarly rational.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on July 17, 2017, 05:40:02 AM

For me that dynamic has never been a female/male thing but a human/2000-year-old-alien thing. There's definitely scope to do something a bit different with the show and give it an exciting refresh now, but I don't see them making the Doctor any less alien and the companions any less human (whether they're male or female).

It's more the way the show has been written.  The male characters are often childish buffoons with poor social skills (The Doctor, Rory, Micky etc) and the women have generally been written as more street(or space)wise, sensible and strong.  As a dynamic it works pretty well, but if you reverse it and have a strong, sensible Doctor there isn't much need for a companion, unless they go for the male comedy sidekick.

It's not really a complaint as such.  I just hope they are able to make Jodie's Doctor still have the right quirky traits and a slightly skewed moral compass, rather than she's female therefore we can't possibly give her any negative silliness that a lot of the assistants suffered.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 17, 2017, 09:33:07 AM

For me that dynamic has never been a female/male thing but a human/2000-year-old-alien thing. There's definitely scope to do something a bit different with the show and give it an exciting refresh now, but I don't see them making the Doctor any less alien and the companions any less human (whether they're male or female).

It's more the way the show has been written.  The male characters are often childish buffoons with poor social skills (The Doctor, Rory, Micky etc) and the women have generally been written as more street(or space)wise, sensible and strong.  As a dynamic it works pretty well, but if you reverse it and have a strong, sensible Doctor there isn't much need for a companion, unless they go for the male comedy sidekick.

It's not really a complaint as such.  I just hope they are able to make Jodie's Doctor still have the right quirky traits and a slightly skewed moral compass, rather than she's female therefore we can't possibly give her any negative silliness that a lot of the assistants suffered.
I'm not sure I agree with your generalisation. Rose and Amy were incredibly impulsive and not very sensible. I'd say Rory was more level-headed than Amy (albeit a classic bumbling Englishman). Donna was a total nutter. Apart from the Doctor, I don't see any particular trend in male and female characters.

I do agree with your general point though that the Doctor should still be quirky and alien.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 17, 2017, 09:35:04 AM
Even better. I don't recall that reference, so I'll be sure to take notice when I get to it in my rewatch.
Still, I don't feel the show was quite ready for it when they cast Capaldi. This time, it almost felt inevitable. We've had Michelle Gomez's fantastic portrayal of Missy over the past 3 series, we saw a white male regenerate into a black female in Hell Bent, and The Doctor's conversation with Bill in World Enough and Time felt like it was bringing it all together ready for this to eventuate. I don't know if this was their plan all along, or whether it just came together that way this time, but I think they've done a good job setting it up, and I'm confident in their casting choice.
So I'm definitely excited and interested to see what S11 brings.
The reference in the Doctor's Wife was when he talked about the Corsair (when they found the memory cubes or whatever they were called) and he mentioned that at least a couple of the Corsair's incarnations had been female.

We've also seen that time lords can change skin colour since that same season, when River Song regenerated.
Back to this point, I completely forgot that Moffat introduced the possibility of gender change in his very first scene as showrunner, when the newly regenerated Matt Smith initially thought he was female because he had long hair. So it will have been a full 8 years since the idea was first introduced to the Doctor actually becoming female.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 18, 2017, 01:05:24 AM
I was thinking about that one the other day, but didn't think to mention it.
I think that was as much an off the cuff joke comment about the hair as anything, although I suppose The Doctor wouldn't have said if it wasn't a real possibility. So yeah, Moffat has been setting this up for his entire run. Another thing the haters can blame Moffat for. :lol

But when are they really going to break barriers and make The Doctor a ginger? :neverusethis:
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 18, 2017, 01:19:05 AM
But when are they really going to break barriers and make The Doctor a ginger? :neverusethis:
(https://0.tqn.com/d/menshair/1/S/E/O/-/-/Curly-Red-Afro-Man.jpg)
Yup. I can get behind that. Gingers have been oppressed and marginalized long enough!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 18, 2017, 01:23:22 AM
Can you imagine that fro trying to fit through the TARDIS door? :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on July 18, 2017, 01:36:30 AM
The jokes write themselves. This needs to happen :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 23, 2017, 10:24:04 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCkDXegqjR0

Man, just when you think you're safe from Mark Gatiss for another year, bam, he's starring in the Christmas episode. :lol

It's hard to get a feel for what the Christmas episode is going to focus on, but we can confirm it does tie in to The Tenth Planet. It shows the station, with The Doctor delivering one of his lines, and also shows Polly (looking not particularly accurate, but it's definitely her), with The First Doctor starting his regeneration. It didn't show the Cybermen though, so I don't know if they're a major plot point or just incidental to where we are in the 1st Doctor's timeline.
I wanted some more clear confirmation of this tying into saving Gallifrey in Day of the Doctor, since it would make sense with having two Doctors there.

I'm just hoping Capaldi and Moffat get a great final episode.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 24, 2017, 05:20:45 AM
So, do you think Gatiss is going to playing the Brigadier? 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 24, 2017, 05:30:02 AM
I doubt it. It wouldn't have enough relevance to these Doctors imo, and I think they're stretching the connections to the original series as it is for the average viewer.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on July 24, 2017, 07:13:37 AM
No it's already been confirmed that he's playing a First World War soldier.

I'm just hoping Capaldi and Moffat get a great final episode.
Obviously I hope it's good, but I'm not expecting some huge grand finale like RTD had. I seem to remember reading something about the end of S10 being the big dramatic finale for Capaldi and Moffat with the Christmas special being more a sort of coda. I guess we'll see.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on July 24, 2017, 07:16:10 AM
I'm not expecting anything that big either from the trailer, although we know Bill is in it, and Clara is confirmed to appear in some form too, so who knows. I just don't really know what to make of it yet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 24, 2017, 10:20:14 AM
So, his father then?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on July 28, 2017, 02:28:27 AM
So for a bit of fun I tried to recast the Doctors as if the show was American, trying to match the age, era and style of the British version with an American/Canadian counterpart.  Here's what I came out with....

Lorne Greene - William Hartnell
Dustin Hoffman - Patrick Troughton
James Garner - John Pertwee.
Gene Wilder - Tom Baker.
Dirk Benedict - Peter Davidson.
Christopher Walken - Colin Baker
Jeff Goldblum - Sylvester Mccoy
Billy Zane - Paul Mcgann
Nic Cage - Chris Eccleston.
Sam Rockwell - David Tennant.
Matthew Lillard - Matt Smith.
Steve Buscemi - Peter Capaldi.
Anna Paquin - Jodie Whittaker.

Morgan Freeman - John Hurt.

Struggled most with John Pertwee finding someone to fit that sort of 70's Dandy style who could still look tough doing Venusian Aikido is hard.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on July 28, 2017, 07:07:48 AM
Have you seen the Youtube video of this? A lot of your casting is similar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCv5o7n_mtk&t=6s
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on July 30, 2017, 07:14:11 AM
Finally finished this season.  Capaldi, as always, was fantastic (my favorite Doctor), and another entertaining season.

As sad as I am to see Capaldi (and Moffatt) go, I am definitely excited to see what Jodie Whittaker brings to the role.  She's a talented actress, and I am hopeful.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on July 31, 2017, 04:43:07 AM
Have you seen the Youtube video of this? A lot of your casting is similar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCv5o7n_mtk&t=6s

Aha.   Well no actually I hadn't seen that before, very interesting.  My list was actually inspired by watching 'The WIcker Man' remake drunk with a mate, after the film my mate said Cage would make a great ham Doctor - I agreed we went about throwing other names around.  I remembered what I though were the better ones and made the list, but I suspect my mate had probably seen that video himself as a few of his contrabutions were similar, Rockwell in particular (which I thought was inspired by him!).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 22, 2017, 06:34:03 PM
To keep this thread going, I thought we should have a bit of a debate about Donna's end. If you had to write her story, would you have rather kept the way it ended, or would you rather have had her die young, but knowing she ended up saving billions upon billions of people? I know this sounds morbid, but I'd probably go with the latter: quality over quantity you know
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on September 22, 2017, 11:16:28 PM
I think keeping her alive like that was less cliche, and more sad for The Doctor, and Donna's family. Either way could have worked fine though.
I finished rewatching S4 a couple of weeks ago, and it's definitely my favourite of the Tennant era. Knowing all of the arcs in advance, I enjoyed how it was put together.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 25, 2017, 03:18:47 PM
Her ending is the only one I really actually care about and is just as moving and tragic after all those years. It is perfect.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 22, 2017, 10:33:11 PM
So, the new companions have been announced, and it looks like we've got three companions for the first time in the modern series. The older dude was rumoured for ages, so he was no surprise.

I was actually hoping for multiple companions to continue breaking the pattern as they have with a female Doctor, so hopefully 3 works. They started with 3 in the original series, but that was a different format. I don't want it to take anything away from the new Doctor, and I hope they didn't feel a need to do this to either soften the blow of a female Doctor, or take some focus off her, or just to satisfy as many people as possible. I could definitely see the older male companion as being a response to the older fans who aren't happy with Jodie as The Doctor, which could actually be funny if they wrote his character that way.
I'm not familiar with the other 2 companion actors at all, so I have no opinion one way or another there.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 23, 2017, 02:22:41 AM
This sounds terrible. I have little confidence that they can flesh out both a new doctor and 3 new companions in 40minute episodes. If anything, it makes me think that they are not confident in the doctor's character.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2017, 02:42:55 AM
So, the new companions have been announced, and it looks like we've got three companions for the first time in the modern series.
Pretty much - they've often had multiple companions (Amy/Rory, Bill/Nardole) and sometimes they've had three at once but never for an extended run. It's not clear from the announcements if these are all companions in the traditional sense or if it's more a set of recurring characters.

Sounds great anyway, the Doctor + 1 companion dynamic can get very samey.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 02:52:25 AM
So, the new companions have been announced, and it looks like we've got three companions for the first time in the modern series.
Pretty much - they've often had multiple companions (Amy/Rory, Bill/Nardole) and sometimes they've had three at once but never for an extended run. It's not clear from the announcements if these are all companions in the traditional sense or if it's more a set of recurring characters.

Sounds great anyway, the Doctor + 1 companion dynamic can get very samey.

It could possibly be a Bill/Nardole situation where you have a main companion and then supporting companions, but I get the impression that all 3 are actually considered companions. There also announced someone else as a recurring role, no idea in what capacity they are either.
I'm over the Doctor + young girl dynamic, and I think even with genders reversed it wouldn't have been too fresh. So I'm cautiously optimistic, although I do share abydos' concerns to a degree too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2017, 03:52:46 AM
I'm not concerned about that at all. Even a half-decent writer should be able to develop only four characters in 8.5 hours of TV.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 04:01:28 AM
I guess my only minor concern is it taking some time and focus away from The Doctor. I just hope they're not trying to take some attention off her because of the vocal minority of complaints.
Hopefully I'm just over-analyzing the whole thing, and the new showrunner just wanted to mix it up, which as I said, I'm all for. I'm really looking forward to the new season, I just don't know what to expect yet.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 23, 2017, 04:19:14 AM
Looks like we are going to have to wait nearly a year before getting the next series.   
I suspect this will be a bigger change than moving from the RTD era to the Moffat era.  I look forward to it, but I'm also a tad worried - Chibnall's writing on Doctor Who hasn't been stellar, and I personally found Broadchurch very overrated.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 04:36:11 AM
I haven't seen Broadchurch at all, so I only have his Doctor Who episodes to judge from. I still really like The Power of Three, and Dinosaurs on a Spaceship was fun, but the rest of his episodes were really weak imo.
Hopefully Chibnall will work better as showrunner than he did as a regular writer, but Moffat's episodes were always clear standouts even during the RTD era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 23, 2017, 05:18:41 AM
Yeah his episodes haven't been absolutely awful, but they are all rather 'meh' to me.  Would have liked Jamie Mathieson to have gotten the gig, hopefully he'll get to still guest write a few episode at least.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 05:33:49 AM
Yeah, his episodes have been quite good (I love Flatline). I don't know that there are any clear standout writers like there was with Moffat, but I'm just fucking glad they didn't go with Gatiss. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2017, 06:06:01 AM
I haven't seen Broadchurch at all, so I only have his Doctor Who episodes to judge from. I still really like The Power of Three, and Dinosaurs on a Spaceship was fun, but the rest of his episodes were really weak imo.
Hopefully Chibnall will work better as showrunner than he did as a regular writer, but Moffat's episodes were always clear standouts even during the RTD era.
But then some people who loved Moffat's standalones under RTD have hated his tenure as showrunner (completely unfairly) so just goes to show how different the two roles are.

Broadchurch isn't for everyone, but it's a show that develops characters well (in an ensemble too) and it's generally well-written so I'm cautiously optimistic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 06:15:16 AM
I'm glad that DTF is apparently one place where people have more balanced opinions regarding Moffat. :lol

There are just so many new variables for S11, so it's hard to know what to expect. I'm excited for it though. I've enjoyed every era of Doctor Who I've seen so far, and I'm sure I'll like this too.
Speaking of which, I stopped my classic rewatch half way through Planet of the Daleks which I really need to get back to.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 23, 2017, 06:44:16 AM
I haven't seen Broadchurch at all, so I only have his Doctor Who episodes to judge from. I still really like The Power of Three, and Dinosaurs on a Spaceship was fun, but the rest of his episodes were really weak imo.
Hopefully Chibnall will work better as showrunner than he did as a regular writer, but Moffat's episodes were always clear standouts even during the RTD era.
But then some people who loved Moffat's standalones under RTD have hated his tenure as showrunner (completely unfairly) so just goes to show how different the two roles are.

Moffat's tenure as the showrunner if compared to his episodes in the RTD era could be classed as a tad underwhelming, but a lot of this is down to the type of audience Doctor Who attracts in the UK.   It's a prime time BBC show, the BBC doesn't do any other show like Doctor Who (they barely touch Sci-Fi and certainly never prime time).   The negatively towards the Moffat era is from people who want a very casual vibe from Doctor Who.   Moffat's finest hour should have been series 6 (his second one) he went big, lots of connecting threads - there was a ton of swagger about that series, it's not without it's faults, but I generally loved the fact it tried to shoot for the stars, even if it fell a little short.   But the complex structure alienated a lot of the casual audience, I think this knocked Moffat and he never really recovered, not to say I didn't enjoy the next 4 series, but I got the feeling he was holding back.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2017, 06:58:28 AM
I agree with all that. Season 5 and the first half of Season 6 were the show at its peak, and Season 6 I still thought was great overall despite some misfires in the second half.

I've really liked everything since too, but it definitely feels a bit less ambitious/exciting now. As you say, all the clever connecting threads and speculation were maybe too complex for the broader viewer base.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 07:02:09 AM
I generally agree with that too, although I think S8/9 are arguably the best of the modern series (5 and 6 were great too). S10 feels like Moffat was Who'd out though, I don't know. I hope Capaldi can still go out with a bang.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 23, 2017, 07:39:23 AM
I generally agree with that too, although I think S8/9 are arguably the best of the modern series (5 and 6 were great too). S10 feels like Moffat was Who'd out though, I don't know. I hope Capaldi can still go out with a bang.

Thing that holds me back on those two series was Clara, just not a companion I enjoyed very much.  However I do think Series 8 had a mostly fantastic collection of stand alone episodes, but Clara (and Danny Pink) drag it down.   Series 9 wasn't as good, still decent and contained Peter's finest moment with 'Heaven Sent'.  Series 10 kind off felt like series 7 again - rather lightweight and forgettable.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2017, 07:45:53 AM
Danny Pink was shit, but I have nothing against Clara.
S10 had no bangers or standouts at all, but while S7 was very inconsistent, it still had its share of great episodes, and it ended very strong with the "...of the Doctor" eps. Patchy season, but still several fantastic episodes to redeem it. Not that S10 had any particularly bad episodes, but it was just consistently ok, no essentials. No season is perfect, but they all have their strengths and weaknesses. Really looking forward to rewatching S8 and S9. I'm up to Time of the Doctor in my rewatch, although I've seen it so many times already!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 10, 2017, 01:24:44 AM
So what do people think of the new Doctor's outfit?

I was hoping it would still be something Doctor-y (long pants, boots, some kind of coat/jacket), and hoping for a bit more colour and less tame than recent Doctors, so I like those factors.
I'm not sold on the random colours, which make it feel like an '80s Doctor Who outfit. I've warmed to it a bit seeing the fan art, and I hope I like it better once they vary it up a bit. I don't hate it though, and like it in principle.
The updated TARDIS looks great. I think they've well incorporated the features of the older TARDIS with the modern proportions. I didn't expect I would like the change to the sign, but I do.

All around, it feels very vintage Who, for better or worse. Very interested to see this new era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 10, 2017, 02:02:42 AM
The pants are stupid. Don't really care that much about their outfits in general.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on November 10, 2017, 02:05:51 AM
The shortness of the trousers kind off bothers me for some reason.  Other than that seems OK, thought they might have done something with her hair though?
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on November 10, 2017, 02:53:12 AM
What do you expect them to do with her hair? That's how her hair is.
I don't like the 3/4 pants much either. Looks kinda hipster with the suspenders and socks to me. And I realized that the outfit reminds me a lot of Mork from Mork and Mindy.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on November 10, 2017, 02:59:36 AM
What do you expect them to do with her hair? That's how her hair is.

Some sort of different style, nothing outlandish, no freaky colouring.   Just something a bit different, a bob or something? (I don't know much bout female hair styles...).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2017, 08:16:59 PM
I enjoyed that Christmas episode a lot, more than I expected from the trailers. A very nice sendoff for Capaldi.
It was interesting that it ended up involving no "bad guy" in the end. I loved the clips tying in to The Tenth Planet, and the first Doctor was funny. The characterization did't match up with the first Doctor super well, lacking the signature phrases, and he wasn't that overtly sexist, but it was still an amusing way of addressing the change in the Doctor's attitude over the course of the show to reflect the times, so I still thought it was hilarious in that way. Capaldi was awesome as ever.

I knew Jenna Coleman was going to be in it, so I was curious how they'd handle that given that he'd had his memory wiped. I liked that too.

My favourite bit was definitely how the WWI scenario tied into Christmas, and also the message of being the Doctor, as the first Doctor kind of stumbled into this stuff rather than making it his mission. Just the right amount of Christmas.

An interesting setup for the 13th Doctor, it reminded me of the start of The Eleventh Hour, except to the extreme. Hopefully the new TARDIS interior is good, because I absolutely love the current one so much. I would have liked a few more lines from Whittaker, but it was a good tease, and I have no complaints there. I'm really excited to see S11 now.

I was hoping this episode would tie up the loose end of Day of the Doctor, since you had two of the Doctors there. But that probably would have been too much to pack in. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on December 25, 2017, 09:52:15 PM
It was a perfect send off. Just a long love letter to Capaldi and his Doctor. It didn't need a crazy plot. Just a light, easy episode. I'm going to miss him so much. I just loved his Doctor.

Of course, I see people online already ripping Moffat to shreds for either a boring episode or destroying the history of Who or whatever else they can think of. People are slamming him for the new Doctor crashing the Tardis because it's a woman. If they knew anything then they would know he was not involved in anything after the regeneration. Everything after the change is written by the incoming showrunner which is Chibnall. That won't stop the Moffat haters club.

So tired of seeing endless hate about everything. Clearly, they didn't get the Doctors final message - Be Kind.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2017, 09:58:39 PM
It was a perfect send off. Just a long love letter to Capaldi and his Doctor. It didn't need a crazy plot. Just a light, easy episode. I'm going to miss him so much. I just loved his Doctor.

Of course, I see people online already ripping Moffat to shreds for either a boring episode or destroying the history of Who or whatever else they can think of. People are slamming him for the new Doctor crashing the Tardis because it's a woman. If they knew anything then they would know he was not involved in anything after the regeneration. Everything after the change is written by the incoming showrunner which is Chibnall. That won't stop the Moffat haters club.

I jokingly thought about whether people would mention a female crashing the TARDIS.

Which is totally forgetting that the first thing 11 did after regeneration was crash the TARDIS (for the exact same reason 13 crashed it, because the regeneration damaged the TARDIS). The first thing 12 did after generating is forget how to even pilot the TARDIS and crash it. 3 in a row. I hope they don't feel like they have to walk on eggshells with everything 13 does for fear of being viewed as sexist or whatever. The Doctor has always been a flawed person.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on December 25, 2017, 10:16:17 PM
It was a perfect send off. Just a long love letter to Capaldi and his Doctor. It didn't need a crazy plot. Just a light, easy episode. I'm going to miss him so much. I just loved his Doctor.

Of course, I see people online already ripping Moffat to shreds for either a boring episode or destroying the history of Who or whatever else they can think of. People are slamming him for the new Doctor crashing the Tardis because it's a woman. If they knew anything then they would know he was not involved in anything after the regeneration. Everything after the change is written by the incoming showrunner which is Chibnall. That won't stop the Moffat haters club.

I jokingly thought about whether people would mention a female crashing the TARDIS.

Which is totally forgetting that the first thing 11 did after regeneration was crash the TARDIS (for the exact same reason 13 crashed it, because the regeneration damaged the TARDIS). The first thing 12 did after generating is forget how to even pilot the TARDIS and crash it. 3 in a row. I hope they don't feel like they have to walk on eggshells with everything 13 does for fear of being viewed as sexist or whatever. The Doctor has always been a flawed person.

To get all nerdy, people seem to have a perception filter blocking things when it comes to Moffat.

As soon as the door opened and she was looking to be pulled out I immediately thought of Smith's first scene. In the little documentary afterwards, Rachel Talalay even said she wanted explosions and fire and a crashing Tardis just like when Tennant left. That's exactly what we got.

Unfortunately, this next season will be one of the most scrutinized and analyzed of any other because of Jodie. It's unnecessary, but inevitable.

With just the little bit we got with her, I got an impression of playfulness. The look on her face when she said her only words just had this air of fun.

Missy was proof that gender didn't define the Master and I'm sure that Jodie will prove the same for the Doctor.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 25, 2017, 10:29:41 PM
Missy was definitely a test run for a female Doctor, and if Michelle Gomez didn't prove to people that a female can play a charismatic Time Lord, I doubt anything will.
I don't know how much of Jodie's characterization of the Doctor was planned out when they shot her scene, but she did seem fun. Her upcoming outfit would suggest the same thing. I can't imagine a brooding dark Doctor running around in suspenders and a bright multi-coloured shirt.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on December 26, 2017, 09:15:56 AM
High marks on the Christmas special. Really great, and I totally called who Gatiss was going to be. Cannot wait to see what Jodie will bring to the table
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on December 27, 2017, 01:09:38 PM
Really great sendoff for Capaldi!

Didn't watch the last full series with Capaldi, so i was a little bit lost about Bill and Nardole. Should watch he's last series when i have time..

Really excited about the next doctor, and i agree that she is going to receive some very unfair scrutiny, for all the wrong reasons..
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: noxon on December 27, 2017, 04:11:31 PM
I wonder how quickly the tardis will reappear, or if we'll have a long stretch of non-tardis episodes (kinda like 3rd doctor had)...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 27, 2017, 09:42:21 PM
I don't think they'd dare go without the TARDIS that long. It'll probably be like The 11th Hour, where the Doctor will go the entire episode without the TARDIS, but get the new rebuilt TARDIS at the end of the episode, along with the outfit. Unless they kick it off with a double episode, in which case it'll maybe be two.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 28, 2017, 12:12:18 AM
I’m quite happy with the episode, not as silly as I’m usually afraid that the christmas episode will be. Good send-off for Capaldi.

As for Whittaker, while I don’t necessary think it’s wrong, I’m always a bit annoyed with pc pandering or using popularity of male characters to sort of create an illusion of popularity for the now female character instead of just creating interesting female characters from scratch. That said, she’s here now, I have no other choice but to give it an honest chance which I will of course do. I hope she does great and I’m still looking forward to the new season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on December 28, 2017, 10:29:35 AM
Now that I have had some time to digest the episode, I do have one major criticism. If the Doctor is supposed to originally be from the future, how does he not know what a browser history. I know they wanted to show how progressive the Doctor has become since being the First, but when you take in the larger context, it doesn't make sense.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlackInk on December 28, 2017, 11:22:39 AM
Yes, and why does an alien being from an insanely advanced culture where people can cross-gender regenerate reflect 1960s human views on gender equality. This show was never really about making sense to me, but it’s fun so it’s okay.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 28, 2017, 11:45:23 AM
Now that I have had some time to digest the episode, I do have one major criticism. If the Doctor is supposed to originally be from the future, how does he not know what a browser history. I know they wanted to show how progressive the Doctor has become since being the First, but when you take in the larger context, it doesn't make sense.

Because it's an Earth concept (at least by name), and he had not spent much time on Earth yet, especially past 1963. He would have been unfamiliar with the term, even if the technology is beneath the Time Lords.

Yes, and why does an alien being from an insanely advanced culture where people can cross-gender regenerate reflect 1960s human views on gender equality. This show was never really about making sense to me, but it’s fun so it’s okay.

The first Doctor wasn't overtly sexist like that, and it wasn't a very accurate portrayal at all. But, it was funny, and it worked for the context of the episode, so I'll excuse it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on December 30, 2017, 05:43:36 AM
I've now seen two Doctors regenerate this week. First was of course the 12th Doctor, and I just saw Pertwee's regeneration into Tom Baker. Pertwee's final season seemed much stronger than previous seasons to me, although his final story was a bit weak, as was his death. But it's the first time regeneration is mentioned by name IIRC, so that still makes it notable.

I've only watched the first episode with Tom Baker so far, but he's stolen every scene he's in. From what little I'd seen in the past, I knew I'd like him, but I can already see why he's the favourite of the original series. He's so wacky and fun, and I look forward to finally seeing his era.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on January 02, 2018, 03:00:51 AM
Quite liked the Chrimbo special, didn't really have much of a story though.   Sad to see Peter leave, but very much looking forward to seeing what direction they go with with Jodie (kind off thought she'd get more screen time).

I've now seen two Doctors regenerate this week. First was of course the 12th Doctor, and I just saw Pertwee's regeneration into Tom Baker. Pertwee's final season seemed much stronger than previous seasons to me, although his final story was a bit weak, as was his death. But it's the first time regeneration is mentioned by name IIRC, so that still makes it notable.

I've only watched the first episode with Tom Baker so far, but he's stolen every scene he's in. From what little I'd seen in the past, I knew I'd like him, but I can already see why he's the favourite of the original series. He's so wacky and fun, and I look forward to finally seeing his era.

I'm pretty much alone in the opinion Tom Baker is only an average Doctor for me.  I preferred Troughton, Pertwee and Davidson from the original series, and probably all the returning show Doctors more (Eccleston is kind off hard to judge, I'm basing it mostly off his potential, had he continued).   Most of my issues with Tom Baker are due to his later series when he clearly just became lazy.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2018, 03:14:11 AM
As many will know, I frequently have different opinions/preferences to the prevailing popularity among fanbases, but I do think Tom Baker is amazing and definitely my favourite of the original series (with Troughton in second place). He brought such energy, humour and dynamism to the character, in my opinion. Some of the writing was also fantastic during that period too, which I think helped a lot.

Oh and the Christmas special was lovely. Really looking forward to what comes next!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 02, 2018, 03:56:49 AM
Even by the end of Tom Baker's first episode, I preferred him to Pertwee. I loved the 3rd Doctor's character on paper, but Pertwee had limited range and didn't do much for me. I didn't dislike him by any means, but I liked Hartnell and Troughton so much more. It also didn't help that most of the 3rd Doctor's stories were really weak and formulaic, with the exception of his final season, which I felt was a noticeable improvement. Since I'm watching this stuff for the first time, I have no opinion of the later Doctors in the classic series yet.

I'm towards the end of Genesis of the Daleks right now, and I've liked every story so far this season. It took me forever to get through the 3rd Doctor's era, but I'm getting through the 4th much faster, because his energy and charisma make it a lot more enjoyable.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2018, 04:11:50 AM
Your reactions are very similar to mine, Blob. I similarly found myself more interested during the Baker seasons and got through them a lot faster.

There isn't one Doctor that I dislike at all, and I like the fact that they're all a little different.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on January 02, 2018, 04:15:39 AM
The only Doctor so far I'd say I don't like is Eccelston, and I've still managed to watch those episodes twice. When you've had so many different people play incarnations of the same character over such a long period, it's likely they're not all going to appeal to everyone equally. Still, they've done a great job overall, and I love most Doctors for what they bring to the table.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on January 02, 2018, 05:26:06 AM
I get why a lot of people love Tom Baker version of the Doctor.  I think he was great at the start, and the writing was top notch during that period of the end of Pertwee's era till the middle of the Tom Era.   For me he stayed to long and started to phone in his performance, this coupled with the noticeably weaker writing in his last couple of series made for a somewhat sour ending (also his attitude towards the show and character after he left was pretty bitter).   Even though the writing didn't really improve, i much prefer the early Davidson era over the tail end of the Tom era.

There have been a couple of Doctor's I haven't really like and they would be Hartnell and McCoy.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on May 19, 2018, 08:40:55 PM
Finally decided to start finishing up classic who. Just watched The Happiness Patrol and Silver Nemesis.

Happiness Patrol was a fun story.

Silver Nemesis was a mess, a fun mess in my opinion but a mess. I read that the Cybermen were tossed in last minute and you can kinda tell. The thing that really held this one together was The Doctor and Ace. They have such good chemistry together and are a lot of fun. Makes me want to check out the audio dramas with those two. I also like how Mccoys doctor was on the darker side. It's a shame that the BBC axed the show as the writing was starting to improve (this story excluded) because I would've loved to see where the seventh doctor would've gone.



The only doctors I'm not huge fans of are Davidson and Tennant. Davidson because his doctor was just kinda bland for me....at least in his run on the show, I've heard he does a far better job in the Big Finish stuff. I love David Tennant and he gave the show his all but I'm just not a fan of RTD as showrunner.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 20, 2018, 12:43:22 AM
I wasn't a big fan of the RTD era either, but Tennant was always awesome, and S4 was great, so he's still easily one of my favs.

I'm still on The Creature From the Pit. It's been a big improvement with Romana. The Leela era kinda sucked hard, and the 3rd Doctor era was mostly whatever. The Sarah Jane stuff was good with both Doctors though.

Also Mary Tamm is the best looking companion of the classic era. Prove me wrong.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on May 20, 2018, 05:18:08 AM
She isn't even the best looking Romana. :P
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on May 20, 2018, 05:22:58 AM
ariich, please. Romana 2 doesn't even have a fucking chin. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on May 20, 2018, 03:26:44 PM
Ive always been a jo, peri, or teagan person myself lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on May 24, 2018, 12:29:08 PM
Can't stand Teagan. Got used to Jo during her last season, but really couldn't stand her the first season. Haven't got to Peri yet
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on May 30, 2018, 07:14:43 AM
And with Survival I have finally finished all 26 seasons of classic doctor who. It's a shame that the BBC canned it as the show was starting to get really good again. The Seventh Doctor and Ace are now one of my favorite pairings in the show's history.

Also if the seventh doctor hadn't regenerated i get the feeling the time war wouldn't have happened. That's because he would've had the entire thing settled in an afternoon.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on May 30, 2018, 12:15:29 PM
A tie in to the Reading thread in General Discussion, but I recently finished The Writer's Tale by Russell T. Davies, which describes his creative process for all of series four. It's quite fascinating, albeit very detailed
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on August 09, 2018, 07:35:56 PM
I discovered that Spotify has the first 50 main range entries of the Big Finish audio dramas and decided to check them out. Im now about ten entries in and I'm hooked.

I already liked the sixth doctor more than some people, but I think these may have pushed him near the top of my favorite doctors.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on September 06, 2018, 12:07:08 PM
So, Doctor Who is now on Sundays (because British people want to watch dancing instead) and it's premiering October 7
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 06, 2018, 12:54:53 PM
(because British people want to watch dancing instead)
Pretty much perfect summary. :lol

Makes no difference whatsoever to me, I never watch live TV so I'll likely just watch it on catch up either Sunday night or Monday morning on my commute to work.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on October 06, 2018, 06:52:08 PM
It's Jodie's turn tomorrow. Really excited for this. My son and I have been binging Who for the last week and a half to get ready.

Here in the Central Time Zone it will start at 12:45pm. We'll be watching.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 07, 2018, 11:26:48 AM
I expect it to be full of cringy glass ceiling and other socjus crap but I'm secretly hoping for it to be better as I really didn't enjoy Capaldi's run overall, I think he was wasted with most of the writing he had to work with.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on October 07, 2018, 01:46:16 PM
Great episode. The cinematography felt more like Torchwood than Who. Kinda makes sense since Chibnall worked a lot on Torchwood.

They barely made mention that the Doctor was a women. Was practically an afterthought.

Jodie has an infectious energy and I love her delivery. This looks like it will be a fun season.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 07, 2018, 02:12:39 PM
Yeah that was great. Different but also the same.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on October 07, 2018, 04:17:00 PM
I only saw the first few minutes (the game was on in another room). And in the opening scenes I felt like she was channeling Tennant. Not in a bad way. In a way I thought it was brilliant to weave a sense of the familiar into such an iconic moment in Dr Who history.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on October 07, 2018, 04:43:18 PM
I only saw the first few minutes (the game was on in another room). And in the opening scenes I felt like she was channeling Tennant. Not in a bad way. In a way I thought it was brilliant to weave a sense of the familiar into such an iconic moment in Dr Who history.

I admit that I was getting a low-level Tennant vibe from her myself. That is definitely not a bad thing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 08, 2018, 12:31:11 AM
I enjoyed the first episode. The cinematography was excellent, I liked the grounded style, and the Doctor vs Predator storyline. I think Jodie still has some settling in to do, but she's off to a great start. You can't fully judge a Doctor from their regeneration episode though. I liked Capaldi less after his first episode, and now he's one of my favourites.
The new companions are good so far. I think the old dude stole the show for now.
Shame we didn't get the proper intro for this episode, but the new theme at the end was perfect. Very classic.

Still can't wait to see the new TARDIS interior properly. I can't judge based on the leaked pic without lighting etc.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 08, 2018, 12:48:40 AM
Actually the theme was the only thing I wasn't so keen on. I liked that it's the closest they've done to the classic sound in terms of style, but I'm not a fan of also going with 60s BBC production values for it, especially when the show itself feels very refreshed.

Oh and I enjoyed the cliffhanger. Sounds like maybe they're doing that Classic Who thing of basically unconnected stories, but with regular cliffhangers to set up the next one.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on October 08, 2018, 12:53:44 AM
Episode felt pretty standard, but given a new showrunner, a new Doctor, a new composer, and a whole new cast I guess it might take them a bit to find their footing.

Really loving Jodie as the Doctor. Still not a ginger, though.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 08, 2018, 02:06:02 PM
I enjoyed it somewhat. It wasn't terrible. Jodie Whittaker didn't convince me but perhaps that was the point. None of the new companions do anything for me at this point, so... let them die in space and start over, please? :D Anyway, I'm a bit more optimistic about the whole thing than I was yesterday so that's a good sign for now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on October 08, 2018, 10:49:45 PM
Actually the theme was the only thing I wasn't so keen on. I liked that it's the closest they've done to the classic sound in terms of style, but I'm not a fan of also going with 60s BBC production values for it, especially when the show itself feels very refreshed.

Oh and I enjoyed the cliffhanger. Sounds like maybe they're doing that Classic Who thing of basically unconnected stories, but with regular cliffhangers to set up the next one.

All of this seems to connect a bit with what I was saying about her “channeling Tennant”...

I’m not even saying that it was intentional (though maybe subconsciously it was)....but to me, logic dictates that if you are going to throw the biggest curveball in the history of a 50+ year old series that is OOZING with tradition...you probably want to throw as much of “something familiar” or “something classic” into the mix so that everyone is reminded that “just because we made the Doctor a woman, doesn’t mean we’re throwing out everything that made the show what it has been for 50 years”

If that makes any sense.   

It’s a smart move considering the stakes IMO
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 09, 2018, 12:16:07 PM
I had a lot of classic who vibes from this episode which I liked. I think the extra 20 minutes or so that this episode had added a lot to it. I like the companions so far and look forward to see where they go from here.

Jodie was really doctoring it up in this episode (if that makes any sort of sense) I'm sure over the next few episodes we'll see more of what HER version of the doctor will end up being.

Overall very solid start for the new series. Post regeneration episodes usually aren't classics (with a few exceptions) but overall I think this was one of the better ones.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 15, 2018, 04:54:57 AM
It's always amazing to see how powerful empty threats can be in Who, for no good reason. The second episode was more meh than the first and I'm not at all fan of the new Tardis design.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ozzy554 on October 19, 2018, 06:55:24 PM
The second was a more standard episode of NuWho. Enjoyable enough for what it was. I still love how the season looks, the change in cameras was for the best IMO.

I thought the tardis interior was fine, I have no gripes about it. My personal favorite Tardis interior is the wooden one that Tom Baker had for a season or 2. It was pretty short lived as the set was stored improperly between seasons and got warped.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 21, 2018, 11:39:23 PM
I loved this episode of Doctor Who. From the trailer I was expecting it to involve more alien stuff, so I'm glad they limited that to the minimum necessary for the story here, and kept it real and grounded. I'm not used to seeing Doctor Who tackle racism so directly and bluntly like that, and they did it perfectly. Having the three companions worked very well here too.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 22, 2018, 03:25:18 PM
A rather pointless episode. No resolve, the bad guy was totally handicapped and we didn't even get an explanation of why he wanted to change history. My best guess is someone wanted her as a trophy from the past or something, I don't know. So far, the weakest episode but the best in terms of atmosphere, it really sold what I imagine that period was like.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 22, 2018, 11:50:10 PM
we didn't even get an explanation of why he wanted to change history.
What? He literally explicitly said why he was doing it - he told Ryan he wanted "you people" back in their place.

Basically he's a massive racist from the future who hates that Rosa's action spawned a civil rights movement that ended up leading to equality, and wanted to undo it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2018, 03:29:15 AM
Yeah, it was pretty clearly explained that he was a racist who chose this as the major turning point in history where things went "wrong" in his opinion.
The bad guy wasn't explained in a lot of detail, which I think actually helped not to take away from the point of the story, but his motivation was made clear enough there.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2018, 03:45:05 AM
Yeah. My only real criticism is that I'd actually have quite liked it if they'd made more of that. It was somewhat subtle (enough so that abydos didn't even register it). I also wasn't entirely convinced by some of the dialogue in the episode.

So it was maybe my least favourite of the three so far, but conceptually I loved it and there were some really great touches. I especially liked the way the Doctor made sure that they didn't intervene in Rosa's action itself. They made sure that the circumstances were still there for her to do it, but what was important was that she had to do it herself, with no knowledge of what it would end up meaning. Felt quite different to what Doctor Who normally does but it was a great moment.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 23, 2018, 04:09:00 AM
we didn't even get an explanation of why he wanted to change history.
What? He literally explicitly said why he was doing it - he told Ryan he wanted "you people" back in their place.

Basically he's a massive racist from the future who hates that Rosa's action spawned a civil rights movement that ended up leading to equality, and wanted to undo it.
A murderous alien traveled back in time to "fix" history. On earth. In the US only. He's such a racist that this is the only thing he cares about after being released from a prison for very dangerous people. Human history must be a very popular subject in intergalactic schools I guess.
That is worse than having no motivation, which is why I didn't take it at face value. Maybe I am not supposed to give the benefit of the doubt to the current writing team then.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2018, 04:46:11 AM
we didn't even get an explanation of why he wanted to change history.
What? He literally explicitly said why he was doing it - he told Ryan he wanted "you people" back in their place.

Basically he's a massive racist from the future who hates that Rosa's action spawned a civil rights movement that ended up leading to equality, and wanted to undo it.
A murderous alien traveled back in time to "fix" history. On earth. In the US only. He's such a racist that this is the only thing he cares about after being released from a prison for very dangerous people. Human history must be a very popular subject in intergalactic schools I guess.
That is worse than having no motivation, which is why I didn't take it at face value. Maybe I am not supposed to give the benefit of the doubt to the current writing team then.
Again, what? He's not an alien and he's not doing it because he wants to only change this one incident. He's a human from the future who clearly hates racial equality, and as Blob said in his post, has determined that Rosa's action was the crucial turning point when it comes to civil rights. By stopping that from happening, everything else that spawns from it in the future doesn't happen.

Sometimes I feel like you go into things looking for reasons to hate them. :lol
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on October 23, 2018, 04:57:04 AM
Oh, a human, assumed he's not because of the time travel. :D Surely there are better time periods to pick that would have a much larger impact than that.

I never go into something with a reason to dislike it, quite the contrary, but they just give me stupid reasons like this to bitch about :lol Admittedly, I get irritated by minor things way more than I should be, but that's how I am. I'm working on it!

Him being human makes more sense, but still, a very cartoonish character to write and doesn't change my opinion on the overall story of the episode.

Oh, one more thing. So, I was thinking that they always say that history is very sensitive in Who and other time travel shows. But then they always portray changing the future as something that's OK or at most not something to be worried about. But when you time travel, your current future is also the past, depending on where you are so unless you're at the end of time, isn't it just as bad to mess with it?

Paging Blob and other time travel enthusiasts.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2018, 05:08:30 AM
Fair enough. :lol I actually agree that the character himself wasn't written in a particularly interesting way. Like I said, I love the concept but I wasn't entirely sold on the execution.

In terms of time travel, it's pretty well established in Doctor Who lore that humans have time travel capabilities in future using vortex manipulators and whatever else: https://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Time_Agency

It's also a pretty standard trope in Doctor Who and time-travel based sci-fi in general that changing a small but important event in the past has huge ramifications for the future. And Rosa Parks' defiance is pretty widely hailed as a huge moment in the American civil rights movement that had an emormous impact globally. So in both a historical and sci-fi context, the story makes a lot of sense.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2018, 05:11:44 AM
Oh, one more thing. So, I was thinking that they always say that history is very sensitive in Who and other time travel shows. But then they always portray changing the future as something that's OK or at most not something to be worried about. But when you time travel, your current future is also the past, depending on where you are so unless you're at the end of time, isn't it just as bad to mess with it?

Paging Blob and other time travel enthusiasts.
The way that Doctor Who and a lot of other sci-fi shows/movies/books/games address this is the concept that there are hard and soft events. Some things absolutely have to happen for the timeline to function - if they are changed then the ramifications are enormous and could even threaten the fabric of space-time. Other events are soft and flexible and can be changed, within reason, without destroying the universe.

That's a pretty common trope and it can be good when utilised effectively.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 23, 2018, 07:41:15 AM
Basically in Doctor Who it's just a matter of what the story calls for, because handling that realistically in a show like Doctor Who would be a nightmare. You just have to accept the contrivance as a viewer.

Also, the dude was a psycho racist criminal, so who knows if he was even right about the impact of this event. Him being an idiot isn't necessarily a plot hole. :lol
Surely equal rights would have happened at some point regardless, but again, it wasn't really the point of the story here. The focus was on the historical/social significance of the real life event and figures, the time travelling bad guy was only used to the extent necessary to set up the scenario. I agree it left something to be desired in that regard, but it was what it was. Still my favourite ep of the season so far.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on October 23, 2018, 10:58:18 AM
I kind of assumed he came from the time that Captain Jack originally came from as he had the same time travel device.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 23, 2018, 12:35:14 PM
I kind of assumed he came from the time that Captain Jack originally came from as he had the same time travel device.
Certainly possible. He was also locked up in the Stormcage, which was where River Song was imprisoned.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on October 24, 2018, 12:51:07 AM
Gotta say that I'm liking the new series so far!

It feels different enough from the Moffat and Davies eras, while at the same time retaining some of the Dna of the previous NewWho seasons. I'm liking Jodie as the doctor, but so far it feels difficult to say, what her character arc will be throughout her run. I'm hoping it will get clearer as the season goes on. Companions are also good, with the old guy being my favorite so far.

Last episode "Rosa" had very heavy subject matter, and felt pretty dark compared to most of Moffat's run. I hope they won't shy away from doing these kinds of episodes in the future.

I'm loving the music and the cinematography so far. Feels super refreshing to get some new blood to compose the music, instead of Murray Gold all over again. I'm also liking the sonic and the Tardis redesign.

Series 11 is going well so far!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: BlobVanDam on October 24, 2018, 03:59:35 AM
While I'm enjoying the music so far this season a lot, especially the the team theme or whatever it is they've used a few times, I'm still VERY sad to see Murray Gold go, because he's possibly my favourite composer from his work on Doctor Who, and he wrote countless memorable themes. The Doctor Who soundtracks are amazing, especially from S5 onwards.
I don't even know if the 13th Doctor has a theme. Is it the recurring music they use for the team? It's not used in the same context, so I don't think so.

The previous TARDIS interior was my absolute favourite, so I'm sad to see that go too, but obviously that was inevitable, and I like each Doctor to get their own TARDIS. My only issue with the TARDIS interior is that the big pillars kind of block the wide shots too much. At least with the 9th/10th interior, the pillars were at the edges, not around the console. I love the new exterior though. Very classic influence there, as with a lot of other elements this season.

Jodie is settling into the role more now, and she's already a very good Doctor imo. Can't wait to see how her Doctor develops over the rest of her run.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on October 25, 2018, 03:52:04 AM
I enjoyed episode 3 far more than the previous 2 - although it felt more like an episode of Quantum Leap or Timeless rather than Doctor Who to be honest.

I found the first couple of episodes really flat and quite frankly pretty boring (which is ironic because I normally found Moffat Who to be often too rushed).  They are clearly going for a more grounded version of the show and it's going to take some getting used too for me.   

Jodie is.........OK I guess - they've gone for the safe route of the 'nice, human and mildly quirky' Doctor (basically a Female Tennant).   It's understandable as the first female Doctor they couldn't really takes to many risks with the character, and Tennant has been the most popular Doctor with regards to viewing figures.   I've not yet seen a moment where I felt 'Jodie' is the Doctor - but there again the scripts haven't really given her any 'Doctor' moments.  It feels they are going for a 'gang' vibe, with the Doctor not standing out so much from her companions....speaking of which.

Companions,  I'm still thinking three is one too many.  Yaz in particular doesn't seem to have done anything in the first 3 episodes.  Graham is fine - a little bit of 'Wilf' about him.   And if Ryan isn't going to have to ride a bike in the season finale to save the day I'll be very surprised!

Overall it's different - a tad safe and bland in my opinion, needs more Sci-Fi (and better villains).   I get the feeling for me this is going to be like the RTD era in that I'm going to like the guest writers episodes more than the showrunners episodes - which looking at the writing credit the second half on this series should be better than the first.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on November 18, 2018, 11:07:19 PM
Spoiler:





https://gfycat.com/DeliriousEsteemedGoldenmantledgroundsquirrel
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on November 20, 2018, 10:43:19 AM
Saw a story that said Chibnall already wants out. He's apparently unhappy with how things are being run behind the scenes and won't even commit to a full second year. He may only do like 5 episodes and bail. They said Jodie would walk with him. There was a mention of splitting the next 10 into separate years if this goes down.

Seems to be a constant complaint about the BBC going all the way back to Eccleston, who really hates them.

What a mess, if true.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 20, 2018, 01:31:42 PM
I wonder what might be the BBC agenda behind this, if true, that would be so different than his vision.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 20, 2018, 02:13:09 PM
I'm always VERY sceptical of rumours like that. There was loads of that throughout Moffat's whole era and it never amounted to anything.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 20, 2018, 02:19:08 PM
Oh also, this week's episode was possibly my favourite of the season so far. It was really old school Doctor Who style but they did it really well.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on January 01, 2019, 08:40:49 PM
While I will say that Jodie's first season was kind of tame, I just watched the New Year's special. Wow, that was some right proper Who. I hope that her second season is more like this episode. It was easily my favorite of her first run.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2019, 03:07:26 AM
I thought the last few eps of the season were really good, as was Resolution (which also felt like much more of a season finale). I'm definitely less keen on the episodic approach though, and it was the same when Moffat did that for some of his seasons. I much prefer a strong story arc. But for an episodic season of Doctor Who, it was really good and Jodie is awesome.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on January 02, 2019, 09:19:36 AM
Resolution was very good, and I was fine with having an episodic season. I think that was a way to flesh out the characters more. I wonder if next season will have a more story arc
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: pg1067 on January 07, 2019, 10:52:27 AM
Ok...I'm not a Dr. Who fan, but my wife is.  I only know the most basic of information.

Over the weekend, I asked my wife the following:  Has anyone ever done cover of The Who's "My Generation" with the lyrics changed to say "talkin' 'bout regeneration"?  She didn't know.  If the answer is no, it seems like a lost opportunity.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on December 28, 2019, 10:45:05 PM
Few days from Jodie's second season. Press seems to emphasize a more intense season. They are claiming the opening 2-parter is the biggest episode they've ever done or something to that effect. The finale is also a 2-parter. I get the impression that there might be a overarching story that will tie the season together.

Whatever the case, looking forward to new Who.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lupton on December 29, 2019, 03:11:44 AM
Wasn't that impressed with Series 11 first time around. But I must say, on re-watch it really clicked with me. I think the 13th Doctor (IMO) is more of a throwback to the classic series. Less emphasis on The Doctor (character), and more on the actual story and other regular and supporting characters -- just like it was for Doctors 1-7. No more angsty "woe-is-me", sad, baggage-ridden Doctors (with stories focused around the Doctor). It's back to just the Doctor in the TARDIS having adventures and enjoying the experience. I really like Jodie's enthusiasm and positivity. Looking forward to the next series. 
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: DoctorAction on January 01, 2020, 01:30:51 PM
Just watched the opening episode.

Loved Tom Baker and Peter Davison as a child and was delighted when they brought it back. Thought Ecclestone was very good. But, in general, I've never been able to click with it since his series.

There's been some good episodes but this episode is what the show has largely been for years: random, over-acted rubbish. Nothing makes any sense and just feels like it was written by a ten year old. Such a shame as it's SO iconic.

Jodie Whittaker is great, though. Hope it continues to be popular for her.

In all fairness, I usually feel this way about it. A new doctor starts and i try to get into it. Watched all of the last season and it was just ok. Bah...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on January 01, 2020, 08:26:13 PM
Wow. Just watched the premiere. Never saw that coming. Absolutely loved it. Thank god I watched it before spoilers could hit. Bring on Part II.

EDIT: I seriously just unlocked my phone after typing the above and right there is a spoiler from Google News about the episode. Jeezus, why does the world have to be like that? It is so hard to be surprised with instant headline spoilers.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: DoctorAction on January 02, 2020, 09:24:59 AM
Yes, it's very hard not to have surprises ruined these days.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on January 03, 2020, 03:40:03 AM
Opener was awesome. Excellent twist, and much better-paced storytelling than most of last season - I do generally prefer Doctor Who when it has two-parters or longer story arcs as it feels so much less rushed. Definitely made me more excited for this season!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on January 03, 2020, 05:50:51 AM
I did not really care for the .. twist. I don't think they'll top the last time they had that character so I was a bit disappointed in seeing how the episode unravaled. Hopefully I'm proven wrong.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on September 25, 2021, 10:58:43 AM
Bit of a dead thread, but some huge news in the world of Who.

https://ew.com/tv/doctor-who-russell-t-davies-returning-showrunner/

I've not had the issues with the show that many seem to, but I can't say that I'm not supremely excited for Russell to be back helming the show.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on September 26, 2021, 11:30:34 AM
I'll definitely check out some of his stuff as the show has been stale and barely watchable for a few seasons and basically, nothing of JW's run was interesting for me, which was a shame as she had a nice performance.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 26, 2021, 12:22:23 PM
Peter Capaldi was my fave of the RTD Reboot era. I didn't see his final series or any of Jodie as I dont have a TV and you have to pay to watch iPlayer on catch up

and just never bothered to seek it out elsewhere...
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Lupton on September 26, 2021, 01:12:21 PM
Peter Capaldi was my fave of the RTD Reboot era. I didn't see his final series or any of Jodie as I dont have a TV and you have to pay to watch iPlayer on catch up

and just never bothered to seek it out elsewhere...

Same here! Loved Capaldi. But for whatever reasons the general public did not take to him like they did Smith or Tennant and the show lost a lot of viewers and has never really recovered ratings-wise.

And Chris Chibnall's version of the show is pretty plain vanilla compared to all of Steven Moffat's time twisting plot convolutions. Lots of wooden naturalistic dialogue...almost as if it's being written for younger viewers who need to have everything we can clearly see on the screen to be explained to them as it's happening.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 26, 2021, 01:47:58 PM
I thought a lot of what I saw had a lot of Deus Ex Machina and a lot of episodes ending on a 'this is the worst thing that has ever happened ever' like every week.

It gets a bit tiresome after a while.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on September 29, 2021, 06:08:14 PM
I think Chibnall's run has definitely been really weak, which is a shame because I think Jodi Whittaker could be an amazing Doctor if the writing actually backed her up, but I really don't know how to feel about Davies returning. For as much criticism as Moffat got for his big series arcs, I think Davies' were much much worse. I mean a fair bit of his stuff would be nearly unwatchable if it weren't for Eccleston or Tennant at least putting in fantastic performances.

Not to say he didn't have his hits along with his misses, of course, but....

Maybe Davies can showrun and Moffat can write the episodes. That's at least a template that's never led to anything short of great before.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: SoundscapeMN on September 29, 2021, 08:03:26 PM
the show clearly got worse once Russel T Davies left.

I would have gone for J Michael Straczynski as Showrunner (it was talked about a few weeks ago), but having him reboot Babylon 5 instead, and RTD back with Doctor Who is probably better than just having JMS take over Doctor Who only.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on September 29, 2021, 11:31:08 PM
the show clearly got worse once Russel T Davies left.


Disagree.  Moffat as showrunner, Smith as the Doctor and Amy + Rory as companions was the best period for me (that's seasons 5 & 6).
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 29, 2021, 11:54:26 PM
the show clearly got worse once Russel T Davies left.


Disagree.  Moffat as showrunner, Smith as the Doctor and Amy + Rory as companions was the best period for me (that's seasons 5 & 6).

Agreed.

And I've enjoyed Chibnall's run too, though less so than Davies and Moffat's. I didn't think the fully episodic/no story arc approach to series 11 really worked - for me, Doctor Who is the type of show that benefits from longer narratives, whether that's multi-part episodes or single episodes but with a strong story arc over the season. I liked series 12 more as a result and I thought the twist/revelation at the end was great.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Polarbear on September 30, 2021, 02:50:55 AM
I got into Doctor Who around the tail end of Matt Smith era.

Capaldi is easily my favorite doctor, and I followed the show actively through his run. Capaldi had almost a "Clint Eastwood" like intensity to his approach to the doctor. I have no idea how the show lost so many viewers during his run.

I have to be honest, I don't think I've seen a single Jodie Whitaker episode in it's entirety..
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 30, 2021, 08:25:18 AM
I have no idea how the show lost so many viewers during his run.


Probably all the teen girls going EWWW HES OLD LOL!!!!! and No longer being Matt Smith or some other floppy haired young dude.

I think they should go older than Peter next time. Just to really rub it in.

" You've had the Doctor you SAID you wanted - but you still complained. . We're going old school. The first three Doctors were all old dudes..."

Imagine Patrick Stewart or Ian McKellen as the next Doctor.  Or some other English Shakespearean Actor like Ken Brannagh.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on September 30, 2021, 11:22:22 AM
The rating were sliding during the end of the Matt Smith era.  I think the reason is simply this was the time streaming TV really started to take off (in the UK at least) - and TV show quality ramped up with massive budget - all of a sudden Doctor Who no longer seemed top tier TV.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on September 30, 2021, 02:29:36 PM
The rating were sliding during the end of the Matt Smith era.  I think the reason is simply this was the time streaming TV really started to take off (in the UK at least) - and TV show quality ramped up with massive budget - all of a sudden Doctor Who no longer seemed top tier TV.
I think that's probably right. Doctor Who has always been a show with production values that have been good for its budget, and it's got away with it because most shows even at the higher-budget end still didn't look that great. But suddenly once literally millions of dollars an episode were being invested and shows looked comparable with Hollywood movies, a gulf in quality opened up.

It's never bothered me, some of the effects in the first rebooted series were so terrible but I've always watched it for the narrative and the creativity and the characters. But I can see how people who were less into it had their attention pulled away to other things.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Kotowboy on September 30, 2021, 04:46:11 PM
I can forgive bad TV fx if the story and acting are good and for the most part - Capaldi's first 2 seasons were great. The one where he is stuck in his confession dial

for 4 billion years was amazing. And the one where they're stuck on a train and he's channeling Tom Baker.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on October 01, 2021, 09:50:22 AM
I don't have any problems with Davies, but I preferred the Moffat era overall.

Either way, I look forward to better storytelling than we've gotten for the last several years.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: masterthes on October 09, 2021, 12:30:57 PM
So, looks like Doctor Who is coming out with an all star monster episode called Flux on Halloween, featuring new baddies called Ravages
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on October 09, 2021, 04:00:47 PM
So, looks like Doctor Who is coming out with an all star monster episode called Flux on Halloween, featuring new baddies called Ravages
Actually Flux is the name of series 13. It's a single 6-parter story. But yes the first episode airs on Halloween, which is quite fun.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: SoundscapeMN on May 08, 2022, 12:49:34 PM
new Doctor cast
https://twitter.com/i/events/1523290964462252032

Ncuti Gatwa, the 1st Black Doctor, and the 3rd from Scotland.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6967441/

Kind of an unknown, but it's probably a good thing

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Adami on May 08, 2022, 04:45:48 PM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on May 09, 2022, 12:11:17 AM
Hopefully the writing they give him is better, Whitaker was wasted on what they came up with.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on May 09, 2022, 02:01:48 AM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.

Surprises me.  I'd have thought it'd be your thing.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on May 09, 2022, 10:14:32 AM
Hopefully the writing they give him is better, Whitaker was wasted on what they came up with.

I mean, with Davies back in charge, I really didn't care who the next Doctor was since I kind of expect it to be really good.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Adami on May 09, 2022, 10:17:18 AM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.

Surprises me.  I'd have thought it'd be your thing.

I’m a completionist. So if I start a show, I have to watch all of it. No way I can do that with Dr. Who so Ive just avoided it.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on May 09, 2022, 12:50:22 PM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.

Surprises me.  I'd have thought it'd be your thing.

I’m a completionist. So if I start a show, I have to watch all of it. No way I can do that with Dr. Who so Ive just avoided it.

The easy thing to do is to treat the old and new versions as separate shows and start with Chris Eccleston when it was brought back in 2006(?).  It was written as a fresh start so new fans could enjoy it without prior lore of the original run.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Adami on May 09, 2022, 12:51:22 PM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.

Surprises me.  I'd have thought it'd be your thing.

I’m a completionist. So if I start a show, I have to watch all of it. No way I can do that with Dr. Who so Ive just avoided it.

The easy thing to do is to treat the old and new versions as separate shows and start with Chris Eccleston when it was brought back in 2006(?).  It was written as a fresh start so new fans could enjoy it without prior lore of the original run.

Nope haha. Sadly my brain doesn't work that way. Plus, even if I did do that, that's 16 years of a show? I ain't got that time. I have Star Trek to watch!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on May 10, 2022, 06:32:25 AM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.

Surprises me.  I'd have thought it'd be your thing.

I’m a completionist. So if I start a show, I have to watch all of it. No way I can do that with Dr. Who so Ive just avoided it.

The easy thing to do is to treat the old and new versions as separate shows and start with Chris Eccleston when it was brought back in 2006(?).  It was written as a fresh start so new fans could enjoy it without prior lore of the original run.

Nope haha. Sadly my brain doesn't work that way. Plus, even if I did do that, that's 16 years of a show? I ain't got that time. I have Star Trek to watch!

It's a British show - we don't produce 22 episodes a year!
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ZirconBlue on May 11, 2022, 08:51:02 AM
Not a doctor who guy but he was fantastic in Sex Ed.

Surprises me.  I'd have thought it'd be your thing.

I’m a completionist. So if I start a show, I have to watch all of it. No way I can do that with Dr. Who so Ive just avoided it.

The easy thing to do is to treat the old and new versions as separate shows and start with Chris Eccleston when it was brought back in 2006(?).  It was written as a fresh start so new fans could enjoy it without prior lore of the original run.

Nope haha. Sadly my brain doesn't work that way. Plus, even if I did do that, that's 16 years of a show? I ain't got that time. I have Star Trek to watch!

It's a British show - we don't produce 22 episodes a year!


And there wasn't even a "season" every year.  It's probably the equivalent of 7 or 8 US TV seasons.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: soupytwist on November 24, 2023, 04:12:01 AM
Soft reboot incoming after the rather disappointing Jodie Whittaker era - not really her fault, the new showrunner (Chris Chibnell) was terrible.

But we are going back to Tennant as the Doctor for 3 specials starting tomorrow (also the 60th anniversary of the show).  After these specials a new series will start next year with a new Doctor in Ncuti Gatwa - all of this is with Russell T Davies returning as showrunner.

Even though I'm more of a Smith/Moffat era guy myself, this is still very exciting after the poor Chibnell era.  The extra money poured into from Disney (it's going to appear on Disney+) should help too.

Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on November 24, 2023, 04:30:39 AM
Halfway through Capaldi's run and after I've kind of lost interest, even in getting Tennant back which is my favourite. If they've kept the same writing team, I'll probably pass as they were pretty terrible or just ran out of ideas.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: DoctorAction on November 24, 2023, 09:28:31 AM
I'll watch these specials and the new guy come in as I loved it as a kid. After that, we'll just see.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on November 24, 2023, 10:45:14 AM
It looks like old seasons will not be on Disney+. Boo.

Seems like to catch up I have to buy them on Amazon.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: chknptpie on November 25, 2023, 06:31:51 AM
It looks like old seasons will not be on Disney+. Boo.

Seems like to catch up I have to buy them on Amazon.

I've been doing a run through from Season 1 with Eccleston on HBO. I think I would rank these modern day doctors/series:

Tennant - I think I most prefer companion Donna episodes
Smith - the entire River Song stuff is great, huge story arcs and touching moments
Eccleston - solid story arc, Rose is great
Whittaker - She's very likable, but the show is even more preachy and repetitive. Oh another Dalek or Cybermen episode.... again....
Capaldi - So hard to watch. Once the Impossible Girl stuff was over with Clara, it was a mess
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on November 25, 2023, 12:06:56 PM
It looks like old seasons will not be on Disney+. Boo.

Seems like to catch up I have to buy them on Amazon.

I bought the first 11 complete seasons (of the revival show) on DVD for $100. I will never have a problem accessing them ever again.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on November 25, 2023, 02:32:29 PM
Just finished watching the first special. I could watch Tennant be the Doctor until the end of time.

Pretty sure the writing crew is entirely different since Davies is back. This felt like a Tennant episode right out of the Tennant/Davies era. Just fantastic.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ariich on November 25, 2023, 03:23:09 PM
Cheesy as hell but a ton of fun.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: DoctorAction on November 25, 2023, 03:38:04 PM
Great fun. And looked fantastic. The interior of the TARDIS is beautiful. Very much reminded me of the era when I watched it as a kid (Baker/Davidson). White, hexagonal centre console with perspex thingy.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: Jamesman42 on November 25, 2023, 05:11:03 PM
It looks like old seasons will not be on Disney+. Boo.

Seems like to catch up I have to buy them on Amazon.

I've been doing a run through from Season 1 with Eccleston on HBO. I think I would rank these modern day doctors/series:

Tennant - I think I most prefer companion Donna episodes
Smith - the entire River Song stuff is great, huge story arcs and touching moments
Eccleston - solid story arc, Rose is great
Whittaker - She's very likable, but the show is even more preachy and repetitive. Oh another Dalek or Cybermen episode.... again....
Capaldi - So hard to watch. Once the Impossible Girl stuff was over with Clara, it was a mess

I have only seen doctors 9-11, and the pilot for 12.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on November 25, 2023, 06:10:01 PM
Despite the writing flaws, Capaldi himself was often a joy to watch. His demeanor felt more like a classic doctor than anyone else, and his performance and interaction with Alex Kingston in the final River Song episode was absolutely incredible.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ZirconBlue on November 27, 2023, 11:50:04 AM
Despite the writing flaws, Capaldi himself was often a joy to watch. His demeanor felt more like a classic doctor than anyone else, and his performance and interaction with Alex Kingston in the final River Song episode was absolutely incredible.


I warmed up to Capaldi as time went on.  It has been said that Capaldi and Moffat had discussed Capaldi's Doctor being more of a grumpy Doctor.  So, the writers wrote him that way, but then Capaldi added extra grumpiness on top of that.  So, they ended up with a more cantankerous personality than intended.  The edges get filed off as he goes along.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 27, 2023, 12:04:37 PM
I loved Capaldi as the Doctor.

I know that this new stuff is going to be on Disney+, but isn't the old stuff still on MAX?  Not the really old stuff, but from Eccleston - on.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on November 27, 2023, 05:03:16 PM
Despite the writing flaws, Capaldi himself was often a joy to watch. His demeanor felt more like a classic doctor than anyone else, and his performance and interaction with Alex Kingston in the final River Song episode was absolutely incredible.


I warmed up to Capaldi as time went on.  It has been said that Capaldi and Moffat had discussed Capaldi's Doctor being more of a grumpy Doctor.  So, the writers wrote him that way, but then Capaldi added extra grumpiness on top of that.  So, they ended up with a more cantankerous personality than intended.  The edges get filed off as he goes along.

I don’t know, riding in on a tank, playing a guitar, while wearing shades seemed exactly the opposite of cantankerous to me
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: chknptpie on November 27, 2023, 06:27:23 PM
Holy hell that Flux series was awful.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: hefdaddy42 on November 28, 2023, 07:46:14 AM
I know that this new stuff is going to be on Disney+, but isn't the old stuff still on MAX?  Not the really old stuff, but from Eccleston - on.
I checked last night.  The answer is yes, it's still on MAX.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ZirconBlue on November 28, 2023, 01:28:15 PM
Despite the writing flaws, Capaldi himself was often a joy to watch. His demeanor felt more like a classic doctor than anyone else, and his performance and interaction with Alex Kingston in the final River Song episode was absolutely incredible.


I warmed up to Capaldi as time went on.  It has been said that Capaldi and Moffat had discussed Capaldi's Doctor being more of a grumpy Doctor.  So, the writers wrote him that way, but then Capaldi added extra grumpiness on top of that.  So, they ended up with a more cantankerous personality than intended.  The edges get filed off as he goes along.

I don’t know, riding in on a tank, playing a guitar, while wearing shades seemed exactly the opposite of cantankerous to me


That sort of reinforces my point, as that happened in his second season, after he and the writers got on the same page.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on November 28, 2023, 01:55:37 PM
Man, we missed out. Davies said he was willing to ride with the Doctor Donna as long as those two wanted. He said if they committed to 12 episodes, he would've done 12 with them. Sadly, they only committed to the 3 we're getting. Better than nothing, but oh what could have been.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: ProfessorPeart on December 09, 2023, 04:34:32 PM
Wow, so no spoilers, but was not expecting what we got in The Giggle. Davies really has brought the camp back to the show. Very interested in the future now.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: abydos on December 12, 2023, 06:33:47 AM
I did not enjoy that, not one bit. It felt totally off for me. Didn't hate it, just didn't click with me on any level.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: jammindude on December 12, 2023, 07:09:23 AM
Wow, so no spoilers, but was not expecting what we got in The Giggle. Davies really has brought the camp back to the show. Very interested in the future now.

Totally agree. That was the best of the 3 specials for me.
Title: Re: Doctor Who v. Patrick Troughton
Post by: DoctorAction on December 13, 2023, 08:19:35 AM
Was just "fine" for me. My least favourite of the three. Nice to see Bonnie Langford again (despite the McCoy era driving Who into the ground break in the day).

Liked Doogie Howser's camp baddie and the new camp Doctor very much.