DreamTheaterForums.org Dream Theater Fan Site

General => Movies and TV => Topic started by: zerogravityfat on May 29, 2011, 03:48:53 PM

Title: Sherlock
Post by: zerogravityfat on May 29, 2011, 03:48:53 PM
The BBC series in present time, amazing series, loving it. :corn
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: ariich on May 29, 2011, 03:58:37 PM
It really is fantastic! I liked the more traditional Guy Ritchie film as well, very entertaining. But there's just something really cool and clever about the BBC series.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: robwebster on May 29, 2011, 04:04:27 PM
Absolutely superb. Under usual circumstances I'd call a run of three episodes criminal, but given they're essentially three films, I'll give it to 'em.

Gorgeously acted, directed, everything. Beautiful series.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: King Postwhore on May 29, 2011, 04:34:52 PM
The BBC series in present time, amazing series, loving it. :corn

ZFG.  Is it playing on BBC America?
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: zerogravityfat on May 29, 2011, 04:46:26 PM
The BBC series in present time, amazing series, loving it. :corn

ZFG.  Is it playing on BBC America?

not sure, i found it on netflix.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: King Postwhore on May 29, 2011, 04:49:09 PM
Dammit. Thanks anyway.  I'm a DVR whore.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes: Vampire Slayer (In 3D)
Post by: LeeHarveyKennedy on May 29, 2011, 05:47:27 PM
Is that region-specific for Netflix? I just searched and couldn't find anything, and you've whet my appetite for some good Holmes action.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: robwebster on May 29, 2011, 05:48:36 PM
The BBC one's just called "Sherlock," so if you've been typing "Holmes" that could be it.

Features Benedict Cumberbatch (yes, really) and Martin Freeman, if you can search like that. I've never used Netflix myself, not sure.

EDIT: https://www.netflix.com/Movie/Masterpiece-Mystery-Sherlock-Series-1/70151278?strkid=2111367581_0_0&lnkctr=srchrd-sr&strackid=51c8e478a0a8f2c6_0_srl&trkid=222336 This'll probably be it. Not sure where "Masterpiece Mystery" comes from. Accurate enough, but a tacky label and I've never heard it used before.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Cool Chris on May 29, 2011, 05:59:02 PM
Other than the recent film with Downey and Jude Law, I've never seen a Holmes film/TV production. And I've read all the stories multiple times. Maybe I should rectify that.
Title: Re: We can yell at women! Not sexually, just unintelligibly.
Post by: LeeHarveyKennedy on May 29, 2011, 05:59:44 PM
And in this thread, RW becomes my favorite in the history of ever. I want to fly to Britain, get you drunk, and just listen to your accent all night.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: zerogravityfat on May 29, 2011, 07:14:38 PM
did you check tv shows?
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on December 21, 2011, 04:28:17 PM
GUYS IT COMES BACK JANUARY 1ST I AM SO EXCITE
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Fiery Winds on December 21, 2011, 04:39:39 PM
:caffeine::caffeine::caffeine::caffeine:
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: PuffyPat on December 22, 2011, 12:58:17 AM
Just saw the movie tonight, and was in such a Holmes-y mood that I watched the first episode of the show. Both of them were brilliant in different ways. The film had really cool action sequences (loved all the Steadicam), and I love that the show transfers to modern times so well. Can't wait to watch the other two episodes
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Gadough on December 22, 2011, 12:59:01 AM
Yeah, the new Sherlock Holmes movie was incredible. I highly recommend it.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on January 01, 2012, 04:02:04 PM
Bampin' for the new series :caffeine:
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: TheVoxyn on January 01, 2012, 04:04:50 PM
Haven't seen it yet, but series 1 was amazing! Only saw it recently and I loved it!
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Millais on January 01, 2012, 04:27:25 PM
I'd recorded the whole of Series 1 to watch sometime. Decided to start today.

8 hours later I've watched all of series one and the first episode tonight. absolutely incredible!
what I said about Series 2 Episode 1 in another thread: "Wow. There's 364 days left in the year. If anything beats that in terms of script writing, acting, visuals .. ANYTHING I will be surprised. That was truly incredible television."
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 01, 2012, 07:14:06 PM
Amazing show. To bad I can't convince anyone to watch it once they're like, "Oh. This isn't the movie?"
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: TempusVox on January 01, 2012, 07:16:15 PM
Just saw this series over the past couple of days on Netflix. I abolutely LOVE this show. I was radically bummed out to learn that there are only three episodes to watch. I cannot wait to see more of this incredible series. Very well acted, directed and the stories are crafted very, very well. Cumberbatch is an amazing Holmes. Best Sherlock Holmes depiction I have seen in a long, long time, and the modern aspect makes it that much more richer in my opinion. Kudos to the BBC in this one. I give it four stars. I'd give it five, but there are only three shows damnit!!  :biggrin:
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: robwebster on January 01, 2012, 08:06:31 PM
Just saw this series over the past couple of days on Netflix. I abolutely LOVE this show. I was radically bummed out to learn that there are only three episodes to watch. I cannot wait to see more of this incredible series. Very well acted, directed and the stories are crafted very, very well. Cumberbatch is an amazing Holmes. Best Sherlock Holmes depiction I have seen in a long, long time, and the modern aspect makes it that much more richer in my opinion. Kudos to the BBC in this one. I give it four stars. I'd give it five, but there are only three shows damnit!!  :biggrin:
As of six hours ago, there are actually four episodes! And there'll be six by January 15th.

Get cracking, Tempus. The new one's a corker. Even by Sherlock standards.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: PuffyPat on January 01, 2012, 11:26:48 PM
Another episode!?! If my sister wasn't using Netflix right now I would totally be watching that right now.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2012, 04:51:13 AM
That was a fantastic first episode of the series! Maybe even the best one they've done so far, the way it came together at the end was fantastic.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Millais on January 02, 2012, 05:45:45 AM
After even sleeping on it I can't get over how good that new episode was. wowowowowow.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on January 02, 2012, 12:58:06 PM
Yeah, that was brilliant.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: zerogravityfat on January 02, 2012, 02:00:58 PM
ohhh is it online somewhere? we don't get it here, i need to find it.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Heretic on January 02, 2012, 03:12:13 PM
ohhh is it online somewhere? we don't get it here, i need to find it.

yeah I'd like to know if it was online or something, I don't have any other way to watch it since BBC America is only showing Top Gear all day. :P
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2012, 03:13:47 PM
It definitely won't be online anywhere legally other than iPlayer, which I think you need to be in the UK to have access to.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Jaq on January 04, 2012, 12:58:53 PM
It isn't available out of the UK legally, but...yeah, I found it online 20 minutes after it ended.  :P

I loved the first episode. On first watch, it seemed to drag a bit with all the twist endings, but on the second watch, it moved a lot more quickly, and the way everything tied together, even the throwaway cases at the start, was sheer brilliance. One of the best things Moffat's written, and he's written a LOT of good things. Can't wait for next week.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: chknptpie on January 05, 2012, 09:16:25 AM
Might have to give this a shot. I really liked the first movie from a few years ago, but definitely want to see the show.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Millais on January 05, 2012, 09:36:44 AM
Might have to give this a shot. I really liked the first movie from a few years ago, but definitely want to see the show.

highly recommended. beautifully scripted series. mind you, I wasn't a huge fan of the original movie.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Cyclopssss on January 05, 2012, 11:11:47 AM
Yeah, highly recommended! Took me about five minutes to get used to the moderna age thing...but the acting is great.   :metal
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Silver Tears on January 05, 2012, 02:02:19 PM
Loved that first episode so much. WHY ISN'T THE NEXT ONE OUT NOW.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: zerogravityfat on January 07, 2012, 04:15:22 PM
yea the first one was really good, the next is the hound of the baskervilles right?
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on January 07, 2012, 04:18:44 PM
yea the first one was really good, the next is the hound of the baskervilles right?

Yup.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Heretic on January 07, 2012, 08:36:24 PM
This show is fantastic. Finally got around to watching it, and man, it's amazing.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Nekov on January 08, 2012, 03:56:00 AM
This show is fantastic. Finally got around to watching it, and man, it's amazing.

Just recently wathced it and yes, it is very interesting. The only thing I still have a hard time liking is the fact that SH is so good at fighting but at least it's not as bad in the recent movies.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Silver Tears on January 08, 2012, 04:15:50 PM
 :heart :heart :heart
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: tartarus250 on January 09, 2012, 04:25:16 AM
the wife and i watched it for the first time last night and were very pleasantly surprised at how good it was!! we are looking forward to another one tonight :-)
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: zerogravityfat on January 09, 2012, 08:50:37 AM
pretty awesome take on baskerville last night. i really enjoyed the classic.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Millais on January 09, 2012, 10:43:53 AM
yeah, not quite as good as last weeks but that's due to the fact that last weeks was absolutely incredible/best tv i've seen in years and the fact that the original story must have been quite hard to translate to a modern version of it.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: jag66 on January 09, 2012, 03:20:27 PM
Never saw series 1 but this is stellar stuff. Will have to go back at watch S1 now..
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: PuffyPat on January 10, 2012, 08:31:16 PM
Just got caught up with the second series, and I have to say that "A Scandal in Belgravia" is my favorite episode so far. It just shows another side of Sherlock that never really comes out, and when Mrs. Hudson gets attacked he just goes into super bad ass mode and effs that dude up.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: robwebster on January 15, 2012, 04:00:35 PM
Wouldn't read any further if you haven't watched the very last episode. Here you go, here's a nice picture, so you can click the "back" button without accidentally glancing at the rest of my post.


(https://i44.tinypic.com/1e6s61.jpg)


So - have we all worked out what happened yet?!

My theory hinges on my favourite coroner, the homeless network, and the way a certain character faked her own death in episode 1...
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: PuffyPat on January 15, 2012, 08:03:44 PM
I don't know quite how to feel after that episode.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on January 15, 2012, 09:07:46 PM
God damn that was good.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Jaq on January 15, 2012, 10:09:54 PM
I think "holy fuck" about covers my reaction to that episode.

Christ what a good show.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: jcmistat on January 15, 2012, 11:26:49 PM
Waiting for the 3 episodes to release in the US, don't want to watch then wait!
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: jcmistat on January 15, 2012, 11:27:22 PM
Waiting for the 3 episodes to release in the US, don't want to watch then wait! Not going to download either.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 16, 2012, 12:06:47 PM
You have to wait until May then.  :'(

Man, that was great.

SPOILERS

So many things that might helped him. Was Moriarty in on it? He did copy Sherlock's appearance before. Adler? They've had experience faking deaths. Homeless network? Obviously Molly has to be involved because Sherlock needed her. And for some reason I feel like the biker that knocked down John at the end is significant as well.

I guess we'll know in time whether Moffat can redeem himself in how he gets around a main character's death. (Yeah, I wasn't too impressed by that DW finale)
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on January 16, 2012, 12:08:52 PM
To be fair, I assume how he faked it has already been established, so I'm not sure how much Moffat will really have to do with that besides revealing it.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 16, 2012, 12:10:16 PM
I thought the same was with Doctor Who. All the pieces were there. He just revealed it.

Edit: Wait I forgot that we saw 11 die in the first episode--if that has significance to what you're talking about.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Sigz on January 16, 2012, 12:12:56 PM
The difference is Moffat also wrote all those pieces being laid out. Steven Thompson wrote this episode.

My point is, I doubt he has as much creative control over the death as he did with DW.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 16, 2012, 12:14:19 PM
Ah, okay. Good point.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: robwebster on January 16, 2012, 12:50:20 PM
The difference is Moffat also wrote all those pieces being laid out. Steven Thompson wrote this episode.

My point is, I doubt he has as much creative control over the death as he did with DW.
His responsibility's shared with Gatiss, (supposedly this is in part to help train Gatiss up should Moffat leave the Doctor Who post) but they'll have very much told Stephen Thompson precisely where they wanted the characters to end up. They wouldn't let their only guest writer define such a gamechanging story-arc by himself. Thompson's probably the one who made it brilliant, with Pentonville and the crown jewels and Rich Brook, but the outcome of the narrative - the places Holmes, Watson and Moriarty end up - will, I'd presume, have been given to him.

He'd certainly be working to a brief, at the very least.

I'm being careful not to downplay Thompson's contribution, here, of course. The Blind Banker was my least favourite Sherlock ep (albeit still good!), and The Curse of the Black Spot was in the lower half of Doctor Who (albeit still good!), so I am absolutely overjoyed that he's pulled out a blinder. Stunned by his work, I think he's fantastic, and I am really excited to see more of his work, and preferably as soon as possible. But he's not even the showrunner, so the last draft may have even been Moffat's or Gatiss's. Rewrites from a head writer are the rule, rather than the exception.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: robwebster on January 16, 2012, 01:01:21 PM
MEGASPOILY SPECULATION AHOY
You have to wait until May then.  :'(

Man, that was great.

SPOILERS

So many things that might helped him. Was Moriarty in on it? He did copy Sherlock's appearance before. Adler? They've had experience faking deaths. Homeless network? Obviously Molly has to be involved because Sherlock needed her. And for some reason I feel like the biker that knocked down John at the end is significant as well.

I guess we'll know in time whether Moffat can redeem himself in how he gets around a main character's death. (Yeah, I wasn't too impressed by that DW finale)
Well!

Molly's the lady of the morgue, and she knew Sherlock, so she'd be able to identify his corpse, no questions asked. Or, if necessary, misidentify it. Likewise, when Watson was knocked down, it was to prevent him from getting a clear look. He was concussed, unable to see anything other than what he was expecting to see. Plus, to give it context, they were standing on top of the pathology building. He could've been making who knows how many phone calls as he went, and a van went past as he fell.

It's not a perfect explanation, but I feel everything's been seeded. And there's a sort of poetry to it, 'cos when Moriarty listed Sherlock's three friends, he missed out Molly. Who I kind of love a bit of a lot. She even out-Sherlocked Sherlock, a little bit, this time round. Here and there.

It's the kind of stunt that seems impossible at first glance, so you get the shock of seeing Sherlock there (although I will admit... I was half-expecting it!) but I think we were meant to be able to "get" it, once the credits had rolled. How rubbish would it be if we spent the next year and a half thinking "That last Sherlock was bullshit." I think we're meant to have worked that one out.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Millais on January 16, 2012, 01:04:57 PM
incredible episode. I realise people the US haven't seen it yet so I'll post my solutions to what I think may have actually happened at the end here, HUGE spoiler alert so don't read from here on if you want to save it for later ..and please do, it's certainly worth the wait:

1) Somehow Sherlock knew that Moriarty was trying to get him to jump so he arranged for a truck to be at the bottom. The first time when he leaned over the edge it hadn't arrived yet which is why he stalled and went back down. The second time he went up it had arrived and he jumped and landed in all the rubbish bins in the back of that. John couldn't see that because Sherlock was so specific about where he wanted to him to stand so he didn't have the full field of view - John was then hit by the cyclist, making him lose vision of the truck for a few seconds. Sherlock then jumped down off the truck and lay dead in fake blood as the crowd surrounded him. Molly, who was earlier asked by Sherlock to do a favour for him, faked his death because "DNA Tests are only as good as the records you keep".

2) There is also another person that looks like Sherlock - we know this because earlier in the episode the little girl screamed as soon as Sherlock walked into the room. So there's a face identical to him - Moriarty probably paid a plastic surgeon to create a replica of Sherlock's face and so the body that flew off the building was Moriarty with a mask of Sherlock on. Again, the bike hitting John blurred his vision and subsequently he didn't capture the moments after.

not exactly sure though, option one seems much more plausible. either way, series 3 is too far away!
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: jag66 on January 16, 2012, 03:46:46 PM
Just watched it.. quality stuff. Some nice deductions in the spoilers there  :tup
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 16, 2012, 04:00:08 PM
MEGASPOILY SPECULATION AHOY
You have to wait until May then.  :'(

Man, that was great.

SPOILERS

So many things that might helped him. Was Moriarty in on it? He did copy Sherlock's appearance before. Adler? They've had experience faking deaths. Homeless network? Obviously Molly has to be involved because Sherlock needed her. And for some reason I feel like the biker that knocked down John at the end is significant as well.

I guess we'll know in time whether Moffat can redeem himself in how he gets around a main character's death. (Yeah, I wasn't too impressed by that DW finale)
Well!

Molly's the lady of the morgue, and she knew Sherlock, so she'd be able to identify his corpse, no questions asked. Or, if necessary, misidentify it. Likewise, when Watson was knocked down, it was to prevent him from getting a clear look. He was concussed, unable to see anything other than what he was expecting to see. Plus, to give it context, they were standing on top of the pathology building. He could've been making who knows how many phone calls as he went, and a van went past as he fell.

My thoughts exactly.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Nekov on January 17, 2012, 08:15:12 AM
MEGASPOILY SPECULATION AHOY
You have to wait until May then.  :'(

Man, that was great.

SPOILERS

So many things that might helped him. Was Moriarty in on it? He did copy Sherlock's appearance before. Adler? They've had experience faking deaths. Homeless network? Obviously Molly has to be involved because Sherlock needed her. And for some reason I feel like the biker that knocked down John at the end is significant as well.

I guess we'll know in time whether Moffat can redeem himself in how he gets around a main character's death. (Yeah, I wasn't too impressed by that DW finale)
Well!

Molly's the lady of the morgue, and she knew Sherlock, so she'd be able to identify his corpse, no questions asked. Or, if necessary, misidentify it. Likewise, when Watson was knocked down, it was to prevent him from getting a clear look. He was concussed, unable to see anything other than what he was expecting to see. Plus, to give it context, they were standing on top of the pathology building. He could've been making who knows how many phone calls as he went, and a van went past as he fell.

My thoughts exactly.

+1 here

This is a tremendous show really.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Heretic on January 17, 2012, 07:49:38 PM
THAT ENDING OH MY GOSH. One of the most emotional things I've seen, geez. I really want Sherlock to get his name cleared, though, I hate the world thinking that he was a fraud who killed himself...
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: ariich on January 20, 2012, 05:11:46 PM
Finally caught up.

That was bloody brilliant.

The writers are such teases though - and I agree with Rob that Thompson did a really stellar job with this episode, but that ending had Moffat written ALL over it!
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: zerogravityfat on January 20, 2012, 08:49:39 PM
My guess is they used the dummy we saw earlier in the episode to throw him off the roof and used the cyclist to distract watson so he doesnt end up finding out and getting himself killed. the pathology girl obviously arranged for the heart stopping drugs, blood etc. to do the same stuff done in teh movies ala time delayed death trick. i can't believe moriarti would be dead either, i'm guessing that's a fake and he knows what holmes did and will come back to taunt him about it.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 20, 2012, 09:47:53 PM
I bet that Moriarty was in on it. After all, he owed Sherlock.
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Millais on January 22, 2012, 09:46:29 AM
could the title of this thread be changed to 'Sherlock' as opposed to 'Sherlock Holmes'  :blush :blush
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Heretic on January 22, 2012, 07:36:33 PM
Two things that have been mentioned by the creators (spoilers, don't scroll down if you haven't seen the finale):















-The show probably won't air again until early 2013 (“@Sherlockology: @Steven_Moffat was misquoted in The Guardian, no new #Sherlock until 2013 at the earliest” )

-That most of the deductions about how Sherlock survived were missing one vital clue, something that was completely out of character for Sherlock.
(“We’ve all worked out exactly how Sherlock Holmes survived at the end of the series finale, right? WRONG.
At our exclusive Radio Times covers party last night, co-creator Steven Moffat said there’s something in Sunday night’s episode, The Reichenbach Fall, which everyone has overlooked.
Moffat admitted he had been following the fevered speculation about how Sherlock, played by Benedict Cumberbatch, could appear alive and well in the last scene of the episode, despite having apparently fallen to his death and, indeed, been buried. But according to Moffat, all the fans’ talk of switched corpses and mystery cyclists has been lacking a crucial detail.
“I’ve been online and looked at all the theories,” Moffat told us, “and there’s one clue that everyone’s missed. It’s something that Sherlock did that was very out of character, but which nobody has picked up on.”
What does he mean? Of course we tried to convince him - and fellow Sherlock creator Mark Gatiss, who also attended the party - to elaborate, but Moffat merely smiled and said that was all we were getting!
Over to you…”

-Steven Moffat for Radio Times)
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Cool Chris on January 24, 2012, 10:05:46 PM
This show is fantastic. Finally got around to watching it, and man, it's amazing.

Just watched the first episode, and came here to post exactly that. Big Sherlockian here, and that did not disappoint! Can't wait to watch more!
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: Implode on January 25, 2012, 12:28:48 AM
I was bored the other night with a friend, so I made this in the snow on campus. It kind of sucks, but it was a first attempt.

(https://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lya4tk3gUf1qgg53uo1_500.png)
Title: Re: Sherlock Holmes
Post by: jcmistat on January 25, 2012, 12:32:50 AM
Should've been on BBC America sucks I gotta wait this long.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Sigz on January 28, 2012, 03:09:56 PM
Saw this on campus:

(https://i.imgur.com/IwWT8.jpg)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Implode on January 28, 2012, 03:22:43 PM
I should put some of those up.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2014, 07:21:27 AM
Given that it took Sherlock two years to return from the dead, it's fitting that the same applies to this thread.

So, who's seen The Empty Hearse? So excited to have this show back, even if it is only for two weeks! :D
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 02, 2014, 07:55:02 AM
Loved the episode but could only think of Khan whenever Benedict was speaking. :p

The only thing that confused me was - as Rich already knows - the moment where Sherlock reveals to Anderson how he did it and afterwards it cuts back to John in the train.

Is this actually a flashback or Anderson fantasising about Sherlock visiting him and revealing everything ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 02, 2014, 08:27:52 AM
I thought it was brilliant.  Watson was so emotionally abused   :P
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2014, 08:36:36 AM
Loved the episode but could only think of Khan whenever Benedict was speaking. :p

The only thing that confused me was - as Rich already knows - the moment where Sherlock reveals to Anderson how he did it and afterwards it cuts back to John in the train.

Is this actually a flashback or Anderson fantasising about Sherlock visiting him and revealing everything ?
As I mentioned on Twitter, I'm pretty sure that's a flashback. It occurs at that particular moment (a cut in the scene on the train) to leave us in suspense about the bomb. But Sherlock goes there to have a go at Anderson for the Ripper scam, and then tells him a story that is almost certainly not the real way he did it. He even walks away with a smirk on his face once Anderson realises this.

I'm hoping that they continue to revisit this throughout the remaining two episodes!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 02, 2014, 08:50:44 AM
I thought it was brilliant.  Watson was so emotionally abused   :P

Martin's acting was awesome when he saw Sherlock . It was the perfect mixture of confusion and happiness and anger all at once.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2014, 08:57:56 AM
I thought it was brilliant.  Watson was so emotionally abused   :P

Martin's acting was awesome when he saw Sherlock . It was the perfect mixture of confusion and happiness and anger all at once.
Definitely. :lol The episode was so nicely done in that regard, seeing the way the different characters responded. I love the way Greg Lestrade hugged him!

Following from your latest Twitter question Kotow, I don't know if they'll keep going with this. Assuming that what Sherlock told Anderson was a lie, I think it'll go one of either two ways. Either they'll continue to revisit it over the rest of series 3, and eventually reveal it (or at the very least reveal more about it), or they'll just move on now and not mention it again. Personally, I'd like it to be the former.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 02, 2014, 09:02:29 AM
Considering Gatiss & Moffatt have said that some people have guessed the correct method - this implies that there is a correct method or else they could just dance around it like what they've been doing so far.

Why would you write a method and tell people that they got it right and then not reveal what they got right ?

I'm fine either way - if they just show 6 more possibilities then it means that they're nodding to the fanbase and "everyone can be right."

But i'd also like a definitive version. But the way The Empty Hearse played out - i'm fine either way.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2014, 09:18:31 AM
Yeah if they went for that approach, to just never reveal a difinitive version, then that's fine because it's them saying "the exact way that he did it doesn't matter, what matters is what he did to John". Which is a good human angle, but for me wouldn't be very in line with the show in general which is all about the clever details of how the villains do things and how Sherlock works things out.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 02, 2014, 10:21:22 AM
I didn't pick up on the smirk as he left Anderson, I just assumed that was the true sequence of events and was a bit disappointed, I didn't like how many people that story involved.
They seemed to be having fun teasing us so perhaps they are dragging it out a bit more, maybe they will even repeat it because faking death again is needed to get him out of a situation in another episode.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 02, 2014, 10:24:21 AM
The alternate where both Moriarty and Sherlock were giggling behind the stuffed figure with the Sherlock face on it -- I was rolling!   :rollin

The..uhhhh..."after bit" was rather disconcerting...   :P
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Jaq on January 02, 2014, 10:37:41 AM
You'd understand if you spent five minutes on the Sherlock tab on Tumblr.

In fact, the episode seemed designed to troll the living fuck out of the Tumblr Sherlock fandom, and did it brilliantly.

Loved it, of course. Sherlock never lasts long but it gives you more bang for your buck than most full American TV series dream of giving.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 02, 2014, 02:54:36 PM
*SPOILER*


Did anyone else think that the bomb with a handy "off switch" was a little hokey ?

Of course, I know nothing about modern bomb disposal :lol

Sherlock said something about all modern bombs having an off switch. Does this have any basis in reality ?

Seems like it would make bomb disposal a piece of fuckin piss if you can just switch them "off".
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 02, 2014, 02:56:01 PM
The alternate where both Moriarty and Sherlock were giggling behind the stuffed figure with the Sherlock face on it -- I was rolling!   :rollin

The..uhhhh..."after bit" was rather disconcerting...   :P

I can imagine some people finding it uncomfortable but I bet that Andrew & Benedict were loving it :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2014, 03:01:23 PM
*SPOILER*


Did anyone else think that the bomb with a handy "off switch" was a little hokey ?

Of course, I know nothing about modern bomb disposal :lol

Sherlock said something about all modern bombs having an off switch. Does this have any basis in reality ?

Seems like it would make bomb disposal a piece of fuckin piss if you can just switch them "off".
I can believe it. You rely on the bomb not being seen by anyone. If you couldn't turn it off and you accidentally trigger it, you'd be screwed.

I've no idea if it's true or not though.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 02, 2014, 03:09:48 PM
The alternate where both Moriarty and Sherlock were giggling behind the stuffed figure with the Sherlock face on it -- I was rolling!   :rollin

The..uhhhh..."after bit" was rather disconcerting...   :P

I can imagine some people finding it uncomfortable but I bet that Andrew & Benedict were loving it :lol

I'm sure.  I "got" it -- I actually said, "oh man, WHATT??" out loud when it happened!  :D

Just discovered that Sherlock's parents were actually Cumberbatch's parents!  Everything was all in the family last night!  Such a good show!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 02, 2014, 03:16:22 PM
Yeah and Watson's fiancee is actually Freeman's wife.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 02, 2014, 04:32:41 PM
;D Just something I threw together

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdAvY-PCUAA27w8.png:large)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: senecadawg2 on January 02, 2014, 10:05:13 PM
I didn't realize the show was back already! I'll have to watch the new episode tomorrow, super excite :caffeine:
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TempusVox on January 03, 2014, 12:19:45 AM
In the U.S. January 14th I believe. :metal
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 03, 2014, 02:48:02 AM
Awesome episode. Anderson was a great metaphor for the fanbase's likely reaction. Sherlcok and Mycroft's game of deduction was fun to see. Martin Freeman did some fantastic acting.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 03, 2014, 07:29:33 AM
Pretty strong episode, though both s1e1 and s2e1 were stronger. That could be because I generally like Moffat's episodes more, but still. This show is officially on TV in Russia, but I had to acquire it through, well, other sources, because this translation is just :lol They turned "night out with Stamford" line under Watson's eyes in "A Scandal in Belgravia" to like "didn't sleep at night, was walking out with a beloved terrier". Or something like that. It was a disaster anyway.

That switch-off bomb thing... it was borderline believable. I mean, the bomb certainly has to have some kind of switch-off, but a literal switch? Should be more like a code or maybe multiple switches, one turns it off, others blow it up, so the terrorists know which is which, but others do not. It was just, well, kinda convenient.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Heretic on January 04, 2014, 03:43:22 PM
The Empty Hearse was written for the fans, no doubt about it. Less focus on plot, more focus on character interaction and lots of witty banter. I really, really enjoyed it, though, and I loved the scenes between Sherlock and Mycroft immensely. I cannot wait to see the Big Bad of the season and his twisted plans, but I hope they try to make him a different type of character than Moriarty. If the show is just Sherlock facing off against other psychopath geniuses the whole time, it might get stale-- hopefully they'll create very different, individual villain types.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 05, 2014, 04:51:46 PM
Another great episode this week! While the dramatic side hasn't so far been quite as great as in the first two series, the character side is the best its ever been and there is some wonderful stuff in this ep.

The dramatic side is still pretty great though, I loved the way the different strands came together at the end.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 05, 2014, 05:29:30 PM
I'm just downloading it from the BBC Iplayer. I'll watch it tomorrow probably.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: LCArenas on January 05, 2014, 06:16:19 PM
Man, I love this show. I just hate the tumblr fanbase it has. Seems to concentrate more in their physical appearance and their fantasies about Sherlock and Watson being a gay couple instead of concentrating on the genius of the acting and the screenplay it has.

[SPOILER]And the Empty Hearse was a brilliant comeback. However I still wonder how Sherlock didn't realize why Watson was ignoring him in the beginning of the episode. I mean, he knows how to read people. Just minutes ago he knew a waiter was an expecting father. In Scandal in Belgravia he read Watson's appearance and knew he was going to a date within seconds. How come he didn't realize Watson was going to propose to Mary that night?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 05, 2014, 06:19:59 PM
Another great episode this week! While the dramatic side hasn't so far been quite as great as in the first two series, the character side is the best its ever been and there is some wonderful stuff in this ep.

The dramatic side is still pretty great though, I loved the way the different strands came together at the end.

Possible spoilers:


That's the way I see it too. Rather than focus on lots of clever twists to solve a case, they are making the episode's main plot revolve around events which are more to show Sherlock's character development and make the cases a bit more secondary.
This episode was a weird one. It was only when they started bringing the flashbacks together into the present that I suddenly went "oh, actually, this is a really good episode!", prior to that I was just going "not another bloody unresolved flashback!?"
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 05, 2014, 07:42:09 PM
Sucks that there's only one more episode. I hope they've filmed enough for two series and there's another later in the year.


Edit : They must have because they hinted at the new Villain in The Empty Hearse and there is only one episode left to give him a complete arc.

I'm guessing / hoping that episode 3 will introduce the new villain and then they will advertise Series 4 will arrive later in the year.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Jaq on January 05, 2014, 10:07:07 PM
There will be a series four, but they haven't even started production on it, so don't hold your breath waiting.

Tonight's episode was amazing, even if it took almost all of it for everything to snap together, but when it did goddamn did it get GOOD. It's more character focused this year and feels a little different than the other two series-I have the feeling Moffat was involved a little less in this one, what with the 50th Anniversary of Doctor Who and Matt Smith's departure-but it's still really damn good. I just hate that it blows in and is gone in so short a time and then we have to wait a couple of years for the next three!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 06, 2014, 07:44:26 AM
3 episodes is a ridiculously short series. Even if they are 90 minutes each.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 06, 2014, 08:23:39 AM
Eh, I think of them more like movies than episodes anyway, given that they're 90 minutes long. In which case, three movies in two years is pretty good going.

Even treating them as episodes it's the equivalent of 6 regular-length episodes, which is about right for a mini-series.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 06, 2014, 11:12:28 AM
Yeah, the second episode was more hilarious, than dramatic. I think they left most of dramatic stuff for the final one, so I don't mind.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 06, 2014, 02:17:12 PM
Great episode last night!  So much detail -- I need to watch it again.



3 episodes is a ridiculously short series. Even if they are 90 minutes each.

THIS!!!  It's the only bad thing about this series.  I could happily watch it every week indefinitely!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 06, 2014, 03:40:47 PM
It only started Last Wednesday for goodness sake and it's OVER on Sunday :emo:



I don't see why they can't have them in 45min episodes. One a week.


Then the series would last a month and a half and not a week and a bit...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Jaffa on January 06, 2014, 04:26:48 PM
Eh, I think it's just a matter of how you look at them, like Rich said.  If you look at it as a television series, yeah, it seems short.  But if you look at the episodes as mini movies instead, you're getting a whole trilogy in the space of a couple weeks, and that's pretty dang cool. 
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 06, 2014, 05:58:18 PM
For me, it's just the very sad lack of quality television out there that makes me sad that something so good is over so quickly.  More, smaller meals rather than three feasts...then nothing for a year or more would be my preference.

I feel the same about "Luther" even though the series is longer.  I don't watch much serialized TV for that reason.  I love British dramas but I don't like that they seem to be over and done just like *snap*.  :(

I'm going to find a nice long one on Netflix (MI5, perhaps?) and deal with it that way.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 06, 2014, 06:00:20 PM
Have you seen Spaced ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 06, 2014, 06:39:47 PM
No, is it good ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 06, 2014, 06:46:31 PM
Yes !!

It's one of the best English comedy shows ever !

Simon Pegg & Nick Frost from the Cornetto films are in it - along with most of the guest actors. And Edgar Wright directed it.

Bill Bailey is in it too. It's brilliant. It's very nerdy and full of pop culture references.

Try and find the 1st episode on You tube :) x
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 07, 2014, 04:51:58 AM
spaced is channel 4, most of their older stuff is up on netflix (at least in the UK it is)

EDIT: Just checked, seems that they haven't put spaced up on netflix. boo hiss etc.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 07, 2014, 07:00:01 AM
I loved the second episode, I knew it was going to be amazing but it actually pleasantly surprised me. So good.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 07, 2014, 11:24:50 AM
spaced is channel 4, most of their older stuff is up on netflix (at least in the UK it is)

EDIT: Just checked, seems that they haven't put spaced up on netflix. boo hiss etc.

It WAS there for streaming - I had it in my queue for ages.  I just never got around to watching it.  Now, it's only on CD.  Netflix had a big purge of streaming content recently.  :(
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 08, 2014, 04:43:49 AM
You should try and find Spaced somewhere else. It's only 14 episodes in total.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 08, 2014, 11:27:18 PM
https://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-01-08/sherlock-weve-plotted-out-the-whole-of-series-4-and-5-reveals-steven-moffat (https://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-01-08/sherlock-weve-plotted-out-the-whole-of-series-4-and-5-reveals-steven-moffat)

 :tup
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 09, 2014, 12:51:07 AM
:caffeine:
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 09, 2014, 02:53:45 AM
Nice! Hopefully we won't have to endure another two year wait then, maybe just one?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 09, 2014, 06:30:27 AM
That would be cool seeing as I only started watching Sherlock a year ago :lol

Last night I watched The Empty Hearse & The Sign Of Three back to back . . .

While they are great episodes - they both feel lacking in some department compared to the first two series.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: masterthes on January 09, 2014, 07:05:19 AM
I enjoyed this last one, but not as much as the first. I thought the show should've been more linear. Felt it jumped around too much
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 09, 2014, 07:29:07 AM
I enjoyed this last one, but not as much as the first. I thought the show should've been more linear. Felt it jumped around too much
This is a show by Moffat and Gatiss. Don't expect too much linear storytelling. :lol

Personally I thought it worked so well in this episode. Using the wedding speech as a framing device for the plots, and then bringing it together with the wedding actually being central to the plot after all, was just great.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 09, 2014, 08:36:22 AM
And that speech was amazing. Very moving too.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 09, 2014, 09:52:26 AM
I enjoyed this last one, but not as much as the first. I thought the show should've been more linear. Felt it jumped around too much
This is a show by Moffat and Gatiss. Don't expect too much linear storytelling. :lol

Personally I thought it worked so well in this episode. Using the wedding speech as a framing device for the plots, and then bringing it together with the wedding actually being central to the plot after all, was just great.

Yeah it was fantastic - at first I thought they were just dropping in snippets of cases to give the wedding episode some semblance of a normal Sherlock episode - rather than it just being about the wedding for 90 minutes - but then when all the loose threads got tied up at the end - it was brilliant. Really great writing.

I'm assuming that to write something like that - you start with "someone gets murdered at the wedding but there's no murderer " and extrapolate backwards from there - creating plot threads that you can flesh out.

I can't imagine writing something like that forwards...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 09, 2014, 04:08:29 PM
https://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s129/sherlock/news/a542720/sherlock-series-4-well-make-it-as-quickly-as-we-can-says-moffat.html

Good news. Hopefully the wait will be less than two years this time! At least Freeman doesn't have any more Hobbit to film.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 09, 2014, 05:42:09 PM
And Khanberbatch won't be doing another Trek / Fifth Estate Part II : The Wrath Of Assange.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 10, 2014, 02:15:58 AM
And Khanberbatch won't be doing another Trek / Fifth Estate Part II : The Wrath Of Assange.

... Or will he? *mystery music*
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on January 10, 2014, 03:22:59 AM
Am I the only one who is deadly interested in knowing the full "Elephant In The Room" and "Inexplicable" cases?  :-X
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2014, 03:58:41 AM
Yes :D

They were obviously just sight gags and nothing more.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on January 10, 2014, 04:05:14 AM
I know, but I would nonetheless appreciate if they were expanded into full cases by someone willing and capable.  :biggrin:
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2014, 04:08:58 AM
:D Ask Rob Webster - he's into that whole scripty-writey-wibbly-wobbly stuff. :p
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 12, 2014, 03:39:39 PM
However long it is until series 4, IT'S TOO LONG.

That was soooooooo good!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 12, 2014, 03:52:28 PM
Currently downloading from iPlayer but people have already been orgasming all over twitter because they can't control themselves.

But I managed to steer clear of major plot points save for a surprise at the end.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 12, 2014, 05:14:33 PM
MY GOD THAT WAS GOOD!

SPOILERS BENEATH:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's why they never revealed the full story of the fall from the roof in a satisfactory way! How the holy hell are they going to explain that plot twist!? We saw him literally shoot himself in the mouth, thats usually pretty fatal right!?
Fave bits:
- Sherlock thinking through the best course of action when he has just been shot and trying to control his body
- When Sherlock took the simple solution of just shooting him when he realised the bearded guy (whose name I have already forgotten) was the single-point failure of his whole empire, nobody could possibly take it over from him!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 12, 2014, 05:24:02 PM
Meh. I liked the previous 2 episodes much more. Still good, but disappointing final episode. And the whole vaults thing I found to be rather predictable. Don't like it when I can guess things happening on a Sherlock episode.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 12, 2014, 06:40:25 PM
SPOLIERS


Moriarty could have fired blanks and had a blood pack on the back of his head. Easily done. i didn't think Magnussen was that great as a villain. Too irritating and not scary enough.

And as soon as it was revealed that the vaults were all in his head - the only logical next step was to shoot him, surely ?

I just assumed Mycroft would do it.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 13, 2014, 12:37:35 AM
And as soon as it was revealed that the vaults were all in his head - the only logical next step was to shoot him, surely ?

I just assumed Mycroft would do it.
Mycroft didn't know that fact.

Magnusson had presumably never revealed it to anyone, but revealed it to Sherlock and Watson imagining that they would never just murder him. Indeed, I think that usually Sherlock would not have done that, and he only did it because of the vow he made in the previous episode to always look after John and Mary. Hence the title of the episode, "His Last Vow". Actually rather brilliant, in my opinion!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on January 13, 2014, 04:24:25 AM
I thought it was a stunning episode.  :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 13, 2014, 04:46:08 AM
Me too.

I also thought Magnusson was properly creepy! So cold and brutal.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: puppyonacid on January 13, 2014, 06:24:38 AM
SPOLIERS


Moriarty could have fired blanks and had a blood pack on the back of his head. Easily done. i didn't think Magnussen was that great as a villain. Too irritating and not scary enough.

And as soon as it was revealed that the vaults were all in his head - the only logical next step was to shoot him, surely ?

I just assumed Mycroft would do it.

AFAIK even firing a blank in to your cranium would kill you.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 13, 2014, 08:47:44 AM
All's i'm saying is - If Moriarty is not dead after all then there's plenty of ways to get around it with fake guns etc...

Also i like how the theme music was about to start and then it suddenly cut back to 2 more minutes of episode :P
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 13, 2014, 09:05:34 AM
I think Series 3 was all about character building and series 4 will get back to being like the first two 2 series with the possible return of Moriarty.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 13, 2014, 09:25:19 AM
All's i'm saying is - If Moriarty is not dead after all then there's plenty of ways to get around it with fake guns etc...
It's definitely possible. I thought that when the Reichenbach Fall first aired. We seem him fire and fall and some red liquid come out the back of his head, but that's not proof.

When they had all that "did you miss me" stuff at the end of His Last Vow, I did think that maybe Sherlock himself set all that up, as a way to keep himself out of prison/exile in the event of him having to do something like kill Magnusson. But then, at the very END of the credits, we see a actual clip of Moriarty saying it, rather than the cartoon versions before the credits. So I dunno, he could well be alive.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 13, 2014, 09:29:45 AM
it probably won't happen but the true resolution of TRF could be revealed in S4 to explain how both Sherlock & M survived...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 13, 2014, 09:48:12 AM
it probably won't happen but the true resolution of TRF could be revealed in S4 to explain how both Sherlock & M survived...
Good point. You never know!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 13, 2014, 11:18:39 AM
Bless this show. 

Last night's was SOOOO GOOOOODDDDD!!!!!!  Magnusson was a great villain; sorry he's dead (or IS HE?????  people don't seem to stay dead on Sherlock).  I loved how Sherlock thought he was wearing some sort of Google glass to reference everyone -- but it was all in his head!

 Oooh, I was so angry with Mary at first.  But Watson is a champ...true spousal love, there.   :'(

Sherlock and the Irish girl!!!   :o  That was cold.  And hot!

OMG Moriarty!!!  I am so glad he's coming back.  Threw me off with the end credit break...then the teaser.  Man, I hope series four isn't too far off. 

 :tup :tup for Sherlock!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 13, 2014, 11:37:06 AM
Type out a huge reply then accidentally refreshed the page and lost the lot...


In summary : didn't like Magnussen - too slimy and not intelligent enough or interesting. Just had a great memory and loved to blackmail people. That's it.

Probably Martin's best acting of any episode so far.

Not as good as Reichenbach Fall - but that episode was fantastic anyway.

Had a thought that maybe the Moriarty vid was made by Mycroft / Holmes to force Holmes to stay in London...

the " did you miss me" after the credits could have been a tease for the fans and a red herring...

Series 4 will reveal all !

But yeah - Magnussesn stay dead please.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 13, 2014, 11:57:28 AM
Martin Freeman is brilliant.  I've always liked him best.

Benny C has the voice (and he's a good actor)...but Freeman just "clicks" with me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 13, 2014, 11:59:22 AM
The face Benedict pulls when he says " I've made a deal with the devil "reminds me of when he is sitting in the brig in Star Trek explaining who he is to Kirk.

Obviously there were a few times this series when i thought of Khan :lol.

Not least when Sherlock was angry and speaking in his slow, angry voice.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on January 13, 2014, 12:18:17 PM
I know you caught the dragon references between him and Mycroft.   ;D

"Here be dragons"...    :hat
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 13, 2014, 12:18:40 PM
I actually liked Magnussen quite much. As the whole episode, I loved the sequence after Sherlock was shot, and the one with John as a dummy was pretty dramatic too. My only complaint the reveal about the vaults was too obvious, and I was literally thinking "now you've got to just kill him and it's all fine". It felt a bit lackluster, but I had my expectations too high, like s02e01 high.

Oh, and I really hope Moriarty just stays dead. Andrew Scott is a great actor, but it would be just too much.

I still need to stomach this episode, but for now my rankings stay like:

A Scandal in Belgravia
A Study in Pink
The Reichenbach Fall
His Last Vow
The Empty Hearse
The Great Game
The Sign of Three
The Blind Banker
The Hounds of Baskerville

Overall, the seasons for me are ranked as 2 > 1 > 3, but the last one will probably grew on me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 13, 2014, 02:42:37 PM
My only complaint the reveal about the vaults was too obvious, and I was literally thinking "now you've got to just kill him and it's all fine".
I think maybe that says something worrying about how your mind works. :lol

At that point I thought Sherlock was a bit screwed, because although he and John have shrugged off deaths, I definitely didn't think he'd outright murder someone. I was shocked when he did.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 13, 2014, 02:57:08 PM
Another reason I thought one of Mycroft's people would do it - I didn't really want Sherlock to be a murderer.

Even if he was murdering a blackmailing brainiac. Murder is murder.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 13, 2014, 03:01:13 PM
Like I said before, it's because of the vow he made to be there for John and Mary no matter what.

Of course, it's possible that he didn't actually kill him. It seems rather unlikely, but anything's possible in Sherlock.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2014, 09:16:06 AM
So I just listened to an hour long interview with Gatiss & Moffatt and they pretty much all but confirmed the airbag resolution was the real one.

Choice quotes ( not verbatim - it was a long podcast :lol )

" Fans actually ask us which of the three is the real one - and i'm like - well there's obviously two that it's not. "

" I really liked the idea of cutting away to the resolution during the bonb scene as you've almost forgotten about it - and just when you think you're never going to get the real explanation - it's in the middle of a really tense moment "

" Fans online are saying we stole the squash ball idea from them - but it's there in The Reichenbach Fall - because that's how he did it. "

I can't remember much else..

But doesn't Sherlock say *in the actual episode* that if you remove the impossible - whatever remains must be the answer ? And - the Derren Brown and Moriarty kiss scenarios are obviously both nonsense. Ergo the final explanation must be the right one...


They also confirmed just in case anyone was wondering that Moriarty is definitely back and Sherlock didn't fake the video.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 16, 2014, 11:28:36 AM
Hmm, weird if true.

But remember, Moffat lies. Don't trust a word he says!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2014, 12:20:10 PM
Hmm, weird if true.

But remember, Moffat lies. Don't trust a word he says!

Most of what I quoted was spoken by Gatiss tbh..

Moffatt spoke mostly about the writing process / choices.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Implode on January 16, 2014, 12:24:25 PM
I just watched series 3 last night. I thought it was excellent.

Does anyone think the plant in the background was intentional, or....?

(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4213aac87d052eb3caa1217788840dfb/tumblr_mzblrsUyI01qfjduoo2_500.gif)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2014, 12:39:34 PM
I'm sure they would have re-shot if it was a mistake.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Implode on January 16, 2014, 12:54:31 PM
I can't figure out why it would move. Clearly it was just an angle choice, not like the room is actually tilting...unless it was like supposed to be a delusion from Sherlock or something.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2014, 01:00:46 PM
if the room is tilting that way - it could mean that Cumberbatch could be slowly lowered to the floor and they forgot to secure the plant.

:dunno:
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 17, 2014, 04:07:13 AM
I think the sliding pot was proof that they tilted the room. Very few people can fall naturally like that with no crash mat to land on, and also syncing the camera rotation speed to match the rate of falling would be quite tough. Just seems silly that they went to all the trouble of doing a tilting room and didn't bother sorting out that plant pot!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: GuineaPig on January 17, 2014, 08:15:37 AM
I felt series three was pretty mediocre.  Felt a lot like series seven of Doctor Who, which is not a good thing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 17, 2014, 09:03:09 AM
I felt series three was pretty mediocre.  Felt a lot like series seven of Doctor Who, which is not a good thing.
Oh, you.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 17, 2014, 09:29:16 AM
I felt like it was the series with the least amount of meat so far. the next series should be back to normal with actual cases and Moriarty.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 17, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
I'm actually disappointed that they will bring him back. Didn't Sherlock see him blowing his brains out and confirm that he was dead? Would be pretty obvious. Unless it was a double but that's just cheap, imo.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Implode on January 17, 2014, 11:46:26 AM
I don't think it was quite as meh as Doctor Who. This series iust focused on the characters more, which is what should happen more often in Doctor Who. This series was a bit...fanservicey and maybe a little hostile towards fans at times, but that's Moffat for you.  :\

It's still the best TV show I've seen.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: masterthes on January 17, 2014, 07:06:42 PM
Rather excellent episode, and I'm not ashamed to admit I got weepy during the Watsons' reconciliation scene
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 17, 2014, 09:26:13 PM
Why would Mycroft have that laptop with secret state files on at his parents house just lying around ?

Certainly points to them planning Magnussen's murder.

I'm sure he didn't intend for it to end up at Appledore just for Mary Watson's sake.

If he did - Sherlock wouldn't have needed to drug him.



Also - bit of a stretch but Charles Augustus Magnussen - his initials are CAM - subtly implying he remembers everything he sees?

Am I reading too much into it ? :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: GuineaPig on January 18, 2014, 03:03:34 AM
I don't think it was quite as meh as Doctor Who. This series iust focused on the characters more, which is what should happen more often in Doctor Who. This series was a bit...fanservicey and maybe a little hostile towards fans at times, but that's Moffat for you.  :\

It's still the best TV show I've seen.

This would be all well and good if the characters retained any sort of consistency, instead of flimsily reorganizing themselves to suit whatever contrived situation comes up.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 18, 2014, 12:11:49 PM
GuineaPig, why do you hate (almost) everything once it's been around for more than a couple of years? :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 18, 2014, 12:21:14 PM
GuineaPig, why do you hate (almost) everything once it's been around for more than a couple of years? :lol

Don't ever have kids :p
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: GuineaPig on January 19, 2014, 02:40:31 AM
GuineaPig, why do you hate (almost) everything once it's been around for more than a couple of years? :lol

There are some shows that improve with age.  I just dislike things I find bad.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 24, 2014, 10:54:17 AM
Anyone see the theory that Moriarty is the third Homes ?

People are pointing to the line Mycroft says " I'm not prone to acts of brotherly compassion - you know what happened to the other one."

And When Sherlock is hallucinating Moriarty during his dying scene - Moriarty says " Mother & Father will cry - John Watson will cry "

Not your mother & father will cry.

I think it's stretching it a bit but what does everyone else think ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 24, 2014, 12:47:28 PM
Anyone see the theory that Moriarty is the third Homes ?

I would say that it is a possibility, and a story I would probably like actually.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 24, 2014, 01:25:46 PM
Of course in A Study IN Pink when John asks him who Moriarty is - Sherlock says : " I've got no idea " ...

But then he never mentioned that Mycroft was his brother either.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 24, 2014, 01:27:53 PM
I can't see what it would bring to the story if it was his brother. So what? He's still a psycopath who needs to be put down or locked away.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 24, 2014, 02:08:43 PM
Of course in A Study IN Pink when John asks him who Moriarty is - Sherlock says : " I've got no idea " ...

Well maybe he doesn't even know. And his name wouldn't have been James Moriarty back then.

I can't see what it would bring to the story if it was his brother. So what? He's still a psycopath who needs to be put down or locked away.

I don't really know what it would bring either, but it'd be a nice little twist if done exactly right. He most likely will not turn out to be the last brother, but it feels like they're setting at least something up with that line from Mycroft.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 24, 2014, 03:59:36 PM
Of course in A Study IN Pink when John asks him who Moriarty is - Sherlock says : " I've got no idea " ...

But then he never mentioned that Mycroft was his brother either.
The whole "Jim from IT" thing would just make absolutely no sense if Moriarty was his brother.

I'm almost entirely certain that it's not the case.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 24, 2014, 04:51:31 PM
Yeah I don't buy it either - but I thought it was an interesting theory.

Of course people online do like to fabricate entire backstories out of one off-the-cuff line.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 25, 2014, 03:19:13 PM
https://twitter.com/arwelwjones/status/426996243089612800

So they did it on purpose ? :lol

Which means that Cumberbatch was gently lowered to the floor and they pulled the plant away deliberately ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: RuRoRul on January 25, 2014, 03:36:11 PM
Did anyone really think it wasn't deliberate and that something like that could be left in as an accident?

It was part of a whole sequence of surreal experiences - the plant was not moving in reality but neither was the room rotating, so I never saw any issue with the plant sliding as a way to heighten the effect of the room rotating.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 25, 2014, 04:51:47 PM
I didn't think that they would have missed it either when shooting or in editing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 26, 2014, 02:32:58 AM
I don't think it's unrealistic that they could have missed something like that, although it is unlikely when Moffat's involved.

My main thought, though, was simply that using a rotating set seemed very excessive. There aren't many so they must be really expensive to hire out, so I would have been surprised if they'd done that rather than lowering him down on wires.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 26, 2014, 05:15:42 AM
So in the wedding episode - Sherlock has like 7 Apple Macbooks and in His Last Vow he buys a ring just to get into Magnussen's office.

It was established in the first series that he doesn't want to get paid for his crime solving - so where does he get all his money from?

Is he on a Bursary from Mycroft or something ? Government funded ?

Is he just exceptionally wealthy ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 26, 2014, 05:23:05 AM
Yeah. Guess Apple products don't have apps that can support tabs :)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 26, 2014, 05:27:06 AM
Well later on we see him using multiple tabs on one macbook so :p
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 26, 2014, 05:36:42 AM
That must have been the yearly content update from Apple. One new feature per year, 1000$ for the convenience :D
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 26, 2014, 05:50:13 AM
So is Sherlock funded by Mycroft or is his whole family just wealthy ?

Also - do we know in this go around of Sherlock what he did before he was a detective ?

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 26, 2014, 01:59:47 PM
That must have been the yearly content update from Apple. One new feature per year, 1000$ for the convenience :D
:lol

So is Sherlock funded by Mycroft or is his whole family just wealthy ?
It's pretty implied that his family is wealthy. He's never needed to be paid for anything (so regardless of his Macbooks, how else woud be pay rent, bills, etc?).

Plus we've seen how posh his entire family is. They clearly have money.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Silver Tears on January 27, 2014, 12:30:24 PM
Noooo I was waiting til I had more time to watch the other two Sherlock episodes but now it's gone off iPlayer!!  :'(
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 28, 2014, 04:51:12 AM
Damn, I was quite hoping to re-watch it too. Damn you BBC!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 28, 2014, 05:01:18 AM
That's why I bought the DVDs yesterday. :)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 28, 2014, 09:31:06 AM
I see, some kind of scam where they want us to actually pay to own it now. Outrageous!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 28, 2014, 11:05:14 AM
 :angry: I KNOW RIGHT !!! I actually LEFT my house the other day and went for A WALK. I stumbled upon this boutique where they were actually *SELLING* stuff you can download on the Internet for FREE :lol

And they were trying to tempt people by including " deleted scenes " ... a BOX :lol gee thanks!!! And putting some kind of artwork on the "box" and the CDR !!!! :lol


This new scheme will never catch on... :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 28, 2014, 11:13:02 AM
A Dee Vee Dee? What is this, some hipster new product?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 28, 2014, 11:20:25 AM
I dunno man :lol it's like a CDR with a film on but they put like special extra footage on to make you buy it or some shit :lol the fuck ?!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 28, 2014, 11:21:35 AM
Mind. Blown. The technology these days!!!!!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 28, 2014, 11:23:41 AM
:lol the other day I actually heard two people trying to text each other - but with their VOICES. WHAT THE SHIT ? ? :lol

They were trying to make the sounds of the words themselves.. haha... just text each other man.. ffs...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TimmyHiggy on January 29, 2014, 08:17:39 AM
:lol the other day I actually heard two people trying to text each other - but with their VOICES. WHAT THE SHIT ? ? :lol

They were trying to make the sounds of the words themselves.. haha... just text each other man.. ffs...
That sounds awesome! Voice typing is far from perfect, and you have to wait a while for a response. If they were right there they would hear what you said without it having to be interpreted by your phone, and they could respond right away. Copyright it quick before it catches on!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 29, 2014, 08:53:47 AM
:lol I like this conversation. On a more serious note though:

I see, some kind of scam where they want us to actually pay to own it now. Outrageous!
BBC are looking to change the iPlayer approach later this year so that programmes will be available for 30 days as standard, rather than 7 days. Not sure what that'll mean for its DVD releases - whether they will happen a bit later (as they usually come out very soon after the programme has aired) or whether they'll just have a few weeks' overlap.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Tiko on February 02, 2014, 09:31:39 AM
Good stuff guys. One of the best tv shows ever!

- Tiko
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: sueño on February 06, 2014, 07:04:23 AM
Gah.  Another two years...   :-\

https://screenrant.com/sherlock-season-4-premiere-date/ (https://screenrant.com/sherlock-season-4-premiere-date/)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on February 06, 2014, 07:16:26 AM
That article doesn't confirm anything at all, just reports the same as everywhere else has done - that they haven't scheduled anything, that these things can take a long time because of the commitments of the cast and producers, and that it could end up being two years again. We knew all of that already.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: puppyonacid on February 06, 2014, 07:36:06 AM
I saw the episode of Sesame Street with Sherlock on it.

It seems he moonlights as an actor called Benedict Cumberbatch so I guess that's how he makes his money. He was very convincing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 19, 2014, 09:03:53 PM
This has fast become my favourite TV show, eclipsing even Doctor Who (though not by much). The Reichenbach Fall is some of the most perfect 90 minutes of TV I have ever had the pleasure of seeing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: TempusVox on April 20, 2014, 01:55:38 AM
"A Scandal in Belgravia" did that for me. It ranked for me the same as savoring the finest steak, or sipping the finest scotch I'd ever had. I've seen that one episode about six times. Flawless story telling imo.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on April 20, 2014, 03:51:34 AM
"A Scandal in Belgravia" did that for me. It ranked for me the same as savoring the finest steak, or sipping the finest scotch I'd ever had. I've seen that one episode about six times. Flawless story telling imo.

Agree with all this. I think I watched it more than 10 times. It's fantastic and that ending never fails to send chills down my spine. Just incredible.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on March 19, 2015, 08:01:40 AM
So, looks like the Sherlock special this year is entirely unrelated to the main series, and is set in Victorian London: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-31920229

Shame that we'll have to wait even longer to find out what happens next, but could be a fun thing in itself still!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on March 19, 2015, 08:05:21 AM
It'll probably turn out there's no Moriarty ( in series 4 ) and they faked it to keep Sherlock in London.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on March 19, 2015, 08:10:27 AM
I trust that they have a plan and I trust them to do something cool.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on March 19, 2015, 09:15:17 AM
It'll probably turn out there's no Moriarty ( in series 4 ) and they faked it to keep Sherlock in London.

I hope so. If it turns out Moriarty is alive and is featured in S4 I will be quite pissed off.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on March 19, 2015, 10:08:18 AM
It'll probably turn out there's no Moriarty ( in series 4 ) and they faked it to keep Sherlock in London.
That was my interpretation at the time.

I would definitely prefer it if Moriarty is alive though, just because that would create a fantastic dynamic with him and Sherlock both having faked their deaths with nobody having a clue how they did it.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on March 19, 2015, 01:39:59 PM
I'm always in favor of more Moriarty. And I would have assumed that it was fake if they had not shown that 'miss me?' bit after the credits. That, for me, was kinda confirmation that it was actually him.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Shadow Ninja 2.0 on March 19, 2015, 01:43:25 PM
Moriarty is amazing, so I really have no problem with him coming back.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on March 19, 2015, 10:06:57 PM
Moriarty is amazing, so I really have no problem with him coming back.

Am I late to the party with the theory that Moriarty is actually another brother of Sherlock? Has that been discussed or offered up? It just seems as if they've hinted at it here and there. Not like they were close growing up but like they always knew there was a brother out there.....
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on March 20, 2015, 01:10:11 AM
Yeah I have heard that theory before. From Mycrofts line "you know what happened to the other one" and how mind-palace-Moriarty phrased "mommy and daddy will cry". I would say that it's possible, but I'm not really an active supporter of the theory.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: masterthes on March 20, 2015, 07:11:54 AM
Wouldn't Sherlock acknowledge him as such though?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on March 20, 2015, 07:19:48 AM
OK, I'm way behind the times, but my daughter and I just finished the first season.  Great, great stuff.  Cumberbatch and Freeman are amazing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on March 20, 2015, 07:27:53 AM
OK, I'm way behind the times, but my daughter and I just finished the first season.  Great, great stuff.  Cumberbatch and Freeman are amazing.
Awesome, welcome to the club! Second season is even better in my opinion, enjoy!

Wouldn't Sherlock acknowledge him as such though?
Yeah I don't see how that would make any sense. I've heard the theory before, but it wouldn't fit at all in my opinion.

I think what the show does brilliantly is that big twists and reveals make sense. It's not that they make you think "oh I should have spotted that" but they definitely feel sensible. Moriarty being Sherlock and Mycroft's brother just wouldn't fit well with that.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on March 20, 2015, 10:11:15 AM
OK, I'm way behind the times, but my daughter and I just finished the first season.  Great, great stuff.  Cumberbatch and Freeman are amazing.
Awesome, welcome to the club! Second season is even better in my opinion, enjoy!

Yeah, Season 2 is even better than the Season 1 (mainly because it doesn't have The Blind Banker, even though the middle story is, once again, the weakest of the three) - A Scandal in Belgravia and The Reichenbach Fall are two of the best episodes of anything, ever.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on March 20, 2015, 10:13:48 AM
Wouldn't Sherlock acknowledge him as such though?

That's why I'm curious as to if it were a case of a half brother or just his parents giving him up or something? It's a long shot and for the show....almost too easy of a 'twist' to even be an option. It felt like that's where they were headed though for a bit to me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on March 20, 2015, 12:18:56 PM
OK, I'm way behind the times, but my daughter and I just finished the first season.  Great, great stuff.  Cumberbatch and Freeman are amazing.
Awesome, welcome to the club! Second season is even better in my opinion, enjoy!

Yeah, Season 2 is even better than the Season 1 (mainly because it doesn't have The Blind Banker, even though the middle story is, once again, the weakest of the three) - A Scandal in Belgravia and The Reichenbach Fall are two of the best episodes of anything, ever.

The Blind Banker is definitely the weakest from S1, but it's a good action-packed episode. I think I like it more than The Hounds of Baskerville.

I would say S1 and S2 are pretty even, maybe S2 is a bit better because of the third episode. I agree with you about A Scandal in Belgravia, best television I've ever seen, but A Study in Pink is incredibly awesome too; The Reichenbach Fall is merely good, however, compared to The Great Game, it's just superior. The Great Game's ending is just awful, I think.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on March 20, 2015, 12:50:35 PM
... I have no words. That climax of The Great Game - how can you not like that? ???
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on March 20, 2015, 12:52:20 PM
Well, it's cheesy and forced as hell. Everything in this episode was good until the pool scene came in.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on March 20, 2015, 01:36:11 PM
The Final Episode of Series 3 with the German memory master..

As soon as he said his vault was in his mind I was like " oh - just shoot him then ".

And they did :p
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on March 20, 2015, 01:49:39 PM
The Final Episode of Series 3 with the German memory master..

As soon as he said his vault was in his mind I was like " oh - just shoot him then ".

And they did :p

Yeah, that was basically my thought as well.

I guess he's Swedish though.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on March 20, 2015, 01:50:42 PM
Well, I like it. Both The Great Game and His Last Vow are pretty dang awesome in my opinion.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on March 20, 2015, 01:52:54 PM
I don't have a criticism on any episode. I find the entire series has been nothing but awesome!!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on March 20, 2015, 01:58:06 PM
I wouldn't go quite that far. The Blind Banker is pretty subpar and The Empty Hearse has some really wonky pacing, but yeah, on the whole, Sherlock is pretty dang amazing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on March 20, 2015, 01:59:32 PM
I don't have a criticism on any episode. I find the entire series has been nothing but awesome!!
Basically this. Blind Banker definitely the weakest but it still has a ton of terrific stuff in it. The rest has just been brilliant IMO, particularly the season finales.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on March 20, 2015, 02:00:54 PM
I wouldn't go quite that far. The Blind Banker is pretty subpar and The Empty Hearse has some really wonky pacing, but yeah, on the whole, Sherlock is pretty dang amazing.

When compared to what's available to watch on Television....I think this show is in the top percentile of 'must see'. Like any show sure it's had some great moments and some 'down' moments.....but all in all it's well written and the acting is top notch.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on March 20, 2015, 02:10:00 PM
It's been interesting watching this with my daughter.  She just likes the show, but I've actually read all of the original SH stories and novels, so she is constantly asking me to compare the two, or asking if something is legit.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on March 20, 2015, 02:17:51 PM
It's been interesting watching this with my daughter.  She just likes the show, but I've actually read all of the original SH stories and novels, so she is constantly asking me to compare the two, or asking if something is legit.

I've never read any of the original material either.....which makes it all new to me. I know Cumberbatch is an actor and he's paid to act and all of that.....but his depiction of Sherlock is great! I can't imagine having to learn the lines he has to learn and deliver them in the manner in which he delivers them.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on March 20, 2015, 02:26:27 PM
He's fantastic.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on March 20, 2015, 02:43:36 PM
Ha, I'm totally the opposite, I've read all the original material some years ago, and that's why I'm actually so fascinated by this series. Those are some brilliant modern adaptation for sure.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on March 21, 2015, 02:50:47 AM
Personally, I think Baskerville is the weakest (or the least strong) episode. The Blind Banker isn't at all my favorite, but it has some moments I really enjoy. More so than Baskerville.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on March 21, 2015, 05:17:07 AM
Baskerville had some fantastic stuff as well. Two in particular - Sherlock doubting whether he can believe the evidence of his own eyes, and Watson in the dark in the complex (I'm not going into too much detail here because SPOILERS for hef who hasn't got that far yet).
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on March 21, 2015, 05:18:33 AM
Thanks, buddy.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 24, 2015, 08:46:36 AM
I just started watching this show and I'm 5 episodes in (so almost done with the second season). I'm loving it! Could not stop watching- got through the first season in one night. My only complaint so far is this Moriarty dude- I don't find him very convincing as somebody I should be afraid of. Seems like you guys like him, so maybe there's a good reason for that later in the series, but when he was first introduced as himself in the pool scene I was like "Really? This is the mastermind behind all this?" *shrug*
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 24, 2015, 08:50:12 AM
Moriarty is awesome.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: orcus116 on April 24, 2015, 09:03:51 AM
I'm kind of with Jackie on this. He doesn't have any unique defining features as a villain and just kind of comes across as just a typical psychotic guy. He's passable but boring.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: faizoff on April 24, 2015, 09:32:06 AM
Freaking love this show and season 4 can't come soon enough.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 24, 2015, 10:42:37 AM
I just started watching this show and I'm 5 episodes in (so almost done with the second season). I'm loving it! Could not stop watching- got through the first season in one night. My only complaint so far is this Moriarty dude- I don't find him very convincing as somebody I should be afraid of. Seems like you guys like him, so maybe there's a good reason for that later in the series, but when he was first introduced as himself in the pool scene I was like "Really? This is the mastermind behind all this?" *shrug*

The Season 2 finale is basically Moriarty at his very best. Now, I loved in in the Season 1 finale too so your mileage may vary, but don't write him off just yet.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on April 24, 2015, 10:53:46 AM
I just started watching this show and I'm 5 episodes in (so almost done with the second season). I'm loving it! Could not stop watching- got through the first season in one night. My only complaint so far is this Moriarty dude- I don't find him very convincing as somebody I should be afraid of. Seems like you guys like him, so maybe there's a good reason for that later in the series, but when he was first introduced as himself in the pool scene I was like "Really? This is the mastermind behind all this?" *shrug*

The Season 2 finale is basically Moriarty at his very best. Now, I loved in in the Season 1 finale too so your mileage may vary, but don't write him off just yet.

Yeah....his sinisterness (yeah, that's a word apparently) just continues to build as his character's presence increases
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on April 24, 2015, 11:18:50 AM
I'm kind of with Jackie on this. He doesn't have any unique defining features as a villain and just kind of comes across as just a typical psychotic guy. He's passable but boring.

I agree. I never liked Moriarty in this series, though I admit in S2E3 he was quite good. I dunno, I always pictured Moriarty as more serious and somber guy. I love how Moffat and Gatiss deviate from books in their plots, I love how they've made those series more modern, but I hate their choices about Moriarty. One of the few gripes I have with these series.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 24, 2015, 11:39:21 AM
It took a little while for me to accept this take on Moriarty. The one in the RDJ movie is easier to handle, since it's pretty much exactly how one would picture him. But over the years I have come to absolutely love the series Moriarty, and I way prefer him over the more classic one in the movies.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on April 24, 2015, 11:43:34 AM
This being my only exposure to Moriarty I'm perfectly fine with this interpretation of him. Just odd and frail looking enough to be overlooked and underestimated but also seems to be several steps ahead of most everyone when it comes to his intentions.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on April 24, 2015, 11:48:47 AM
He's basically The Joker. I prefer the more classical take on Moriarty, tbh.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 24, 2015, 04:48:25 PM
I just started watching this show and I'm 5 episodes in (so almost done with the second season). I'm loving it! Could not stop watching- got through the first season in one night. My only complaint so far is this Moriarty dude- I don't find him very convincing as somebody I should be afraid of. Seems like you guys like him, so maybe there's a good reason for that later in the series, but when he was first introduced as himself in the pool scene I was like "Really? This is the mastermind behind all this?" *shrug*

The Season 2 finale is basically Moriarty at his very best. Now, I loved in in the Season 1 finale too so your mileage may vary, but don't write him off just yet.

Okay, I will be watching that one later tonight so I will let you know what I think  :D
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 26, 2015, 02:49:34 AM
Okay, he was a little better in that episode but I still don't totally "buy" him.
In other news, I'm dying to know how the fuck Sherlock pulled off the death-faking thing, considering the circumstances. Clearly Molly is involved and I have some theories, but I still can't quite figure it out. Season 3 is on its way from the library...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 26, 2015, 03:06:07 AM
:(

That moment when he's faking being the actor and does the sob story and the minute that the female reporter isn't looking and he grins at Sherlock and John is amazing. SO GOOD

What did you think of the episode in general? Did the fact that you don't really buy the antagonist ruin your enjoyment of it?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on April 26, 2015, 03:25:31 AM
Each to their own. I love the BBC's Moriarty, and he is absolutely terrifying in that episode.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 26, 2015, 03:51:15 AM
I did enjoy the episode and I'm not saying he's terrible, but I'm still just not really threatened by him. It's like, yeah I get what he's capable of and I know I should find him scary, but I don't for some reason. But no, that didn't ruin the episode for me or anything. Sherlock's ridiculousness and his relationship with Watson are really the reasons I love the show, with the antagonists just there to sort of... shake things up.
Now that I think of it, I haven't really been super-impressed with any of the others. The taxi driver guy was kinda lame (I really liked the story leading up to his identity being revealed, though I was a bit surprised Sherlock didn't figure it out sooner- it was kind of a DUH) and the Chinese smugglers, meh. I really liked the whole HOUND concept but there was nothing special about that dude who was the brains behind it. Not sure how to classify her, but I do like Irene.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 26, 2015, 06:17:20 AM
Yeah, besides Moriarty, Adler is the best 'villain' they've got. But even she was just working stuff out for Moriarty.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 26, 2015, 06:22:24 AM
I'd actually say that beside Moriarty, that one guy that Jackie doesn't know yet is their best villain.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 26, 2015, 07:01:37 AM
Yeah he's cool too. A real creep.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on April 26, 2015, 07:19:28 AM
If you mean the guy from the last episode of series 3 i have to say he was just annoying. Once you find out his secret you lose all interest in him and it's obvious what's going to happen next.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 26, 2015, 07:29:40 AM
It might be obvious in retrospect but it was still an shocking twist for me on first viewing.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on April 26, 2015, 07:31:21 AM
It might be obvious in retrospect but it was still an shocking twist for me on first viewing.

Well, I didn't guess his secret on the first viewing, but like Kotowboy I totally called what will happen next instantly.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 26, 2015, 07:39:14 AM
I've heard people say that before, but I honestly didn't guess what would happen. Maybe I was just so into the story, or I'm just not clever enough.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 26, 2015, 08:22:27 AM
I've heard people say that before, but I honestly didn't guess what would happen. Maybe I was just so into the story, or I'm just not clever enough.

Yeah, same for me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on April 26, 2015, 09:23:33 AM
I've heard people say that before, but I honestly didn't guess what would happen. Maybe I was just so into the story, or I'm just not clever enough.
It's not a case of being clever enough - it also depends on assumptions you'll make about different characters, their motivations, and so on. I was also quite taken aback. It certainly wasn't obvious.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on April 26, 2015, 12:17:23 PM
I knew something of that kind would happen, but I was expecting Mycroft to kill him from the elicopter, even though that would have surely diminished the impact of the resolution
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 26, 2015, 02:01:00 PM
Ohh, can't wait to find out wtf you're all talking about!  :lol
I'm guessing it will be at the library for me tomorrow.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on April 26, 2015, 03:55:18 PM
Ohh, can't wait to find out wtf you're all talking about!  :lol
I'm guessing it will be at the library for me tomorrow.

Don't focus too much on the twist, focus on the causes and the implications. The twist itself is not huge nor exceedingly shocking. It's not there for the shock value, so it's not in the league of The Red Wedding, or the Lily Of the Valley revelation, but it's a hugely developement moment for a certain character and after a few watching and a bit of thought is without a doubt the perfect conclusion for the episode and the season.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on April 26, 2015, 04:21:08 PM
Just re-watched Season 2.

Wondering what Mark Gatiss meant by " the one clue you all missed " in The Reichenbach Fall.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on April 26, 2015, 04:34:08 PM
Just re-watched Season 2.

Wondering what Mark Gatiss meant by " the one clue you all missed " in The Reichenbach Fall.

It's likely that the actors missed that shooting too  :lo
To this day I have no idea what he could have meant.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on April 26, 2015, 05:00:00 PM
The squash ball?

The hanging dummy at the start of the episode ?

You repel me ?

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on April 27, 2015, 04:17:16 AM
You repel me ?
Repel.

Like rappel.

Like abseiling.

He was on a rope!!1
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on April 27, 2015, 05:34:48 AM
Could have worked but she said it back to him later in the episode so....
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on April 27, 2015, 06:24:59 AM
Finally caught Baskerville yesterday.  Only one episode left in Season 2 for me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 27, 2015, 07:52:04 AM
The Reichenbach Fall is my favourite Sherlock episode, so you're in for a treat.

Also what did you think of Hounds?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on April 27, 2015, 08:03:30 AM
The Reichenbach Fall is my favourite Sherlock episode, so you're in for a treat.

Also what did you think of Hounds?
I enjoyed it, but TBH, it was probably my least favorite of the episodes I've seen.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 27, 2015, 08:13:52 AM
I wouldn't say that it's worse than The Blind Banker, but yeah, it's definitely one of the weaker ones.

Which only serves to show how ridiculously good this show is, I guess.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on April 27, 2015, 08:21:18 AM
I wouldn't say that it's worse than The Blind Banker, but yeah, it's definitely one of the weaker ones.

Which only serves to show how ridiculously good this show is, I guess.
I agree.  Nothing wrong with the episode, it's only in comparison with the others that it seems weak.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on April 28, 2015, 11:13:23 AM
So. Best Sherlock Series ? I just watched all 9 episodes in two days and I have to say that series 3 is the weakest and doesn't have the fun of the first

 ( even though ironically it's perhaps more "light"  )

I think it's series 2 myself. The Reichenbach Fall is just sublime and even The Hound Of Baskerville can't bring it down ( it's not a bad episode as mentioned earlier but it's in the middle of

two much better episodes ).

Series 1 introduces the characters and has The Great Game but the Blind Banker is another medium episode and The Great Game < Reichenbach Fall.

What say ye ? DTF ? :hat
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on April 28, 2015, 12:13:37 PM
S3 is definitely the weakest. S1 and S2 are about equal for me, I like The Blind Banker more than Hounds, and I like Reichenbach more than The Great Game; and the first episodes of both seasons are just incredible and unfair to compare.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 28, 2015, 01:54:49 PM
I think season 2 is the best, but I can't quite decide on whether I like 1 or 3 more. Season 3 has some of my favorite moments of the entire show.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: wasteland on April 28, 2015, 02:00:07 PM
Well, from favourite to least favourite:

3.3 - last vow
2.1 - Belgravia
2.3 - Reichenbach
3.2 - Sign Of Three
3.1 - hearse
1.3 - long game
1.1 - studio in pink
2.2 - baskerville
1.2 - blind banker

Awarding 9 points to the top episode and down to 1 point to the least favourite, the aggregate standings are:

S3: 20 points
S2: 17 points
S1: 8 points

So yeah, S3 is my favourite season of Sherlock so far.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on April 28, 2015, 02:31:31 PM
Yeah seasons 2 and 3 are my favourites, but I'd probably give the edge to season 2.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 28, 2015, 11:15:44 PM
I'm 2/3 through Season 3, so I'll let you know when I finish  :D
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 29, 2015, 12:02:10 AM
I'd say that S2 is my favourite, just by virtue of not having either The Empty Hearse or The Blind Banker - easily my two least favourite episodes of the show.

That said, all three are great.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 30, 2015, 12:24:46 AM
Last episode was awesome!
I was wondering when the truth was going to come up about Mary (I had a feeling when she was introduced, so I paused it when he was reading her and "liar" and "secret" showed up on the screen).
I agree with Scorpion- this particular villain definitely wins over Moriarty. Gawd, I just wanted to squeeze his face until it imploded. Luckily Sherlock took care of it for me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on April 30, 2015, 10:17:57 AM
Yeah 'His Last Vow' is amazing. The 'memory palace' scene in particular is some of the coolest and forcefully emotional stuff I've ever seen on a show.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on April 30, 2015, 11:17:27 AM
Last episode was awesome!
I was wondering when the truth was going to come up about Mary (I had a feeling when she was introduced, so I paused it when he was reading her and "liar" and "secret" showed up on the screen).
I agree with Scorpion- this particular villain definitely wins over Moriarty. Gawd, I just wanted to squeeze his face until it imploded. Luckily Sherlock took care of it for me.

Like Sherlock did in Star Trek into Darkness. :D
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 30, 2015, 02:29:36 PM
Have not seen that, but now I'm curious  :lol

Yeah 'His Last Vow' is amazing. The 'memory palace' scene in particular is some of the coolest and forcefully emotional stuff I've ever seen on a show.

Yes, that part was SO COOL.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 30, 2015, 02:38:18 PM
I think one of the most powerful scenes in the entire show is when he pisses into their fireplace.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 30, 2015, 02:51:23 PM
I wanted to smash his face into that mirror.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Scorpion on April 30, 2015, 03:05:55 PM
Oh definitely, but I dare say that that was supposed to be the viewers reaction to him. After all, don't they say that the worst somebody can feel about a character is indifferent? I find it hard to imagine somebody feeling indifferent to Magnusson.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: bout to crash on April 30, 2015, 05:11:56 PM
Right, which makes him superior to Moriarty.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 01, 2016, 08:38:12 PM
W00t! Did anyone else just catch the special episode of Sherlock? What did you think?

I thoroughly enjoyed it!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 01, 2016, 09:39:17 PM
W00t! Did anyone else just catch the special episode of Sherlock? What did you think?

I thoroughly enjoyed it!

So ticked that my BBC has vanished from my guide. I have no idea why? I haven't changed a thing and it's gone. Must investigate.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: SwedishGoose on January 02, 2016, 12:12:28 AM
Been enjoying this series since I found it last year on Netflix...

So stoked for the special... when will it show up on Netflix?

Edit: Just found out that SVT will air it on the 23rd of January... so unless Netflix gets it quicker....
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 02, 2016, 03:56:48 AM
Just saw the special, and wow! That was not what I was expecting. Many great moments. I suppose more detailed discussion will have to wait until more have seen it.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 02, 2016, 04:18:34 AM
I wasn't too impressed to be honest, but yeah, that wasn't what I was expecting.

I do want to see how the whole thing progresses in S4 though.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 02, 2016, 08:11:38 AM
W00t! Did anyone else just catch the special episode of Sherlock? What did you think?

I thoroughly enjoyed it!

So ticked that my BBC has vanished from my guide. I have no idea why? I haven't changed a thing and it's gone. Must investigate.
Here in the U. S. it was broadcast on Masterpiece Mystery on PBS.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: masterthes on January 02, 2016, 03:29:52 PM
I enjoyed it. Eagerly awaiting season 4.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 03, 2016, 11:23:08 AM
Great episode.

Really interesting how they bounced around in time towards the end...

It was pretty funny seeing Mark Gatiss in a fat suit too. Doing his Mr. Creosote bit.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 03, 2016, 02:05:30 PM
I loved it. Figured out the timey wimey twist pretty early on, but it was still very well done and played out nicely.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 03, 2016, 02:07:18 PM
Did you see that thing on twitter which was basically :

" On Sherlock tonight - he got off a plane and got in a car. "

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Podaar on January 04, 2016, 07:27:16 AM
We watched the special episode yesterday.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 04, 2016, 08:39:48 AM
¡ ¡ SPOILER !  !





- If Sherlock's Victorian fantasy was just him imagining how Moriarty could have shot himself in the head and survived OR How he would have solved that ancient case if he was around at the

time....What was the reason for the feminist sub plot ?

Because zeitgeist ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 04, 2016, 08:55:03 AM
Wasn't that how he solved the case? Becuase it was women who did it? Seems logical to me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 04, 2016, 08:59:58 AM
Yes it was many women dressed the same. But that didn't really explain why they had to be a cult of feminists.

Seems like it was just Moffatt & Gatiss shoving it in to seem current.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Nekov on January 04, 2016, 12:29:57 PM
Yes it was many women dressed the same. But that didn't really explain why they had to be a cult of feminists.

Seems like it was just Moffatt & Gatiss shoving it in to seem current.

I think the logic behind it is, Moriarty really is dead but he has a cult of people that want to wreck havoc in his name which is exactly what happened in the Victorian age case.
But from your comment I gather that you're wondering if the feminist thing had anything to do with it, in that case I just think it was a way to explain the fact that they were a cult, that's the thing that brings these group of women together. I don't think it's being used as a sub plot.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 05, 2016, 12:01:32 AM
Yeah exactly. Plus including a relevant, interesting topic doesn't mean they were just "shoving it in". I thought that aspect was great.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: abydos on January 05, 2016, 10:39:42 AM
Eh, relevant at the time or 50 years ago. I enjoyed the episode but to me that part felt a bit too out of place, especially the way it was portrayed. But I'd rather not get deeper into that topic since it's a whole different can of worms I'd rather not open.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: masterthes on January 07, 2016, 12:05:55 PM
I get the impression this season might be the last. Benedict is getting too big, and Freeman is coming into his own
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 07, 2016, 12:07:33 PM
Now that both will have roles in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, I hope that a future film will allow them to have at least one scene to interact lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 07, 2016, 12:09:35 PM
I get the impression this season might be the last. Benedict is getting too big, and Freeman is coming into his own

Well, Moffat and Gatiss said they've developed a plot for both S4 and S5 already, so it would be a waste not to make S5 in that case. But I guess anything can happen.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 07, 2016, 02:08:29 PM
I'm sure Martin & Benedict both enjoy doing it.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 07, 2016, 02:33:00 PM
I'm sure Martin & Benedict both enjoy doing it.
Exactly.  Both have plenty of opportunities for other work, and yet they keep coming back to this, because they love the roles and the people they work with.

As long as the writing production team keep writing good scripts and schedules continue to work out, I don't expect them to quit making Sherlock.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 07, 2016, 02:53:46 PM
Yeah and it's not like Moffat has masses of free time with his Doctor Who responsibilities. But the four of them always say that they'd like to keep making it as long as they can and just fit it in when they're able to.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 07, 2016, 03:21:16 PM
I love Sherlock but I don't count down the days til it's back on.

The gap between series don't seem that long to me because i'm not waiting for it.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: faizoff on February 08, 2016, 06:21:00 AM
Finally got to watch the special and really loved it. I don't think there is any episode I don't like. I'll have to rewatch all the episodes but off hand I don't remember not enjoying any episode. I thought depicting the mind palace was a really well done premise. Goes to show how intricate Sherlock's thinking goes.
I do wish these were more abundant but I guess part of the charm is that they come in short bursts and make the episodes that much enjoyable.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on February 08, 2016, 06:27:54 AM
I think it makes the writing that much better if they're not writing like 10 episodes a year.

They can focus on three really great stories once every two years.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on February 08, 2016, 08:30:53 AM
Or three years... Or four...

But yeah, I agree.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 01, 2017, 06:53:20 PM
TONIGHT!!!!! :metal   :metal
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 02, 2017, 08:20:24 PM
Liked the episode.....curious that they didn't really expand on Moriarty any further and stuck to a 'normal' story. Sure the end was a bit unexpected but I had a hunch the whole time she was gonna die due to the amount of times Sherlock guaranteed her safety. It was real thick foreshadowing. And As much as i like the show I'm not a fan of yet another instance of John being mad at Sherlock. Seems played already and was it really his fault?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: pogoowner on January 02, 2017, 10:21:45 PM
I kind of agree with that. Also, just the way the show is written, I find it very hard to have a strong emotional reaction to anything that happens, because hell, how am I supposed to know if anybody's really dead anyway?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 02, 2017, 11:00:54 PM
I kind of agree with that. Also, just the way the show is written, I find it very hard to have a strong emotional reaction to anything that happens, because hell, how am I supposed to know if anybody's really dead anyway?

Just read an interview where the show runners were asked point blank if we were being mislead with her death and they said no. She is dead, for real, for good. That she died in the original stories and the show has always tried to stay true to the source material and that this show is about Sherlock and Holmes.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 03, 2017, 01:01:37 AM
Sherlock and Holmes.

But yeah, I hope she's dead for real, and am glad if they're telling the truth with that.

Also, I really liked the episode, classic Sherlock and I always enjoy watching these characters do anything.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 04, 2017, 08:12:33 AM
Great episode.  Really shocking ending that brought my daughter to tears.  :metal
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 04, 2017, 08:36:20 AM
Sherlock and Holmes.

But yeah, I hope she's dead for real, and am glad if they're telling the truth with that.

Also, I really liked the episode, classic Sherlock and I always enjoy watching these characters do anything.

 :lol   just realized what I did there.....anyway....Watson...Holmes....Whatever    :lol



Great episode.  Really shocking ending that brought my daughter to tears.  :metal

Hef, did you have the feeling the whole time something like that was going to happen due to the heavy foreshadowing? Although it was shocking, I feel like I was completely 'ready' for it just because of the amount of times Sherlock guaranteed her safety in that episode.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 04, 2017, 08:55:56 AM
Nope.  They totally got me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: soupytwist on January 04, 2017, 09:38:08 AM
There was some serious bullet time going on from Mary.
Episode was pretty messy I thought.  Toby Jones is coming soon so hopefully it'll pick up.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 04, 2017, 01:38:24 PM
I think it was a really fun and cool episode, it really surprised me to see that IGN only gave it 5.5/10, which is crazy to me.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 08, 2017, 05:03:25 PM
I only just saw episode 1 so I already knew from online what happened but i'm not massively invested in the show so i don't care. I just watch it.

I hope Toby Jones character is better than Charles Augustus Magunsson. ( CAM - YOU GET IT ? HE HAS A PHOTOGRAPHIC MEMORY )

" My memory is my mind palace "

::) Oh no. Just shoot him in the head....

*Sherlock shoots him in the head*

I mean...If all your evidence for blackmail are only your memories - how is that proof ?


I finally found an official Sherlock channel on YouTube where I could purchase the 3 episodes for £7.

I'd rather pay than download illegally OR pay £150 for a TV License when I don't own a TV...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 08, 2017, 05:23:56 PM
All that sounded really negative. Wasn't meant to.

It was a decent episode, Mid Tier i'd say. It was no Reichenbach falls but it wasn't The Blind banker either ;)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 08, 2017, 06:02:20 PM
All that sounded really negative. Wasn't meant to.

It was a decent episode, Mid Tier i'd say. It was no Reichenbach falls but it wasn't The Blind banker either ;)

Yep. It wasn't the best or the worst. It was just a really good episode. The only thing that detracted from it for me was that I had (correctly) speculated to myself around the time they all were in That Middle Eastern apartment (Iran?) and Sherlock said he needed to get her on his turf to protect her that Mary was going to certainly die....so when she did I wasn't floored by it.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: orcus116 on January 08, 2017, 07:31:30 PM
What a bizarre episode so far.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 08, 2017, 10:35:57 PM
What a bizarre episode so far.

No kidding! What a ride that was. I liked it a lot but man, that was all over the place....then the last five minutes? WTF? Is the 'miss me' from Sherlocks long lost sister supposed to imply she's in cahoots with Moriarty....or was....and now is just taking up the torch?

There was a whole lot going on there.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 09, 2017, 05:21:05 AM
When Sherlock was wandering around London - I thought - Oh is he spelling out fuck off ?

...yep. :p

Bit of Trainspotting in episode 2 also.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 09, 2017, 06:22:20 AM
Good episode #2. Bit of an info-dump at the end. I'll need to rewatch it.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 09, 2017, 12:47:06 PM
All that sounded really negative. Wasn't meant to.

It was a decent episode, Mid Tier i'd say. It was no Reichenbach falls but it wasn't The Blind banker either ;)

Yep. It wasn't the best or the worst. It was just a really good episode. The only thing that detracted from it for me was that I had (correctly) speculated to myself around the time they all were in That Middle Eastern apartment (Iran?) and Sherlock said he needed to get her on his turf to protect her that Mary was going to certainly die....so when she did I wasn't floored by it.

Well, that and the fact that she dies in the books. So I certainly wasn't shocked by it, but the way it was done was still thrilling and pretty intense.

Second episode was bonkers, and brilliant. Loved the way they did a bit of a Mr Robot, showing most of it from Sherlock's perspective so you couldn't tell what was real and what wasn't.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 09, 2017, 12:50:49 PM
So ...*someone* put "Euros Holmes" in touch with Culverton Smith... Who gave her Faith's original note - she added stuff to it to fool Sherlock..

...then she turned up at 221B pretending to be the real Faith in order to get Sherlock interested in Culverton ?

Then Culverton invited Sherlock & Watson to look around the hospital in order to present the actual Faith to humiliate Sherlock ?

Meanwhile - on a DVD - Mary had implored Sherlock to save John Watson by deliberately using again and placing himself in harms way so that John would be there for him

when he needed it the most?

Why was Euros Holmes also pretending to be the therapist ?


*sidebar - I thought Eros meant love - which would also tie in with last weeks episode with Norberry (?) being Amo. Maybe she put Euros Holmes in touch with Culverton ?

Maybe we'll find out - maybe we won't ::)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 09, 2017, 01:15:53 PM
All that sounded really negative. Wasn't meant to.

It was a decent episode, Mid Tier i'd say. It was no Reichenbach falls but it wasn't The Blind banker either ;)

Yep. It wasn't the best or the worst. It was just a really good episode. The only thing that detracted from it for me was that I had (correctly) speculated to myself around the time they all were in That Middle Eastern apartment (Iran?) and Sherlock said he needed to get her on his turf to protect her that Mary was going to certainly die....so when she did I wasn't floored by it.

Well, that and the fact that she dies in the books. So I certainly wasn't shocked by it, but the way it was done was still thrilling and pretty intense.

Second episode was bonkers, and brilliant. Loved the way they did a bit of a Mr Robot, showing most of it from Sherlock's perspective so you couldn't tell what was real and what wasn't.

I hate to admit I've never read the source material..... :omg:.....so I had no idea Mary died.

and yes...the manner in which the episode was shot was really neat and intense. And the make-up department did a spot on job showing a strung out Sherlock. when he was at that hospital in front of the kids...man, he looked like  :censored   
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 10, 2017, 01:05:58 AM
Great episode. The ending especially, great reveal.

A really nasty villain too.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: soupytwist on January 10, 2017, 01:29:35 AM
Thought it was rubbish, but entertaining rubbish.  Nothing made sense at all.
Mary leaving Sherlock a video is weird enough.
Mary leaving Sherlock a video telling him to save Watson is TV lala land.
Mary leaving Sherlock a video telling him to save Watson by putting himself in danger is pure WTF...

We have also got Watson imagining his dead wife and having conversations with her -  :biggrin:

It's like Moffats channelling his Doctor Who writing (which is supposed to be outlandish) into Sherlock now.  ('MISS ME' is bound to be linked somehow - initial's maybe?)

I'm honestly expecting a forth sibling to turn up next week (why does everyone stop at three?).  Watson to be dead but Sherlock having conversations with him and maybe a flying car.

What i'm not expecting is an actual mystery to solve, Sherlock doesn't seem to do that anymore!
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2017, 10:09:48 AM
This thread is deader than John Watson's dead wife Mary.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 10, 2017, 10:15:21 AM
This thread is deader than John Watson's dead wife Mary.

how so?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2017, 10:17:32 AM
Two posts since monday
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: orcus116 on January 10, 2017, 10:37:05 AM
The two year gaps between series really kills part of the show IMO. Even with the recaps and such I've almost completely wiped the original viewing of even series 3 from my memory because of how long ago I watched it so it's partially a relearning process with the flashbacks and references to past episodes. I had to ask a coworker who the woman at the end of this last episode was because clearly it was supposed to be a big reveal but I was drawing a blank since it's been years since I saw that episode.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 10, 2017, 10:41:25 AM
I'm honestly expecting a forth sibling to turn up next week (why does everyone stop at three?).  Watson to be dead but Sherlock having conversations with him and maybe a flying car.

:rollin

You know, I actually kinda agree with soupytwist. I did like when they did an international politics/terrorism episode with S2E1, but then we had more international politics, secret agents and all in S3 and S4E1. They did it once and it worked big time, but they kept delving into it, and I just don't think it works anymore. I also think the show got too much into personal drama between John, Sherlock and (now dead) Mary—and with introduction of Holmes sister I think the personal aspect is going to be developed even further)—while neglecting the aspect which I loved most about this show, which is Sherlock displaying actual cunning and detective skills and solving actual cases.

I know that me not liking Mary's character at all didn't help the situation, but now that she was dead, I kind of expected the show to maybe get back on the level of S1/S2, and it didn't happen for me with this episode. I never thought I would say it after waiting for S3 so eagerly, but I think the show has become a bit tiresome for me. It's still entertaining, but it's not something I would recommend my friends anymore, nor it's something I'll go out of my way to watch by any means.

I frankly think The Blind Banker is the worst episode out of first six, but I'd gladly take another Blind Banker over latest episode.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2017, 10:42:00 AM
The two year gaps between series really kills part of the show IMO. Even with the recaps and such I've almost completely wiped the original viewing of even series 3 from my memory because of how long ago I watched it so it's partially a relearning process with the flashbacks and references to past episodes. I had to ask a coworker who the woman at the end of this last episode was because clearly it was supposed to be a big reveal but I was drawing a blank since it's been years since I saw that episode.


Pretty sure this series is the first time we've been introduced to Sherlock's sister.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 10, 2017, 11:20:26 AM
Two posts since monday
It's only Tuesday. :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2017, 11:21:15 AM
Oh right I forgot about you 4th dimensional morons.

As you were.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: hefdaddy42 on January 10, 2017, 12:04:24 PM
I thought the episode was fantastic.  Can't wait to see how it plays out this weekend, on what may very well be the final episode ever.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 10, 2017, 12:38:01 PM
I heard they'd written a 5th series so who knows.

And i'm sure they'll sneak in christmas specials and one-offs if not.

I didn't really like Culverton Smith. I thought he was less menacing than Magnusson - who was just a a dick because he knew stuff.

Once you know that his memory is his weapon - just shoot him in the head - which Sherlock did.

Also - there's no way a court could ever convict someone based on Photographic memory.

Exhibit A.."  This woman stole plans for Trident..."

I assume you have proof, Mr. Magnusson

" Ohhhhhh yes. "

*taps head*

CASE DISMISSED ! ::)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 11, 2017, 12:44:15 AM
Also - there's no way a court could ever convict someone based on Photographic memory.

He said he could send for physical evidence if he needed to.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 11, 2017, 02:53:11 AM
I'm sure there was an exchange which was something like..

So it's all in your head ? Nowhere else ?

No nowhere else.

I'll re-watch it and check.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 11, 2017, 03:54:50 AM
This is the quote:

MAGNUSSEN: Oh, sometimes I send out for something ... (he lifts his left hand and looks down at his watch) ... if I really need it ...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 11, 2017, 04:00:47 AM
He probably wasn't joking but i'm used to the writing and he may have meant takeaway food.

You are probably right but this is Gatiss and Moffatt we're on about :p
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 11, 2017, 06:08:28 AM
I think you're referring to this exchange:

SHERLOCK (loudly over the noise of the hovering helicopter, stepping forward and walking to John’s side): To clarify: Appledore’s vaults only exist in your mind, nowhere else, just there.
MAGNUSSEN (looking towards the helicopter): They’re not real. They never have been.

While a bit contradictory, I think it means that he just doesn't have it all stored somewhere like a vault, but could still aquire proper evidence if he needs it.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 15, 2017, 03:56:23 AM
So. Final episode tonight.

God I hope that the final shot is not Moriarty coming back and then we have to wait 2 years to NOT be told how he's not dead.

:facepalm:

Moriarty is back !!

- 2 years later -

John to Sherlock : So...Wait...How is Moriarty not dead ?

Sherlock to John : it doesn't matter - he's back.

NEVER MENTIONED AGAIN.

THANKS WRITERS


- - - - - - - -

I wonder if Gatiss and Moffatt knew how Sherlock survived the Reichenbach fall or if in the 2 years they read every fan theory and just picked one :lol
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 15, 2017, 10:14:15 PM
So did Sherlocks sister brainwash Moriarty also? Anyway for as fun as the episode was I thought there were moments that they were really stretching the realm of what she could be capable of. All in all I enjoyed the season and really hope we get another.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: soupytwist on January 16, 2017, 04:09:28 AM
What the Hell was that!  Again quite entertaining but absolute nonsense of the highest order.

So Sherlock had repressed his memory of his sister, so his parents never brought this up like ever?  What was the point of the grenade, clearly she didn't want to kill Sherlock (at that moment), in fact I'm not entirely certain of her motive (did she want to kill Sherlock or just want a hug? why leave the island to become a Therapist/Bus Girl/Smith's fake sister).   Another 'mind palace' ugh....A missing dog is one thing, but a missing Child would have been investigated by the orthoritys for ages.  Why was Morarity making video's to Sherlock when he seemed so certain he'd won (at the end of series 2) - talking of video's how many of the sodding things has Mary made?

Just so messy. (and surprisngly similar plot to Spectre - even including an underwhelming Andrew Scott Cameo).

Next time just solve some interesting mysteries maybe?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2017, 04:32:01 AM
Final Shot : Rathbone place. I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2017, 05:52:58 AM
I thought it was a bit boring. Also - When did the tombstones with the wrong dates on get made ?? I thought it was when they were all little

but they somehow had a code on for Adult Sherlock to decipher right at that very minute. That's some God Level forward planning. . .

Am I missing something ?


- - - - - - - -


Either way - that episode definitely had a sense of finality about it in more ways than one.

I do love how they revealed Moriarty's re-appearance with "Five Years Ago".

I was relieved then. No stupid " he just is " explanation.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2017, 10:03:03 AM
Does anyone else even watch the show ?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 16, 2017, 10:13:35 AM
I do, and I thought this episode was abysmal. No offense to anyone who liked it, but in my opinion, this was the worst Sherlock episode by far, and it came to the point when I seriously considered just turning it off. This is the first Sherlock episode I kind of regret wasting my time on. This stuff with different rooms and experiments in the middle was ridiculous, it's like I watched Saw or played Portal or whatever, and it was also contrived as hell. Definitely not something I want to see in this show.

I won't even go to details, since I'm frustrated a bit too much that one of my favourite shows turned into such a disaster, but I will probably read the feedback and reviews for S5 (if it ever happens) before watching it.

(It also doesn't help that I have to stay up until 2 A.M. to finish the episode, and I have to get up at 5 A.M., so I'm feeling even worse about time wasted on watching this episode.)
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2017, 10:23:43 AM
Yeah I hate when good shows "go dark" because......that's what you do ?

I really miss S1 where it was more about villain of the week - solving smaller crimes which led to an overall mastermind.

If there is a S5 - which I doubt as The Final problem did seem to be wrapping everything up - I so hope they make it a lot lighter overall.

No idea how the tombstones when they were kids meant that Eurus was in the house at the exact moment Sherlock solved the code.


Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Evermind on January 16, 2017, 10:28:33 AM
I really miss S1 where it was more about villain of the week - solving smaller crimes which led to an overall mastermind.

I totally second that, S1 was my favourite by far. The first episode is the one I used to get my friends watch this show and it always worked.

I admit I didn't get the tombstones part exactly, but I was watching the episode with Russian translation (it airs at the same time as BBC) and things like that tend to get lost in translation (it didn't make sense to me at all). While it wasn't a problem for the first two episodes of the show, which I rewatched later in English, I have no desire to watch this one again.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 16, 2017, 10:32:19 AM
I had to leave literally the same time the episode finished so i wasn't paying 100% attention..

..But there was mention of baby sherlock liking the gravestones as a child because the dates didn't add up.

Now 30 odd years later - he solves the code to mean help Me Brother - i'm in my room ?!

What ?? How does that even work ? Did baby Eurus make the gravestones ?

I need to re-watch it properly
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 16, 2017, 11:13:13 AM
..But there was mention of baby sherlock liking the gravestones as a child because the dates didn't add up.

Now 30 odd years later - he solves the code to mean help Me Brother - i'm in my room ?!

What ?? How does that even work ? Did baby Eurus make the gravestones ?

I'm just as frustrated with this episode (and season) as the rest of the folks who like this show. It was 'off' in a way....like the writers got a bit too full of themselves. Anyway, I took it as a young Eros put together the puzzle for Sherlock when they were kiddos because she was jealous of his best friend then....and that, had a young Sherlock figured it out then he'd have saved his little buddy back in the day. Being that he never solved it back then....she just kept the same puzzle in place for him when she used John as the victim this time around. Had he solved it way back when they were young she'd have been in her room then as well.

Either way....the entire episode was way too bombastic and over the top, and...despite elements of the show always being 'unbelievable' or just too involved....the whole episode was entirely ridiculous to the point of silly.

From Mycroft allowing Moriarty 'five minutes alone' with Eros....two of the most evil minded, cunning individuals alive....to like Evermind said the B-Rated horror show crap of a puzzle in each room....it was just silly which is a shame because this show can be so incredible at times.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 16, 2017, 02:00:06 PM
The internet has not been kind to the Finale either. Tons of articles questioning the show....questioning if a 5th season is even something wanted at this point? Yikes...
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 17, 2017, 12:22:43 AM
While not as good as I hoped it would be, I'm not nearly as displeased as you guys seem to be. I liked it, not as much as some other episodes of Sherlock, but I still liked it.

And no, Eurus obviously didn't make the gravestones, she just built her pussle around them.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 17, 2017, 02:25:30 AM
And no, Eurus obviously didn't make the gravestones, she just built her pussle around them.
This.

I took it as a young Eros put together the puzzle for Sherlock when they were kiddos because she was jealous of his best friend then....and that, had a young Sherlock figured it out then he'd have saved his little buddy back in the day. Being that he never solved it back then....she just kept the same puzzle in place for him when she used John as the victim this time around. Had he solved it way back when they were young she'd have been in her room then as well.
And this.

Anyway I liked it. Not perfect, but it was absolutely thrilling television.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: soupytwist on January 17, 2017, 03:28:16 AM
Did anyone else find it odd that Euros appariently told that she had drowned 'redbeard' yet no one thought to check the open well.....even more so once you know redbeard is in fact a child not a dog, and therefore would have sparked a investigation.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 17, 2017, 03:31:01 AM
Yes. When Mycroft said - she cryptically started calling him "drowned redbeard" I was like " ??? Um. That's not very cryptic. "

In fact that narrows it down significantly.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: ariich on January 17, 2017, 03:45:53 AM
I thought she only started calling him "drowned redbeard" later on. Creepy though she was as a child, I'm not sure why the Holmes parents would consider that she'd murdered her brother's friend. Clearly if they thought she was capable of that they'd have done something about it (which they did later on when they had her incarcerated).
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: soupytwist on January 17, 2017, 08:37:12 AM
I thought she only started calling him "drowned redbeard" later on. Creepy though she was as a child, I'm not sure why the Holmes parents would consider that she'd murdered her brother's friend. Clearly if they thought she was capable of that they'd have done something about it (which they did later on when they had her incarcerated).

I got the feeling that she told Sherlock she'd taken Redbeard hence mocked him with the rhyme clue, which lead to him trying to solve it - I would imagine his parents would have be aware of this as one of the mocking scene's we saw was at a dinner table.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 17, 2017, 08:38:48 AM
" If this series of Sherlock is too confusing for you - go read a children's book instead. One with hard pages. "


- Mark Gatiss.


Glad i'm not a fan frankly. I just watch it for Benedict & Martin.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: gmillerdrake on January 17, 2017, 11:22:54 AM
While not as good as I hoped it would be, I'm not nearly as displeased as you guys seem to be. I liked it, not as much as some other episodes of Sherlock, but I still liked it.

I still liked it....not trying to imply I didn't. This show is better than 90% of what's on television. But I will say that this season was the 'weakest' if I had to rate them.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: pogoowner on January 18, 2017, 10:25:34 PM
The show has really gone downhill. At some point it stopped being solving crimes/mysteries and just became about totally nonsensical personal circumstances. I don't want it to be a typical, boring procedural, but it'd be nice if it was a little more grounded in reality.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 20, 2017, 07:05:56 AM
Since I still really enjoyed the season I'm not too hyped to contribute to the negativity, but after some thinking about the final episode I realized my personal biggest issue with it and thought I'd share.

We never really get to see Eurus be a genius. We hear about it, again and again. "She's an era defining genius", "she enslaves everyone she talks to", "it took her only five minutes to do this to us", "she made this clever puzzle", and so on. And sure, she had a long and complicated plan that all worked out, but that was planned years in advance, which is never as cool as displays of intelligence in the moment. Sherlock is at his coolest when he notices all these different things and has to be a genius in the moment, and I'm disappointed after all the Eurus buildup that we never got a moment that showed us how much more of a genius Eurus is. Instead we were just told it over and over, and it's implied all the time.

So that's my biggest problem. There's no big cool villain moment where she really gets to shine. The actress did great, but I'd have loved for the character to have a better show-off moment.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: soupytwist on January 23, 2017, 08:31:20 AM
Since I still really enjoyed the season I'm not too hyped to contribute to the negativity, but after some thinking about the final episode I realized my personal biggest issue with it and thought I'd share.

We never really get to see Eurus be a genius. We hear about it, again and again. "She's an era defining genius", "she enslaves everyone she talks to", "it took her only five minutes to do this to us", "she made this clever puzzle", and so on. And sure, she had a long and complicated plan that all worked out, but that was planned years in advance, which is never as cool as displays of intelligence in the moment. Sherlock is at his coolest when he notices all these different things and has to be a genius in the moment, and I'm disappointed after all the Eurus buildup that we never got a moment that showed us how much more of a genius Eurus is. Instead we were just told it over and over, and it's implied all the time.

So that's my biggest problem. There's no big cool villain moment where she really gets to shine. The actress did great, but I'd have loved for the character to have a better show-off moment.

That's kindoff been the problem with SHerlock since the end of series two.  We constantly get told Sherlock is a genius but we never actually get shown this anymore.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: Kotowboy on January 23, 2017, 08:40:57 AM
I just hate that all serial fiction has to "go dark" at some point. Like it's a requirement.

I would be more than happy of 4 series like the first series.

Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 23, 2017, 10:12:38 AM
I've got nothing against dark. I actually prefer it and always have, so no complaint from me there.
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: pogoowner on January 23, 2017, 10:20:25 AM
Since I still really enjoyed the season I'm not too hyped to contribute to the negativity, but after some thinking about the final episode I realized my personal biggest issue with it and thought I'd share.

We never really get to see Eurus be a genius. We hear about it, again and again. "She's an era defining genius", "she enslaves everyone she talks to", "it took her only five minutes to do this to us", "she made this clever puzzle", and so on. And sure, she had a long and complicated plan that all worked out, but that was planned years in advance, which is never as cool as displays of intelligence in the moment. Sherlock is at his coolest when he notices all these different things and has to be a genius in the moment, and I'm disappointed after all the Eurus buildup that we never got a moment that showed us how much more of a genius Eurus is. Instead we were just told it over and over, and it's implied all the time.

So that's my biggest problem. There's no big cool villain moment where she really gets to shine. The actress did great, but I'd have loved for the character to have a better show-off moment.

That's kindoff been the problem with SHerlock since the end of series two.  We constantly get told Sherlock is a genius but we never actually get shown this anymore.
Yeah. How many times do we need to be told things like "Oh, I set that up weeks ago, predicting your every move" with no evidence for it whatsoever?
Title: Re: Sherlock
Post by: BlackInk on January 23, 2017, 02:00:39 PM
But at least with Sherlock we do get moments where we actually see him be super intelligent and use his genius. It's not like they never prove that to us, we get stuff like that constantly. My problem is that they never gave us anything like that with Eurus.